Challenges and affordances of reading and writing development in technology-assisted language learning

References

• References marked with an asterisk indicate studies included in the systematic review.
   Google Scholar
• Abbas, M. A., Hammad, S., Hwang, G. J., Khan, S., & Gilani, S. M. M. (2020). An assistive environment for EAL academic writing using formulaic sequences classification. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(6), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1789670
   Google Scholar
• Abe, M. (2021). L2 interactional competence in asynchronous multiparty text-based communication: Study of online collaborative writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(4), 409–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1614070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrami, P. C., Lysenko, L., & Borokhovski, E. (2020). The effects of ABRACADABRA on reading outcomes: An updated meta-analysis and landscape review of applied field research. Journal of Computer-Assist Learning, 36(1), 260–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12417
   Google Scholar
• Abrams, Z. (2016). Exploring collaboratively written L2 texts among first-year learners of German in Google docs. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(8), 1259–1270. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2016.1270968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, R., Nik, A. N. M. A., & Newton, J. (2015). Task complexity effects on the complexity and accuracy of writing via text chat. Journal of Second Language Writing, 29(1), 64–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.06.002
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, P. A. (2020). Methodological guidance paper: The art and science of quality systematic reviews. Review of Educational Research, 90(1), 6–23. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319854352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allagui, B. (2021). Writing a descriptive paragraph using an augmented reality application: An evaluation of students’ performance and attitudes. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 26(3), 687–710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-019-09429-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avidov-Ungar, O., & Amir, A. (2018). Development of a teacher questionnaire on the use of ICT tools to teach first language writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(7), 675–693. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1433216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awada, G., Burston, J., & Ghannage, R. (2020). Effect of student team achievement division through WebQuest on EFL students’ argumentative writing skills and their instructors’ perceptions. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(3), 275–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1558254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baceviciute, S., Terkildsen, T., & Makransky, G. (2021). Remediating learning from non-immersive to immersive media: Using EEG to investigate the effects of environmental embeddedness on reading in virtual reality. Computers & Education, 164(1), 104122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104122
   Google Scholar
• Bahari, A. (2019). FonF practice model from theory to practice: CALL via focus on form approach and nonlinear dynamic motivation to develop listening and speaking proficiency. Computers & Education, 130(3), 40–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahari, A. (2020a). CANDA: Computer-assisted nonlinear dynamic approach for the L2 teaching in blended and distance learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(6), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1805774
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahari, A. (2020b). Game-Based Collaborative Vocabulary Learning in Blended and Distance L2 Learning. The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 35(3), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2020.1814229
   Google Scholar
• Bahari, A. (2020c). Mainstream theoretical trends and future directions of L2 motivation studies in classroom and CALL contexts. Computer-Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal, 21(1), 1–28. http://callej.org/journal/21-1.html
   Google Scholar
• Bahari, A. (2021). Computer-mediated Feedback for L2 learners: challenges vs. affordances. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(1), 24–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahari, A., Zhang, X., & Ardasheva, Y. (2021a). Establishing a nonlinear dynamic individual-centered language assessment model: A dynamic systems theory approach. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(7), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1950769
   Google Scholar
• Bahari, A., Zhang, X., & Ardasheva, Y. (2021b). Establishing a computer-assisted interactive reading model. Computers & Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahari, A. (2022a). Challenges and Affordances of Cognitive Load Management in Technology-Assisted Language Learning: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 38(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.2019957
   Google Scholar
• Bahari, A. (2022b). Affordances and Challenges of Technology-Assisted Language Learning for Motivation: A Systematic Review. Interactive Learning Environments. http://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.2021246c
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahari, A. (2022c). Affordances and Challenges of Teaching Language Skills by Virtual Reality: A Systematic Review (2010- 2020). E-Learning and Digital Media, 19(2), 163–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530211036583
   Google Scholar
• Bai, B., Wang, J., & Zhou, H. (2021). An intervention study to improve primary school students’ self-regulated strategy use in English writing through e-learning in Hong Kong. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 38(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1871030
   Google Scholar
