170
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Self-efficacy is stronger than social support in predicting technology-enhanced hands-on learning

&
Received 27 Jan 2022, Accepted 13 Sep 2022, Published online: 01 Oct 2022

References

  • Al-Rahmi, W. M., Alias, N., Othman, M. S., Marin, V. I., & Tur, G. (2018). A model of factors affecting learning performance through the use of social media in Malaysian higher education. Computers & Education, 121, 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.010
  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  • Chang, C. C., & Chen, Y. (in press). Using mastery learning theory to develop task-centered hands-on STEM learning of Arduino-based educational robotics: Psychomotor performance and perception by a convergent parallel mixed method. Interactive Learning Environments, https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1741400
  • Chao, C. M. (2019). Factors determining the behavioral intention to use mobile learning: An application and extension of the UTAUT model. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1652. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01652
  • Chen, H. Y., Wang, D. C., Wu, C. C., & Huang, Y. M. (in press). Social interaction ties drive students participate in flipped civic education continuously. Interactive Learning Environments, https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.2005104
  • Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern business research methods (pp. 295–336). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Chin, W. W., & Newsted, P. R. (1999). Structural equation modeling analysis with small samples using partial least squares. In R. Hoyle (Ed.), Statistical strategies for small sample research (pp. 307–341). Sage Publications.
  • Chu, S. L., Quek, F., Bhangaonkar, S., Ging, A. B., & Sridharamurthy, K. (2015). Making the maker: A means-to-an-ends approach to nurturing the maker mindset in elementary-aged children. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 5, 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2015.08.002
  • Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14), 1111–1132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x
  • Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. Macmillan.
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
  • Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331–362. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.322
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis. Prentice-Hall.
  • Hollman, A. K., Hollman, T. J., Shimerdla, F., Bice, M. R., & Adkins, M. (2019). Information technology pathways in education: Interventions with middle school students. Computers & Education, 135, 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.019
  • Hsiao, H. S., Lin, Y. W., Lin, K. Y., Lin, C. Y., Chen, J. H., & Chen, J. C. (2022). Using robot-based practices to develop an activity that incorporated the 6E model to improve elementary school students’ learning performances. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(1), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1636090
  • Huang, T. C., Wang, Y. J., & Lai, H. M. (2022). What drives internet entrepreneurial intention to use technology products? An investigation of technology product imagination disposition, social support, and motivation. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 829256. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.829256
  • Huang, Y. M. (2020a). Students’ continuance intention toward programming games: Hedonic and utilitarian aspects. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 36(4), 393–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1647665
  • Huang, Y. M. (2020b). What drives students to continue using social mindtools? The perspectives of social support and social influence. Computers in Human Behavior, 111, 106447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106447
  • Laird, Y., Fawkner, S., & Niven, A. (2018). A grounded theory of how social support influences physical activity in adolescent girls. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 13(1), 1435099. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2018.1435099
  • Liao, S., Hong, J. C., Wen, M. H., Pan, Y. C., & Wu, Y. W. (2018). Applying technology acceptance model (TAM) to explore users’ behavioral intention to adopt a performance assessment system for e-book production. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(10), em1601. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/93575
  • Liao, Y. W., Huang, Y. M., & Wang, Y. S. (2015). Factors affecting students’ continued usage intention toward business simulation games: An empirical study. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 53(2), 260–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633115598751
  • Lin, K. Y., Lu, S. C., Hsiao, H. H., Kao, C. P., & Williams, P. J. (in press). Developing student imagination and career interest through a STEM project using 3D printing with repetitive modeling. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.19136
  • Liu, C. H., & Huang, Y. M. (2015). An empirical investigation of computer simulation technology acceptance to explore the factors that affect user intention. Universal Access in the Information Society, 14(3), 449–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-015-0402-7
  • Liu, Y., Su, X., Du, X., & Cui, F. (2019). How social support motivates trust and purchase intentions in mobile social commerce. Review of Business Management, 21(5), 839–860. https://doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v21i5.4025
  • Luse, A., & Rursch, J. (2021). Using a virtual lab network testbed to facilitate real-world hands-on learning in a networking course. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(3), 1244–1261. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13070
  • Martín-Ramos, P., Lopes, M. J., da Silva, M. M. L., Gomes, P. E., da Silva, P. S. P., Domingues, J. P., & Silva, M. R. (2018). Reprint of ‘first exposure to Arduino through peer-coaching: Impact on students’ attitudes towards programming’. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 420–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.12.011
  • Marcoulides, G. A., & Saunders, C. (2006). Editor's comments: PLS: a silver bullet?. MIS Quarterly, 30(2), iii–ix.
  • Maslow, A. (1954). Motivation and personality. Harper.
  • Masood, A., & Lodhi, R. N. (2016). Determinants of behavioral intentions to use SPSS among students: Application of technology acceptance model (TAM). FWU Journal of Social Sciences, 10(2), 146–152.
  • Matere, I. M., Weng, C., Astatke, M., Hsia, C. H., & Fan, C. G. (in press). Effect of design-based learning on elementary students computational thinking skills in visual programming maker course. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1938
  • Morreale, F., Moro, G., Chamberlain, A., Benford, S., & McPherson, A. P. (2017). Building a maker community around an open hardware platform. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 6948–6959). Denver, USA.
  • Negahban, A., & Chung, C. H. (2014). Discovering determinants of users perception of mobile device functionality fit. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.020
  • Ng, O. L., & Chan, T. (2019). Learning as making: Using 3D computer-aided design to enhance the learning of shape and space in STEM-integrated ways. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 294–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12643
  • Papavlasopoulou, S., Giannakos, M. N., & Jaccheri, L. (2016). Creative programming experiences for teenagers: attitudes, performance and gender differences. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (pp. 565–570). Manchester, UK.
  • Rubio, M. A., Romero-Zaliz, R., Mañoso, C., & de Madrid, A. P. (2015). Closing the gender gap in an introductory programming course. Computers & Education, 82, 409–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.12.003
  • Stupurienė, G., Juškevičienė, A., Jevsikova, T., Dagienė, V., & Meškauskienė, A. (2021). Girls’ summer school for physical computing: methodology and acceptance issues. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Informatics in Schools: Situation, Evolution, and Perspectives (pp. 95–108). Virtual Event.
  • Valente, J. A., Caceffo, R., Bonacin, R., dos Reis, J. C., Gonçalves, D. A., & Baranauskas, M. C. C. (2021). Embodied-based environment for kindergarten children: Revisiting constructionist ideas. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(3), 986–1003. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13078
  • Wang, D. C., & Huang, Y. M. (2018). Cloud services in collaborative learning: Applications and implications. In M. Spector, V. Kumar, A. Essa, Y. M. Huang, R. Koper, R. A. W. Tortorella, T. W. Chang, Y. Li, & Z. Zhang (Eds.), Frontiers of cyberlearning: Emerging technologies for teaching and learning (pp. 195–210). Springer.
  • Wongwatkit, C., Panjaburee, P., Srisawasdi, N., & Seprum, P. (2020). Moderating effects of gender differences on the relationships between perceived learning support, intention to use, and learning performance in a personalized e-learning. Journal of Computers in Education, 7(2), 229–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-020-00154-9
  • Zhang, D. Q. (2021). STEM education through making: What are affordances and challenges of making out of school club? Open Journal of Social Sciences, 9(9), 572–583. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2021.99042
  • Zhang, L., & Nouri, J. (2019). A systematic review of learning computational thinking through Scratch in K-9. Computers & Education, 141, 103607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103607
  • Zulfiqar, S., Al-reshidi, H. A., Moteri, M. A. A., Feroz, H. M. B., Yahya, N., & Al-Rahmi, W. M. (2021). Understanding and predicting students’ entrepreneurial intention through business simulation games: A perspective of COVID-19. Sustainability, 13(4), 1838. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041838

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.