0
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Understanding factors influencing ESL student teachers’ adoption of classroom response systems: an integration of TAM and AOI theory

ORCID Icon &
Received 12 Feb 2023, Accepted 18 Jun 2024, Published online: 17 Jul 2024

References

  • Abidin, H. Z., & Zaman, F. H. K. (2017, November 9–10). Students’ perceptions on game-based classroom response system in a computer programming course. 2017 IEEE 9th International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED), Japan. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEED.2017.8251203
  • Al-Rahmi, W. M., Yahaya, N., Alamri, M. M., Alyoussef, I. Y., Al-Rahmi, A. M., & Kamin, Y. B. (2021). Integrating innovation diffusion theory with technology acceptance model: Supporting students’ attitude towards using a massive open online courses (MOOCs) systems. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(8), 1380–1392. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1629599
  • Alawadhi, A., & Abu-Ayyash, E. A. S. (2021). Students’ perceptions of Kahoot!: An exploratory mixed-method study in EFL undergraduate classrooms in the UAE. Education and Information Technologies, 26(4), 3629–3658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10425-8
  • Alsabawy, A. Y., Cater-Steel, A., & Soar, J. (2016). Determinants of perceived usefulness of e-learning systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 843–858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.065
  • Awang, P. (2015). SEM made simple: A gentle approach to learning structural equation modeling. MPWS Rich Publication.
  • Bakonyi, V., Illés, Z., & Verma, C. (2020, June 17–19). Analyzing the Students’ attitude towards a real-time classroom response system. 2020 International Conference on Intelligent Engineering and Management (ICIEM), London. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIEM48762.2020.9160162
  • Braak, V. J., & Tearle, P. (2007). The computer attributes for learning scale (CALS) among university students: Scale development and relationship with actual computer use for learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(6), 2966–2982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2006.08.014
  • Çelik, S., & Baran, E. (2022). Student response system: Its impact on EFL students’ vocabulary achievement. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 31(2), 141–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2021.1986125
  • Chou, P.-N. (2022). Using plickers to support student learning in rural schools: A comprehensive analysis. SAGE Open, 12(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221116109
  • Comrey, A. L. (1988). Factor-analytic methods of scale development in personality and clinical psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56(5), 754. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.56.5.754
  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  • Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
  • Dearing, J. W. (2009). Applying diffusion of innovation theory to intervention development. Research on Social Work Practice, 19(5), 503–518. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731509335569
  • De Grove, F., Bourgonjon, J., & Van Looy, J. (2012). Digital games in the classroom? A contextual approach to teachers’ adoption intention of digital games in formal education. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(6), 2023–2033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.05.021
  • Deng, Z., Hong, Z., Ren, C., Zhang, W., & Xiang, F. (2018). What predicts patients’ adoption intention toward mHealth services in China: Empirical study. JMIR MHealth and UHealth, 6(8), e172. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.9316
  • DeVellis, R. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications. Sage Publication.
  • Ebadi, S., Rasouli, R., & Mohamadi, M. (2021). Exploring EFL learners’ perspectives on using Kahoot as a game-based student response system. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1881798
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
  • Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2009). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson.
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (Vol. 5). Prentice Hall.
  • Hardgrave, B. C., Davis, F. D., & Riemenschneider, C. K. (2014). Investigating determinants of software developers’ intentions to follow methodologies. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20, 123–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045751
  • Holbrey, C. E. (2020). Kahoot! using a game-based approach to blended learning to support effective learning environments and student engagement in traditional lecture theatres. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 29(2), 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1737568
  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  • Huang, H.-M., & Liaw, S.-S. (2018). An analysis of learners’ intentions toward virtual reality learning based on constructivist and technology acceptance approaches. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19, 91–115. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i1.2503
  • Jiang, Y., Chen, D., & Lai, F. (2010). Technological-personal-environmental (TPE) framework: A conceptual model for technology acceptance at the individual level. Journal of International Technology and Information Management, 19, 89–98. https://doi.org/10.58729/1941-6679.1087
  • Kapoor, K. K., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Williams, M. D. (2014). Rogers’ innovation adoption attributes: A. Systematic Review and Synthesis of Existing Research. Information Systems Management, 31, 74–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2014.854103
  • Kebritchi, M. (2010). Factors affecting teachers’ adoption of educational computer games: A case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), 256–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00921.x
  • Knudsen, H. K., & Roman, P. M. (2015). Innovation attributes and adoption decisions: Perspectives from leaders of a national sample of addiction treatment organizations. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 49, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2014.08.003
  • Lee, Y.-H., Hsieh, Y.-C., & Hsu, C.-N. (2011). Adding innovation diffusion theory to the technology acceptance model: Supporting employees’ intentions to use e-learning systems. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 14, 124–137.
  • Li, S.-C. S., & Huang, W.-C. (2016). Lifestyles, innovation attributes, and teachers’ adoption of game-based learning: Comparing non-adopters with early adopters, adopters and likely adopters in Taiwan. Computers & Education, 96, 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.009
  • Liu, C., Sands-Meyer, S., & Audran, J. (2019). The effectiveness of the student response system (SRS) in English grammar learning in a flipped English as a foreign language (EFL) class. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(8), 1178–1191. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1528283
  • Luo, Z. (2023). Determinants of the perceived usefulness (PU) in the context of using gamification for classroom-based ESL teaching: A scale development study. Education and Information Technologies, 28(4), 4741–4768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11409-6
  • Luo, Z. (2024). Factors contributing to teachers’ acceptance intention to gamified EFL tools: A scale development study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10249-6
  • Luo, Z., Brown, C., & O’Steen, B. (2021). Factors contributing to teachers’ acceptance intention of gamified learning tools in secondary schools: An exploratory study. Education and Information Technologies, 26(5), 6337–6363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10622-z
  • Luo, Z., Tan, X., He, M., & Wu, X. (2023). The Seewo interactive whiteboard (IWB) for ESL teaching: How useful it is? Heliyon, 9(10), e20424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20424
  • Menzli, L. J., Smirani, L. K., Boulahia, J. A., & Hadjouni, M. (2022). Investigation of open educational resources adoption in higher education using Rogers’ diffusion of innovation theory. Heliyon, 8(7), e09885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09885
  • Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 192–222. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2.3.192
  • Pallant, J. (2016). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Park, S. Y., Nam, M. W., & Cha, S. B. (2012). University students’ behavioral intention to use mobile learning: Evaluating the technology acceptance model. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(4), 592–605. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01229.x
  • Pinho, C., Franco, M., & Mendes, L. (2021). Application of innovation diffusion theory to the E-learning process: Higher education context. Education and Information Technologies, 26(1), 421–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10269-2
  • Ranieri, M., Raffaghelli, J. E., & Bruni, I. (2021). Game-based student response system: Revisiting its potentials and criticalities in large-size classes. Active Learning in Higher Education, 22(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787418812667
  • Reinicke, B. A., & Marakas, G. M. (2005, January 6–6). Exploring the psychological determinants of perceived ease of use and usefulness. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences Hawaii (pp. 1–8).
  • Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
  • Sahin, I. (2006). Detailed review of Rogers’ diffusion of innovations theory and educational technology-related studies based on rogers’ theory. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 5, 14–23.
  • Sánchez-Prieto, J. C., Huang, F., Olmos-Migueláñez, S., García-Peñalvo, F. J., & Teo, T. (2019). Exploring the unknown: The effect of resistance to change and attachment on mobile adoption among secondary pre-service teachers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2433–2449. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12822
  • Sasaki, M. (2018). Application of diffusion of innovation theory to educational accountability: The case of EFL education in Japan. Language Testing in Asia, 8(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-017-0052-1
  • Schmid, E. C. (2007). Enhancing performance knowledge and self-esteem in classroom language learning: The potential of the ACTIVote component of interactive whiteboard technology. System, 35(2), 119–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2007.01.001
  • Selim, H. M. (2007). Critical success factors for e-learning acceptance: Confirmatory factor models. Computers & Education, 49(2), 396–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.09.004
  • Shaban, A., & Egbert, J. (2018). Diffusing education technology: A model for language teacher professional development in CALL. System, 78, 234–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.09.002
  • Sheng, R., Goldie, C. L., Pulling, C., & Luctkar-Flude, M. (2019). Evaluating student perceptions of a multi-platform classroom response system in undergraduate nursing. Nurse Education Today, 78, 25–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2019.03.008
  • Shiau, S. J. H., Huang, C.-Y., Yang, C.-L., & Juang, J.-N. (2018). A derivation of factors influencing the innovation diffusion of the OpenStreetMap in STEM education. Sustainability, 10(10), 3447. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/10/3447
  • Siau, K., Sheng, H., & Nah, F. F. H. (2006). Use of a classroom response system to enhance classroom interactivity. IEEE Transactions on Education, 49(3), 398–403. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2006.879802
  • Sprenger, D. A., & Schwaninger, A. (2021). Technology acceptance of four digital learning technologies (classroom response system, classroom chat, e-lectures, and mobile virtual reality) after three months’ usage. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00243-4
  • Straub, E. T. (2009). Understanding technology adoption: Theory and future directions for informal learning. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 625–649. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325896
  • Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
  • Türel, Y. K., & Johnson, T. E. (2012). Teachers’ belief and use of interactive whiteboards for teaching and learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15, 381–394.
  • Vagnani, G., & Volpe, L. (2017). Innovation attributes and managers’ decisions about the adoption of innovations in organizations: A meta-analytical review. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 1(2), 107–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2017.10.001
  • Vanderlinde, R., & Braak, v. J. (2011). A new ICT curriculum for primary education in Flanders: Defining and predicting teachers’ perceptions of innovation attributes. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 14, 124–135.
  • Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
  • Webster, C. A., Mîndrilă, D., Moore, C., Stewart, G., Orendorff, K., & Taunton, S. (2020). Measuring and comparing physical education teachers’ perceived attributes of CSPAPs: An innovation adoption perspective. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 39(1), 78–90. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2018-0328
  • Wong, G. K. (2016). The behavioral intentions of Hong Kong primary teachers in adopting educational technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(2), 313–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9426-9
  • Yuen, K. F., Cai, L., Qi, G., & Wang, X. (2021). Factors influencing autonomous vehicle adoption: An application of the technology acceptance model and innovation diffusion theory. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 33(5), 505–519. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2020.1826423
  • Zhang, P., Aikman, S. N., & Sun, H. (2008). Two types of attitudes in ICT acceptance and use. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 24(7), 628–648. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447310802335482
  • Zhang, L., Wen, H., Li, D., Fu, Z., & Cui, S. (2010). E-learning adoption intention and its key influence factors based on innovation adoption theory. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 51(11-12), 1428–1432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2009.11.013

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.