Evaluation and developmental suggestions on undergraduates’ computational thinking: a theoretical framework guided by Marzano’s new taxonomy

References

• Anderson, N. D. (2016). A call for computational thinking in undergraduate psychology. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 15(3), 226–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725716659252
   Google Scholar
• Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2020). Developing young children’s computational thinking with educational robotics: An interaction effect between gender and scaffolding strategy. Computers in Human Behavior, 105, 105954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.03.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atmatzidou, S., & Demetriadis, S. (2016). Advancing students’ computational thinking skills through educational robotics: A study on age and gender relevant differences. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 75, 661–670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2015.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, V., & Stephenson, C. (2011). Bringing computational thinking to K-12: What is involved and what is the role of the computer science education community? ACM Inroads, 2(1), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.1145/1929887.1929905
   Google Scholar
• Bebras−Ireland. (2019). The Bebras computational thinking challenge. https://bebras.techweek.ie/
   Google Scholar
• Birney, L., & McNamara, D. (2019). The curriculum and community enterprise for restoration science S.T.E.M. + C professional learning model: Expansion and enhancement. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 8(3), 122–131. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v8n3p122
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012, April 13–17). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (pp. 1–25), Vancouver, BC, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, D., & Leahy, M. (2021). Developing preservice teachers’ understanding of computational thinking: A constructionist approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(3), 1060–1077. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chevalier, M., Giang, C., Piatti, A., & Mondada, F. (2020). Fostering computational thinking through educational robotics: A model for creative computational problem solving. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00238-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curzon, P. (2015). Computational thinking: Searching to speak. http://teachinglondoncomputing.org/free-workshops/computational-thinking/searching-to-speak/
   Google Scholar
• Dam, G. T., & Volman, M. L. (2004). Critical thinking as a citizenship competence: Teaching strategies. Learning and Instruction, 14(4), 359–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasuki, S., & Quaye, A. (2017). Undergraduate students’ failure in programming courses in institutions of higher education in developing countries: A Nigerian perspective. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 76(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2016.tb00559.x
   Google Scholar
• Denning, P. J., & Tedre, M. (2019). Computational thinking. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• DeVellis, R. F. (1991). Scale development: Theory and application. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Durak, H. Y., & Saritepeci, M. (2018). Analysis of the relation between computational thinking skills and various variables with the structural equation model. Computers & Education, 116, 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, B. D. (2010). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Organizational Research Methods, 13(1), 214–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428108323758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espino, E., & González, G. (2016, September 13–16). Gender and computational thinking: Review of the literature and applications. The XVII International Conference on Human Computer Interaction (pp. 1–2), New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Evia, C., Sharp, M. R., & Pérez-Quiñones, M. A. (2015). Teaching structured authoring and DITA through rhetorical and computational thinking. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 58(3), 328–343. http://works.bepress.com/matthew_sharp/3/ https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2016.2516639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fields, D. A., Shaw, M. S., & Kafai, Y. B. (2018, August 21–25). Personal learning journeys: Reflective portfolios as “objects-to-learn-with” in an e-textiles high school class. V. Dagiene, & E. Jastu_e (Eds.), Constructionism 2018: Constructionism, computational thinking and educational innovation: Conference proceedings (pp. 213–223), Vilnius, Lithuani. http://www.constructionism2018.fsf.vu.lt/proceedings
   Google Scholar
• Gagne, R. M., & Briggs, L. J. (1974). Principles of instructional design. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Gignac, G. E., & Szodorai, E. T. (2016). Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 74–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational thinking in K-12: A review of the state of the field. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12463051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzdial, M. (2008). Education paving the way for computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 51(8), 25–27. https://doi.org/10.1145/1378704.1378713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, M., Chen, W., Chen, X., Ye, X., Yang, F., & Wang, K. (2014). Analysis on the reform method of university computer basic course based on computational thinking. Computer Engineering and Science, 36(S1), 96–99. (In Chinese). https://doi.org/10.13966/j.cnki.kfjyyj.2008.02.001
   Google Scholar
• ISTE. (2015). CT leadership toolkit. http://www.iste.org/docs/ctdocuments/ct-leadershipt-toolkit.pdf?sfvrsn¼4
   Google Scholar
• Jun, S., Han, S., & Kim, S. (2017). Effect of design-based learning on improving computational thinking. Behaviour & Information Technology, 36(1), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2016.1188415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kale, U., Akcaoglu, M., Cullen, T., & Goh, D. (2018). Contextual factors influencing access to teaching computational thinking. Computers in the Schools, 35(2), 69–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2018.1462630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katai, Z. (2014). The challenge of promoting algorithmic thinking of both sciences- and humanities-oriented learners. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(4), 287–299. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Korkmaz, Ö, Çakir, R., & Özden, M. Y. (2017). A validity and reliability study of the computational thinking scales (CTS). Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 558–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M., & Lee, J. (2021). Enhancing computational thinking skills in informatics in secondary education: The case of South Korea. Educational Technology Research and Development, 2021, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10035-2
