Real time learning during and after the pandemic: how to productively use chat and polling

References

• Bain, K. (2004). What the best college teachers do. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruff, D. (2019). Intentional tech: Principles to guide the Use of Educational Technology in College teaching. West Virginia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Camacho-Minano, M., & del Campo, C. (2016). Useful interactive teaching tool for learning: Clickers in higher education†. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(4), 706–723. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2014.917108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caplan, J. (2021). How To Create a Digital Teaching Toolkit. Teaching in Higher Ed Podcast, 17 June.
   Google Scholar
• Cohn, J. (2021). Who Chooses What Ed Tech to Buy for the College Classroom? The Chronicle of Higher Education, 3 June.
   Google Scholar
• Dangel, H. L., & Wang, C. X. (2008). Student response systems in higher education: Moving beyond linear teaching and surface learning. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 1(1), 93–104. https://aquila.usm.edu/jetde/vol1/iss1/8/ https://doi.org/10.18785/jetde.0101.08
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, R. E., Laga, E. E., Leon, J., Villafañe, S., Stains, M., Murphy, K., & Raker, J. R. (2017). Chasm crossed? Clicker Use in postsecondary chemistry education. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(5), 549–557. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, C. R., Tripp, T. R., Seawright, L., & Joeckell, G. L. (2007). Empowering or compelling reluctant participators using audience response systems. Active Learning in Higher Education, 8(3), 233–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787407081885
   Google Scholar
• Huang, B., Hew, K. F., & Lo, C. K. (2019). Investigating the effects of gamification-enhanced flipped learning on undergraduate students’ behavioral and cognitive engagement. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(8), 1106–1126. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1495653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung, H. T. (2017). Clickers in the flipped classroom: Bring your Own device (BYOD) to promote student learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(8), 983–995. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2016.1240090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanov, I. D. (2019). The Use of interactive student response software in an introductory international relations course. Journal of Political Science Education, published online 09 December. https://doi.org/10.1080/15512169.2019.1694533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay, R. H., & LeSage, A. (2009). Examining the benefits and challenges of using audience response systems: A review of the literature. Computers & Education, 53(3), 819–827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, J. M. (2016). Small teaching: Everyday lessons from the science of teaching. Josey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, C., Chen, S., Chi, C., Chien, K. P., Liu, Y., & Chou, T. L. (2017). The effects of clickers With different teaching strategies. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 55(5), 603–628. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633116674213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazur, E. (1997). Peer instruction: A user’s manual. Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Mazur, E. (2012). “Eric Mazur Shows Interactive Teaching”. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wont2v_LZ1E, YouTube, 9 February.
   Google Scholar
• McMurtrie, B. (2021). What One Department Learned About Making Online Teaching Work. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 18 March.
   Google Scholar
• Molla, R. (2020). The Pandemic was Great for Zoom. What Happens when There’s a Vaccine?. Vox, 4 December.
   Google Scholar
• Newland, S. A., & Black, B. (2020). More than multiple choice: A toolbox for incorporating clickers into political science courses. Journal of Political Science Education, 16(2), 158–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/15512169.2018.1544906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pew. (2014). Faith and skepticism about trade, foreign investment. Pew Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Pew. (2017). Spring 2017 global attitudes survey. Pew Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Ricke, A. (2022). Enhancing classroom interaction: The integration of image-sharing projection software in social science and humanities classrooms. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(2), 276–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1652834
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, J. (2022). How To Run a Better Discussion Board: A Template and a Response to Critics. The Scholarly Teacher, 16 March
   Google Scholar
• Rosling, H. (2018). Factfulness: Ten reasons we’re wrong about the world—And Why things are better than You think. Flatiron Books.
   Google Scholar
• Whitmarsh, L., & Corner, A. (2017). Tools for a New climate conversation: A mixed-methods study of language for public engagement across the political spectrum. Global Environmental Change, 42(1), 122–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.12.008
   Google Scholar
• Wood, R., & Shirazi, S. (2020). A systematic review of audience response systems for teaching and learning in higher education: The student experience. Computers & Education, 153, 103896–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., Zhang, H., Chai, H., & Xu, W. (2022). Design and application of intelligent teaching space for blended teaching. Interactive Learning Environments, published online 24 January. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2028857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zull, J. E. (2002). The Art of changing the brain. Stylus Publishing.
   Google Scholar