Exploring the relationship between interaction patterns and social capital accumulation in connectivist learning

References

• Ahn, J., Butler, B. S., Alam, A., & Webster, S. A. (2013). Learner participation and engagement in open online courses: Insights from the peer 2 peer university. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(2), 160–171. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/learner-participation-engagement-open-online/docview/1500422736/se-2
   Google Scholar
• AlDahdouh, A. A. (2018). Jumping from one resource to another: How do students navigate learning networks? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0126-x
   Google Scholar
• AlDahdouh, A. A. (2020). Emotions among students engaging in connectivist learning experiences. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(2), 98–117. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v21i2.4586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldowah, H., Al-Samarraie, H., & Fauzy, W. M. (2019). Educational data mining and learning analytics for 21st century higher education: A review and synthesis. Telematics and Informatics, 37, 13–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, T. (2003). Modes of interaction in distance education: Recent developments and research questions. In M. Moore & G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 129–144). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, T., & Dron, J. (2011). Three generations of distance education pedagogy. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(3), 80–97. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai, Y., & Xiao, J. (2021). The impact of cMOOC learners’ interaction on content production. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1969955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barba, P. G., Malekian, D., Oliveira, E. A., Bailey, J., Ryan, T., & Kennedy, G. (2020). The importance and meaning of session behaviour in a MOOC. Computers & Education, 146, 103772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, D., Irving, J., & Albertson, K.(2017). Recovery and desistance: What the emerging recovery movement in the alcohol and drug area can learn from models of desistance from offending. Addiction Research & Theory, 25(3), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/16066359.2016.1185661
   Google Scholar
• Birendra, K. C., Morais, D. B., Seekamp, E., Smith, J. W., & Peterson, M. N. (2018). Bonding and bridging forms of social capital in wildlife tourism microentrepreneurship: An application of social network analysis. Sustainability, 10(2), 315. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). GreenWood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, B., Hogan, B., Ellison, N., Lampe, C., & Vitak, J. (2014). Assessing structural correlates to social capital in Facebook ego networks. Social Networks, 38, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2014.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burt, R. S. (1995). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cadima, R., Ojeda, J., & Monguet, J. M. (2012). Social networks and performance in distributed learning communities. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(4), 296–304. http://hdl.handle.net/2117/100653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castiglione, D., Van Deth, J. W., & Wolleb, G. (Eds.). (2008). The handbook of social capital. Oxford University Press on Demand.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, L. (2004). A hierarchical model for student and teacher interaction in distance learning. Distance Education in China, 05, 24–28+78. https://doi.org/10.13541/j.cnki.chinade.2004.05.008
   Google Scholar
• Cocquyt, C., Zhu, C., Diep, A. N., De Greef, M., & Vanwing, T. (2019). Examining the role of learning support in blended learning for adults’ social inclusion and social capital. Computers & Education, 142, 103610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corder, G. I., & Foreman, D. I. (2009). Nonparametric statistics for non-statisticians a step-by-step approach. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, S. (2010). ‘Seeing’ the learning community: An exploration of the development of a resource for monitoring online student networking. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(5), 736–752. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00970.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diep, N. A., Cocquyt, C., Zhu, C., & Vanwing, T. (2016). Predicting adult learners’ online participation: Effects of altruism, performance expectancy, and social capital. Computers & Education, 101, 84–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diep, N. A., Cocquyt, C., Zhu, C., Vanwing, T., & de Greef, M. (2017). Effects of core self-evaluation and online interaction quality on adults’ learning performance and bonding and bridging social capital. The Internet and Higher Education, 34, 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downes, S. (2008). An introduction to connective knowledge. In T. Hug (Ed.), Media, knowledge & education: Exploring new spaces, relations and dynamics in digital media ecologies (pp. 77–102). Innsbruck University Press. http://www.oapen.org/download?type=document&docid=449459#page=84
   Google Scholar
• Downes, S. (2010). Learning networks and connective knowledge. In H. H. Yang & S. C.-Y. Yuen (Eds.), Collective intelligence and E-Learning 2.0: Implications of web-based communities and networking (pp. 1–26). IGI global.
   Google Scholar
• Downes, S. (2012). Connectivism and connective knowledge: Essays on meaning and learning networks. National Research Council Canada (pp. 616). http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:Connectivism+and+Connective+Knowledge+Essays+on+meaning+and+learning+networks#0
   Google Scholar
• Duan, J., Xie, K., Hawk, N. A., Yu, S., & Wang, M. (2019). Exploring a Personal Social Knowledge Network (PSKN) to aid the observation of connectivist interaction for high- and low-performing learners in connectivist massive open online courses. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 199–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etxabe, I. (2018). Measuring social capital with twitter within the electronics and ICT cluster of the basque country. City & Community, 17(2), 350–373. https://doi.org/10.1111/cico.12297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, L., Feng, X., Chen, P., Wang, R., & Luo, S. (2020). Research on the relationships of interactions in connectivist learning based on social network analysis. Paper presented at the 2020 Ninth International Conference of Educational Innovation through Technology (EITT). https://doi.org/10.1109/EITT50754.2020.00038
   Google Scholar
• Joksimović, S., Dowell, N., Poquet, O., Kovanović, V., Gašević, D., Dawson, S., & Graesser, A. C. (2018). Exploring development of social capital in a CMOOC through language and discourse. The Internet and Higher Education, 36, 54–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joksimović, S., Dowell, N., Skrypnyk, O., Kovanović, V., Gašević, D., Dawson, S., & Graesser, A. C. (2015). How do you connect? Analysis of social capital accumulation in connectivist MOOCs. Proceedings of the fifth international conference on learning analytics And knowledge, Poughkeepsie, New York. https://doi.org/10.1145/2723576.2723604
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, L., & Rousseeuw, P. J. (1990). Finding groups in data: An introduction to cluster analysis. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, L., & Rousseeuw, P. J. (2009). Finding groups in data: An introduction to cluster analysis (Vol. 344). John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Knox, J. (2014). Digital culture clash: “Massive” education in the E-learning and Digital Cultures MOOC. Distance Education, 35(2), 164–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2014.917704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kop, R. (2011). The challenges to connectivist learning on open online networks: Learning experiences during a massive open online course. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(3), 19. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovanović, V., Joksimović, S., Gašević, D., & Hatala, M. (2014). What is the source of social capital? The association between social network position and social presence in communities of inquiry. Graph-based Educational Data Mining (GEDM) workshop at 2014 Educational Data Mining conference (EDM 2014). http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1183/gedm_paper03.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, R. G., & Jurs, P. C. (1990). New index for clustering tendency and its application to chemical problems. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, 30(1), 36–41. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci00065a010
   Google Scholar
• Leung, M. R., Chin, J. J., & Petrescu-Prahova, M. (2016). Involving immigrant religious organizations in HIV/AIDS prevention: The role of bonding and bridging social capital. Social Science & Medicine, 162, 201–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.06.042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S., Tang, Q. N., & Zhang, Y. (2016). A case study on learning difficulties and corresponding supports for learning in cMOOCs [Une étude de cas sur les difficultés d’apprentissage et le soutien correspondant pour l’apprentissage dans les cMOOC]. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology / La Revue Canadienne de L’apprentissage et de la Technologie, 42(2), 2–26. https://doi.org/10.21432/T2GS4S
   Google Scholar
• Lin, N. (2008). A network theory of social capital. In D. Castiglione, J. W. van Deth, & G. Wolleb (Eds.), The handbook of social capital (pp. 50–69, Chapter xxi, 722 Pages). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, N., & Smith, J. (2001). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, C., Lin, C., Chang, C., & Chao, P. (2014). Knowledge sharing among university students facilitated with a creative commons licensing mechanism: A case study in a programming course. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(3), 154–167. http://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.17.3.154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lusher, D., Koskinen, J., & Robins, G. (Eds.). (2012). Exponential random graph models for social networks: Theory, methods, and applications. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M. G. (1989). Editorial: Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923648909526659
   Google Scholar
• Norusis, M. J. (2012). IBM SPSS statistics 19 statistical procedures companion. Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Oztok, M., Zingaro, D., Makos, A., Brett, C., & Hewitt, J. (2015). Capitalizing on social presence: The relationship between social capital and social presence. The Internet and Higher Education, 26, 19–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Rana, S., Jasola, S., & Kumar, R. (2011). A hybrid sequential approach for data clustering using K-means and particle swarm optimization algorithm. International Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology, 2(6), 157–176. https://doi.org/10.4314/ijest.v2i6.63708
   Google Scholar
• Recuero, R., Zago, G., & Soares, F. (2019). Using social network analysis and social capital to identify user roles on polarized political conversations on twitter. Social Media+Society, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119848745
   Google Scholar
• Rybakova, K., & Witte, S. (2019). Academic bloggers, commenters, lurkers and non-bloggers: How and why in-service English teachers blog. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 28(5), 575–588. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2019.1683065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Arrieta, N., González, R. A., Cañabate, A., & Sabate, F. (2021). Social capital on social networking sites: A social network perspective. Sustainability, 13(9), 5147. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, B. (2021). Exploring network measures of social capital: Toward more relational measurement. Journal of Planning Literature, 36(3), 328–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412221999415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siemens, G. (2004). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3–10. https://xueshu.baidu.com/usercenter/paper/show?paperid=aad300d0d5b1949ab80555b044359d8e&site=xueshu_se
   Google Scholar
• Siemens, G. (2007). Connectivism: Creating a learning ecology in distributed environments. In T. Hug (Ed.), Didactics of microlearning. Concepts, discourses and examples (pp. 53–68). Waxmann Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Siemens, G. (2011). Orientation: Sensemaking and wayfinding in complex distributed online information environments [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Aberdeen.
   Google Scholar
• Tian, H., Chen, L., Huang, L. Y., & Wang, R. X. (2020). The relationship between the knowledge flow characteristics and the interaction level of cMOOC learners. Distance Education in China, 08, 15–24+76. https://doi.org/10.13541/j.cnki.chinade.2020.08.003
   Google Scholar
• Tibshirani, R., Walther, G., & Hastie, T. (2001). Estimating the number of clusters in a data set via the gap statistic. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 63(2), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9868.00293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H. M., & Chen L. (2019). Impact of social networking features of cMOOC WeChat groups on learners’ cognition development. Distance Education in China, 11, 15–23+92. https://doi.org/10.13541/j.cnki.chinade.2019.11.002
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Z. J., Anderson, T., & Chen, L. (2018). How learners participate in connectivist learning: An analysis of the interaction traces from a cMOOC. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(1), 44–67. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i1.3269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z. J., Chen, L., & Anderson, T. (2014). A framework for interaction and cognitive engagement in connectivist learning contexts. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(2), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i2.1709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, B., & Wu, C. (2021). Research on the mechanism of knowledge diffusion in the MOOC learning forum using ERGMs. Computers & Education, 173(3), 104295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104295
   Google Scholar
• Wu, L., & Chen L. (2019). cMOOC learner’s learning process: A perspective from grounded theory. Distance Education in China, 12, 1–11+92. https://doi.org/10.13541/j.cnki.chinade.2019.12.002
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Y., & Chen, L. (2019). Research on the relationship between individual social network status and corresponding concept network characteristics in connective learning: A partial analysis of interaction in a cMOOC. Distance Education in China, 10, 9–19+51+92. https://doi.org/10.13541/j.cnki.chinade.2019.10.003
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Y., & Du, J. (2021). What participation types of learners are there in connectivist learning: An analysis of a cMOOC from the dual perspectives of social network and concept network characteristics. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.2007137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, B., Xu, J. Y., & Tan, L. Q. (2020). Clustering of cMOOC learners based on social network and topic similarity. Journal of Open Learning, 25(01|1), 10–12. https://doi.org/10.19605/j.cnki.kfxxyj.2020.01.02
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., Yang, Y., Wang, H., & Chen, L. (2019). Online interaction and network analysis in international perspective. Review and Prospect. E-Education Research, 10, 26–34. https://doi.org/10.13811/j.cnki.eer.2019.10.004
   Google Scholar