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, J., Mitchell, M., Barnes-Johnson, J., Unertl, A., Outka-Hill, J., Robinson, R., & Hester-Croff, C. (2018). Preparing teachers to engage rural students in computational thinking through robotics, game design, and culturally responsive teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 69(4), 386–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117732317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, F., Antonenko, P. D., & Davis, E. C. (2020). Exploring the evolution of two girls’ conceptions and practices in computational thinking in science. Computers & Education, 146, 103759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyon, J. A., & Magana, A. J. (2020). Computational thinking in higher education: A review of the literature. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 28(5), 1174–1189. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marzano, R. J. (1998). A theory-based meta-analysis of research on instruction (technical report). Mid-continent Regional Educational Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Marzano, R. J. (2001). Designing a new taxonomy of educational objectives. Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marzano, R. J., & Kendall, J. S. (2007). The new taxonomy of educational objectives. Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Master, A., Cheryan, S., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2016). Computing whether she belongs: Stereotypes undermine girls’ interest and sense of belonging in computer science. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(3), 424–437. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2011). Notice on the issuance of the catalogue of disciplines for degree awarding and Talent training (2011). http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A22/moe_833/201103/t20110308_116439.html
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2018). Notice on the publication of the list of computer curriculum reform projects in universities. http://edu.sh.gov.cn/xxgk_jyyw_gdjy_5/20200514/0015−gw_418212019002.html
   Google Scholar
• Moreno−León, J., Robles, G., & Román−González, M. (2016). Code to learn: Where does it belong in the K−12 curriculum? Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 15, 283–303. https://doi.org/10.28945/3521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nouri, J., Zhang, L., Mannila, L., & Noren, E. (2020). Development of computational thinking, digital competence and 21st century skills when learning programming in K− 9. Education Inquiry, 11(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2019.1627844
   Google Scholar
• NRC. (2011). Report of a workshop on the pedagogical aspects of computational thinking. Nat. Acad. Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13170
   Google Scholar
• Pan, T. T., Zhan, G. H., & Li, Z. H. (2016). Exploration on the cultivation of computational thinking ability in the teaching of PhotoShop. L. Huang, J. Cao & J. Gao (Eds.), Proceedings of the first international conference on information technology in education and learning (pp. 32–35). 1st International Conference on Information Technologies in Education and Learning (ICITEL), December 19–20.
   Google Scholar
• Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers and powerful ideas. Basic Books, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Plucker, J., Beghetto, R., & Dow, G. (2004). Why isn't creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39, 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3902_1
   Google Scholar
• Pompili, M., Tatarelli, R., Rogers, J. R., & Lester, D. (2007). The hopelessness scale: A factor analysis. Psychological Reports, 100(2), 375–378. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.100.2.375-378
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnick, L. (1987). Education and learning to think. National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Román-González, M., Pérez-González, J., & Jiménez-Fernández, C. (2017). Which cognitive abilities underlie computational thinking? Criterion validity of the Computational Thinking Test. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 678–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, S., Habgood, J., & Jay, T. (2018, October 4–5). Pirate plunder: Game-based computational thinking using Scratch blocks. 12th European Conference on Game Based Learning (pp. 556–564), Sophia Antipolis, France. SKEMA Business School
   Google Scholar
• Sáez-López, J., Román-González, M., & Vázquez-Cano, E. (2016). Visual programming languages integrated across the curriculum in elementary school: A two year case study using “scratch” in five schools. Computers & Education, 97, 129–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheng, Q. L. (2008). Foster high-level ability of problem-solving: The systemic explanation of Marzano’ s taxonomy of cognitive objectives. Open Education Research, 14(2), 10–21. (In Chinese). https://doi.org/10.13966/j.cnki.kfjyyj.2008.02.001
   Google Scholar
• Sousa, D. A., & Tomlinson, C. A. (2011). Differentiation and the brain: How neuroscience supports the learner-friendly classroom. Bloomington.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (1997). Are cognitive styles still in style? American Psychologist, 52(7), 700–712. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.7.700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, L., Hu, L., Yang, W., Zhou, D., & Wang, X. (2020). STEM learning attitude predicts computational thinking skills among primary school students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(2), 346–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, L., Hu, L., & Zhou, D. (2021a). Which way of design programming activities is more effective to promote K-12 students’ computational thinking skills? A meta-analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(4), 1048–1062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, L., Hu, L., & Zhou, D. (2021b). Improving 7th-graders’ computational thinking skills through unplugged programming activities: A study on the influence of multiple factors. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 42, 1000926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, X. D., Yin, Y., Lin, Q., Hadad, R., & Zhai, X.M. (2020). Assessing computational thinking: A systematic review of empirical studies. Computers & Education, 148, 103798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tikva, C., & Tambouris, E. (2020). Mapping computational thinking through programming in K-12 education: A conceptual model based on a systematic literature review. Computers & Education, 162, 104083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, M. J., Liang, C. J., Lee, S. W., & Hsu, C. Y. (2021). Structural validation for the developmental model of computational thinking. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 60, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331211017794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wing, J. M. (2008). Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society a Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences, 366(1881), 3717–3725. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2008.0118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wing, J. M. (2010). Computational thinking: What and why? http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~CompThink/resources/TheLinkWing.pdf,2010-11-17.
   Google Scholar
• Xing, W. (2021). Large-scale path modeling of remixing to computational thinking. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(3), 414–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1573199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yagci, M. (2019). A valid and reliable tool for examining computational thinking skills. Education and Information Technologies, 24(1), 929–951. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9801-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, T., & Richardson, J. (2015). Examining reliability and validity of a Korean version of the community of inquiry instrument using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar