409
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Teachers’ perception about the difficulty and use of programming and robotics in the classroom

ORCID Icon &
Pages 7074-7085 | Received 06 Oct 2021, Accepted 28 Mar 2022, Published online: 13 Apr 2022

References

  • Aksu, F. N., & Durak, G. (2019). Robotics in education: Examining information technology teachers’ views. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 6(4), 162–168. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509.2019.64.162.168
  • Alimisis, D. (2019). Teacher training in educational robotics: The ROBOESL project paradigm. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 24(2), 279–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9357-0
  • Álvarez, J. F. (2019). Interés por la robótica y el pensamiento computacional entre el futuro profesorado de Educación Infantil [Paper presentation]. EDUNOVATIC 2019, 4th Virtual International Conference on Education, Innovation, and ICT, Madrid, Spain, 18-19 December 2019.Redline.
  • Baller, S., Dutta, S., & Lanvin, B. (2016). Global Information Technology Report 2016. Innovating in the Digital Economy. World Economic Forum and INSEAD.
  • Borrull, A., Schina, D., Valls, C., & Vallverdú, M. (2020). INTROBOT: Introducción de la robótica educativa en el grado de educación infantil. In R. Vila (Ed.), La docencia en la enseñanza superior. Nuevas aportaciones desde la investigación e innovación educativas (pp. 528–538). Octaedro.
  • Çakır, R., Şahin, H., Balci, H., & Vergili, M. (2021). The effect of basic robotic coding in-service training on teachers’ acceptance of technology, self-development, and computational thinking skills in technology use. Journal of Computer in Education, 8(2), 237–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-020-00178-1
  • Camilleri, P. (2017). Minding the gap. Proposing a teacher learning-training framework for the integration of robotics in primary schools. Informatics in Education, 16(2), 165–179. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2017.09
  • Chalmers, C. (2017). Preparing teachers to teach STEM through robotics. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 25(4), 17–31.
  • Chevalier, M., Riedo, F., & Mondada, F. (2016). Pedagogical uses of thymio II: How do teachers perceive educational robots in formal education? IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 23(2), 16–23. https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2016.2535080
  • Çoban, E., Korkmaz, Ö, Çakır, R., & Uğur Erdoğmuş, F. (2020). Attitudes of IT teacher candidates towards computer programming and their self-efficacy and opinions regarding to block-based programming. Education and Information Technologies, 25(5), 4097–4114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10164-w
  • Di Battista, S., Pivetti, M., Moro, M., & Menegatti, E. (2020). Teachers’ opinions towards educational robotics for special needs students: An exploratory Italian study. Robotics, 9(3), 72. https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics9030072
  • González-Fernández, M. O., Flores-González, Y. A., & Muñoz-López, C. (2021). Panorama de la robótica educativa a favor del aprendizaje STEAM. Revista Eureka Sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 18(2), 2301. https://doi.org/10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2021.v18.i2.2301
  • Gülbahar, Y., & Kalelioğlu, F. (2017). Competencies of high school teachers and training needs for computer science education. Proceedings of the 6th Computer Science Education Research Conference, 14 November 2017, 26–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/3162087.3162092
  • Guven, G., & Cakir, N. K. (2020). Investigation of the opinions of teachers who received in-service training for arduino-assisted robotic coding applications. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 15(1), 253–274. https://doi.org/10.29329/epasr.2020.236.14
  • Jaipal-Jamani, K., & Angeli, C. (2017). Effect of robotics on elementary preservice teachers’ self-efficacy, science learning, and computational thinking. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(2), 175–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9663-z
  • Jung, S. E., & Won, E. S. (2018). Systematic review of research trends in robotics education for young children. Sustainability, 10(4), 905. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10040905
  • Kaya, E., Newley, A., Deniz, H., Yesilyurt, E., & Newley, P. (2017). Introducing engineering design to a science teaching methods course through educational robotics and exploring changes in views of preservice elementary teachers. Journal of College Science Teaching, 47(2), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/jcst17_047_02_66
  • Kert, S. B. (2019). A proposal of in-service teacher training approach for computer science teachers. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(2), 477–489. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.2.477
  • Kucuk, S., & Sisman, B. (2018). Pre-service teachers’ experiences in learning robotics design and programming. Informatics in Education, 17(2), 301–320. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2018.16
  • López-Belmonte, J., Segura-Robles, A., Moreno-Guerrero, A. J., & Parra-González, M. E. (2021). Robotics in education: A scientific mapping of the literature in web of science. Electronics, 10(3), 291. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10030291
  • Mallik, A., Rajguru, S. B., & Kapila, V. (2018, June). Fundamental: Analyzing the effects of a robotics training workshop on the self-efficacy of high school teachers [Paper presentation]. American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, , 23 June 2018,24–27.
  • Mason, S. L., & Rich, P. J. (2019). Preparing elementary school teachers to teach computing, coding, and computational thinking. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 19(4), 790–824.
  • Miller, D. P., & Nourbakhsh, I. (2016). Robotics for education. In B. Siciliano & O. Khatib (Eds.), Springer handbook of robotics (pp. 2115–2134). Springer International, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32552-1
  • Monteiro, A. F., Miranda-Pinto, M., Osório, A., & Araújo, C. L. (2019, November). Curricular integration of computational thinking, programming and robotics in basic education: A proposal for teacher training. In Proceedings of ICERI2019 Conference. Sevilla, Spain, 11-13 November, 2019.
  • Negrini, L. (2019). Teacher training in educational robotics. In W. Lepuschitz, M. Merdan, G. Koppensteiner, R. Balogh, & D. Obdržálek (Eds.), Robotics in education. RiE 2018. Advances in intelligent systems and computing, 829, 92–97. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97085-1_10
  • Ortega-Ruipérez, B., & Asensio, M. M. (2018). Robótica DIY: Pensamiento computacional para mejorar la resolución de problemas. Revista Latinoamericana de Tecnología Educativa-RELATEC, 17(2), 129–143. https://doi.org/10.17398/1695-288X.17.2.129
  • Pandolfini, V. (2016). Exploring the impact of ICTs in education: Controversies and challenges. Italian Journal of Sociology of Education, 8(2), 28–53. https://doi.org/10.14658/pupj-ijse-2016-2-3
  • Piedade, J., Dorotea, N., Pedro, A., & Matos, J. F. (2020). On teaching programming fundamentals and computational thinking with educational robotics: A didactic experience with pre-service teachers. Education Sciences, 10(9), 214. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10090214
  • Pina-Calafi, A. (2017). Robótica Educativa en Educación Primaria: ¿por qué y cómo? En. In S. Pérez-Aldeguer, G. Castellano-Pérez, & y. A. Pina-Calafi (Coords.) (Eds.), Propuestas de Innovación Educativa en la Sociedad de la Información (pp. 15–27). Adaya Press.
  • Quevedo, E., Álamo, J., Marqués, J. P., Martí, A., Aponte, D., Gamero, L., Granados, M. A., Santana, A., Hernández, P., Zapatera, A., Cabrera, J. M., Ortega, S., Fabelo, H., Guerra, R., Díaz, M., López, S., Monagas, J., Hernández-Fernández, P., Vega, A., … Marrero-Callicó, G. (2020, November). Expectativas del profesorado en la implementación curricular de una plataforma modular de robótica educativa [Paper presentation]. En VII Jornadas Iberoamericanas de Innovación Educativa en el Ámbito de las TIC y las TAC (pp. 93–100). Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
  • Román-Graván, P., Hervás-Gómez, C., Martín-Padilla, A. H., & Fernández-Márquez, E. (2020). Perceptions about the use of educational robotics in the initial training of future teachers: A study on STEAM sustainability among female teachers. Sustainability, 12(10), 4154. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104154
  • Sáez-López, J. M., Buceta-Otero, R., & De-Lara García-Cervigón, S. (2021). Introducing robotics and block programming in elementary education. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 24(1), 95–113. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.24.1.27649
  • Sáez-López, J. M., del Olmo-Muñoz, J., González-Calero, J. A., & Cózar-Gutiérrez, R. (2020). Exploring the effect of training in visual block programming for preservice teachers. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 4(3), 65. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti4030065
  • Segura-Robles, A., Fuentes-Cabrera, A., Parra-González, M. E., & López-Belmonte, J. (2020). Effects on personal factors through flipped learning and gamification as combined methodologies in secondary education. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1103. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01103
  • Smyrnova-Trybulska, E., Morze, N., Kommers, P., Zuziak, W., & Gladun, M. (2017). Selected aspects and conditions of the use of robots in STEM education for young learners as viewed by teachers and students. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 14(4), 296–312. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-04-2017-0024
  • Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U. (2018). Dancing robots: Integrating art, music, and robotics in Singapore’s early childhood centers. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28(2), 325–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-017-9397-0
  • Tang, A. L. L., Tung, V. W. S., & Cheng, T. O. (2020). Teachers’ perceptions of the potential use of educational robotics in management education. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1780269
  • Thai, T. N. T., De Wever, B., & Valcke, M. (2017). The impact of a flipped classroom design on learning performance in higher education: Looking for the best “blend” of lectures and guiding questions with feedback. Computers & Education, 107, 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.01.003
  • Uğur-Erdoğmuş, F. (2020). How do elementary childhood education teachers perceive robotic education in kindergarten? A qualitative study. Participatory Educational Research, 8(2), 421–434. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.21.47.8.2
  • Wu, T., & Albion, P. (2019). Investigating remote access laboratories for increasing pre-service teachers’ STEM capabilities. Educational Technology & Society, 22(1), 82–93.
  • Yoon, M., Hill, J., & Kim, D. (2021). Designing supports for promoting self-regulated learning in the flipped classroom. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 33(2), 398–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-021-09269-z
  • Zha, S., Jin, Y., Moore, P., & Gaston, J. (2020). A cross-institutional investigation of a flipped module on preservice teachers’ interest in teaching computational thinking. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 36(1), 32–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2019.1693941
  • Zhong, B., & Xia, L. (2020). A systematic review on exploring the potential of educational robotics in mathematics education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(1), 79–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-09939-y

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.