Catch Them If You Can: The Effect of Reminder Direct Mailings on the Return Rate of First-Time Donors

References

• Andaleeb, S. S., & Basu, A. K. (1995). Explaining blood donation: The trust factor. Journal of Health Care Marketing, 15(1), 42–48.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arnold, M. J., & Tapp, S. R. (2001). The effect of direct marketing techniques on performance: An application to arts organizations. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 15(3), 41–52. doi:10.1002/dir.1015
   Google Scholar
• Bacile, T. J., Ye, C., & Swilley, E. (2014). From firm-controlled to consumer-contributed: Consumer co-production of personal media marketing communication. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 28(2), 117–133. doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2013.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balabanis, G., Stables, R. E., & Phillips, H. C. (1997). Market orientation in the top 200 British charity organizations and its impact on their performance. European Journal of Marketing, 31(8), 583–603. doi:10.1108/03090569710176592
   Google Scholar
• Barkworth, L., Hibbert, S., Horne, S., & Tagg, S. (2002). Giving at risk? Examining perceived risk and blood donation behaviour. Journal of Marketing Management, 18(9–10), 905–922. doi:10.1362/0267257012930376
   Google Scholar
• Bekkers, R., & Crutzen, O. (2007). Just keep it simple: A field experiment on fundraising letters. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 12(4), 371–378. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1479-103X
   Google Scholar
• Bekkers, R., & Wiepking, P. (2011). A literature review of empirical studies of philanthropy: Eight mechanisms that drive charitable giving. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(5), 924–973. doi:10.1177/0899764010380927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boenigk, S., & Helmig, B. (2013). Why do donors donate? Examining the effects of organizational identification and identity salience on the relationships among satisfaction, loyalty, and donation behavior. Journal of Service Research, 16(4), 533–548. doi:10.1177/1094670513486169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boenigk, S, Leipnitz, S, & Scherhag, C. (2011). Altruistic values, satisfaction and loyalty among first‐time blood donors. International Journal Of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 16(4), 356-370.
   Google Scholar
• Callero, P. L., & Piliavin, J. A. (1983). Developing a commitment to blood donation. The impact of one’s first experience. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 13(1), 1–16. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1983.tb00883.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, D., Erdahl, R., Johnson, D., Bibelnieks, E., Haydock, M., Bullock, M., & Crowder, H. (2001). Optimizing customer mail streams at Fingerhut. Interfaces, 31(1), 77–90. doi:10.1287/inte.31.1.77.9691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, J. S. K., Wan, W. Y., & Yu, P. L. H. (2014). A Poisson geometric process approach for predicting drop-out and committed first-time blood donors. Journal of Applied Statistics, 41(7), 1486–1503. doi:10.1080/02664763.2014.881781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Rada, V. D. (2005). The effect of follow-up mailings on the response rate and response quality in mail surveys. Quality & Quantity, 39(1), 1–18. doi:10.1007/s11135-004-5950-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutskens, E., de Ruyter, K., Wetzels, M., & Oosterveld, P. (2004). Response rate and response quality of internet-based surveys: An experimental study. Marketing Letters, 15(1), 21–36. doi:10.1023/B:MARK.0000021968.86465.00
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond, W. D., & Iyer, E. S. (2007). Creating effective direct mail charitable solicitations: The effects of enclosures and different appeals. Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing, 18(1), 81–100. doi:10.1300/J054v18n01_05
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, W. D., & Noble, S. M. (2001). Defensive responses to charitable direct mail solicitations. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 15(3), 2–12. doi:10.1002/dir.1012
   Google Scholar
• Direct Marketing Association [DMA]. (2015). Statistical fact book. New York, NY: Direct Marketing Association.
   Google Scholar
• Eastlick, M. A., Feinberg, R., & Trappey, C. (1993). Information overload in mail catalog shopping: How many catalogs are too many? Journal of Direct Marketing, 7(4), 14–19. doi:10.1002/dir.4000070404
   Google Scholar
• Elsner, R., Krafft, M., & Huchzermeier, A. (2004). Optimizing Rhenanias’s direct marketing business through dynamic multilevel modeling (DMLM) in a multicatalog-brand environment. Marketing Science, 23(2), 192–206. doi:10.1287/mksc.1040.0063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feld, S., Frenzen, H., Krafft, M., Peters, K., & Verhoef, P. C. (2013). The effect of mailing design characteristics on direct mail campaign performance. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 30(2), 143–159. doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2012.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• German Red Cross Blood Donor Service North-East [GRC]. (2015a). Termine zur Blutspende. Retrieved July 27, 2016, from https://www.blutspende-nordost.de/blutspende/termine-zur-blutspende/
   Google Scholar
• German Red Cross Blood Donor Service North-East [GRC]. (2015b). Blutgruppen & Verteilung in der Bevölkerung. Retrieved July 27, 2016, from http://www.blutspende-nordost.de/blutspende/wissenswertes-ueber-blut/blutgruppen-und-verteilung.php
   Google Scholar
• Godin, G., Conner, M., Sheeran, P., Bélanger-Gravel, A., & Germain, M. (2007). Determinants of repeated blood donation among new and experienced blood donors. Transfusion, 47(9), 1607–1615. doi:10.1111/trf.2007.47.issue-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gönül, F. F., & Hofstede, F. T. (2006). How to compute optimal catalog mailing decisions. Marketing Science, 25(1), 65–74. doi:10.1287/mksc.1050.0136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Heberlein, T. A., & Baumgartner, R. (1978). Affecting response rates to mailed questionnaires: A quantitative analysis of the published literature. American Sociological Review, 43(4), 447–462. doi:10.2307/2094771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennig-Thurau, T., Malthouse, E. C., Friege, C., Gensler, S., Lobschat, L., Rangaswamy, A., & Skiera, B. (2010). The impact of new media on customer relationships. Journal of Service Research, 13(3), 311–330. doi:10.1177/1094670510375460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huck, S., & Rasul, I. (2010). Transactions costs in charitable giving: Evidence from two field experiments. BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 10(1), 1–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonker, J., Piersma, N., & Potharst, R. (2006). A decision support system for direct mailing decisions. Decision Support Systems, 42(2), 915–925. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2005.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasraian, L. (2010). Causes of discontinuity of blood donation among donors in Shiraz, Iran: Cross-sectional study. Sao Paulo Medical Journal, 128(5), 272–275. doi:10.1590/S1516-31802010000500006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasraian, L., & Tavassoli, A. (2012). Relationship between first-year blood donation, return rate for subsequent donation and demographic characteristics. Blood Transfusion, 10(4), 448–452. doi:10.2450/2012.013S
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kheiri, S., & Alibeigi, Z. (2015). An analysis of first-time blood donors return behavior using regression models. Transfusion Medicine, 25(4), 243–248. doi:10.1111/tme.12177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koschate-Fischer, N., & Schandelmeier, S. (2014). A guideline for designing experimental studies in marketing research and a critical discussion of selected problem areas. Journal of Business Economics, 84(6), 793–826. doi:10.1007/s11573-014-0708-6
   Google Scholar
• Lee, L., Piliavin, J. A., & Call, V. R. A. (1999). Giving time, money, and blood: Similarities and differences. Social Psychology Quarterly, 62(3), 276–290. doi:10.2307/2695864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lhoest-Snoeck, S., van Nierop, E., & Verhoef, P. C. (2014). For new customers only: A study on the effect of acquisition campaigns on a service company’s existing customers’ CLV. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 28(3), 210–224. doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2014.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merchant, A., Ford, J. B., & Sargeant, A. (2010). ‘Don’t forget to say thank you’: The effect of an acknowledgement on donor relationships. Journal of Marketing Management, 26(7–8), 593–611. doi:10.1080/02672571003780064
   Google Scholar
• Mews, M. (2013). To pay or not to pay – The role of monetary incentives in an optimal blood donation service bundle. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 18(3), 192–202. doi:10.1002/nvsm.1465
   Google Scholar
• Misje, A. H., Bosnes, V., & Heier, H. E. (2010). Gender differences in presentation rates, deferrals and return behaviour among Norwegian blood donors. Vox Sanguinis, 98(3p1), e241–e248. doi:10.1111/vox.2010.98.issue-3p1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Müller-Steinhardt, M., Müller-Kuller, T., Weiß, C., Menzel, D., Wiesneth, M., Seifried, E., & Klüter, H. (2012). Safety and frequency of whole blood donations from elderly donors. Vox Sanguinis, 102(2), 134–139. doi:10.1111/vox.2012.102.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller-Steinhardt, M, Müller-Kuller, T, Weiß, C, Menzel, D, Wiesneth, M, Seifried, E, & Klüter, H. (2012). Safety and frequency of whole blood donations from elderly donors. Vox Sanguinis, 102(2), 134–139. doi:10.1111/vox.2012.102.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muños-Leiva, F., Sánchez-Fernández, J., Montoro-Ríos, F., & Ibáñez-Zapata, J. Á. (2010). Improving the response rate and quality in web-based surveys through the personalization and frequency of reminder mailings. Quality & Quantity, 44(5), 1037–1052. doi:10.1007/s11135-009-9256-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson Sojka, B., & Sojka, P. (2008). The blood donation experience: Self-reported motives and obstacles for donating blood. Vox Sanguinis, 94(1), 56–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pescher, C., Reichhart, P., & Spann, M. (2014). Consumer decision-making processes in mobile viral marketing campaigns. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 28(1), 43–54. doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2013.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piersma, N., & Jonker, J. (2004). Determining the optimal direct mailing frequency. European Journal of Operational Research, 158(1), 173–182. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00349-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royse, D. (1999). Exploring ways to retain first-time volunteer blood donors. Research on Social Work Practice, 9(1), 76–85. doi:10.1177/104973159900900106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudov, L., McCormick-Ricket, I., Kingsmill, D., Ledford, C., & Carton, T. (2017). Evaluation recommendations for nonprofit social marketing campaigns: An example from the Louisiana campaign for tobacco-free living. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 22(1), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Rupp, C., Kern, S., & Helmig, B. (2014). Segmenting nonprofit stakeholders to enable successful relationship marketing: A review. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 19(2), 76–91. doi:10.1002/nvsm.v19.2
   Google Scholar
• Sargeant, A. (2001). Relationship fundraising: How to keep donors loyal. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 12(2), 177–192. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1542-7854
   Google Scholar
• Sargeant, A., Jay, E., & Lee, S. (2006). Benchmarking charity performance: Returns from direct marketing in fundraising. Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing, 16(1–2), 77–94. doi:10.1300/J054v16n01_05
   Google Scholar
• Schreiber, G. B., Schlumpf, K. S., Glynn, S. A., Wright, D. J., Tu, Y., King, M. R., … Guiltinan, A. M.; National Heart, Lung, Blood Institute Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Stud. (2006). Convenience, the bane of our existence, and other barriers to donating. Transfusion, 46(4), 545–553. doi:10.1111/trf.2006.46.issue-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreiber, G. B., Sharma, U. K., Wright, D. J., Ownby, H. E., Tu, Y., Garratty, G., … Gilcher, R. (2005). First year donation patterns predict long-term commitment for first-time donors. Vox Sanguinis, 88(2), 114–121. doi:10.1111/j.1423-0410.2005.00593.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumann, D. W., Petty, R. E., & Clemons, D. S. (1990). Predicting the effectiveness of different strategies of advertising variation: A test of the repetition-variation hypotheses. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(2), 192–202. doi:10.1086/jcr.1990.17.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweidel, D. A., & Knox, G. (2013). Incorporating direct marketing activity into latent attrition models. Marketing Science, 32(3), 471–487. doi:10.1287/mksc.2013.0781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonntag, A., & Zizzo, D. J. (2015). On reminder effects, drop-outs and dominance: Evidence from an online experiment on charitable giving. PLoS ONE, 10(8), e0134705, 1–17. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0134705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundermann, L. M. (2018). Share experiences: receiving word of mouth and its effect on relationships with donors. Journal Of Services Marketing, 32(3), 322-333. doi:10.1108/JSM-08-2016-0319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundermann, L. M, Boenigk, S, & Willems, J. (2017). Under blood pressure – differentiated versus undifferentiated marketing to increase blood donations. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 14(3), 321-340. doi:10.1007/s12208-017-0174-2
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, S. A., Feng, S., & Krishnan, T. V. (2015). To retain? To upgrade? The effect of direct mail on regular donation behavior. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 32(1), 48–63. doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2014.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trier Damgaard, M., & Gravert, C. (2016). The hidden costs of nudging: Experimental evidence from reminders in fundraising. Working Papers in Economics, 650, 1–48. available at SSRN 2747893.
   Google Scholar
• Van Diepen, M., Donkers, B., & Franses, P. H. (2009). Dynamic and competitive effects of direct mailings: A charitable giving application. Journal of Marketing Research, 46(1), 120–133. doi:10.1509/jmkr.46.1.120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veldhuizen, I. J. T., Doggen, C. J. M., Atsma, F., & de Kort, W. L. A. M. (2009). Donor profiles: Demographic factors and their influence on the donor career. Vox Sanguinis, 97(2), 129–138. doi:10.1111/j.1423-0410.2009.01180.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters, R. D., & LeBlanc Feneley, K. (2013). Virtual stewardship in the age of new media: Have nonprofit organizations moved beyond Web 1.0 strategies? International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 18(3), 216–230. doi:10.1002/nvsm.1469
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, L. M., & Devine, D. V. (2013). Challenges in the management of the blood supply. The Lancet, 381(9880), 1866–1875. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60631-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yammarino, F. J., Skinner, S. J., & Childers, T. L. (1991). Understanding mail survey response behavior: A meta-analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 55(4), 613–639. doi:10.1086/269284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar