553
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Task motivation enhances creative performance in online groups, but not interpersonal interaction

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , , , & show all
Pages 7086-7103 | Received 19 Oct 2021, Accepted 28 Mar 2022, Published online: 19 Apr 2022

References

  • Agogué, M., Kazakçi, A., Hatchuel, A., Le Masson, P., Weil, B., Poirel, N., & Cassotti, M. (2014). The impact of type of examples on originality: Explaining fixation and stimulation effects. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 48(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.37
  • Al-Samarraie, H., & Hurmuzan, S. (2018). A review of brainstorming techniques in higher education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 27, 78–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.12.002
  • Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357–376. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357
  • Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10(1), 123–167.
  • Amabile, T. M., & Pillemer, J. (2012). Perspectives on the social psychology of creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.001
  • Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis (2nd ed). Cambridge university press.
  • Bechtoldt, M. N., De Dreu, C. K., Nijstad, B. A., & Choi, H. S. (2010). Motivated information processing, social tuning, and group creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(4), 622–637. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019386
  • Benedek, M., Jauk, E., Fink, A., Koschutnig, K., Reishofer, G., Ebner, F., & Neubauer, A. C. (2014). To create or to recall? Neural mechanisms underlying the generation of creative new ideas. NeuroImage, 88, 125–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.11.021
  • Benvenuti, M., & Mazzoni, E. (2020). Enhancing wayfinding in pre-school children through robot and socio-cognitive conflict. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(2), 436–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12848
  • Boas, D. A., Elwell, C. E., Ferrari, M., & Taga, G. (2014). Twenty years of functional near-infrared spectroscopy: Introduction for the special issue. NeuroImage, 85, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.11.033
  • Cao, X., & Ali, A. (2018). Enhancing team creative performance through social media and transactive memory system. International Journal of Information Management, 39, 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.11.009
  • Chang, C., & Glover, G. H. (2010). Time–frequency dynamics of resting-state brain connectivity measured with fMRI. Neuroimage, 50(1), 81–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.011
  • Chen, K. K. (2012). Organizing creativity: Enabling creative output, process, and organizing practices. Sociology Compass, 6(8), 624–643. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2012.00480.x
  • Cooper, W., Gallupe, R., Pollard, S., & Cadsby, J. (1998). Some liberating effects of anonymous electronic brainstorming. Small Group Research, 29(2), 147–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496498292001
  • Cui, X., Bryant, D. M., & Reiss, A. L. (2012). NIRS-based hyperscanning reveals increased interpersonal coherence in superior frontal cortex during cooperation. Neuroimage, 59(3), 2430–2437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.003
  • De Barba, P. G., Kennedy, G. E., & Ainley, M. D. (2016). The role of students’ motivation and participation in predicting performance in a MOOC. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(3), 218–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12130
  • Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 627–668. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.627
  • DeRosa, D. M., Smith, C. L., & Hantula, D. A. (2007). The medium matters: Mining the long-promised merit of group interaction in creative idea generation tasks in a meta-analysis of the electronic group brainstorming literature. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(3), 1549–1581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2005.07.003
  • Dugosh, K. L., Paulus, P. B., Roland, E. J., & Yang, H.-C. (2000). Cognitive stimulation in brainstorming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 722–735. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.722
  • Erhel, S., & Jamet, E. (2013). Digital game-based learning: Impact of instructions and feedback on motivation and learning effectiveness. Computers & Education, 67, 156–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.019
  • Freund, P. A., Kuhn, J. T., & Holling, H. (2011). Measuring current achievement motivation with the QCM: Short form development and investigation of measurement invariance. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(5), 629–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.05.033
  • Gaggioli, A., Mazzoni, E., Milani, L., & Riva, G. (2015). The creative link: Investigating the relationship between social network indices, creative performance and flow in blended teams. Computers in Human Behavior, 42, 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.12.003
  • Gaggioli, A., Milani, L., Mazzoni, E., & Riva, G. (2011). Networked flow: A framework for understanding the dynamics of creative collaboration in educational and training settings. The Open Education Journal, 4(1), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874920801104010041
  • Gerhart, B., & Fang, M. (2015). Pay, intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, performance, and creativity in the workplace: Revisiting long-held beliefs. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2(1), 489–521. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111418
  • Grant, A. M., & Berry, J. W. (2011). The necessity of others is the mother of invention: Intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective taking, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 54(1), 73–96. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.59215085
  • Hemphill, J. K., Pepinsky, P. N., Kaufman, A. E., & Lipetz, M. E. (1957). Effects of task motivation and expectancy of accomplishment upon attempts to lead. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 71(22), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093776
  • Hennessey, B. (2019). Motivation and creativity. In J. Kaufman & R. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (Cambridge handbooks in psychology) (pp. 374–395). Cambridge University Press.
  • Hoshi, Y. (2007). Functional near-infrared spectroscopy: Current status and future prospects. Journal of Biomedical Optics, 12(6), 062106. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.2804911
  • Hou, H. T., & Wu, S. Y. (2011). Analyzing the social knowledge construction behavioral patterns of an online synchronous collaborative discussion instructional activity using an instant messaging tool: A case study. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1459–1468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.02.012
  • Huang, T. C., Chen, M. Y., & Lin, C. Y. (2019). Exploring the behavioral patterns transformation of learners in different 3D modeling teaching strategies. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 670–678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.028
  • Iacoboni, M., & Dapretto, M. (2006). The mirror neuron system and the consequences of its dysfunction. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7(12), 942–951. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2024
  • Jesus, S. N., Rus, C. L., Lens, W., & Imaginário, S. (2013). Intrinsic motivation and creativity related to product: A meta-analysis of the studies published between 1990–2010. Creativity Research Journal, 25(1), 80–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2013.752235
  • Jiang, J., Dai, B., Peng, D., Zhu, C., Liu, L., & Lu, C. (2012). Neural synchronization during face-to-face communication. Journal of Neuroscience, 32(45), 16064–16069. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2926-12.2012
  • Karau, S. J., & Williams, K. D. (1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(4), 681–706. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.681
  • Kurtzberg, T. R., & Amabile, T. M. (2001). From guilford to creative synergy: Opening the black box of team-level creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3-4), 285–294. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ1334_06
  • Kwan, H. K., Zhang, X., Liu, J., & Lee, C. (2018). Workplace ostracism and employee creativity: An integrative approach incorporating pragmatic and engagement roles. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(12), 1358–1366. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000320
  • Li, R., Mayseless, N., Balters, S., & Reiss, A. L. (2021). Dynamic inter-brain synchrony in real-life inter-personal cooperation: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy hyperscanning study. NeuroImage, 118263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118263
  • Liikkanen, L. A., Kuikkaniemi, K., Lievonen, P., & Ojala, P. (2011, May). Next step in electronic brainstorming: Collaborative creativity with the web. Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI EA' 11, Vancouver, BC (pp. 2029–2034). https://doi.org/10.1145/1979742.1979929
  • Liu, E., & Lin, C. (2010). The survey study of mathematics motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MMSLQ) for grade 10-12 Taiwanese students. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(2), 221–233.
  • Lu, K., Qiao, X., & Hao, N. (2019). Praising or keeping silent on partner’s ideas: Leading brainstorming in particular ways. Neuropsychologia, 124, 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.01.004
  • Lu, K., Xue, H., Nozawa, T., & Hao, N. (2019). Cooperation makes a group be more creative. Cerebral Cortex, 29(8), 3457–3470. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhy215
  • Lu, K., Yu, T., & Hao, N. (2020). Creating while taking turns, the choice to unlocking group creative potential. NeuroImage, 219(2020), 117025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117025
  • Maaravi, Y., Heller, B., Shoham, Y., Mohar, S., & Deutsch, B. (2021). Ideation in the digital age: Literature review and integrative model for electronic brainstorming. Review of Managerial Science, 15(6), 1431–1464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-020-00400-5
  • Mayseless, N., Hawthorne, G., & Reiss, A. L. (2019). Real-life creative problem solving in teams: fNIRS based hyperscanning study. NeuroImage, 203(2019), 116161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116161
  • Michinov, N. (2012). Is electronic brainstorming or brainwriting the best Way to improve creative performance in groups? An overlooked comparison of two idea-generation techniques. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42, E222–E243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.01024.x
  • Michinov, N., Jamet, E., Métayer, N., & Le Hénaff, B. (2015). The eyes of creativity: Impact of social comparison and individual creativity on performance and attention to others’ ideas during electronic brainstorming. Computers in Human Behavior, 42(2015), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.037
  • Michinov, N., & Primois, C. (2005). Improving productivity and creativity in online groups through social comparison process: New evidence for asynchronous electronic brainstorming. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(1), 11–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.02.004
  • Molavi, B., & Dumont, G. A. (2012). Wavelet-based motion artifact removal for functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Physiological Measurement, 33(2), 259–270. https://doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/33/2/259
  • Pan, Y. F., Cheng, X. J., Zhang, Z., Li, X. C., & Hu, Y. (2017). Cooperation in lovers: An fNIRS based hyperscanning study. Human Brain Mapping, 38(2), 831–841. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23421
  • Paulus, P. B. (2000). Groups, teams, and creativity: The creative potential of idea-generating groups. Applied Psychology, 49(2), 237–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00013
  • Paulus, P. B. (2015). Electronic brainstorming research and its implications for e-planning. International Journal of E-Planning Research, 4(1), 42–53. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijepr.2015010103
  • Paulus, P. B., & Brown, V. R. (2007). Toward more creative and innovative group idea generation: A cognitive-social-motivational perspective of brainstorming. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1(1), 248–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00006.x
  • Pinti, P., Tachtsidis, I., Hamilton, A., Hirsch, J., Aichelburg, C., Gilbert, S., & Burgess, P. W. (2020). The present and future use of functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) for cognitive neuroscience. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1464(1), 5–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13948
  • Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(3), 801–813. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164493053003024
  • Rheinberg, F., Vollmeyer, R., & Burns, B. D. (2001). FAM: Ein fragebogen zur erfassung aktuller motivation in lern- und leistungssituationen. Diagnostica, 47(2), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1026//0012-1924.47.2.57
  • Riva, G., Waterworth, J., & Murray, D. (2014). Extending the self through the tools and the others: A general framework for presence and social presence in mediated interactions. In G. Riva, J. Waterworth, & D. Murray (Eds.), Interacting with presence: HCI and the sense of presence in computer-mediated environments (pp. 9–31). De Gruyter Open Ltd.
  • Robert, L. P. (2020). Behavior‒output control theory, trust and social loafing in virtual teams. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 4(3), 39–61. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti4030039
  • Samašonok, K., Išoraitė, M., & Leškienė-Hussey, B. (2016). The internet entrepreneurship: Opportunities and problems. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 3(4), 329–349. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2016.3.4(3)
  • Silani, G., Lamm, C., Ruff, C. C., & Singer, T. (2013). Right supramarginal gyrus is crucial to overcome emotional egocentricity bias in social judgments. The Journal of Neuroscience, 33(39), 15466–15476. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1488-13.2013
  • Sperduti, M., Guionnet, S., Fossati, P., & Nadel, J. (2014). Mirror neuron system and mentalizing system connect during online social interaction. Cognitive Processing, 15(3), 307–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-014-0600-x
  • Tang, H., Mai, X., Wang, S., Zhu, C., Krueger, F., & Liu, C. (2016). Interpersonal brain synchronization in the right temporo-parietal junction during face-to-face economic exchange. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11(1), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsv092
  • Tzourio-Mazoyer, N., Landeau, B., Papathanassiou, D., Crivello, F., Etard, O., Delcroix, N., Mazoyer, B., & Joliot, M. (2002). Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. Neuroimage, 15(1), 273–289. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.0978
  • Van Overwalle, F., & Baetens, K. (2009). Understanding others’ actions and goals by mirror and mentalizing systems: A meta-analysis. Neuroimage, 48(3), 564–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.06.009
  • Wang, C., Fang, T., & Gu, Y. (2020). Learning performance and behavioral patterns of online collaborative learning: Impact of cognitive load and affordances of different multimedia. Computers & Education, 143, 103683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103683
  • Wang, M. Y., Luan, P., Zhang, J., Xiang, Y. T., Niu, H., & Yuan, Z. (2018). Concurrent mapping of brain activation from multiple subjects during social interaction by hyperscanning: A mini-review. Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery, 8(8), 819–837. https://doi.org/10.21037/qims.2018.09.07
  • Wang, X. H. F., Kim, T. Y., & Lee, D. R. (2016). Cognitive diversity and team creativity: Effects of team intrinsic motivation and transformational leadership. Journal of Business Research, 69(9), 3231–3239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.02.026
  • Wyatt, J., Delpy, D., Cope, M., Wray, S., & Reynolds, E. (1986). Quantification of cerebral oxygenation and haemodynamics in sick newborn infants by near infrared spectrophotometry. The Lancet, 328(8515), 1063–1066. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90467-8
  • Xue, H., Lu, K., & Hao, N. (2018). Cooperation makes two less-creative individuals turn into a highly-creative pair. Neuroimage, 172, 527–537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.02.007
  • Zhang, X., & Bartol, K. M. (2010a). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 107–128. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.48037118
  • Zhang, X., & Bartol, K. M. (2010b). The influence of creative process engagement on employee creative performance and overall job performance: A curvilinear assessment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(5), 862–873. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020173
  • Zhang, X., Pi, Z., Li, C., & Hu, W. (2021). Intrinsic motivation enhances online group creativity via promoting members’ effort, not interaction. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(2), 606–618. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13045

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.