• Bakla, A. (2019). A mixed-methods study of tailor-made animated cartoons in teaching punctuation in EFL writing. ReCALL, 31(1), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344018000046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballance, O. J. (2021). Narrow reading, vocabulary load and collocations in context: Exploring lexical repetition in concordances from a pedagogical perspective. ReCALL, 33(1), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344020000117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, N. S. (2017). Reading in a digital age. Phi Delta Kappan, 99(2), 15–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721717734184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrot, J. S. (2021). Using automated written corrective feedback in the writing classrooms: Effects on L2 writing accuracy. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 38(1), 1–15. http://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1936071
   Google Scholar
• Berns, A., Isla-Montes, J. L., Palomo-Duarte, M., & Dodero, J. M. (2016). Motivation, students’ needs and learning outcomes: A hybrid game-based app for enhanced language learning. SpringerPlus, 5(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2971-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bonneton-Botté, N., Fleury, S., Girard, N., Le Magadou, M., Cherbonnier, A., Renault, M., Anquetil, E., & Jamet, E. (2020). Can tablet apps support the learning of handwriting? An investigation of learning outcomes in kindergarten classroom. Computers & Education, 131(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103831
   Google Scholar
• Brudermann, C., Grosbois, M., & Sarré, C. (2021). Accuracy development in L2 writing: Exploring the potential of computer-assisted unfocused indirect corrective feedback in an online EFL course. ReCALL, 33(3), 248–264. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095834402100015X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burstein, J., Elliot, N., & Molloy, H. (2015). Informing automated writing evaluation using the lens of genre: Two studies. CALICO Journal, 33(1), 117–141. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v33i1.26374
   Google Scholar
• Chandra, S., Dillenbourg, P., & Paiva, A. (2020). Children teach handwriting to a social robot with different learning competencies. International Journal of Social Robotics, 12(5), 721–748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-019-00589-w
   Google Scholar
• Chang, W. C., Liao, C. Y., & Chan, T. W. (2021). Improving children’s textual cohesion and writing attitude in a game-based writing environment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(1-2), 133–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1671459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChanLin, L. J. (2018). Bridging children’s reading with an augmented reality story library. LIBRI, 68(3), 219–229. https://doi.org/10.1515/libri-2018-0017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C. M., Tan, C. C., & Lo, B. J. (2016). Facilitating English language learners’ oral reading fluency with digital pen technology. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(1), 96–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2013.817442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J., Lin, C. H., & Chen, G. (2021). A cross-cultural perspective on the relationships among social media use, self-regulated learning and adolescents’ digital reading literacy. Computers & Education, 175(1), 104322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104322
   Google Scholar
• Chen, M., & Chen, C. (2020). Do readers adjust their lower- and higher-level language skills according to text structures? Evidence from eye movements in Chinese text reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 43(1), 180–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12297
   Google Scholar
• Chen, P. J. (2016). Learners’ metalinguistic and affective performance in blogging to write. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(4), 790–814. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2015.1068813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y. L., & Hsu, C. C. (2020). Self-regulated mobile game-based English learning in a virtual reality environment. Computers & Education, 154(1), 103910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103910
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., Smith, T. J., York, C. S., & Mayall, H. J. (2020). Google earth virtual reality and expository writing for young English learners from a funds of knowledge perspective. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(1-2), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1544151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, G. (2017). The impact of online automated feedback on students’ reflective journal writing in an EFL course. The Internet and Higher Education, 34(1), 8–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.04.002
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, G., Chwo, G. S. M., & Ng, W. S. (2021). Automated tracking of student revisions in response to teacher feedback in EFL writing: Technological feasibility and teachers’ perspectives. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.2001539
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, A. C., & Slavin, R. E. (2012). How features of educational technology applications affect student reading outcomes: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 7(3), 198–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2012.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chew, C. S., Idris, N., Loh, E. F., Wu, W. C. V., Chua, Y. P., & Bimba, A. T. (2019). The effects of a theory-based summary writing tool on students’ summary writing. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(1), 435–449. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12349
   Google Scholar
• Chung, E. S., & Ahn, S. (2021). The effect of using machine translation on linguistic features in L2 writing across proficiency levels and text genres. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 38(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1871029
   Google Scholar
• Coiro, J. (2021). Toward a multifaceted heuristic of digital reading to inform assessment, research, practice, and policy. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(1), 9–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conijn, R., Martinez-Maldonado, R., Knight, S., Shum, S. B., Van Waes, L., & van Zaanen, M. (2020). How to provide automated feedback on the writing process? A participatory approach to design writing analytics tools. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1839503
   Google Scholar
• Conn, C. A., Sujo-Montes, L. E., & Sealander, K. A. (2019). Using iBook features to support English language learners and struggling readers. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 35(5), 496–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2019.1579128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordero, K., Nussbaum, M., Ibaseta, V., Otaíza, M. J., & Chiuminatto, P. (2018). Read, write, touch: Co-construction and multiliteracies in a third-grade digital writing exercise. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(10), 162–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12224
   Google Scholar
• Cordero, K., Nussbaum, M., Ibaseta, V., Otaíza, M. J., Gleisner, S., González, S., & Carland, C. (2015). Read create share (RCS): A new digital tool for interactive reading and writing. Computers & Education, 82(1), 486–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.12.006
   Google Scholar
• Danaei, D., Jamali, H. R., Mansourian, Y., & Rastegarpour, H. (2020). Comparing reading comprehension between children reading augmented reality and print storybooks. Computers & Education, 153(1), 103900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103900
   Google Scholar
• Dizon, G. (2016). A comparative study of facebook vs. paper-and-pencil writing to improve L2 writing skills. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(8), 1249–1258. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2016.1266369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolgunsöz, E., Yıldırım, G., & Yıldırım, S. (2018). The effect of virtual reality on EFL writing performance. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 14(1), 278–292.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, J., & Sweeney, T. (2018). Writing and iPads in the early years: Perspectives from within the classroom. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(1), 859–869. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12621
   Google Scholar
• Ebadi, S., & Rahimi, M. (2017). Exploring the impact of online peer-editing using Google docs on EFL learners’ academic writing skills: A mixed methods study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(8), 787–815. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1363056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebadi, S., & Rahimi, M. (2019). Mediating EFL learners’ academic writing skills in online dynamic assessment using Google docs. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(5-6), 527–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1527362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eubanks, J. F., Yeh, H. T., & Tseng, H. (2017). Learning Chinese through a twenty-first century writing workshop with the integration of mobile technology in a language immersion elementary school. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(4), 346–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1399911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, C. Y., & Chen, G. D. (2021). A scaffolding tool to assist learners in argumentative writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(1-2), 159–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1660685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraillon, J., Ainley, J. G., Schulz, W., Friedman, T., & Gebhardt, E. (2014). Preparing for life in a digital age: The IEA international computer and information literacy study international report. Becky Bliss Design and Production.
   Google Scholar
• Frankenberg-Garcia, A., Lew, R., Roberts, J., Rees, G., & Sharma, N. (2019). Developing a writing assistant to help EAP writers with collocations in real time. ReCALL, 31(1), 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344018000150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gissel, S. T., & Andersen, S. C. (2021). A cluster-randomized trial measuring the effects of a digital learning tool supporting decoding and reading for meaning in grade 2. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(2), 287–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh, T. T., Sun, H., & Yang, B. (2020). Microfeatures influencing writing quality: The case of Chinese students’ SAT essays. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(4), 455–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1572017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golonka, E. M., Bowles, A. R., Frank, V. M., Richardson, D. L., & Freynik, S. (2014). Technologies for foreign language learning: A review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(1), 70–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2012.700315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Görgen, R., Huemer, S., Schulte-Körne, G., & Moll, K. (2020). Evaluation of a digital game-based reading training for German children with reading disorder. Computers & Education, 150(1), 103834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103834
   Google Scholar
• Grami, G. M. A., & Alkazemi, B. Y. (2016). Improving ESL writing using an online formulaic sequence word-combination checker. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(1), 95–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12115
   Google Scholar
• Gruhn, S., Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2020). Moderating role of reading comprehension in children's word learning with context versus pictures. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(1), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu, P., Zhang, Y., & Gu, H. (2020). Creating a technology-enhanced constructivist learning environment for research ability development in a BA thesis writing course. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(5-6), 538–566. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1576735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, Q., Feng, R., & Hua, Y. (2021). How effectively can EFL students use automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) in research writing? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 38(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1879161
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez-Colón, M., Frumuselu, A. D., & Curell, H. (2020). Mobile-assisted language learning to enhance L2 reading comprehension: A selection of implementation studies between 2012–2017. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(1), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1813179
   Google Scholar
• Ha, M. J. (2016). Linking adverbials in first-year Korean university EFL learners’ writing: A corpus-informed analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(6), 1090–1101. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2015.1068814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassanzadeh, M., Saffari, E., & Rezaei, S. (2021). The impact of computer-aided concept mapping on EFL learners’ lexical diversity: A process writing experiment. ReCALL, 33(3), 214–228. doi:10.1017/S095834402100001X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, H. Y., Ma, L., Lin, P. Y., & Yuan-Hsuan Lee, K. (2020). Advancing third graders’ reading comprehension through collaborative knowledge building: A comparative study in Taiwan. Computers & Education, 157(1), 103962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103962
   Google Scholar
• Hsiao, H. S., Chang, C. S., Lin, C. Y., & Hsu, H. L. (2015). “Irobiq”: the influence of bidirectional interaction on kindergarteners’ reading motivation, literacy, and behavior. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(3), 269–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2012.745435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, Y. (2020). Learner interactions in face-to-face collaborative writing with the support of online resources. ReCALL, 32(1), 85–105. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344019000120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, Y. Z., Su, M. C., Chen, S. Y., & Chen, G. D. (2015). The development of a robot-based learning companion: A user-centered design approach. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(3), 356–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2013.765895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, H. C. (2019). Wiki-mediated collaboration and its association with L2 writing development: An exploratory study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(8), 945–967. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1542407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, H. L., Hwang, G., & Chang, J., & Y, C. (2020). Learning to be a writer: A spherical video-based virtual reality approach to supporting descriptive article writing in high school Chinese courses. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(1), 1386–1405. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12893
   Google Scholar
• Huang, R. T., Yu, C. L., Tang, T. W., & Chang, S. C. (2021). A study of the use of mobile learning technology in Taiwan for language learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 58(1), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2019.1628798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung, Y. H., Chen, C. H., & Huang, S. W. (2017). Applying augmented reality to enhance learning: A study of different teaching materials. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(1), 252–266. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12173
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, G. J., Chen, M. R. A., Sung, H. Y., & Lin, M. H. (2019). Effects of integrating a concept mapping-based summarization strategy into flipped learning on students’ reading performances and perceptions in Chinese courses. Br J Educ Technol, 50(1), 2703–2719. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12708
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, D., & Zhang, L. J. (2020). Collaborating with ‘familiar’ strangers in mobile-assisted environments: The effect of socializing activities on learning EFL writing. Computers & Education, 150(2), 103841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103841
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, L., & Yu, S. (2020). Appropriating automated feedback in L2 writing: Experiences of Chinese EFL student writers. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1(25), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1799824
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, Y. (2015). AEE corpus of EFL writing. Br J Educ Technol, 46(10), 1109–1117. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12292
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez, J. E., Seoane, R. C., García, E., & de León, S. C. (2021). Effects of web-based training on Spanish pre-service and in-service teacher knowledge and implicit beliefs on learning to write. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(1), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayaoğlu, M. N., & Erbay Çetinkaya, Ş. (2018). Using what students have at their fingertips: Utilising mobile phones for circular writing. The Qualitative Report, 23(12), 3098–3115. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2018.3495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, M. K., & McCarthy, K. S. (2020). Improving summary writing through formative feedback in a technology-enhanced learning environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(1), 684–704. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12516
   Google Scholar
• Kılıçkaya, F. (2020). Learners’ perceptions of collaborative digital graphic writing based on semantic mapping. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(1-2), 58–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1544912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koşar, G. (2021). Online collaborative learning: Does it improve college students’ critical reading skills? Interactive Learning Environments, 29(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1998137
   Google Scholar
• Kusyk, M. (2017). The development of complexity, accuracy and fluency in L2 written production through informal participation in online activities. CALICO Journal, 34(1), 75–96. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.29513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, S. L., & Chen, H. J. H. (2015). Dictionaries vs concordancers: Actual practice of the two different tools in EFL writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(4), 341–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2013.839567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamb, R. L., Etopio, E., Hand, B., & Yoon, S. Y. (2019). Virtual reality simulation: Effects on academic performance within two domains of writing in science. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28(1), 371–381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09774-y
   Google Scholar
• Lan, Y. C., Lo, Y. L., & Hsu, Y. S. (2014). The effects of meta-cognitive instruction on students’ reading comprehension in computerized reading contexts: A quantitative meta-analysis. Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 186–202. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.17.4.186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lan, Y. J. (2020). Immersion, interaction and experience-oriented learning: Bringing virtual reality into FL learning. Language Learning & Technology, 24(1), 1–5. https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/bitstream/10125/44704/1/24_1_10125-44704.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latifi, S., Noroozi, O., & Talaee, E. (2020). Worked example or scripting? Fostering students’ online argumentative peer feedback, essay writing and learning, Interactive Learning Environments, 28(3), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1799032
   Google Scholar
• Law, L. (2020). Creativity and multimodality: Analytical framework for creativity in multimodal texts (AFCMT). Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 14(1-2), 36–69. https://doi.org/10.1558/lhs.33598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C. (2020). A study of adolescent English learners’ cognitive engagement in writing while using an automated content feedback system. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(1-2), 26–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1544152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K. W., Said, N., & Tan, C. K. (2016). Exploring the affordances of The writing portal (TWP) as an online supplementary writing platform (for the special issue of GLoCALL 2013 and 2014 conference papers). Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(6), 1116–1135. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2016.1172644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. (2019). Her story or their own stories? Digital game-based learning, student creativity, and creative writing. ReCALL, 31(3), 238–254. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344019000028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. M. (2020). The impact of using machine translation on EFL students’ writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(3), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1553186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. M., & Briggs, N. (2021). Effects of using machine translation to mediate the revision process of Korean university students’ academic writing. ReCALL, 33(1), 18–33. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344020000191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H., Majumdar, R., Chen, M. R. A., & Ogata, H. (2021). Goal-oriented active learning (GOAL) system to promote reading engagement, self-directed learning behavior, and motivation in extensive reading. Computers & Education, 171(1), 104239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104239
   Google Scholar
• Li, Z., Dursun, A., & Hegelheimer, V. (2017). Technology and L2 writing. In C. A. Chapelle & S. Sauro (Eds.), The handbook of technology and second language teaching and learning (pp. 62–76). Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Liao, C. C. Y., Chang, W. C., & Chan, T. W. (2018). The effects of participation, performance, and interest in a game-based writing environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(1), 211–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12233
   Google Scholar
• Liaw, M. L., & English, K. (2017). Technologies for teaching and learning L2 reading. In C. A. Chapelle & S. Sauro (Eds.), The handbook of technology and second language teaching and learning (pp. 62–76). Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, V., Liu, G. Z., & Chen, N. S. (2020). The effects of an augmented-reality ubiquitous writing application: A comparative pilot project for enhancing EFL writing instruction. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1770291
   Google Scholar
• Link, S., Mehrzad, M., & Rahimi, M. (2020). Impact of automated writing evaluation on teacher feedback, student revision, and writing improvement. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1743323
   Google Scholar
• Liu, C., Hou, J., Tu, Y. F., Wang, Y., & Hwang, G. J. (2021). Incorporating a reflective thinking promoting mechanism into artificial intelligence-supported English writing environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.2012812
   Google Scholar
• Liu, S., & Kunnan, A. (2015). Investigating the application of automated writing evaluation to Chinese undergraduate English majors: A Case study of WriteToLearn. CALICO Journal, 33(1), 34–56. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v33i1.26380
   Google Scholar
• Liu, X., & Pei, J. (2021). Effects of IELTS reading education by using new media learning environments effectively. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1990086
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Y. T., & Leveridge, A. N. (2017). E-books and implicit L2 vocabulary acquisition. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loftus-Rattan, S. M., & Furey, J. (2021). Word learning in first grade: Evaluating the effectiveness of a technology-based and an extended vocabulary intervention. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 37(4), 317–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2020.1800540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lysenko, L., Abrami, P. C., Wade, A., Marsh, J., WaGioko, M., & Kiforo, E. (2019). Promoting young Kenyans’ growth in literacy with educational technology: A tale of two years of implementation. International Journal of Educational Research, 95(1), 176–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.02.013
   Google Scholar
• Ma, M. Y., & Wei, C. C. (2016). A comparative study of children's concentration performance on picture books: Age, gender, and media forms. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(8), 1922–1937. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1060505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, Q. (2020). Examining the role of inter-group peer online feedback on wiki writing in an EAP context. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(3), 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1556703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manegre, M., & Gutiérrez-Colón, M. (2020). Foreign language learning through collaborative writing in knowledge building forums. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1836499
   Google Scholar
• Maune, M. J. (2016). Toward a genre writing curriculum: Schooling genres in the Common Core State Standards (Doctoral dissertation). Purdue University.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, T. H., Hwang, W. Y., Pham, X. L., & Pham, T. (2020). Self-experienced storytelling in an authentic context to facilitate EFL writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1744665
   Google Scholar
• Niemelä, M., Kärkkäinen, T., Äyrämö, S., Ronimus, M., Richardson, U., & Lyytinen, H. (2020). Game learning analytics for understanding reading skills in transparent writing system. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(1), 2376–2390. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12916
   Google Scholar
• Noroozi, O., Hatami, J., Bayat, A., van Ginkel, S., Biemans, H. J. A., & Mulder, M. (2018). Students’ online argumentative peer feedback, essay writing, and content learning: Does gender matter? Interactive Learning Environments, 26(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1543200
   Google Scholar
• Ok, M. W., Haggerty, N., & Whaley, A. (2020). Effects of video modeling using an augmented reality iPad application on phonics performance of students who struggle with reading. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 37(2), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2020.1723152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oskoz, A., & Elola, I. (2016). Digital stories: Bringing multimodal texts to the Spanish writing classroom. ReCALL, 28(3), 326–342. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344016000094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, H., & Kim, D. (2015). English language learners’ strategies for reading computer-based texts at home and in school. CALICO Journal, 33(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v33i3.26552
   Google Scholar
• Peeters, W., & Pretorius, M. (2020). Facebook or fail-book: Exploring “community” in a virtual community of practice. ReCALL, 32(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344020000099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Segura, J. J., Ruiz, R. S., González- Calero, J. A., & Cózar-Gutiérrez, R. (2020). The effect of personalized feedback on listening and reading skills in the learning of EFL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1705354
   Google Scholar
• Pham, V. H. (2021). The effects of lecturer’s model e-comments on graduate students’ peer e-comments and writing revision. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(3), 324–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1609521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham, V. P. H., & Usaha, S. (2016). Blog-based peer response for L2 writing revision. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(4), 724–748. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2015.1026355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponce, H. R., Mayer, R. E., Figueroa, V. A., & López, M. J. (2018). Interactive highlighting for just-in-time formative assessment during whole-class instruction: Effects on vocabulary learning and reading comprehension. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(1), 42–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2017.1282878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proske, A., Roscoe, R. D., & McNamara, D. S. (2014). Game-based practice versus traditional practice in computer-based writing strategy training: Effects on motivation and achievement. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62(5), 481–505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-014-9349-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puentedura, R. R. (2013, May 29). SAMR: Moving from enhancement to transformation [blog post]. http://www.hippasus.com/rrpweblog/archives/000095.html
   Google Scholar
• Rahimi, M., & Fathi, J. (2021). Exploring the impact of wiki-mediated collaborative writing on EFL students’ writing performance, writing self-regulation, and writing self-efficacy: A mixed methods study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 38(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1888753
   Google Scholar
• Rau, P. L. P., Zheng, J., Guo, Z., & Li, J. (2018). Speed reading on virtual reality and augmented reality. Computers & Education, 125(1), 240–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.016
   Google Scholar
• Razak, N. A., & Saeed, M. A. (2015). EFL Arab learners’ peer revision of writing in a Facebook group: Contributions to written texts and sense of online community. English Language Teaching, 8(12), 11–26. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n12p11
   Google Scholar
• Rubino, I., Barberis, C., & Malnati, G. (2018). Exploring the values of writing collaboratively through a digital storytelling platform: A mixed-methods analysis of users’ participation, perspectives and practices. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(7), 882–894. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2017.1419499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmerón, L., Delgado, P., & Mason, L. (2020). Using eye-movement modelling examples to improve critical reading of multiple webpages on a conflicting topic. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(1), 1038–1051. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12458
   Google Scholar
• Salmerón, L., & Llorens, A. (2018). Instruction of digital reading strategies based on EyeMovements modeling examples. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(2), 343–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117751605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saricaoglu, A. (2019). The impact of automated feedback on L2 learners’ written causal explanations. ReCALL, 31(2), 189–203. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095834401800006X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saricaoglu, A., & Bilki, Z. (2021). Voluntary use of automated writing evaluation by content course students. ReCALL, 33(3), 265–277. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344021000021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selcuk, H., Jones, J., & Vonkova, H. (2021). The emergence and influence of group leaders in web-based collaborative writing: Self-reported accounts of EFL learners. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(8), 1040–1060. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1650781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shang, H. F. (2016). Exploring metacognitive strategies and hypermedia annotations on foreign language reading. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(5), 610–623. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2016.1171787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shang, H. F. (2019). Exploring online peer feedback and automated corrective feedback on EFL writing performance. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1629601
   Google Scholar
• Singh, B. D., Moore, D. W., Furlonger, B. E., Anderson, A., Fall, R., & Howorth, S. (2021). Reading comprehension and autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review of interventions involving single-case experimental designs. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 8(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40489-020-00200-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smeets, D., & Bus, A. (2015). The interactive animated e-book as a word learning device for kindergartners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(4), 899–920. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716413000556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strobl, C. (2014). Affordances of Web 2.0 technologies for collaborative advanced writing in a foreign language. Calico Journal, 31(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.31.1.1-18
   Google Scholar
• Strobl, C. (2015). Attitudes towards online feedback on writing: Why students mistrust the learning potential of models. ReCALL, 27(3), 340–357. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344015000099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Such, B. (2019). Scaffolding English language learners for online collaborative writing activities. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(2), 30–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1579233
   Google Scholar
• Swaggerty, E. A., & Broemmel, A. D. (2017). Authenticity, relevance, and connectedness: Graduate students’ learning preferences and experiences in an online reading education course. The Internet and Higher Education, 32(1), 80–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.10.002
   Google Scholar
• Takacs, Z. K., Swart, E. K., & Bus, A. G. (2015). Benefits and pitfalls of multimedia and interactive features in technology-enhanced storybooks: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 85(4), 698–739. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314566989
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanrıkulu, F. (2021). Students’ perceptions about the effects of collaborative digital storytelling on writing skills. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 38(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1774611
   Google Scholar
• Teng, M. F. (2021). Interactive-whiteboard-technology-supported collaborative writing: Writing achievement, metacognitive activities, and co-regulation patterns. System, 97(1), 102426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102426
   Google Scholar
• ter Beek, M., Brummer, L., Donker, A. S., & Opdenakker, M. C. J. L. (2018). Supporting secondary school students’ reading comprehension in computer environments: A systematic review. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, 34(1), 557–566. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12260
   Google Scholar
• Thoms, J. J., & Poole, F. (2017). Investigating linguistic, literary, and social affordances of l2 collaborative reading. Language Learning and Technology, 21(2), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, S. C. (2018). Implementing interactive courseware into EFL business writing: Computational assessment and learning satisfaction. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(4), 40–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1451896
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, S. C. (2020). Chinese students’ perceptions of using Google Translate as a translingual CALL tool in EFL writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37(2), 50–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1799412
   Google Scholar
• Tseng, S. S., & Yeh, H. C. (2017). Integrating reciprocal teaching in an online environment with an annotation feature to enhance low-achieving students’ English reading comprehension. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(2), 20–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2017.1412989
   Google Scholar
• Tseng, W. T., Liou, H. J., & Chu, H. C. (2020). Vocabulary learning in virtual environments: Learner autonomy and collaboration. System, 96(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.102190
   Google Scholar
• Turan, Z., & Akdag-Cimen, B. (2020). Flipped classroom in English language teaching: A systematic review. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(5-6), 590–606. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1584117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Ven, M., de Leeuw, L., van Weerdenburg, M., & Steenbeek-Planting, E. G. (2017). Early reading intervention by means of a multicomponent reading game. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(1), 320–333. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12181
   Google Scholar
• van Weerdenburg, M., Tesselhof, M., & van der Meijden, H. (2019). Touch-typing for better spelling and narrative-writing skills on the computer. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(1), 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L. (2019). Effects of regulation on interaction pattern in web-based collaborative writing activity. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1667831
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y. (2017). Exploring the effectiveness of integrating augmented reality-based materials to support writing activities. Computers and Education, 113(9), 162–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.04.013
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y. C. (2015). Promoting collaborative writing through wikis: A new approach for advancing innovative and active learning in an ESP context. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(6), 499–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.881386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, C. C., & Ma, M. Y. (2017). Influences of visual attention and reading time on children and adults. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 33(2), 97–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2015.1092100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilken, J. (2016). Perceptions of L1 glossed feedback in automated writing evaluation: A Case study. CALICO Journal, 35(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.26383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, R., Jesson, R., & Shepherd, D. (2020). The summer learning journey: Ameliorating the summer learning effect using blogging. Computers & Education, 145(1), 103738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103738
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J., Ahrendt, C., Fudge, E. A., Raiche, A., Beard, G., & MacArthur, C. (2021). Elementary teachers’ perceptions of automated feedback and automated scoring: Transforming the teaching and learning of writing using automated writing evaluation. Computers & Education, 168(1), 104208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104208
   Google Scholar
• Wood, E., Grant, A. K., Gottardo, A., Savage, R., & Evans, M. A. (2017). Software to promote young children's growth in literacy: A comparison of online and offline formats. Early Childhood Education Journal, 45(2), 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-016-0779-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, T. T. (2016). A learning log analysis of an English-reading e-book system combined with a guidance mechanism. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(8), 1938–1956. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1070272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, W. C. V., Petit, E., & Chen, C. H. (2015). EFL writing revision with blind expert and peer review using a CMC open forum. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(1), 58–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.937442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, W. C. V., Yang, J. C., Hsieh, J. S. C., & Yamamoto, T. (2019). Free from demotivation in EFL writing: The use of online flipped writing instruction. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1567556
   Google Scholar
• Wu, Z., & Chiang, F. K. (2021). Effectiveness of keyboard-based English vocabulary practice application on vocational school students. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1922461
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Y. (2021). Investigating the effects of digital multimodal composing on Chinese EFL learners’ writing performance: A quasi-experimental study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 38(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1945635
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Y., Wang, D., Collins, P., Lee, H., & Warschauer, M. (2021). Same benefits, different communication patterns: Comparing children's reading with a conversational agent vs. A human partner. Computers & Education, 161(1), 104059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104059
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Y., Yau, J. C., & Reich, S. M. (2020). Press, swipe and read: Do interactive features facilitate engagement and learning with e-books? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(1), 212–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Z., Banerjee, M., Ramirez, G., Zhu, G., & Wijekumar, K. (2018). The effectiveness of educational technology applications on adult English language learners’ writing quality: A meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(1-2), 132–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1501069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamaç, A., Ergü, Ö, & Mutlu Neş, M. (2020). Effect of digital writing instruction with tablets on primary school students’ writing performance and writing knowledge. Computers & Education, 157(1), 103881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103981
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Y. F. (2016). Transforming and constructing academic knowledge through online peer feedback in summary writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(4), 683–702. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2015.1016440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y. F. (2018). New language knowledge construction through indirect feedback in web-based collaborative writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(4), 459–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1414852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., & Qian, D. D. (2020). Promoting L2 English learners’ reading proficiency through computerized dynamic assessment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(5-6), 628–652. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1585882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yen, Y. C., Hou, H. T., & Chang, K. E. (2015). Applying role-playing strategy to enhance learners’ writing and speaking skills in EFL courses using Facebook and Skype as learning tools: A case study in Taiwan. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(5), 383–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2013.839568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yueh, H. P., Lin, W., Wang, S. C., & Fu, L. C. (2020). Reading with robot and human companions in library literacy activities: A comparison study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(1), 1884–1900. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13016
   Google Scholar
• Zaini, A., & Mazdayasna, G. (2015). The impact of computer-based instruction on the development of EFL learners’ writing skills. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(6), 516–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhai, N., & Ma, X. (2021). Automated writing evaluation (AWE) feedback: A systematic investigation of college students’ acceptance. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 38(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1897019
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, R., & Zou, D. (2021). Types, features, and effectiveness of technologies in collaborative writing for second language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 38(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1880441
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, M., Liu, O. L., & Lee, H. S. (2020). The effect of automated feedback on revision behavior and learning gains in formative assessment of scientific argument writing. Computers & Education, 143(1), 103668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103668
   Google Scholar
• Zou, B., Wang, D., & Xing, M. (2016). Collaborative tasks in wiki-based environment in EFL learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(5), 1000–1016. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2015.1121878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar