Investigating the relationships among peer moderation, cognitive engagement, and learning achievement in online discussion forums

References

• Arendale, D. R. (2014). Understanding the peer assisted learning model: Student study groups in challenging college courses. International Journal of Higher Education, 3(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v3n2p1
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, R., & Vogel, D. (2013). Computers & education predicting user acceptance of collaborative technologies : An extension of the technology acceptance model for e-learning. Computers & Education, 63, 160–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 219–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.965823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chien, S. Y., Hwang, G. J., & Jong, M. S. Y. (2020). Effects of peer assessment within the context of spherical video-based virtual reality on EFL students’ English-speaking performance and learning perceptions. Computers and Education, 146, 103751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Silva, L. F. C., Barbosa, M. W., & Gomes, R. R. (2019). Measuring participation in distance education online discussion forums using social network analysis. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 70(2), 140–150. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Smet, M., Van Keer, H., De Wever, B., & Valcke, M. (2010). Cross-age peer tutors in asynchronous discussion groups: Exploring the impact of three types of tutor training on patterns in tutor support and on tutor characteristics. Computers and Education, 54(4), 1167–1181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Smet, M., Van Keer, H., & Valcke, M. (2008). Blending asynchronous discussion groups and peer tutoring in higher education: An exploratory study of online peer tutoring behaviour. Computers and Education, 50(1), 207–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filius, R. M., de Kleijn, R. A. M., Uijl, S. G., Prins, F. J., van Rijen, H. V. M., & Grobbee, D. E. (2018). Strengthening dialogic peer feedback aiming for deep learning in SPOCs. Computers and Education, 125(June), 86–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.004
   Google Scholar
• Formanek, M., Wenger, M. C., Buxner, S. R., Impey, C. D., & Sonam, T. (2017). Computers & education insights about large-scale online peer assessment from an analysis of an astronomy MOOC. Computers & Education, 113, 243–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.05.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement potential of the concept. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galikyan, I., & Admiraal, W. (2019). Students’ engagement in asynchronous online discussion: The relationship between cognitive presence, learner prominence, and academic performance. Internet and Higher Education, 43(July), 100692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100692
   Google Scholar
• Galikyan, I., Admiraal, W., & Kester, L. (2021). MOOC discussion forums: The interplay of the cognitive and the social. Computers and Education, 165(March 2020), 104133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104133
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking and computer conferencing: A model and tool to assess cognitive presence. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527071
   Google Scholar
• Gaul, C., & Kim, M. K. (2020). Learner participation regulation supported by long-term peer moderation and participation feedback during asynchronous discussions. Journal of Computers in Education, 7(3), 295–331. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-020-00158-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghadirian, H. (2016). Peer moderation of asynchronous online discussions: An exploratory study of peer e-moderating behaviour. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghadirian, H., Mohd Ayub, A. F., Abu Bakar, K. B., & Hassanzadeh, M. (2016). Growth patterns and E-moderating supports in asynchronous online discussions in an undergraduate blended course. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 17(3), 189–208. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2397
   Google Scholar
• Ghadirian, H., Salehi, K., & Ayub, A. F. M. (2019). Assessing the effectiveness of role assignment on improving students’ asynchronous online discussion participation. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 17(1), 31–51. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJDET.2019010103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Henrie, C. R., Halverson, L. R., & Graham, C. R. (2015). Measuring student engagement in technology-mediated learning: A review. Computers and Education, 90, 36–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heo, H., Yon, K., & Kim, Y. (2010). Exploratory study on the patterns of online interaction and knowledge co-construction in project-based learning. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1383–1392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2008). Attracting student participation in asynchronous online discussions: A case study of peer facilitation. Computers and Education, 51(3), 1111–1124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2011). Higher-level knowledge construction in asynchronous online discussions : an analysis of group size, duration of online discussion, and student facilitation techniques. Instructional Science, 39(3), 303–319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-010-9129-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoan, Y., Lee, J., & Jonassen, D. H. (2011). Computers & education the role of tasks and epistemological beliefs in online peer questioning. Computers & Education, 56(1), 112–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.08.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, T. L. (1939). The selection of upper and lower groups for the validation of test items. Journal of Educational Psychology, 30(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0057123
