Teachers scaffold student discourse and emotions in knowledge building classrooms

References

• Afraimovich, V., Young, T., Muezzinoglu, M. K., & Rabinovich, M. I. (2011). Nonlinear dynamics of emotion-cognition interaction: When emotion does not destroy cognition? Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 73(2), 266–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-010-9572-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calor, S. M., Dekker, R., van Drie, J. P., & Volman, M. L. L. (2022). Scaffolding small groups at the group level: Improving the scaffolding behavior of mathematics teachers during mathematical discussions. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 369–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2021.2024834
   Google Scholar
• Cefai, C. (2011). A framework for the promotion of social and emotional wellbeing in primary schools. In R. H. Shute, P. T. Slee, R. Murray-Harvey, & K. L. Dix (Eds.), Mental health and wellbeing: Educational perspectives (pp. 17–29). Shannon Research Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chai, S., & Zhu, G. (2021). The relationship between groups’ adoption of Knowledge Building Principles and their performance in creating artifacts. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(2), 787–808. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09986-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, C., Burtis, J., & Bereiter, C. (1997). Knowledge building as a mediator of conflict in conceptual change. Cognition and Instruction, 15(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1501_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, B., & Hong, H. Y. (2016). Schools as knowledge-building organizations: Thirty years of design research. Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 266–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1175306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, B., Resendes, M., Chai, C. S., & Hong, H. Y. (2017). Two tales of time: Uncovering the significance of sequential patterns among contribution types in knowledge-building discourse. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(2), 162–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2016.1276081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, W., Tan, J. S., & Pi, Z. (2021). The spiral model of collaborative knowledge improvement: An exploratory study of a networked collaborative classroom. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 16(1), 7–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-021-09338-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuy, M., Zhang, J., Resendes, M., Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2011). Does contributing to a knowledge building dialogue lead to individual advancement of knowledge? In H. Spada, G. Stahl, N. Miyake, & N. Law (Eds.), Connecting computer-supported collaborative learning to policy and practice: CSCL2011 conference proceedings. Volume I—long papers (pp. 57–63). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd Edn). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Di Leo, I., Muis, K. R., Singh, C. A., & Psaradellis, C. (2019). Curiosity … Confusion? Frustration! The role and sequencing of emotions during mathematics problem solving. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 58, 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Mello, S., Lehman, B., Pekrun, R., & Graesser, A. (2014). Confusion can be beneficial for learning. Learning and Instruction, 29, 153–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdogan, I., & Campbell, T. (2008). Teacher questioning and interaction patterns in classrooms facilitated with differing levels of constructivist teaching practices. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1891–1914. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701587028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forman, E. A., Ramirez-DelToro, V., Brown, L., & Passmore, C. (2017). Discursive strategies that foster an epistemic community for argument in a biology classroom. Learning and Instruction, 48, 32–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, S. D., Many, J. E., Wellborn, H. P., & Ward, J. (2002). How scaffolding nurtures the development of young children’s literacy repertoire: Insiders’ and outsiders’ collaborative understandings. Reading Research and Instruction, 41(4), 309–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388070209558374
   Google Scholar
• Koufetta-Menicou, C., & Scaife, J. (2000). Teachers’ questions – types and significance in science education. School Science Review, 81(296), 79–84.
   Google Scholar
• Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y., & Kinzie, M. B. (2012). Teacher question and student response with regard to cognition and language use. Instructional Science, 40(6), 857–874. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9193-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei, C., & Chan, C. K. (2018). Developing metadiscourse through reflective assessment in knowledge building environments. Computers & Education, 126, 153–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, F., & Chan, C. K. (2018). Examining the role of computer‐supported knowledge‐building discourse in epistemic and conceptual understanding. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(5), 567–579. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12261
   Google Scholar
• Liston, D. P., & Garrison, J. W. (2004). Teaching, learning, and loving: Reclaiming passion in educational practice. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mehan, H. (1979). ‘What time is it, Denise?’: Asking known information questions in classroom discourse. Theory Into Practice, 18(4), 285–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405847909542846
   Google Scholar
• Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classroom. Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Muis, K. R., Sinatra, G. M., Pekrun, R., Winne, P. H., Trevors, G., Losenno, K., & Munzar, B. (2018). Main and moderator effects of refutation on task value, epistemic emotions, and learning strategies during conceptual change. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 55, 155–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Näykki, P., Isohätälä, J., Järvelä, S., Pöysä-Tarhonen, J., & Häkkinen, P. (2017). Facilitating socio-cognitive and socio-emotional monitoring in collaborative learning with a regulation macro script – an exploratory study. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 12(3), 251–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-017-9259-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3702_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekrun, R., Vogl, E., Muis, K. R., & Sinatra, G. M. (2017). Measuring emotions during epistemic activities: The epistemically-related emotion scales. Cognition and Emotion, 31(6), 1268–1276. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2016.1204989
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polo, C., Lund, K., Plantin, C., & Niccolai, G. P. (2016). Group emotions: The social and cognitive functions of emotions in argumentation. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 11(2), 123–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-016-9232-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve, R., Messina, R., & Scardamalia, M. (2008). Wisdom in elementary school. In M. Ferrari, & G. Potworowski (Eds.), Teaching for wisdom: Cross-cultural perspectives on fostering wisdom (pp. 79–92). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Resendes, M., Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., Chen, B., & Halewood, C. (2015). Group-level formative feedback and metadiscourse. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 10(3), 309–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-015-9219-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosiek, J. (2003). Emotional scaffolding. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(5), 399–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487103257089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal Education in a Knowledge Society (pp. 67–98). Open Court.
