Hebrew in Tel Aviv, Beijing, Denver, and Melbourne: assessing peer learning in a multicultural environment

References

• Beattie, M. (2000). Narratives of professional learning: Becoming a teacher and learning to teach. Journal of Education Inquiry, 1(2), 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Bebell, D., & Kay, R. (2010). One to one computing: A summary of the quantitative results from the berkshire wireless learning initiative. Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 9(2). http://www.jtla.org
   Google Scholar
• Beller, M., & Or, A. (2001). למידה וירטואלית היא מציאות קיימת [Virtual learning is a reality]. Academia, 99, 27–34.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-David, A. (2009). מטא-קוגניציה בהוראה ולמידה [Meta-cognition in teaching and learning]. Eureka, 27. https://www.matar.tau.ac.il/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/newspaper27-doc06.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Colvin, J. (2007). Peer tutoring and social dynamics in higher education. Mentoring & Tutoring, 15(2), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611260601086345
   Google Scholar
• Doll, W. E. (1993). A post-modern perspective on curriculum. Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• DuFour, R. (2004). What is a “professional learning community”? Educational Leadership, 61(8), 6–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliyahu-Levi, D. (2018). Internet role playing - A tool for promoting teaching-learning classroom processes in Hebrew as an additional language. Hebrew Higher Education, 20, 201–216.
   Google Scholar
• Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, C. R., Maheady, L., & Delquadri, J. (2002). Classwide peer tutoring programs. In M. A. Shinn, H. M. Walker, & G. Stoner (Eds.), Interventions for academic and behavior problems II: Preventive and remedial approaches (pp. 611–649). National Association of School Psychologists.
   Google Scholar
• Heron, T. E., Welsch, R. G., & Goddard, Y. L. (2003). Tutoring programs applied in non-academic subject areas: An analysis of skills, methodology, and results. Remedial and Special Education, 24(5), 288–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325030240050401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• House, E. R. (1993). Professional evaluation, social impact, and political consequence. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lejk, M., & Wyvill, M. (2001). The effect of the inclusion of self-assessment with peer assessment of contributions to a group project: A quantitative study of secret and agreed assessments. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 26(6), 551–561. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930120093887
   Google Scholar
• Levi, D., & Ram, D. (2014). Mentors' perspectives of the benefits of peer-to-peer e mentoring where the peers are from another country. In P. Rabensteiner (Ed.), Internationalization in Teacher Education (pp. 91–104). Switzerland: Schneider Hohengehren.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, T. (1998). מתכנון לימודים קווי למרחב- למידה: מדוע וכיצד? [From linear curriculum planning to learning space: Why and how?]. In S. Sharan, H. Sahar, & T. Levin (Eds.), The innovative school (pp. 149–183). Ramot.
   Google Scholar
• Levin-Rozalis, M., Lapidot, A., & Dover, M. (2007). בדיקת פעולות ההערכה וההכשרה להערכה במכללות האקדמיות להכשרת עובדי הוראה [Testing of evaluation activities and training: Evaluation in teacher training colleges]. Research Paths, 14, 63–70. Mofet.
   Google Scholar
• McLoughlin, C., Brady, J., Lee, M. J. W., & Russell, R. (2007). Peer-to-peer: An e-mentoring approach to facilitating reflection on professional experience for novice teachers. In P. Jeffery (Ed.), AARE 2007: Education, innovation and research: Strategies for capacity-building. AARE.
   Google Scholar
• Olshtain, E., & Nissim-Amitai, F. (2004). Curriculum decision-making in a multilingual context. International Journal of Multilingualism, 1(1), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790710408668178
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (1978). Utilization-focused evaluation. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, T. (2006). Self-peer and group assessment in E-learning. Information Science Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Rovai, A. P. (2002). Building a sense of community at a distance. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 3(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v3i1.79
   Google Scholar
• Seifert, T. (2005). תחושת שייכות לקבוצה בלמידה מקוונת [A sense of belonging to the group in online learning]. Research Paths, 12, 44–47.
   Google Scholar
• Sner, M. (2010). “המורה הטוב”, “התלמיד הטוב” ו"בית הספר הטוב” במציאות תרבותית גלובלית [“Good teacher”, “Good student” and “Good school” in global cultural reality]. Maof & Maase, 13, 17–44.
   Google Scholar
• Stuffelbeam, D. L. (1966). A depth study of the evaluation requirement. Theory Into Practice, 5(3), 121–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405846609542011
   Google Scholar
• Stufflebeam, D. (2004). The 21st-century cipp model: Origins, development, and use. In M. C. Alkin (Ed.), Evaluation roots (pp. 245–266). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984157
   Google Scholar
• Stufflebeam, D. L. (1983). The CIPP model for program evaluation. In G. F. Madaus, M. Scriven, & D. L. Stufflebeam (Eds.), Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation (pp. 117–141). Kluwer- Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Stufflebeam, D. L. (2002). The CIPP model for evaluation. In T. Callaghan & D. L. Stufflebeam (Eds.), International handbook of educational evaluation (pp. 31–62). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Terrion, J. L., & Leonard, D. (2007). A taxonomy of the characteristics of student peer mentors in higher education: Findings from a literature review. Mentoring & Tutoring, 15(2), 149–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611260601086311
   Google Scholar
• Topping, K. J. (2005). Trends in peer learning. Educational Psychology, 25(6), 631–645. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410500345172
   Google Scholar
• Ur, P. (2011). Grammar teaching. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol. 2, pp. 507–522). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wen, M. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2006). University students’ perceptions of and attitudes toward (online) peer assessment. Higher Education, 51(18), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6375-8
   Google Scholar