732
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Personal learning environment toward lifelong learning: an ontology-driven conceptual model

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 6445-6461 | Received 05 Dec 2021, Accepted 02 Feb 2022, Published online: 18 Feb 2022

References

  • Allen, D., Karanasios, S., & Slavova, M. (2011). Working with activity theory: Context, technology, and information behavior. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(4), 776–788. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21441
  • Anthonysamy, L., Koo, A. C., & Hew, S. H. (2020). Self-regulated learning strategies in higher education: Fostering digital literacy for sustainable lifelong learning. Education and Information Technologies, 25(4), 2393–2414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10201-8
  • Baker, E.L. (2012). Assessment in learning. In N. M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning. Springer.
  • Bartolomé, A., & Cebrian-de-la-Serna, M. (2017). Personal learning environments: A study among higher education students’ designs. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 13(2), 21–41.
  • Boland, A., Cherry, G., & Dickson, R. (2017). Doing a systematic review: A student’s guide 2nd edition. SAGE.
  • Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
  • Casquero, O., Ovelar, R., Romo, J., Benito, M., & Alberdi, M. (2016). Students’ personal networks in virtual and personal learning environments: A case study in higher education using learning analytics approach. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(1), 49–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2013.817441
  • Chatti, M. A., Dakova, S., Thus, H., & Schroeder, U. (2013). Tag-based collaborative filtering recommendation in personal learning environments. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 6(4), 337–349. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2013.23
  • Dabbagh, N., & Castaneda, L. (2020). The PLE as a framework for developing agency in lifelong learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(6), 3041–3055. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09831-z
  • Dabbagh, N., & Fake, H. (2017). College students’ perceptions of personal learning environments through the lens of digital tools, processes and spaces. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 6(1), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2017.1.215
  • Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal learning environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.06.002
  • Elfeky, A. I. (2019). The effect of personal learning environments on participants’ higher order thinking skills and satisfaction. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 56(4), 505–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2018.1534601
  • Fiedler, S. H., & Väljataga, T. (2011). Personal learning environments: Concept or technology? International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments, 2(4), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.4018/jvple.2011100101
  • García-Martínez, J. A., Rosa-Napal, F. C., Romero-Tabeayo, I., López-Calvo, S., & Fuentes-Abeledo, E. J. (2020). Digital tools and personal learning environments: An analysis in higher education. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(19), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198180
  • Garcia, R., Falkner, K., & Vivian, R. (2018). Systematic literature review: Self-regulated learning strategies using e-learning tools for computer science. Computer & Education, 123(2018), 150–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.006
  • Gogus, A. (2012a). Outcomes of learning. In N. M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning. Springer.
  • Gogus, A. (2012b). Learning objectives. In N. M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning. Springer.
  • Hager, P.J. (2012a). Formal learning. In N. M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning. Springer.
  • Hager, P.J. (2012b). Informal learning. In N. M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning. Springer.
  • Hasan, H., & Kazlauskas, A. (2014). Activity theory: Who is doing what, why and how. In H. Hasan (Ed.), Being practical with theory: A window into business research (pp. 9–14). University of Wollonggong.
  • Hashim, N. H., & Jones, M. L. (2007). Activity theory: A framework for qualitative analysis. 4th International Qualitative Research Convention (QRC). PJ Hilton, Malaysia. http://ro.uow.edu.au/commpapers/408
  • Hevner, A., & Chatterjee, S. (2010). Design science research in information systems. In A. Hevner & S. Chatterjee (Eds.), Design research in information systems theory and practice. Springer.
  • Humanante-Ramos, P. R., García-Peñalvo, F. J., & Conde-González, MÁ. (2015). Personal learning environments and online classrooms: An experience with university students. Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje, 10(1), 26–31. https://doi.org/10.1109/RITA.2015.2391411
  • Karanasios, S. (2018). Toward a unified view of technology and activity: The contribution of activity theory to information systems research. Information Technology & People, 31(1), 134–155. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-04-2016-0074
  • Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. EBSE Technical Report EBSE-2007-01.
  • Kolb, A.Y., & Kolb, D.A. (2012). Learning Styles. In N. M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning. Springer.
  • Kühn, C. (2017). Are students ready to (re)-design their personal learning environment? The case of the e-dynamic space. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 6(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2017.1.185
  • Lim, J., & Newby, T. J. (2020). Preservice teachers’ Web 2.0 experiences and perceptions on Web 2.0 as a personal learning environment. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 32(2), 234–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-019-09227-w
  • Marín Juarros, V., Salinas Ibáñez, J., & de Benito Crosetti, B. (2014). Research results of two personal learning environments experiments in a higher education institution. Interactive Learning Environments, 22(2), 205–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2013.788031
  • Martínez-Martínez, A., Olmos-Gómez, M. D., Tomé-Fernández, M., & Olmedo-Moreno, E. M. (2019). Analysis of psychometric properties and validation of the personal learning environments questionnaire (PLE) and social integration of unaccompanied foreign minors (MENA). Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102903
  • Nilson, L. B. (2012). Creating SELF-REGULATED LEARNERS strategies to strengthen students’ self-awareness and learning skills. Stylus Publishing.
  • Parra, B. J. (2016). Learning strategies and styles as a basis for building personal learning environments. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0008-z
  • Patterson, C., Stephens, M., Chiang, V., Price, A. M., Work, F., & Snelgrove-Clarke, E. (2017). The significance of personal learning environments (PLEs) in nursing education: Extending current conceptualizations. Nurse Education Today, 48, 99–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.09.010
  • Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., & Chatterjee, S. (2007). A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(3), 45–77. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302
  • Power, C., & Maclean, R. (2013). Lifelong learning: Meaning, challenges, and opportunities. In R. Maclean, S. Jagannathan, & J. Sarvi (Eds.), Skills Development for inclusive and sustainable growth in developing Asia-pacific (Vol. 19, pp. 29–42). Springer.
  • Rahimi, E., Van Den Berg, J., & Veen, W. (2014). Facilitating student-driven constructing of learning environments using Web 2.0 personal learning environments. Computers and Education, 81(February), 235–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.012
  • Recker, J. (2005). Conceptual Model Evaluation. Towards More Paradigmatic Rigor. Tenth International Workshop on Exploring Modeling Methods in Systems Analysis and Design, Portugal, June 13-14.
  • Richter, S. (2012). Learning tasks. In N. M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning. Springer.
  • Romanelli, F., Bird, E., & Ryan, M. (2009). Learning styles: A review of theory, application, and best practices. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 73(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.5688/aj730109
  • Sahin, S., & Uluyol, C. (2016). Preservice teachers’ perception and use of personal learning environments (PLEs). International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 17(2), 141–161. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i2.2284
  • Salehi, M., Nakhai Kamalabadi, I., & Ghaznavi Ghoushchi, M. B. (2013). An effective recommendation framework for personal learning environments using a learner preference tree and a GA. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 6(4), 350–363. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2013.28
  • Shaikh, Z. A., & Khoja, S. A. (2014). Personal learning environments and university teacher roles explored using delphi. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(2), 202–226. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.324
  • Sillat, L. H., Tammets, K., & Laanpere, M. (2021). Digital competence assessment methods in higher education: A systematic literature review. Education Sciences, 11(8), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11080402
  • Simsek, A. (2012). Learning strategies. In n. M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning. Springer.
  • Vaishnavi, V., Kuechler, B., & Petter, S. (2004). Design Science Research in Information Systems. Associations For Information System.
  • Valtonen, T., Hacklin, S., Dillon, P., Vesisenaho, M., Kukkonen, J., & Hietanen, A. (2012). Perspectives on personal learning environments held by vocational students. Computers and Education, 58(2), 732–739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.09.025
  • Vázquez, M. M., & Nístal, M. L. (2013). Distributed personal learning environments towards a suitable architecture. IEEE Global Engineering Education conference, Berlin, 13-15 March.
  • Verdonck, M., Gailly, F., De Cesare, S., & Poels, G. (2015). Ontology-driven conceptual modeling: Asystematic literature mapping and review. Applied Ontology, 10(3-4), 197–227. https://doi.org/10.3233/AO-150154
  • Verdonck, M., Gailly, F., Pergl, R., Guizzardi, G., Martins, B., & Pastor, O. (2019). Comparing traditional conceptual modeling with ontology-driven conceptual modeling: An empirical study. Information System, 81, 92–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2018.11.009

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.