   Google Scholar
• Scardamalia, M. (2004). CSILE/Knowledge forum®. Education and technology: An encyclopedia, 183-192.
   Google Scholar
• Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1991). Higher levels of agency for children in knowledge building: A challenge for the design of new knowledge media. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1(1), 37–68. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0101_3
   Google Scholar
• Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2014). Knowledge building and knowledge creation: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (2nd ed, pp. 397–417). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schäfer, T., & Schwarz, M. A. (2019). The meaningfulness of effect sizes in psychological research: Differences between sub-disciplines and the impact of potential biases. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 813. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00813
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer, K. R., & Moors, A. (2019). The emotion process: Event appraisal and component differentiation. Annual Review of Psychology, 70(1), 719–745. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011854
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherr, R. E., & Hammer, D. (2009). Student behavior and epistemological framing: Examples from collaborative active-learning activities in physics. Cognition and Instruction, 27(2), 147–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000902797379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schutz, P. A., Hong, J. Y., Cross, D. I., & Osbon, J. N. (2006). Reflections on investigating emotion in educational activity settings. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 343–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9030-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, P. (1998). Teacher talk and meaning making in science classrooms: A Vygotskian analysis and review. Studies in Science Education, 32(1), 45–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057269808560127
   Google Scholar
• Seligman, M. (2018). PERMA and the building blocks of wellbeing. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 13(4), 333–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2018.1437466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shuman, V., & Scherer, K. R. (2014). Concepts and structures of emotions. In R. Pekrun, & L. Linnenbrink-Garcia (Eds.), International handbook of emotions in education (pp. 13–35). Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, P. M., & Hackling, M. W. (2016). Supporting teachers to develop substantive discourse in primary science classrooms. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(4), 151–173. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n4.10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao, D., & Zhang, J. (2018). Forming shared inquiry structures to support knowledge building in a grade 5 community. Instructional Science, 46(4), 563–592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-018-9462-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thagard, P. (2007). Coherence, truth and the development of scientific knowledge. Philosophy of Science, 74(1), 28–47. https://doi.org/10.1086/520941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Pol, J., Mercer, N., & Volman, M. (2019). Scaffolding student understanding in small-group work: Students’ uptake of teacher support in subsequent small-group interaction. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 28(2), 206–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2018.1522258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental process. Harvard.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., van Aalst, J., Chan, C. K., & Tian, W. (2016). Reflective assessment in knowledge building by students with low academic achievement. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 11(3), 281–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-016-9239-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (1992). The case study method as a tool for doing evaluation. Current Sociology, 40(1), 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/001139292040001009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., Hong, H. Y., Scardamalia, M., Teo, C. L., & Morley, E. A. (2011). Sustaining knowledge building as a principle-based innovation at an elementary school. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(2), 262–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2011.528317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Reeve, R., & Messina, R. (2009). Designs for collective cognitive responsibility in knowledge-building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(1), 7–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400802581676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., Tao, D., Chen, M. H., Sun, Y., Judson, D., & Naqvi, S. (2018). Co-organizing the collective journey of inquiry with idea thread mapper. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 27(3), 390–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2018.1444992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, G., Teo, C. L., Khanlari, A, & Mohd, S. B. (2018, August). The use of Knowledge Building scaffolds by grade 7 students. Paper presented in Knowledge Building Summer Institute 2018. Toronto, ON.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, G., Chai, S., & Ding, M. (2022). Pre-Service teachers’ democratizing knowledge in a knowledge building community: Indicators and results. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-022-00662-5
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, G., Raman, P., Xing, W., & Slotta, J. (2021). Designing curriculum for student voice and engagement: A learning community approach. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18, 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00276-9
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, G., Scardamalia, M., Nazeem, R., Donoahue, Z., Leanne, M., & Lai, Z. (2020). Collective reflections, knowledge advancement, and emotional well-being of young students. Instructional Science. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, G., Xing, W., Costa, S., Scardamalia, M., & Pei, B. (2019). Exploring emotional and cognitive dynamics of knowledge building in grades 1 and 2. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 29(4), 789–820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-019-09241-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar