188
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Exploring the attitude and use of GenAI-image among art and design college students based on TAM and SDT

, & ORCID Icon
Received 03 Feb 2024, Accepted 03 Jun 2024, Published online: 18 Jun 2024

References

  • Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
  • Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16(3), 397–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510903008204
  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  • Bauer, K., Jussupow, E., Heigl, R., Vogt, B., & Hinz, O. (February 29, 2024). All just in your head? Unraveling the side effects of generative AI disclosure in creative task. SSRN Electronic Journal, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4782554
  • Benlian, A., Klumpe, J., & Hinz, O. (2020). Mitigating the intrusive effects of smart home assistants by using anthropomorphic design features: A multimethod investigation. Information Systems Journal, 30(6), 1010–1042. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12243
  • Bisdas, S., Topriceanu, C.-C., Zakrzewska, Z., Irimia, A.-V., Shakallis, L., Subhash, J., Casapu, M.-M., Leon-Rojas, J., Pinto Dos Santos, D., Andrews, D. M., Zeicu, C., Bouhuwaish, A. M., Lestari, A. N., Abu-Ismail, L., Sadiq, A. S., Khamees, A., Mohammed, K. M. G., Williams, E., Omran, A. I., … Ebrahim, E. H. (2021). Artificial intelligence in medicine: A multinational multi-center survey on the medical and dental students’ perception. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, 795284. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.795284
  • Casteleiro-Pitrez, J. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence image tools among future designers: A usability, user experience, and emotional analysis. Digital, 4(2), 316–332. https://doi.org/10.3390/digital4020016
  • Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8
  • Cheng, Y.-M. (2011). Antecedents and consequences of e-learning acceptance. Information Systems Journal, 21(3), 269–299. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2010.00356.x
  • Chiu, T. K. F. (2023). The impact of Generative AI (GenAI) on practices, policies and research direction in education: A case of ChatGPT and Midjourney. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2253861
  • Chiu, T. K. F., Moorhouse, B. L., Chai, C. S., & Ismailov, M. (2023). Teacher support and student motivation to learn with Artificial Intelligence (AI) based chatbot. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2172044
  • Cooper, G. (2023). Examining science education in ChatGPT: An exploratory study of generative artificial intelligence. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32(3), 444–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10039-y
  • Dai, X., Hou, J., Ma, C.-Y., Tsai, S., Wang, J., Wang, R., Zhang, P., Vandenhende, S., Wang, X., Dubey, A., Yu, M., Kadian, A., Radenovic, F., Mahajan, D., Li, K., Zhao, Y., Petrovic, V., Singh, M. K., Motwani, S., … Parikh, D. (2023). Emu: Enhancing image generation models using photogenic needles in a Haystack (arXiv:2309.15807). arXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.15807.
  • Dai, Y., Liu, A., & Lim, C. P. (2023). Reconceptualizing ChatGPT and generative AI as a student-driven innovation in higher education. Procedia CIRP.
  • Davenport, T. H., & Mittal, N. (2022, November 14). How generative AI Is changing creative work. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2022/11/how-generative-ai-is-changing-creative-work.
  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  • Davis, F. D. (1993). User acceptance of information technology: System characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 38(3), 475–487. https://doi.org/10.1006/imms.1993.1022
  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Handbook of self-determination research. University Rochester Press.
  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2013). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer Science & Business Media.
  • De Vreede, T., Raghavan, M., & De Vreede, G.-J. (2021). Design foundations for AI assisted decision making: A self determination theory approach. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2021.019
  • Eshraghian, J. K. (2020). Human ownership of artificial creativity. Nature Machine Intelligence, 2(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-020-0161-x
  • Fathali, S., & Okada, T. (2018). Technology acceptance model in technology-enhanced OCLL contexts: A self-determination theory approach. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3629
  • Foster, D. (2022). Generative deep learning. O’Reilly Media, Inc.
  • Franceschelli, G., & Musolesi, M. (2022). Copyright in generative deep learning. Data & Policy, 4, e17. https://doi.org/10.1017/dap.2022.10
  • Gagné, M., Parker, S. K., Griffin, M. A., Dunlop, P. D., Knight, C., Klonek, F. E., & Parent-Rocheleau, X. (2022). Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1(7), 378–392. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00056-w
  • Garnier-Villarreal, M., & Jorgensen, T. D. (2020). Adapting fit indices for Bayesian structural equation modeling: Comparison to maximum likelihood. Psychological Methods, 25(1), 46–70. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000224
  • Hong, M. K., Hakimi, S., Chen, Y.-Y., Toyoda, H., Wu, C., & Klenk, M. (2023). Generative AI for product design: Getting the right design and the design right (arXiv:2306.01217). arXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.01217.
  • Hsieh, H.-L., Lai, J.-M., Chuang, B.-K., & Tsai, C.-H. (2022). Determinants of telehealth continuance intention: A multi-perspective framework. Healthcare, 10(10), 2038. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10102038
  • Hutson, J. (2024). Integrating art and AI: Evaluating the educational impact of AI tools in digital art history learning. Forum for Art Studies, 1(1), 393. https://doi.org/10.59400/fas.v1i1.393
  • Jackson, D. N. (1969). Multimethod factor analysis in the evaluation of convergent and discriminant validity. Psychological Bulletin, 72(1), 30–49. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027421
  • Jaiswal, D. P., Kumar, S., & Badr, Y. (2020). Towards an artificial intelligence aided design approach: Application to anime faces with generative adversarial networks. Procedia Computer Science, 168, 57–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.02.257
  • Johnson, D. G., & Verdicchio, M. (2017). Ai anxiety. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(9), 2267–2270. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23867
  • Kaiser, Z. (2019). Creativity as computation: Teaching design in the age of automation. Design and Culture, 11(2), 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2019.1609279
  • Kanbach, D. K., Heiduk, L., Blueher, G., Schreiter, M., & Lahmann, A. (2024). The GenAI is out of the bottle: Generative artificial intelligence from a business model innovation perspective. Review of Managerial Science, 18(4), 1189–1220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-00696-z
  • Khan, I. U., Hameed, Z., Yu, Y., Islam, T., Sheikh, Z., & Khan, S. U. (2018). Predicting the acceptance of MOOCs in a developing country: Application of task-technology fit model, social motivation, and self-determination theory. Telematics and Informatics, 35(4), 964–978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.09.009
  • Latikka, R., Bergdahl, J., Savela, N., & Oksanen, A. (2023). Ai as an artist? A two-wave survey study on attitudes toward using artificial intelligence in art. Poetics, 101, 101839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2023.101839
  • Lee, Y., Lee, J., & Hwang, Y. (2015). Relating motivation to information and communication technology acceptance: Self-determination theory perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 418–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.021
  • Lee, D. Y., & Lehto, M. R. (2013). User acceptance of YouTube for procedural learning: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model. Computers & Education, 61, 193–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.001
  • Li, J., & Huang, J.-S. (2020). Dimensions of artificial intelligence anxiety based on the integrated fear acquisition theory. Technology in Society, 63, 101410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101410
  • Liao, S., Lin, L., & Chen, Q. (2023). Research on the acceptance of collaborative robots for the industry 5.0 era—The mediating effect of perceived competence and the moderating effect of robot use self-efficacy. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 95, 103455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2023.103455
  • Liu, G., & Ma, C. (2023). Measuring EFL learners’ use of ChatGPT in informal digital learning of English based on the technology acceptance model. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 18(2), 125–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2023.2240316
  • Luo, Y., Lin, J., & Yang, Y. (2021). Students’ motivation and continued intention with online self-regulated learning: A self-determination theory perspective. Zeitschrift Für Erziehungswissenschaft, 24(6), 1379–1399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-021-01042-3
  • Michel-Villarreal, R., Vilalta-Perdomo, E., Salinas-Navarro, D. E., Thierry-Aguilera, R., & Gerardou, F. S. (2023). Challenges and opportunities of generative AI for higher education as explained by ChatGPT. Education Sciences, 13(9), 856. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090856
  • Moon, J.-W., & Kim, Y.-G. (2001). Extending the TAM for a world-wide-web context. Information & Management, 38(4), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(00)00061-6
  • Moradbakhti, L., Schreibelmayr, S., & Mara, M. (2022). Do men have no need for “feminist” artificial intelligence? Agentic and gendered voice assistants in the light of basic psychological needs. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 855091. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.855091
  • Nikou, S. A., & Economides, A. A. (2017). Mobile-based assessment: Integrating acceptance and motivational factors into a combined model of self-determination theory and technology acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.020
  • Oppenlaender, J., Visuri, A., Paananen, V., Linder, R., & Silvennoinen, J. (2023). Text-to-image generation: Perceptions and realities (arXiv:2303.13530). arXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.13530.
  • Oppl, S., & Stary, C. (2022). Motivating users to manage privacy concerns in cyber-physical settings—A design science approach considering self-determination theory. Sustainability, 14(2), 900. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020900
  • Pavlov, G., Maydeu-Olivares, A., & Shi, D. (2021). Using the standardized root mean squared residual (SRMR) to assess exact fit in structural equation models. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 81(1), 110–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164420926231
  • Peres, R., Schreier, M., Schweidel, D., & Sorescu, A. (2023). On ChatGPT and beyond: How generative artificial intelligence may affect research, teaching, and practice. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 40(2), 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2023.03.001
  • Racero, F. J., Bueno, S., & Gallego, M. D. (2020). Predicting students’ behavioral intention to use open source software: A combined view of the technology acceptance model and self-determination theory. Applied Sciences, 10(8), 2711. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10082711
  • Rahman, M. S., Ko, M., Warren, J., & Carpenter, D. (2016). Healthcare Technology Self-Efficacy (HTSE) and its influence on individual attitude: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 12–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.016
  • Rezvani, A., Khosravi, P., & Dong, L. (2017). Motivating users toward continued usage of information systems: Self-determination theory perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 76, 263–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.032
  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2006). Self-regulation and the problem of human autonomy: Does psychology need choice, self-determination, and will? Journal of Personality, 74(6), 1557–1586. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00420.x
  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Publications.
  • Sagnier, C., Loup-Escande, E., Lourdeaux, D., Thouvenin, I., & Vallery, G. (2020). User acceptance of virtual reality: An extended technology acceptance model. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 36(11), 993–1007. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1708612
  • Şahin, F., & Şahin, Y. L. (2022). Drivers of technology adoption during the COVID-19 pandemic: The motivational role of psychological needs and emotions for pre-service teachers. Social Psychology of Education, 25(2-3), 567–592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-022-09702-w
  • Sallam, M., Salim, N. A., Barakat, M., Al-Mahzoum, K., Al-Tammemi, A. B., Malaeb, D., Hallit, R., & Hallit, S. (2023). Assessing health students’ attitudes and usage of ChatGPT in Jordan: Validation study. JMIR Medical Education, 9, e48254. https://doi.org/10.2196/48254
  • Scherer, M. U. (2015). Regulating artificial intelligence systems: Risks, challenges, competencies, and strategies. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 29, 353. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2609777
  • Schetinger, V., Bartolomeo, S. D., El-Assady, M., McNutt, A., Miller, M., Passos, J. P. A., & Adams, J. L. (2023). Doom or deliciousness: Challenges and opportunities for visualization in the age of generative models. Computer Graphics Forum.
  • Sergis, S., Sampson, D. G., & Pelliccione, L. (2018). Investigating the impact of Flipped Classroom on students’ learning experiences: A self-determination theory approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 368–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.011
  • Suryadevara, C. (2020). Generating free images with openai’s generative models. International Journal of Virtual Technology and Multimedia, 7(3), 49–56.
  • Tang, A., Li, K., Kwok, K. O., Cao, L., Luong, S., & Tam, W. (2023). The importance of transparency: Declaring the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in academic writing. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 56(2), 314–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12938
  • Tedre, M., & Vartiainen, H. (2023). How text-to-image generative AI is transforming mediated action?. https://doi.org/10.36227/techrxiv.24449185.v1
  • Teeroovengadum, V., Heeraman, N., & Jugurnath, B. (2017). Examining the antecedents of ICT adoption in education using an Extended Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). International Journal of Education and Development Using ICT, 13(3), https://www.learntechlib.org/p/182155/.
  • Teo, T., Lee, C. B., Chai, C. S., & Choy, D. (2009). Modelling pre-service teachers’ perceived usefulness of an ICT-based student-centred learning (SCL) curriculum: A Singapore study. Asia Pacific Education Review, 10(4), 535–545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-009-9051-y
  • Vallerand, R. J. (1997). Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 29, pp. 271–360). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60019-2
  • Van Dis, E. A. M., Bollen, J., Zuidema, W., Van Rooij, R., & Bockting, C. L. (2023). ChatGPT: Five priorities for research. Nature, 614(7947), 224–226. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00288-7
  • Vartiainen, H., & Tedre, M. (2023). Using artificial intelligence in craft education: Crafting with text-to-image generative models. Digital Creativity, 34(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2023.2174557
  • Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x
  • Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
  • Wang, W.-T., & Wang, C.-C. (2009). An empirical study of instructor adoption of web-based learning systems. Computers & Education, 53(3), 761–774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.02.021
  • Wang, Y.-Y., & Wang, Y.-S. (2022). Development and validation of an artificial intelligence anxiety scale: An initial application in predicting motivated learning behavior. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(4), 619–634. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1674887
  • Wang, Y.-M., Wei, C.-L., Lin, H.-H., Wang, S.-C., & Wang, Y.-S. (2022). What drives students’ AI learning behavior: A perspective of AI anxiety. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2153147
  • Zardari, B. A., Hussain, Z., Arain, A. A., Rizvi, W. H., & Vighio, M. S. (2021). Development and validation of user experience-based E-learning acceptance model for sustainable higher education. Sustainability, 13(11), 6201. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116201
  • Zhang, C., Schießl, J., Plößl, L., Hofmann, F., & Gläser-Zikuda, M. (2023). Acceptance of artificial intelligence among pre-service teachers: A multigroup analysis. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00420-7
  • Zheng, J., & Li, S. (2020). What drives students’ intention to use tablet computers: An extended technology acceptance model. International Journal of Educational Research, 102, 101612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101612

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.