Fostering college students’ critical thinking skills through peer assessment in the knowledge building community

References

• Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., & Wade, A. (2008). Instructional interventions affecting critical thinking skills and dispositions: A stage 1 meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 1102–1134. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308326084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ananiadou, K., & Claro, M. (2009). 21st century skills and competences for New millennium learners in OECD countries (pp. 0-1). OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, G. (2004). Fundamentals of Educational research (2 Ed). The Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aoki, K. (2008). Confucius vs. Socrates: The impact of educational traditions of east and west in a global age. The International Journal of Learning, 14(11), 35–40.
   Google Scholar
• Author, et al. (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Author, et al. (2014).
   Google Scholar
• Author, et al. (2018).
   Google Scholar
• Author, et al. (2019).
   Google Scholar
• Author, et al. (2021).
   Google Scholar
• Bakeman, R. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. Cambridge university press.
   Google Scholar
• Bereier, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 51–90.
   Google Scholar
• Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge Age. Lawrence Erlbaum Associate.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. L., & Palincsar, A. S. (1989). Guided, cooperative learning and individual knowledge acquisition. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of robert glaser. Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, C. Y., Kao, C. H., & Hwang, G. J. (2020). Facilitating students’ critical thinking and decision making performances: A flipped classroom for neonatal health care training. Educational Technology & Society, 23(2), 32–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2009). An educational research course facilitated by online peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46(1), 105–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290802646297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, K. H., Liang, J. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2015). Examining the role of feedback messages in undergraduate students’ writing performance during An online peer assessment activity. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 78–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15–42. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1301_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (2005). How We Think, experience and education (2nd Edition). People’s Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Sluijsmans, D. (1999). The use of self-, peer- and co-assessment in higher education: A review. Studies in Higher Education, 24(3), 331–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079912331379935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elder, L., & Paul, R. (1998). The role of socratic questioning in thinking, teaching, and learning. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 71(5), 297–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098659809602729
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, G. W., & Zhang, Y. Z. (2016). The development of 21st century skills in the knowledge building environment. The International Journal of Engineering Education, 32(3a), 1160–1170.
   Google Scholar
• Ennis, R. (1985). A logical basis for measuring critical thinking skills. Educational Leadership, 43(2), 44–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ennis, R. (1996). Critical thinking. Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Erdogan, F. (2019). Effect of cooperative learning supported by reflective thinking activities on students’ critical thinking skills. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 89–112. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2019.80.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. California Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Facione, P. A., Du, J. Y., & Li, Q. (2015). Critical thinking: What is it and why it is important. Industry and Information Education, 31(07), 10–27 + 41.
   Google Scholar
• Facione, P. A., & Facione, N. C. (1998). California Critical Thinking Skills Test manual. California Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Falchikov, N. (1986). Product comparisons and process benefits of collaborative self and peer group assessments. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 11(2), 146–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293860110206
   Google Scholar
• Freeley, A., & Steinberg, D. (2008). Augmentation and debate: Critical thinking for reasoned decision making. Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, M. (1995). Peer assessment by groups of group work. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 20(3), 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293950200305
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R. (1992). Critical thinking and self-directed learning in adult education: An analysis of responsibility and control issues. Adult Education Quarterly, 42(3), 136–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/074171369204200302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrison, T. D., & Anderson, R. (1995). Critical thinking in distance education: Developing critical communities in an audio teleconference context. Higher Education, 29(2), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01383838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, E. (1941). An experiment in the development of critical thinking. Advanced School of Education at Teachers College, Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Graner, M. H. (1985). Revision techniques: Peer editing and the revision workshop. Dissertation Abstracts International, 47, 109.
   Google Scholar
• Guan, X. (2001). On critical thinking of mohism. Social Science Journal, 133(02), 31–36.
   Google Scholar
• Guanwardena. (1997). Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 397–431. https://doi.org/10.2190/7MQV-X9UJ-C7Q3-NRAG
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, K., & Scull, W. (2010). Confucian culture in the mainstream classroom: A case study of an asian American student. The International Journal of Learning, 17(1), 601–616.
   Google Scholar
• Hitchcock, D. (1983). Critical thinking. A Guide to evaluating information. Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, H. Y., Chai, C. S., & Tsai, C. C. (2015). College students constructing collective knowledge of natural science history in a collaborative knowledge building community. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(5), 549–561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9546-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, H. Y., Scardamalia, M., Messina, R., & Teo, C. L. (2015). Fostering sustained idea improvement with principle-based knowledge building analytic tools. Computers & Education, 89(C), 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.08.012
   Google Scholar
• Jeong, A. C. (2003). The sequential analysis of group interaction and critical thinking in online. American Journal of Distance Education, 17(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15389286AJDE1701_3
   Google Scholar
• Levin, R. (2011). A critical view of Chinese undergraduate education. International Talent Exchange, 250(03), 12–14.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, C. (2016). Research on the core literacy of students in the 21st century. Beijing Normal University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, P. Y., Hong, H. Y., & Ma, L. (2019). Advancing elementary students’ reading comprehension scores through knowledge building. CSCL 2019 Proceedings, 632–635.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, S. S. J., Liu, E. Z. F., & Yuan, S. M. (2001). Web-based peer assessment: Feedback for students with various thinking-styles. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17(4), 420–432. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0266-4909.2001.00198.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, R. (2000). On the significance and connotation of critical thinking. Teacher Education Research, 12(01), 56–61. https://doi.org/10.13445/j.cnki.t.e.r.2000.01.011
   Google Scholar
• Lossman, H., & So, H. J. (2010). Toward pervasive knowledge building discourse: Analyzing online and offline discourses of primary science learning in Singapore. Asia Pacific Education Review, 11(2), 121–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-009-9063-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, J. (2014). Prudence, rationality, fairness-looking at shanghai PISA testing results in professional perspective. Primary & Secondary Schooling Abroad, 259(07), 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Luo, Q. X., & Yang, X. H. (2002). Revision of California critical thinking skills test. Psychological Science, 25(06), 740–741.
   Google Scholar
• Paavola, S., & Hakkarainen, K. (2005). The knowledge creation metaphor – An emergent epistemological approach to learning. Science & Education, 14(6), 535–557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-004-5157-0
   Google Scholar
• Paul, R. (1993). Critical thinking: What every person needs to survive in a rapidly changing world (revised third edition). Foundation for Critical Thinking.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, R. (1995). Critical thinking: How to prepare students for a rapidly changing world. Foundation for Critical Thinking.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, R. W. (1987). Dialogical thinking: Critical thought essential to the acquisition of rational knowledge and passions. WH Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, R. W., & Elder, L. (2008). The miniature Guide to critical thinking: Concept and tools. the Foundation for Critical Thinking.
   Google Scholar
• Peng, M. C., Wang, G. C., Chen, J. L., et al. (2004). Validity and reliability of the Chinese critical thinking disposition inventory. Chinese Journal of Nursing, 39(09), 7–10.
   Google Scholar
• Pithers, R. T., & Soden, R. (2000). Critical thinking in education: A review. Educational Research, 42(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/001318800440579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popper, K. R. (1972). Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Resendes, M., Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2015). Group-level formative feedback and metadiscourse. International Journal of Computer, 10(3), 309–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-015-9219-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society. Open Court.
   Google Scholar
• Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1992). Text-Based and knowledge based questioning by children. Cognition and Instruction, 9(3), 177–199. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0903_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 265–283. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0303_3
   Google Scholar
• Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2014). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 397–417). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schellens, T., Keer, H. V., & Wever, B. D. (2009). Tagging thinking types in asynchronous discussion groups: Effects on critical thinking. Interactive Learning Environments, 17(1), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820701651757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sfard, A. (1998). On Two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just One. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X027002004
   Google Scholar
• Tan, C. (2015). Beyond rote-memorisation: Confucius’ concept of thinking. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 47(5), 428–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2013.879693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tishman, S., Jay, E., & Perkins, D. N. (1993). Teaching thinking dispositions: From transmission to enculturation. Theory Into Practice, 32(3), 147–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849309543590
   Google Scholar
• Topping, K. J. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249–276. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068003249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trahasch, S. (2004). Towards a flexible peer assessment system. International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education & Training. IEEE, 16–20.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, C. C. (2012). The development of epistemic relativism versus social relativism via online peer assessment, and their relations with epistemological beliefs and internet self-efficacy. Educational Technology & Society, 15(2), 309–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, C. C., Lin, S. S. J., & Yuan, S. M. (2002). Developing science activities through a networked peer assessment system. Computers & Education, 38(1-3), 241–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(01)00069-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsui, I. (1999). Courses and instruction affecting critical thinking. Research in Higher Education, 40(2), 185–200. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018734630124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van, D. B., Admiraal, W. F., & Pilot, A. (2006). Design principles and outcomes of peer assessment in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 31(3), 341–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600680836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van, DP,J, Van, D. B., Admiraal, B,W, & Simons, P. R. J. (2008). The nature, reception, and Use of online peer feedback in higher education. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1804–1817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X. M., Hwang, G. J., Liang, Z. Y., & Wang, H. Y. (2017). Enhancing students’ computer programming performances, critical thinking awareness and attitudes towards programming: An online peer assessment attempt. Educational Technology & Society, 20(4), 58–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weert, T. J. V., & Pilot, A. (2003). Task-Based team learning with ICT, design and development of New learning. Education and Information Technologies, 8(2), 195–214. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024562515675
   Google Scholar
• Wen, Q. F., Zhang, L. L., & Sun, M. (2014). Are foreign language majors inferior to the other majors in critical thinking? Modern Foreign Languages, 37(06), 794–804 + 873.
   Google Scholar
• Yan, H. (2000). Several methods of the cultivation of mathematical critical thinking. Journal of Xiamen City Vocational College, (03), 57–60. https://doi.org/10.16417/j.cnki.cn35-1312/g4.2000.03.014
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., Van Aalst, J., & Chan, C. K. K. (2016). Reflective assessment in knowledge building by students with low academic achievement. International Journal of Computer, 11(3), 281–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, H., Kunaviktikul, W., Klunklin, A., & Williams, B. A. (2008). Improvement of nursing students’ critical thinking skills through problem-based learning in the people's republic of China: A quasi-experimental study. Nursing & Health Sciences, 10(1), 70–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2018.2007.00373.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J. W., & Sun, Y. Q. (2011). Reading for idea advancement in a grade 4 knowledge building community. Instructional Science, 39(4), 429–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-010-9135-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, W. L. (2020). Epistemological flashpoint in China’s classroom reform: (How) can a ‘confucian do-after-me pedagogy’ cultivate critical thinking? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 52(1), 101–117. doi:10.1080/00220272.2019.1641844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar