Teachers’ intention to use an electronic learning management system in the long term

References

• Achchuthan, S., Kuhanesan, S., & Thuseethan, S. (2015). Usability evaluation of learning management system LMS in Sri Lankan universities, advances in human computer interaction. Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 15(2), 1412.0197v2.
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Busaidi, K. A., & Al-Shihi, H. (2012). Key factors to instructors’ satisfaction of learning management systems in blended learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 24(1), 18–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-011-9051-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alharbi, S., & Drew, S. (2014). Using the technology acceptance model in understanding academics’ behavioural intention to use learning management systems. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 5(1), 143–155. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2014.050120
   Google Scholar
• Almarashdeh, I., Sahari, N., Zin, N., & Alsmadi, M. (2011). Acceptance of learning management system: A comparison between distance learners and instructors. International Journal on Advances in Information Sciences and Service Sciences, 3(5), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4156/aiss.vol3.issue5.1
   Google Scholar
• Ashrafi, A., Zareravasan, A., Rabiee Savoji, S., & Amani, M. (2020). Exploring factors influencing students’ continuance intention to use the learning management system (LMS): a multi-perspective framework. Interactive Learning Environments, in press.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Annals of child development. Vol. 6. Six theories of child development (pp. 1–60). JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bouchrika, I. (2020). 51 LMS Statistics: 2019/2020 Data, Trends & Predictionsin Research. Guide 2 Research. https://www.guide2research.com/research/lms-statistics
   Google Scholar
• Bousbahi, F., & Alrazgan, M. S. (2015). Investigating IT faculty resistance to learning management system adoption using latent variables in an acceptance technology model. The Scientific World Journal, 2015, 375651.
   Google Scholar
• Castillo, G. (2020). Elearning in Latin America. Docebo.
   Google Scholar
• Cavus, N. (2013). Selecting a learning management system (LMS) in developing countries: Instructors’ evaluation. Interactive Learning Environments, 21(5), 419–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2011.584321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavus, N., & Alhih, M. S. (2014). Learning management systems use in science education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 143, 517–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.429
   Google Scholar
• Chahar, B., & Hatwal, V. (2018). A study of performance management system in higher education institution with special reference to academicians. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research, 5(6), 350–353.
   Google Scholar
• Cigdem, H., & Topcu, A. (2015). Predictors of instructors’ behavioral intention to use learning management system: A turkish vocational college example. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 22–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, D. (2020). Eu: Share of individuals doing an online course 2019. Statista.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, D. A., & Steinert, Y. (2013). Online learning for faculty development: A review of the literature. Medical Teacher, 35(11), 930–937. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2013.827328
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results. Massachusetts, United States: Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-Determination in Human Behavior, 1st ed. Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dobre, I. (2015). Learning management systems for higher education - An overview of available options for higher education organizations. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 180, 313–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.122
   Google Scholar
• Elfeky, A. I. M., Masadeh, T. S. Y., & Elbyaly, M. Y. H. (2020). Advance organizers in flipped classroom via e-learning management system and the promotion of integrated science process skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 100622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emelyanova, N., & Voronina, E. (2014). Introducing a learning management system at a Russian university: Students’ and teachers’ perceptions. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(1), 272–289. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i1.1701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enwere, J. O., & Okeke, B. (2020). Effect of using edmodo on students’ retention in financial accounting in secondary schools. Nnadiebube Journal of Education, 5(3), 37–46.
   Google Scholar
• Ghilay, Y. (2019). Effectiveness of learning management systems in higher education: Views of lecturers with different levels of activity in LMSs. Journal of Online Higher Education, 3(2), 29–50.
   Google Scholar
• Gil-Flores, J., Rodríguez-Santero, J., & Torres-Gordillo, J. J. (2017). Factors that explain the use of ICT in secondary-education classrooms: The role of teacher characteristics and school infrastructure. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 441–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, J., Yin, H., & Wang, W. (2015). Exploring the relationship between goal orientations for teaching of tertiary teachers and their teaching approaches in China. Asia Pacific Education Review, 16(4), 537–547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-015-9392-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harpe, S. E. (2015). How to analyze Likert and other rating scale data. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 7(6), 836–850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2015.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heo, M., Kim, N., & Faith, M. S. (2015). Statistical power as a function of cronbach alpha of instrument questionnaire items. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 15(1), 86. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-015-0070-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hevey, D. (2018). Network analysis: A brief overview and tutorial. Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine, 6(1), 301–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2018.1521283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, P. (2019). State of higher ed LMS market for US and Canada: 2019 mid-year edition. PhilOnEdTech.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, L., Guo, Y., Peng, Z., & Porter, A. L. (2011). Characterising a technology development at the stage of early emerging applications: Nanomaterial-enhanced biosensors. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 23(5), 527–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2011.565666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iliya, A., & Ifeoma, L. G. (2015). Assessment of teacher motivation approaches in the less developed countries. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(22), 10–17.
   Google Scholar
• Izquierdo Alfaro, I., Olea Díaz, J., & Abad García, F. J. (2014). Exploratory factor analysis in validation studies: Uses and recommendations. Psicothema, 26(3), 395–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juarez Santiago, B., Olivares Ramirez, J. M., Rodríguez-Reséndiz, J., Dector, A., Garcia Garcia, R., González-Durán, J. E. E., & Ferriol Sanchez, F. (2020). Learning management system-based evaluation to determine academic efficiency performance. Sustainability, 12(10), 4256. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kattoua, T., Al-Lozi, M., & Alrowwad, A. A. (2016). A review of literature on E-learning systems in higher education. International Journal of Business Management & Economic Research, 7(5), 754–762.
   Google Scholar
• Khechine, H., & Augier, M. (2019). Adoption of a social learning platform in higher education: An extended UTAUT model implementation. Proceedings of the 52nd hawaii International Conference on system sciences (53–62). Scolar Space.
   Google Scholar
• Klieger, D. M., Kell, H. J., Rikoon, S., Burkander, K. N., Bochenek, J. L., & Shore, J. R. (2018). Development of the behaviorally anchored rating scales for the skills demonstration and progression guide. ETS Research Report Series, 2018(1), 1–36.
   Google Scholar
• Kyllönen, M. (2018). Applying unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) to investigate teachers’ perceived enablers and barriers for the ICT use in teaching. Conference: ITK2018 - interaktiivinen tekniikka koulussa 2018At: Hämeenlinna, Suomi Finland (1–3). Hämeenlinna, Suomi Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, X., Dai, Y., Shi, H., & Li, C. (2020). E-learners’ satisfaction as predictors of online classroom community. Journal of Contemporary Education Theory & Research, 4(2), 12–19.
   Google Scholar
• Lopes, A. P. (2014). Learning management systems in higher education. Proceedings of EDULEARN14 conference (5360–5365). IATED Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lovric, M. (2011). International encyclopedia of statistical science. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lwoga, E. (2014). Critical success factors for adoption of web-based learning management systems in Tanzania. International Journal of Education and Development Using ICT, 10(1), 4–21.
   Google Scholar
• Mahnegar, F. (2012). Learning management system. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(12), 144–150.
   Google Scholar
• Mtebe, J. S., & Raisamo, R. (2014). Challenges and instructors’ intention to adopt and use open educational resources in higher education in Tanzania. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(1), 249–271. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i1.1687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muries, B. (2016). Assessment of factors influencing continued electronic learning management system usage among higher education institutions in Tanzania [Dissertation. University of Dar es Salaam.
   Google Scholar
• Naveh, G., Tubin, D., & Pliskin, N. (2012). Student satisfaction with learning management systems: A lens of critical success factors. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 21(3), 337–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2012.720413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira, P. C. D., Cunha, C. J. C. D. A., & Nakayama, M. K. (2016). Learning management systems (LMS) and e-learning management: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 13(2), 157–180. https://doi.org/10.4301/S1807-17752016000200001
   Google Scholar
• Panigrahi, R., Srivastava, P. R., & Sharma, D. (2018). Online learning: Adoption, continuance, and learning outcome—A review of literature. International Journal of Information Management, 43, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinder, C. C. (2014). Work motivation in organizational behavior. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Psycharis, S., Chalatzoglidis, G., & Michail, K. (2013). Moodle as a learning environmentin promoting conceptual understandingfor secondary school students. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 9(1), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2013.912a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahrouh, M., Taleb, N., & Mohamed, E. A. (2018). Evaluating the usefulness of e-learning management system delivery in higher education. International Journal of Economics and Business Research, 16(2), 162–181. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEBR.2018.094010
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. (1962). Diffusion of innovations. Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sadykova, G. (2014). Mediating knowledge through peer-to-peer interaction in a multicultural online learning environment: A case of international students in the US. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(3), 24–49. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i3.1629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education, 128, 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, L., & Srivastava, M. (2019). Teachers’ motivation to adopt technology in higher education. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 12(4), 673–692. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-07-2018-0156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobaih, A. E. E., Hasanein, A. M., & Abu Elnasr, A. E. (2020). Responses to COVID-19 in higher education: Social media usage for sustaining formal academic communication in developing countries. Sustainability, 12(16), 6520. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stockless, A. (2018). Acceptance of learning management system: The case of secondary school teachers. Education and Information Technologies, 23(3), 1101–1121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9654-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunkara, V. M., & Kurra, R. R. (2017). An analysis of learner satisfaction and needs on e-learning systems. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Research, 13(3), 433–444.
   Google Scholar
• Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanveer, M., & Karim, M. A. (2018). Higher education institutions and the performance management. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1, 2183.
   Google Scholar
• Teo, T., & Van Schaik, P. (2012). Understanding the intention to use technology by preservice teachers: An empirical test of competing theoretical models. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 28(3), 178–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2011.581892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, R. L., Higgins, C. A., & Howell, J. M. (1991). Personal computing: Toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS Quarterly, 15(1), 125–143. https://doi.org/10.2307/249443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnbull, D., Chugh, R., & Luck, J. (2020). Learning management systems: A review of the research methodology literature in Australia and China. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 44(2), 164–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2020.1737002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughan, N. D., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Garrison, D. R. (2013). Teaching in blended learning environments: Creating and sustaining communities of inquiry. Athabasca University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wadhwani, P., & Gankar, S. (2020). E-Learning Market Industry Analysis Report, Regional Outlook, Growth Potential, Competitive Market Share & Forecast, 2020–2026. GMInsights.
   Google Scholar
• Yanti, H., & Setiawan, A. (2018). Teacher’s perception about the use of E-learning/Edmodo in educational activities. IOP Conference series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 306, No. 1, p. 012055). IOP Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Yasoda, K. (2016). An emerging trend in performance management system. International Journal of Research in Management Studies, 1(8), 6–12.
   Google Scholar