Audience Segmentation of Kentucky Mothers by Nonparticipation Status in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children

References

• Amerson, N. L., Arbise, B. S., Kelly, N. K., & Traore, E. (2014). Use of market research data by state chronic disease programs, Illinois, 2012–2014. Preventing Chronic Disease, 11, 1–8. doi:10.5888/pcd11.140268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, R., & Aday, L. A. (1978). Access to medical care in the U.S.: Realized and potential. Medical Care, 16(7), 533–546. doi:10.1097/00005650-197807000-00001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, R. M. (1995). Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: Does it matter? Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 36(1), 1–10. doi:10.2307/2137284
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, R. M. (2008). National health surveys and the behavioral model of health services use. Medical Care, 46(7), 647–653. doi:10.1097/MLR.0b013e31817a835d
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babitsch, B., Gohl, D., & Von Lengerke, T. (2012). Re-revisiting Andersen’s behavioral model of health services use: A systematic review of studies from 1998–2011. GMS Psycho-Social-Medicine, 9, 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Barents Group LLC. (2000). Final report on “Review of the literature on evaluations of outreach for public health insurance and selected other programs” (Contract No. 290-96-0004). Washington, DC: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
   Google Scholar
• Black, A. P., Brimblecombe, J., Eyles, H., Morris, P., Vally, H., & O’Dea, K. (2012). Food subsidy programs and the health and nutritional status of disadvantaged families in high income countries: A systematic review. BMC Public Health, 12(1), 1099. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-1099
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boslaugh, S. E., Kreuter, M. W., Nicholson, R. A., & Naleid, K. (2005). Comparing demographic, health status and psychosocial strategies of audience segmentation to promote physical activity. Health Education Research, 20(4), 430–438. doi:10.1093/her/cyg138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, C., Wood, J., Gonzalez, K., Kent, E., Hemmick, R., & Newman, C. (1996). North Carolina WIC social marketing study: Inactive participants. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, C. A., Lindenberger, J., Brown, C., Kent, E., Schreiber, J. M., Bustillo, M., & Canright, M. W. (2001). A social marketing approach to increasing enrollment in a public health program: A case study of the Texas WIC program. Human Organization, 60(3), 234–246. doi:10.17730/humo.60.3.9kdw80dx97284yg8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castañeda, X., Clayson, Z. C., Rundall, T., Dong, L., & Sercaz, M. (2003). Promising outreach practices: Enrolling low-income children in health insurance programs in California. Health Promotion Practice, 4(4), 430–438. doi:10.1177/1524839903255523
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Caulfield, L. E. (2005). Methodological challenges in performing targeting: Assessing dietary risk for WIC participation and education. Journal of Nutrition, 135(4), 879–881.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, F., McMahon, B. T., Cheing, G., Rosenthal, D. A., & Bezyak, J. (2005). Drivers of workplace discrimination against people with disabilities: The utility of attribution theory. Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation, 25(1), 77–88.
   Google Scholar
• Colman, S., Nichols-Barrer, I. P., Redline, J. E., Devaney, B. L., Ansell, S. V., Joyce, T., & Johnston, J. (2012). Effects of the special supplemental nutrition program for women, infants, and children (WIC): A review of recent research (Special Nutrition Programs Report No. WIC-12-WM). Alexandria, VA: USDA Food and Nutrition Service.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, P. L., Andersen, R. M., Wyn, R., & Brown, E. R. (2004). A framework for evaluating safety-net and other community-level factors on access for low-income populations. Inquiry, 41(1), 21–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department for Medicaid Services. (2014). Presumptive eligibility (PE) for pregnant women. Retrieved from http://chfs.ky.gov/dms/peservice.htm
   Google Scholar
• Donovan, R., & Henley, N. (2003). Market segmentation and target marketing: The principle of selectivity and concentration. In S. G. Zurbo (Eds.), Social marketing: Principles and practice (pp. 211–235). Melbourne, Australia: IP Communications.
   Google Scholar
• Food and Nutrition Service. (2013). MIS: WIC management information systems. Retrieved from http://www.fns.usda.gov/wic/wic-management-information-systems
   Google Scholar
• Forthofer, M. S., & Bryant, C. A. (2000). Using audience-segmentation techniques to tailor health behavior change strategies. American Journal of Health Behavior, 24(1), 36–43. doi:10.5993/AJHB.24.1.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, E., Hirschman, J., Mabli, J., Nelson, S., & Hourihan, K. (2009). WIC eligibles and coverage—1994 to 2007: Estimates of the population of women, infants and children eligible for WIC benefits. Alexandria, VA: USDA Food and Nutrition Service.
   Google Scholar
• IBM Corp. (2013). IBM SPSS statistics for Windows (Version 22). Armonk, NY: IBM Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• IBM Corp. (2014). SPSS decision trees (SPSS Version 22). Armonk, NY: IBM Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, P., Giannarelli, L., Huber, E., Betson, D., & Lovelette, G. (2015). National and State-Level estimates of special supplemental nutrition program for women, infants, and children (WIC) eligibles and program reach, 2012. Alexandria, VA: USDA Food and Nutrition Service.
   Google Scholar
• Kass, G. V. (1980). An exploratory technique for investigating large quantities of categorical data. Applied Statistics, 29(2), 119–127. doi:10.2307/2986296
   Google Scholar
• Kentucky Department of Public Health. (2015). What is the Kentucky WIC program? Retrieved from http://chfs.ky.gov/dph/mch/ns/wic.htm
   Google Scholar
• Kim, C. I., Lee, Y., Kim, B. H., Lee, H. S., & Jang, Y. A. (2009). Development of supplemental nutrition care program for women, infants and children in Korea: NutriPlus+. Nutrition Research and Practice, 3(3), 171–179. doi:10.4162/nrp.2009.3.3.171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindenberger, J., & Bryant, C. (2002). California WIC meta-analysis and small agency study: Executive summary (pp. 1–12). Tampa, FL: Best Start Social Marketing.
   Google Scholar
• Lindenberger, J. H., & Bryant, C. A. (2000). Promoting breastfeeding in the WIC program: A social marketing case study. American Journal of Health Behavior, 24(1), 53–60. doi:10.5993/AJHB.24.1.8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotenberg, L. D., Schechter, C., & Strand, J. (2011). Segmentation and targeting. In G. Hastings, K. Angus, & C. Bryant (Eds.), The Sage handbook of social marketing (pp. 127–128). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, P. J., Jessiman, T., & Cameron, A. (2015). Healthy start: The use of welfare food vouchers by low-income parents in England. Social Policy and Society, 14(03), 457–469. doi:10.1017/S1474746415000020
   Google Scholar
• McCarty, J. A., & Hastak, M. J. (2007). Segmentation approaches in data-mining: A comparison of RFM, CHAID, and logistic regression. Journal of Business Research, 60(6), 656–662. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.06.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michigan Department of Community Health. (2014). Michigan WIC program outreach tool works: Guidelines for building client and media relations (pp. 1–48). Lansing, MI: Michigan Department of Community Health.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, E. L., & Comiskey, C. M. (2013). Using chi-squared automatic interaction detection (CHAID) modelling to identify groups of methadone treatment clients experiencing significantly poorer treatment outcomes. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 45(4), 343–349. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2013.05.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, J. H. (1996). Segmentation using dependence methods: Interaction detection. Segmentation and positioning for strategic marketing decisions (pp. 153–157). Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association.
   Google Scholar
• Nestor, B., McKenzie, J., Hasan, N., AbuSabha, R., & Achterberg, C. (2001). Client satisfaction with the nutrition education component of the California WIC program. Journal of Nutrition Education, 33(2), 83–94. doi:10.1016/S1499-4046(06)60171-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• North Carolina WIC Program. (2001). Outreach campaign: Checklist for local WIC agencies (pp. 1–6). Raleigh, NC: North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services.
   Google Scholar
• Nutrition Services Branch Staff. (2014). Certification and management. In cabinet for health and family services. Frankfort, KY: WIC and Nutrition Manual.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, V., & Frazão, E. (2009, April). The WIC program: Background, trends, and economic issues, 2009 edition (Economic Research Report No. 73). Washington, D.C., USA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, J., & Baisch, M. J. (2014). An integrative review of information systems and terminologies used in local health departments. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 21(e1), e20–e27. doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001714
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollard, K., Condon, L., Warren, S., Collins, K., Tapp, A., Boyles, A., & Ricketts, A. (2013). Social marketing to encourage initiation and continuation of breastfeeding in Penhill and Pinehurst, Swindon. Project report. Bristol, UK: University of the West of England and Uscreates.
   Google Scholar
• Program Analysis and Monitoring Brach. (2006). WIC Electronic Benefit Transfer (EBT) system development, implementation, and expansion—5-year plan (2003-2008). Alexandria, VA: USDA Food and Nutrition Service.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, D. T. (2012). Kentucky WIC participants’ knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs regarding grains (Master thesis), University of Kentucky, UKnowledge. Theses and Dissertations–Dietetics and Human Nutrition. 4. Lexington, Kentucky. Retrieved from http://uknowledge.uky.edu/foodsci_etds/4
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie, L. D., Whaley, S. E., & Crocker, N. J. (2014). Satisfaction of California WIC participants with food package changes. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 46(3), S71–S78. doi:10.1016/j.jneb.2014.01.009
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosenberg, T. J., Alperen, J. K., & Chiasson, M. A. (2003). Why do WIC participants fail to pick up their checks? An urban study in the wake of welfare reform. American Journal of Public Health, 93(3), 477–481. doi:10.2105/AJPH.93.3.477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAS Institute Inc. (2011). SAS software (Version 9.3). Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Slater, M. D. (1996). Theory and method in health audience segmentation. Journal of Health Communication, 1(3), 267–284. doi:10.1080/108107396128059
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stuber, J., & Schlesinger, M. (2006). Sources of stigma for means-tested government programs. Social Science and Medicine, 63(4), 933–945. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.01.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, J., Wang, Y., & Rodriguez, N. (2013). Health digital inclusion and patient-centered care readiness in the USA. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 32(1), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Supplemental Food Programs Division. (2014). WIC breastfeeding data local agency report FY 2013. Alexandria, VA: USDA Food and Nutrition Services.
   Google Scholar
• Supplemental Food Programs Division. (2015). FY 2014 WIC breastfeeding data local agency report. United States Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service. Retrieved from http://www.fns.usda.gov/sites/default/files/wic/FY%202014%20Breastfeeding%20Data%20Local%20Agency%20Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Szpakowicz, D. (2016). The healthy start scheme: An evidence review. Social research. Scottish Government Social Research. Retrieved from http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/25802/1/00497237.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Thorn, B., Tadler, C., Huret, N., Trippe, C., Ayo, E., Mendelson, M., … Tran, V. (2015). WIC participant and program characteristics 2014 (Prepared by Insight Policy Research under Contract No. AG-3198-C-11-0010). Alexandria, VA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Children’s Fund. (2015). UNICEF’s approach to scaling up nutrition for mothers and their children. Discussion paper. New York, NY: Programme Division, UNICEF.
   Google Scholar
• United States Congress. (1985). Part 246—Special supplemental nutrition program for women, infants and children. (United States Code 50 FR 6121; pp. 369). Washington, DC: United States Congress.
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Agriculture. (2013). WIC agency level monthly data. CSV spreadsheet.. Alexandria, VA. Retrieved from: https://www.fns.usda.gov/pd/wic-program
   Google Scholar
• Van Diepen, M., & Franses, P. H. (2006). Evaluating chi-squared automatic interaction detection. Information Systems, 31(8), 814–831. doi:10.1016/j.is.2005.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstein, A. (2004). Market segmentation: An overview. In A. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of market segmentation (p. 9). Florence, KY: Haworth Press.
   Google Scholar