37
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Predictors of higher education students’ behavioural intention and usage of ChatGPT: the moderating roles of age, gender and experience

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Received 24 May 2023, Accepted 28 May 2024, Published online: 12 Jun 2024

References

  • Akhmedov, B. A. (2022). Use of information and communication technologies in higher education: Trends in the digital economy. Ijtimoiy Fanlarda Innovasiya Onlayn Ilmiy Jurnali, 71–79.
  • Ameen, N., Willis, R., & Shah, M. H. (2018). An examination of the gender gap in smartphone adoption and use in Arab countries: A cross-national study. Computers in Human Behaviour, 89, 148–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.07.045
  • Arthur, F., Arkorful, V., Salifu, I., & Abam Nortey, S. (2023). Digital paradigm shift: Unraveling students’ intentions to embrace tablet-based learning through an extended UTAUT2 model. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(2), Article 2277340. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2277340
  • Bervell, B., & Umar, I. N. (2017). Validation of the UTAUT model: Re-considering non-linear relationships of exogeneous variables in higher education technology acceptance research. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(10), 6471–6490. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/78076
  • Bonsu, E. M., & Baffour-Koduah, D. (2023). From the consumers’ side: Determining students’ perception and intention to use ChatGPT in Ghanaian higher education. Journal of Education, Society & Multiculturalism, 4(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.2478/jesm-2023-0001
  • Burger, B., Kanbach, D. K., Kraus, S., Breier, M., & Corvello, V. (2023). On the use of AI-based tools like ChatGPT to support management research. European Journal of Innovation Management, 26(7), 233–241. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-02-2023-0156
  • Busch, P. A., & Hausvik, G. I. (2023). Too good to be true? An empirical study of ChatGPT capabilities for academic writing and implications for academic misconduct. In 29th Americas Conference on Information Systems, Panama (pp 1-10).
  • Bygstad, B., Øvrelid, E., Ludvigsen, S., & Dæhlen, M. (2022). From dual digitalization to digital learning space: Exploring the digital transformation of higher education. Computers & Education, 182, Article 104463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104463
  • Cabrera-Sánchez, J. P., Villarejo-Ramos, ÁF, Liébana-Cabanillas, F., & Shaikh, A. A. (2021). Identifying relevant segments of AI applications adopters – expanding the UTAUT2’s variables. Telematics and Informatics, 58, Article 101529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101529
  • Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: Complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206
  • Chang, C. M., Liu, L. W., Huang, H. C., & Hsieh, H. H. (2019). Factors influencing online hotel booking: Extending UTAUT2 with age, gender, and experience as moderators. Information, 10(9), 281. https://doi.org/10.3390/info10090281
  • Chin, W. (2010). How to write up and report PLS analyses. In V. Vinzi, W. Chin, J. Henseler, & H. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods and applications (pp. 655–690). Springer.
  • Chu, T. H., Chao, C. M., Liu, H. H., & Chen, D. F. (2022). Developing an extended theory of UTAUT 2 model to explore factors influencing Taiwanese consumer adoption of intelligent elevators. SAGE Open, 12(4), 21582440221142209.
  • Coenen, C. (2021). Understanding technology, changing the world. Nanoethics, 15(3), 203–209.
  • Dinh, C. M., & Park, S. (2023). How to increase consumer intention to use chatbots? An empirical analysis of hedonic and utilitarian motivations on social presence and the moderating effects of fear across generations. Electronic Commerce Research, 1–41.
  • Dowling, M., & Lucey, B. (2023). ChatGPT for (finance) research: The Bananarama conjecture. Finance Research Letters, 53, Article 103662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.103662
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
  • Fuchs, K. (2023). Exploring the opportunities and challenges of NLP models in higher education: Is ChatGPT a blessing or a curse? Frontiers in Education, 8, 258. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1166682
  • Geisser, S. (1974). A predictive approach to the random effect model. Biometrika, 61(1), 101–107. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/61.1.101
  • George, D., & Mallery, P. (2021). IBM SPSS statistics 27 step by step: A simple guide and reference. Routledge.
  • Gilson, A., Safranek, C. W., Huang, T., Socrates, V., Chi, L., Taylor, R. A., & Chartash, D. (2023). How does CHATGPT perform on the United States Medical Licensing Examination? The implications of large language models for medical education and knowledge assessment. JMIR Medical Education, 9(1), e45312. https://doi.org/10.2196/45312
  • Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Sage.
  • Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage.
  • Hair, J. F., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed, a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
  • Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance. Long Range Planning, 46(1-2), 1–12.
  • Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Gudergan, S. P. (2017). Advanced issues in partial least squares structural equation modeling. Sage Publications.
  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of The Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). New challenges to international marketing (Vol. 20, pp. 277–319). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  • Hu, S., Laxman, K., & Lee, K. (2020). Exploring factors affecting academics’ adoption of emerging mobile technologies – an extended UTAUT perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 25(5), 4615–4635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10171-x
  • Hwang, J., Lee, J. S., & Kim, H. (2019). Perceived innovativeness of drone food delivery services and its impacts on attitude and behavioral intentions: The moderating role of gender and age. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 81, 94–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2019.03.002
  • Jaradat, M. I. R. M., & Atyeh, A. J. (2017). Do personality traits play a role in social media addiction? Key considerations for successful optimized model to avoid social networking sites addiction: A developing country perspective. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 17(8), 120–131.
  • Jones, M. J., & Harvey, M. (2019). Library 2.0: The effectiveness of social media as a marketing tool for libraries in educational institutions. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 51(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000616668959
  • Kabudi, T. M. (2022). Artificial intelligence for quality education: Successes and challenges for AI in meeting SDG4. In International Conference on Social Implications of Computers in Developing Countries (pp. 347–362). Springer International Publishing.
  • Kasilingam, D. L. (2020). Understanding the attitude and intention to use smartphone chatbots for shopping. Technology in Society, 62, Article 101280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101280
  • Kelly, S. (2010). Qualitative interviewing techniques and styles. In I. Bourgeault, R. Dingwall, & R. de Vries (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative methods in health research (pp. 307-326). Sage Publications.
  • Kenny, D. A. (2018). Moderation. http://davidakenny.net/cm/moderation.htm
  • King, M. R., & ChatGPT. (2023). A conversation on artificial intelligence, chatbots, and plagiarism in higher education. Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering, 16(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12195-022-00754-8
  • Kline, R. B. (2023). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications.
  • Kumar, J. A., & Bervell, B. (2019). Google classroom for mobile learning in higher education: Modelling the initial perceptions of students. Education and Information Technologies, 24(2), 1793–1817. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-09858-z
  • Kwateng, K. O., Atiemo, K. A. O., & Appiah, C. (2018). Acceptance and use of mobile banking: an application of UTAUT2. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 32(1), 118–151.
  • Lim, X. J., Cheah, J. H., Ng, S. I., Basha, N. K., & Liu, Y. (2021). Are men from Mars, women from Venus? Examining gender differences towards continuous use intention of branded apps. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 60, Article 102422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102422
  • Lin, Z., & Theingi, H. (2019). Extended UTAUT2 model on factors influencing of mobile commerce acceptance in Yangon, Myanmar. AU-GSB e-Journal, 12(2), 3–18.
  • Linge, A. A., Chaudhari, T., Kakde, B. B., & Singh, M. (2023). Analysis of factors affecting use behavior towards mobile payment apps: A SEM approach. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2023, Article 3327994. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/3327994
  • Mahmud, A., Susilowati, N., & Sari, P. N. (2022). Investigating factor of behaviour intention and usage of siskeudes in Central Java Indonesia. Journal of Management Information & Decision Sciences, 25, 1–14.
  • Moraes, C. L. (2021). Chatbot as a learning assistant: Factors influencing adoption and recommendation [Doctoral dissertation, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa (Portugal)]. https://www.proquest.com/openview/4e3522fccf6b29be44e4bfde1cd3ac71/1?cbl=2026366&diss=y&pq-origsite=gscholar
  • Nikolopoulou, K., Gialamas, V., & Lavidas, K. (2021). Habit, hedonic motivation, performance expectancy and technological pedagogical knowledge affect teachers’ intention to use mobile internet. Computers and Education Open, 2, Article 100041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2021.100041
  • Ragheb, M. A., Tantawi, P., Farouk, N., & Hatata, A. (2022). Investigating the acceptance of applying chat-bot (artificial intelligence) technology among higher education students in Egypt. International Journal of Higher Education Management, 8(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.24052/IJHEM/V08N02/ART-1
  • Rahim, N. I. M., Iahad, N. A., Yusof, A. F., & Al-Sharafi, M. A. (2022). AI-based chatbots adoption model for higher-education institutions: A hybrid PLS-SEM-neural network modelling approach. Sustainability, 14(19), 12726. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912726
  • Rahman, M. M., & Watanobe, Y. (2023). ChatGPT for education and research: Opportunities, threats, and strategies. Applied Sciences, 13(9), 5783. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13095783
  • Ramírez-Correa, P. E., Grandón, E. E., & Arenas-Gaitán, J. (2019). Assessing differences in customers’ personal disposition to e-commerce. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 119(4), 792–820. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-07-2018-0280
  • Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Sinkovics, N., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2023). A perspective on using partial least squares structural equation modelling in data articles. Data in Brief, 48, Article 109074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2023.109074
  • Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J.-M. (2015). Smartpls 3. Bonningstedt: SmartPLS. http://smartpls.com.
  • Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J. M. (2022). SmartPLS 4. SmartPLS.
  • Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling. In C. Homburg, M. Klarmann, & A. E. Vomberg (Eds.), Handbook of market research (pp. 1–47). Springer.
  • Sawyer, S. M., Azzopardi, P. S., Wickremarathne, D., & Patton, G. C. (2018). The age of adolescence. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health, 2(3), 223–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(18)30022-1
  • Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education, 128, 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009
  • Shahsavar, Y., & Choudhury, A. (2023). The role of AI chatbots in healthcare: A study on user intentions to utilize ChatGPT for self-diagnosis. JMIR Preprints.
  • Siedlecki, S. L. (2020). Understanding descriptive research designs and methods. Clinical Nurse Specialist, 34(1), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.1097/NUR.0000000000000493
  • Soper, D. S. (2020). A-priori sample size calculator for structural equation models [Software]. Free Statistics Calculators.
  • Stone, M. (1974). Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical prediction (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (Series B), 36(2), 111–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1974.tb00994.x
  • Strzelecki, A. (2023). To use or not to use ChatGPT in higher education? A study of students’ acceptance and use of technology. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2209881.
  • Sugumar, M., & Chandra, S. (2021). Do I desire chatbots to be like humans? Exploring factors for adoption of chatbots for financial services. Journal of International Technology and Information Management, 30(3), 38–77. https://doi.org/10.58729/1941-6679.1501
  • Sullivan, M., Kelly, A., & McLaughlan, P. (2023). ChatGPT in higher education: Considerations for academic integrity and student learning. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 6(1), 1–10.
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2021). Using multivariate statistics (7th ed.). Pearson.
  • Tamilmani, K., Rana, N. P., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2019). Use of “habit” is not a habit in understanding individual technology adoption: A review of UTAUT2 based empirical studies. In Smart Working, Living and Organising: IFIP WG 8.6 International Conference on Transfer and Diffusion of IT, TDIT 2018, Portsmouth, UK, June 25, 2018, Proceedings (pp. 277–294). Springer International Publishing.
  • Tamilmani, K., Rana, N. P., Wamba, S. F., & Dwivedi, R. (2021). The extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT2): A systematic literature review and theory evaluation. International Journal of Information Management, 57, Article 102269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102269
  • Terblanche, N., & Kidd, M. (2022). Adoption factors and moderating effects of age and gender that influence the intention to use a non-directive reflective coaching chatbot. SAGE Open, 12(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221096136
  • Umami, R. F., & Irawan, M. I. (2021). Application of UTAUT2 for analysis of use behavior management information system (SIMBMD) in regional government XYZ. In 3rd International Conference on Business and Management of Technology (ICONBMT 2021) (pp. 72–79). Atlantis Press.
  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly, 425–478.
  • Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412
  • Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X. (2016). Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: A synthesis and the road ahead. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 17(5), 328–376. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00428
  • Wagner, G., Raymond, L., & Paré, G. (2023). Understanding prospective physicians’ intention to use artificial intelligence in their future medical practice: Configurational analysis. JMIR Medical Education, 9, e45631. https://doi.org/10.2196/45631
  • Yeap, J. A., Ramayah, T., & Soto-Acosta, P. (2016). Factors propelling the adoption of m-learning among students in higher education. Electronic Markets, 26(4), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-015-0214-x
  • Yidana, M. B., Arthur, F., Kaku, D. W., & Anti Partey, P. (2023). Predictors of economics students’ behavioural intention to use tablets: A two-staged structural equation modelling-artificial neural network approach. Mobile Information Systems, 2023, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/9629405

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.