   Google Scholar
• Liu, S., Liu, S., Liu, Z., Peng, X., & Yang, Z. (2022). Automated detection of emotional and cognitive engagement in MOOC discussions to predict learning achievement. Computers & Education, 181, 104461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Z., Pinkwart, N., Liu, H., Liu, S., & Zhang, G. (2018a). Exploring students’ engagement patterns in SPOC forums and their association with course performance. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(7), 3143–3158.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Z., Zhang, W., Cheng, H. N. H., Sun, J., & Liu, S. (2018b). Investigating relationship between discourse behavioral patterns and academic achievements of students in SPOC discussion forum. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 16(2), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJDET.2018040103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, H., Chen, Y., Chen, T., Koszalka, T. A., & Feng, Q. (2023). Impact of role assignment and group size on asynchronous online discussion: An experimental study. Computers and Education, 192(October 2022), 104658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104658
   Google Scholar
• Michinov, N., Morice, J., & Ferrières, V. (2015). A step further in peer instruction: Using the stepladder technique to improve learning. Computers and Education, 91, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, L., Cheung, S., & Hew, F. (2012). Interaction in asynchronous discussion forums: Peer facilitation techniques. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(3), 280–294. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00454.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouyang, F., & Chang, Y. H. (2019). The relationships between social participatory roles and cognitive engagement levels in online discussions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(3), 1396–1414. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1978). The development of thought. Equilibration of cognitive structures. Viking.
   Google Scholar
• Rasheed, R. A., Kamsin, A., & Abdullah, N. A. (2020). Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review. Computers and Education, 144(September 2019), 103701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103701
   Google Scholar
• Salmon, G. (2004). E-Moderating. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203465424
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, H. B., Lee, C. H., Wyman Roth, N. E., Li, K., Çetinkaya-Rundel, M., & Canelas, D. A. (2017). Understanding the massive open online course (MOOC) student experience: An examination of attitudes, motivations, and barriers. Computers and Education, 110, 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, Y., Tong, M., & Long, T. (2021). Investigating relationships among blended synchronous learning environments, students’ motivation, and cognitive engagement: A mixed methods study. Computers and Education, 168(March), 104193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104193
   Google Scholar
• Topping, K., Buchs, C., Duran, D., & van Keer, H. (2017). Effective peer learning: From principles to practical implementation. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315695471
   Google Scholar
• Topping, K., & Ehly, S. (2009). Peer-assisted learning. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Topping, K., & Topping, K. (2007). Reaching where adults cannot: Peer education and peer counselling (pp. 37–41). April 2015. https://doi.org/10.1080/0266736960110405
   Google Scholar
• Topping, K. J., & Topping, K. J. (2009). Theory into practice (pp. 37–41). August 2014. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840802577569
   Google Scholar
• Tullis, J. G., & Goldstone, R. L. (2020). Why does peer instruction benefit student learning? Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 5(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-020-00218-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard university press.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, X., Yang, D., Wen, M., Koedinger, K., & Rosé, C. P. (2015). Investigating how student’s cognitive behavior in MOOC discussion forums affect learning gains. In Proceedings of the 8th international conference on educational data mining (pp. 226–233).
   Google Scholar
• Xie, K., Di Tosto, G., Lu, L., & Cho, Y. S. (2018). Detecting leadership in peer-moderated online collaborative learning through text mining and social network analysis. Internet and Higher Education, 38, 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, K., & Ke, F. (2011). The role of students’ motivation in peer-moderated asynchronous online discussions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(6), 916–930. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01140.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, K., Lu, L., Cheng, S. L., & Izmirli, S. (2017). The interactions between facilitator identity, conflictual presence, and social presence in peer-moderated online collaborative learning. Distance Education, 38(2), 230–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2017.1322458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, S., Chen, J., Wen, Y., Chen, H., Gao, Q., & Wang, Q. (2021). Capturing regulatory patterns in online collaborative learning: A network analytic approach. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 16(1), 37–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-021-09339-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zingaro, D., & Porter, L. (2014). Peer instruction in computing: The value of instructor intervention. Computers and Education, 71, 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar