Using the instant semantic analysis and feedback system for mining effective behavioural patterns to facilitate learning effectiveness of online discussion

References

• Althaus, S. L. (1997). Computer-mediated communication in the university classroom: An experiment with on-line discussions. Communication Education, 46(3), 158–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529709379088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amichai-Hamburger, Y., Gazit, T., Bar-Ilan, J., Perez, O., Aharony, N., Bronstein, J., & Sarah Dyne, T. (2016). Psychological factors behind the lack of participation in online discussions. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 268–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andresen, M. A. (2009). Asynchronous discussion forums: Success factors, outcomes, assessments, and limitations. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(1), 249–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angeli, C., Valanides, N., & Bonk, C. J. (2003). Communication in a web-based conferencing system: The quality of computer-mediated interactions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(1), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8535.00302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branon, R., & Essex, C. (2001). Synchronous and asynchronous communication tools in distance education. TechTrends, 45(1), 36–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02763377
   Google Scholar
• Chen, B., Chang, Y.-H., Ouyang, F., & Zhou, W. (2018). Fostering student engagement in online discussion through social learning analytics. Internet and Higher Education, 37, 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C. M., Li, M. C., & Chang, W. C. (2021). Developing a topic analysis instant feedback system to facilitate asynchronous online discussion effectiveness. Computers & Education, 163, 104095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C. M., Li, M. C., & Huang, Y. L. (2020). Developing an instant semantic analysis and feedback system to facilitate learning performance of online discussion. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1839505
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C. M., & Tsao, H. W. (2020). An instant perspective comparison system to facilitate learners’ discussion effectiveness in an online discussion process. Computers & Education, 164(9), 104037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104037
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C. Y., Pedersen, S., & Murphy, K. L. (2012). The influence of perceived information overload on student participation and knowledge construction in computer-mediated communication. Instructional Science, 40(2), 325–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9179-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, W., & Looi, C.-K. (2007). Incorporating online discussion in face to face classroom learning: A new blended learning approach. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 23(3), 307–326. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, C. K., Paré, D. E., Collimore, L.-M., & Joordens, S. (2011). Assessing the effectiveness of a voluntary online discussion forum on improving students’ course performance. Computers & Education, 56(1), 253–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, H. C., Hwang, G. J., Tsai, C. C., & Chen, N. S. (2009). An innovative approach for promoting information exchanges and sharing in a Web 2.0-based learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 17(4), 311–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820903195173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chua, Y. P., & Chua, Y. P. (2017). Do computer-mediated communication skill, knowledge and motivation mediate the relationships between personality traits and attitude toward Facebook? Computers in Human Behaviour, 70, 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conijn, R., Beemt, V. d., & & Cuijpers, A. (2018). Predicting student performance in a blended MOOC. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(5), 615–628. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). The five-factor model of personality and its relevance to personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 6(4), 343–359. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.1992.6.4.343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, J., & Graff, M. (2005). Performance in e-learning: Online participation and student grades. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(4), 657–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00542.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, M. J., Smith, M., & Cook, K. (2013). Implementing online problem based learning (PBL) in postgraduates new to both online learning and PBL: An example from strength and conditioning. Journal of hospitality. Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 12(1), 79–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2012.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, F., & Putnam, R. T. (2009). Using research on learning from text to inform online discussion. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 41(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.41.1.a
   Google Scholar
• Gao, F., Zhang, T., & Franklin, T. (2013). Designing asynchronous online discussion environments: Recent progress and possible future directions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(3), 469–483. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01330.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghorbani, F., & Montazer, G. A. (2015). E-learners’ personality identifying using their network behaviors. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 26–42. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26
   Google Scholar
• Han, F., & Ellis, R. A. (2019). Identifying consistent patterns of quality learning discussions in blended learning. Internet and Higher Education, 40, 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hara, N., Bonk, C. J., & Angeli, C. (2000). Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology course. Journal Citation Report, 28(2), 115–152. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003764722829
   Google Scholar
• Hou, H.-T., & Wu, S.-Y. (2011). Analyzing the social knowledge construction behavioral patterns of an online synchronous collaborative discussion instructional activity using an instant messaging tool: A case study. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1459–1468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.02.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalelioglu, F., & Gulbahar, Y. (2014). The effect of instructional techniques on critical thinking and critical thinking dispositions in online discussion. Educational Technology & Society, 17(1), 248–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, H., & Song, J. (2006). The features of peer argumentation in middle school students’ scientific inquiry. Research in Science Education, 36(3), 211–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-005-9005-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., Lee, A., & Ryu, H. (2013). Personality and its effects on learning performance: Design guidelines for an adaptive e-learning system based on a user model. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 43(5), 450–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2013.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lan, Y. F., Tsai, P. W., Yang, S. H., & Hung, C. L. (2012). Comparing the social knowledge construction behavioral patterns of problem-based online asynchronous discussion in e/m-learning environments. Computers & Education, 59(4), 1122–1135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loncar, M., Barrett, N. E., & Liu, G.-Z. (2014). Towards the refinement of forum and asynchronous online discussion in educational contexts worldwide: Trends and investigative approaches within a dominant research paradigm. Computers & Education, 73, 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marbouti, F., & Wise, A. F. (2016). Starburst: A new graphical interface to support purposeful attention to others’ posts in online discussions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(1), 87–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9400-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marra, R. M., Moore, J. L., & Klimczak, A. (2004). Content analysis of online discussion forums: A comparative analysis of protocols. Etr&d-Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(2), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, K. A. (2003). Face-to-face versus threaded discussions: The role of time and higher-order thinking. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(3), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v7i3.1845
   Google Scholar
• Morris, L. V., Finnegan, C., & Wu, S.-S. (2005). Tracking student behavior, persistence, and achievement in online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 8(3), 221–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2005.06.009
   Google Scholar
• Oh, E. G., Huang, W.-H. D., Mehdiabadi, A. H., & Ju, B. (2018). Facilitating critical thinking in asynchronous online discussion: Comparison between peer- and instructor-redirection. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(3), 489–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9180-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouyang, F., & Scharber, C. (2017). The influences of an experienced instructor’s discussion design and facilitation on an online learning community development: A social network analysis study. Internet and Higher Education, 35, 34–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, A. T., & Roseth, C. J. (2016). Effects of four CSCL strategies for enhancing online discussion forums: Social interdependence, summarizing, scripts, and synchronicity. International Journal of Educational Research, 76, 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2015.04.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramos, C., & Yudko, E. (2008). “Hits” (not “discussion posts”) predict student success in online courses: A double cross-validation study. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1174–1182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivers, D. J. (2021). The role of personality traits and online academic self-efficacy in acceptance, actual use and achievement in moodle. Education and Information Technologies, 26(4), 4353–4378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10478-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., Barab, S. A., & Scott, B. (2007). What do students gain by engaging in socioscientific inquiry? Research in Science Education, 37(4), 371–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9030-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spitzberg, B. H. (2006). Preliminary development of a model and measure of computer-mediated communication (CMC) competence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2), 629–666. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00030.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiene, D. (2000). Online discussions: A survey of advantages and disadvantages compared to face-to-face discussions. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 9(4), 371–384.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, S.-M., Hou, H.-T., & Wu, S.-Y. (2017). Analyzing the knowledge construction and cognitive patterns of blog-based instructional activities using four frequent interactive strategies (problem solving, peer assessment, role playing and peer tutoring): A preliminary study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(2), 301–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9471-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, H.-C., Peng, H., & Chou, C. (2015). Can more interactivity improve learning achievement in an online course? Effects of college students’ perception and actual use of a course-management system on their learning achievement. Computers & Education, 83, 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.12.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiser, O., Blau, I., & Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2018). How do medium naturalness, teaching-learning interactions and students’ personality traits affect participation in synchronous E-learning? The Internet and Higher Education, 37, 40–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, M., Dewan, M. A. A., Lin, F., & Murshed, M. (2019, May 5–8). Visualization of course discussion forums: A short review rom online learning perspective. IEEE Canadian Conference of Electrical and Computer Engineering (CCECE), Edmonton, AB, IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CCECE43985.2019.9052406
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Y. T. C. (2008). A catalyst for teaching critical thinking in a large university class in Taiwan: Asynchronous online discussions with the facilitation of teaching assistants. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(3), 241–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-007-9054-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeo, T. M., & Quek, C. L. (2011). Investigating design and technology students’ peer interactions in a technology-mediated learning environment: A case study. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(4), 751–764. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.948
   Google Scholar