3,661
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Factors influencing EFL teachers’ implementation of SPOC-based blended learning in higher vocational colleges in China: A study based on grounded theory

ORCID Icon
Pages 859-878 | Received 01 Apr 2022, Accepted 07 Jul 2022, Published online: 21 Jul 2022

References

  • Abbas, T. (2016). Social factors affecting students’ acceptance of e-learning environments in developing and developed countries. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 7(2), 200–212. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTT-11-2015-0042
  • Adekola, J., Dale, V. H., & Gardiner, K. (2017). Development of an institutional framework to guide transitions into enhanced blended learning in higher education. Research in Learning Technology, 25. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v25.1973/rlt.v25.1973
  • Ankit, A., Nachouki, M., & Abou Naaj, M. (2015). Blended learning at ajman University of Science and technology. In P. Ellerani (Ed.), Curriculum design and classroom management (pp. 975–998). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-8246-7.ch054
  • Antwi-Boampong, A. (2020). Towards a faculty blended learning adoption model for higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 25(3), 1639–1662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10019-z
  • Apandi, A. M., & Raman, A. (2020). Factors affecting successful implementation of blended learning at higher education. International journal of instruction. Technology, and Social Sciences (IJITSS), 1(1), 13–23.
  • Apriska, E. (2020). Flipped classroom research trends in mathematics learning in Indonesia. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1613(1), 012030. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1613/1/012030
  • Bai, H. (2021). An empirical study on the influencing factors of blended teaching quality of Public English in higher vocational colleges. Vocational Technology, 3, 65–70+75. https://doi.org/10.19552/j.cnki.issn1672-0601.2021.03.013
  • Bai, X., & Han, X. (2019). Research on implementation strategies of leaders for blended learning in adult college. e-Education Research, 40(7), 101–109. https://doi.org/10.13811/j.cnki.eer.2019.07.013
  • Bai, X., & Han, X. (2020). University strategies of blended learning implementation with external support. Tsinghua Journal of Education, 41(3), 140–148. https://doi.org/10.14138/j.1001-4519.2020.03.014009
  • Bai, X., & Han, X. (2022). Research on the influencing factors of teachers’ blended learning—qualitative research based on an adult university. Adult Education, 1, 65–70. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-8794.2022.01.011
  • Bhuasiri, W., Xaymoungkhoun, O., Zo, H., Rho, J. J., & Ciganek, A. P. (2012). Critical success factors for e-learning in developing countries: A comparative analysis between ICT experts and faculty. Computers & Education, 58(2), 843–855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.010
  • Bokolo, A. J. (2021). Institutional factors for faculty members implementation of blended learning in higher education. Education + Training, 63(5), 701–719. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-06-2020-0179
  • Bolliger, D. U., & Wasilik, O. (2009). Factors influencing faculty satisfaction with online teaching and learning in higher education. Distance Education, 30(1), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910902845949
  • Chan, E. Y. M. (2019). Blended learning dilemma: Teacher education in the confucian heritage culture. Australian Journal of Teacher Education), 44(1), 36–51. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2018v44n1.3
  • Dang, Q. (2019). Research on SPOC online learning behavior and its influencing factors [Master’s thesis, Hangzhou Normal University]. https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbname=CMFD201902&filename=1019921516.nh
  • Dashtestani, R. (2014). Computer literacy of Iranian teachers of English as a foreign language: Challenges and obstacles. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 9(1), 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/18334105.2014.11082022
  • de los Arcos, B., Farrow, R., Pitt, R., Weller, M. & McAndrew, P. (2016). Adapting the curriculum: How K-12 teachers perceive the role of open educational resources. Journal of Online Learning Research, 2(1), 23–40. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/151664/
  • Dintoe, S. S. (2019). Technology innovation diffusion at the University of Botswana: A comparative literature survey. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 15(1), 255–282.
  • Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299597
  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1977). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Journal of Business Venturing, 44(5), 177–189.
  • Fox, A. (2013). Viewpoint: From MOOCs to SPOCs. Communications of the ACM, 56(12), 38. https://libproxy.umflint.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/viewpoint-moocs-spocs/docview/2049933781/se-2?accountid=14584 https://doi.org/10.1145/2535918
  • Garrote, R., & Pettersson, T. (2016). Lecturers’ attitudes about the use of learning management systems in engineering education: A Swedish case study. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 23(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1256
  • Gedik, N., Kiraz, E., & Ozden, M. Y. (2013). Design of a blended learning environment: Considerations and implementation issues. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.6
  • General Office of the Ministry of Education. (2020). Temporary measures for the naming of colleges and universities, 2020. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A03/s7050/202008/t20200827_480729.html
  • Glaser, B. G. (1992). Emergence vs. Forcing: Basis of grounded theory analysis. Sociology Press.
  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Transaction Publishers.
  • Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-9022-5
  • Hoffman, M. S. (2013) An examination of motivating factors on faculty participation in online higher education [Doctoral dissertation, Northeastern University].
  • Hu, R. (2008). The present situation and countermeasures of English teaching in vocational education. Shandong Foreign Language Teaching, 4, 110–112. https://doi.org/10.16482/j.sdwy37-1026.2008.04.021
  • Jiang, D. (2021). An analysis of the influencing factors and coping strategies of English listening and speaking blended teaching in higher vocational colleges. English on Campus, (21), 48–49.
  • Jin, X., & Shi, W. (2022). Reshaping the social status of vocational education–an interpretation of the general part of the newly revised vocational education Law of the People's Republic of China. Exploration of Higher Vocational Education, (3), 1–6.
  • Jing, Y., Li, X., & Jiang, X. (2021). Analysis of factors that influence behavioral intention to use online learning and enlightenment in the post COVID-19 education. China Educational Technology, 6, 31–38.
  • Joo, Y. J., So, H. J., & Kim, N. H. (2018). Examination of relationships among students’ self-determination, technology acceptance, satisfaction, and continuance intention to use K-MOOCs. Computers & Education, 122, 260–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.01.003
  • Jung, H. J. (2015). Fostering an English teaching environment: Factors influencing English as a foreign language teachers’ adoption of mobile learning. Informatics in Education, 14(2), 219–241. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2015.13
  • Kabakçı-Yurdakul, I., Ursavaş, ÖF, & Becit-İşçitürk, G. (2014). An integrated approach for preservice teachers’ acceptance and use of technology: UTAUTPST scale. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 55(55), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2014.55.2
  • Kasse, J. P., Musa, M., & Nansubuga, A. K. (2015). Facilitating condition for E-learning adoption—case of Ugandan universities. Journal of Communication and Computer, 12(5), 244–249. https://doi.org/10.17265/1548-7709/2015.05.004
  • Khan, M. S. H., Bibi, S., & Hasan, M. (2016). Australian technical teachers’ experience of technology integration in teaching. Sage Open, 6(3), 215824401666360. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016663609
  • Kihoza, P. D., Zlotnikova, İ., Bada, J. K. & Kalegele, K. (2016). An assessment of teachers’ abilities to support blended learning implementation in Tanzanian secondary schools. Contemporary Educational Technology, 7(1), 60–84. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6163
  • Kleijnen, M., Lievens, A., de Ruyter, K., & Wetzels, M. (2009). Knowledge creation through mobile social networks and its impact on intentions to use innovative mobile services. Journal of Service Research, 12(1), 15–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670509333238
  • Kuang, S., Zhang, H., Lu, J., & Zhou, G. (2019). Research on the model construction of the influencing factors of SPOC learning intention of college students based on PRATAM. Modern Distance Education, (5), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.13927/j.cnki.yuan.2019.0049.
  • Lee, C. S., Osop, H., Goh, D. H.-L., & Kelni, G. (2017). Making sense of comments on YouTube educational videos: A self-directed learning perspective. Online Information Review, 41(5), 611–625. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-09-2016-0274
  • Li, B. (2022). Ready for online? Exploring EFL teachers’ ICT acceptance and ICT literacy during COVID-19 in mainland China. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 60(1), 196–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331211028934
  • Li, L. (2014). Understanding language teachers’ practice with educational technology: A case from China. System, 46, 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.07.016
  • Li, L., & Walsh, S. (2010). Technology uptake in Chinese EFL classes. Language Teaching Research, 15(1), 99–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810383347
  • Li, M. (2021). A study on teachers’ effective teaching behavior in College English blended teaching in higher vocational colleges. Overseas English, (12), 258–259.
  • Li, X., Yan, W., & Li, Y. (2018). Research on the influence of blended teaching mode on teachers’ ability. Technology Wind, 33, 44. https://doi.org/10.19392/j.cnki.1671-7341.201833037
  • Liu, M. (2018). Research on the influential factors of college teachers’ acceptance towards blended learning–from the perspective of diffusion of innovations theory. Modern Educational Technology, 2, 54–60. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-8097.2018.02.008
  • Ma, L., & Lee, C. (2019). Investigating the adoption of MOOCs: A technology–user–environment perspective. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(1), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12314
  • Ma, M., Chen, J., Zheng, P., & Wu, Y. (2020). Factors affecting EFL teachers’ affordance transfer of ICT resources in China. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1709210
  • McLaren, J. H., & Kenny, L. P. (2016). Motivating change from lecture-tutorial modes to less traditional forms of teaching. Australian Universities’ Review, 16(6), 1893–1919. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1130765
  • Mediani, H. S. (2017). An introduction to classical grounded theory. SOJ Nursing & Health Care, 3(3), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.15226/2471-6529/3/3/00135
  • Ministry of Education, People’s Republic of China. (2007). College English curriculum requirements. Ministry of Education.
  • Mustapa, M. A. S., & Ibrahim, M. (2015). Engaging vocational college students through blended learning: Improving class attendance and participation. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 204, 127–135.
  • Ngimwa, P., & Wilson, T. (2012). An empirical investigation of the emergent issues around OER adoption in sub-saharan Africa. Learning, Media and Technology, 37(4), 398–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2012.685076
  • Osman, N., & Hamzah, M. I. (2017). Student readiness in learning arabic language based on blended learning. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 6(5), 83–89. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.6n.5p.83
  • Porter, W. W., & Graham, C. R. (2016). Institutional drivers and barriers to faculty adoption of blended learning in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(4), 748–762. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12269
  • Rahman, N. A. (2014). Measuring teachers’ readiness in implementing virtual learning environment in primary classroom [Master’s thesis, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak]. https://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/8704/1/Measuring%20Teachers%20Readiness%20in%20Implementing%20VLE%20(Virtual%20Learning%20Environment)%20In%20Primary%20Classroom%20(24pgs).pdf
  • Salim, H., Lee, P. Y., Ghazali, S. S., Ching, S. M., Ali, H., Shamsuddin, N. H., & Dzulkarnain, D. H. A. (2018). Perceptions toward a pilot project on blended learning in Malaysian family medicine postgraduate training: A qualitative study. BMC Medical Education, 18(1), 206. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1315-y
  • Shi, P. (2017). Analysis on influencing factors of blended teaching quality in higher vocational colleges. Course Education Research, (34), 35.
  • Smith, J. A., & Sivo, S. A. (2012). Predicting continued use of online teacher professional development and the influence of social presence and sociability. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(6), 871–882. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01223.x
  • Smits, A., & Voogt, J. (2017). Elements of satisfactory online asynchronous teacher behaviour in higher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33, 2. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2929
  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology: An overview. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 273–285). Sage Publications, Inc.
  • Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Frontmatter.
  • Taherdoost, H. (2018). A review of technology acceptance and adoption models and theories. Procedia Manufacturing, 22, 960–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.03.137
  • Teo, T. (2011). Factors influencing teachers’ intention to use technology: Model development and test. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2432–2440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.008
  • Teo, T., Fan, X., & Du, J. (2015). Technology acceptance among pre-service teachers: Does gender matter? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(3), 235–251. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.v0i0.1672
  • Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412
  • Wang, H. (2009). Research on online consumer stickiness [Master’s thesis]. Shandong University.
  • Wang, J., & Liu, W. (2022). Research on influencing factors of online course users’ sticky behavior. Distance Education in China, 3, 61–67+75. https://doi.org/10.13541/j.cnki.chinade.2022.03.006
  • Wang, Y., & Ma, X. (2020). Research on blended teaching ability of college English teachers. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 08(12), 308–319. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2020.812025
  • Wang, Y., Yun, F., Gui, Y., & Lu Xiaoli (2021). The development course, problems, challenges and optimization path of vocational and technical universities in China. Research on Vocational Education Development (04), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.19796/j.cnki.2096-6555.2021.04.005
  • Win, N. L., & Wynn, S. D. (2015). Introducing blended learning practices in our classrooms. Journal of Institutional Research South East Asia, 13(2), 17–27.
  • Xu, D. (2016). Exploring influential factors on implementing blended learning in higher education—a longitudinal case study of fuzhou university. China Educational Technology, 12, 141–145. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-9860.2016.12.025
  • Xu, Q, Liu, X, Zhang, H. (2021). Construction and empirical analysis of continuous learning behavior model of college students in online learning environment. Journal of Hubei Normal University (Natural Science), (04), 62–68.
  • Xu, Y., Zheng, G., & Yu, H. (2020). An empirical study on the influencing factors of vocational: College teachers’ online teaching during the epidemic period. Vocational and Technical Education, (12), 17–22.
  • Yahya, M., Nadzar, F., & Rahman, B. A. (2012). Examining user acceptance of E-syariah portal Among syariah users in Malaysia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 67, 349–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.338
  • Yang, S. C., & Huang, Y.-F. (2008). A study of high school English teachers’ behavior, concerns and beliefs in integrating information technology into English instruction. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 1085–1103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.03.009
  • Yeop, M. A., Yaakob, M. F. M., Wong, K. T., Don, Y., & Zain, F. M. (2019). Implementation of ICT policy (blended learning approach): Investigating factors of behavioural intention and use behaviour. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 767–782. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12149a
  • Zhang, X., & Zhu, Z. (2016). Research on online teachers’ role identity and professional development—a case study of young teachers in China open university. China Youth Study, 5, 74–79+32. https://doi.org/10.19633/j.cnki.11-2579/d.2016.05.012
  • Zhao, J., & Zhang, L. (2017). An empirical study on college teachers’ acceptance of blended teaching—from the perspective of the integration of DTPB and TTF. Modern Educational Technology, 27(10), 67–73.
  • Zhao, L., Feng, J., & Gao, S. (2021). Research on influencing factors of college students’ continuous learning behavior in online education environment. Heilongjiang Higher Education Research, 39(2), 141–146. https://doi.org/10.19903/j.cnki.cn23-1074/g.2021.02.025
  • Zhu, S., & Deng, X. (2015). Study on influence factors of older adults’ online health information seeking. Library and Information Service, 5, 60–67+93. https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2015.05.010
  • Zhu, T. (2017). Problems and training strategies of higher vocational teachers’ teaching ability in blended learning environment. Journal of Vocational Education, (32), 10–13.