The Difference a Smile Makes: Effective Use of Imagery by Children’s Nonprofit Organizations

References

• Arnett, D. B., German, S. D., & Hunt, S. D. (2003). The identity salience model of relationship marketing success: The case of nonprofit marketing. Journal of Marketing, 67(2), 89–105. doi:10.1509/jmkg.67.2.89.18614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashley, C., & Tuten, T. (2015). Creative strategies in social media marketing: An exploratory study of branded social content and consumer engagement. Psychology & Marketing, 32(1), 15–27. doi:10.1002/mar.20761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baghat, V. (2005). Online advocacy: How the internet is transforming the way nonprofits reach, motivate, and retain supporters. In T. Hart, J. M. Greenfield, & M. Johnston (Eds.), Nonprofit internet strategies: Best practices for marketing, communications, and fundraising success (pp. 119–134). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Bagozzi, R., & Moore, D. (1994). Public service advertisements: Emotions and empathy guide prosocial behavior. Journal of Marketing, 58(1), 56–70. doi:10.2307/1252251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, T. (2005). Inspiring donors online: How your message can make people feel extraordinary. In T. Hart, J. M. Greenfield, & M. Johnston (Eds.), Nonprofit internet strategies: Best practices for marketing, communications and fundraising success (pp. 111–117). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Bakshy, E., Hofman, J., Mason, W., & Watts, D. (2011). Everyone’s an influencer: Quantifying influence on twitter. Proceedings of the Fourth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (pp. 65–74). Kowloon, Hong Kong. 10.1177/1753193411414639
   Google Scholar
• Berger, J., & Milkman, K. L. (2012). What makes online content viral? Journal of Marketing Research, 49(2), 192–205. doi:10.1509/jmr.10.0353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, J. (1993). Threatened children: Rhetoric and concern about child-victims. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biocca, F. (2013). Television and Political Advertising: Volume I: Psychological Processes. New York: Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Branthwaite, A. (2002). Investigating the power of imagery in marketing communication: Evidence-based techniques. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 5(3), 164–171. doi:10.1108/13522750210432977
   Google Scholar
• Burnett, J. (2007). Nonprofit marketing best practices. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Burt, C. D. B., & Strongman, K. (2005). Use of images in charity advertising: Improving donations and compliance rates. International Journal of Organisational Behaviour, 8(8), 571–580.
   Google Scholar
• Carruthers, M. (2000). The craft of thought: Meditation, rhetoric, and the making of images, 400-1200 (Vol. 34). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, J. D., Rangan, P., & Singh, S. N. (2016). Do cold images cause cold-heartedness? The impact of visual stimuli on the effectiveness of negative emotional charity appeals. Journal of Advertising, 45(4), 417–426. doi:10.1080/00913367.2016.1185982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, M., & Toma, C. L. (2014). Social sharing through interpersonal media: Patterns and effects on emotional well-being. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 530–541. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culnan, M. J., McHugh, P. J., & Zubillaga, J. I. (2010). How large US companies can use Twitter and other social media to gain business value. MIS Quarterly Executive, 9(4).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, D W, Chattopadhyay, Amitava, & Gorn, G J. (1999). The use of visual mental imagery in new product design. Journal Of Marketing Research, 36(1), 18-28. doi:10.2307/3151912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davison, P. (2012). The language of internet memes. In M. Mandiberg, The social media reader (pp. 120–134), New York, NY: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dees, J. G., Emerson, J., & Economy, P. (2002). Enterprising nonprofits: A toolkit for social entrepreneurs (Vol. 186). Hoboken, NJ. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Detenber, B. H., Simons, R. F., & Reiss, J. E. (2000). The emotional significance of color in television presentations. Media Psychology, 2(4), 331–355. doi:10.1207/S1532785XMEP0204_02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolnicar, S., & Lazarevski, K. (2009). Marketing in non-profit organizations: An international perspective. International Marketing Review, 26(3), 275–291. doi:10.1108/02651330910960780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1975). Unmasking the face: A guide to recognizing emotions from facial expressions. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Emrich, C. G., Brower, H. H., Feldman, J. M., & Garland, H. (2001). Images in words: Presidential rhetoric, charisma, and greatness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(3), 527–557. doi:10.2307/3094874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, D. (2010). Social media marketing: The next generation of business engagement. Berkeley, CA: Sybex Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Forgas, J. P., & George, J. M. (2001). Affective influences on judgments and behavior in organizations: An information processing perspective. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(1), 3–34. doi:10.1006/obhd.2001.2971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gal, N., Shifman, L., & Kampf, Z. (2016). “It Gets Better”: Internet memes and the construction of collective identity. New Media & Society, 18(8), 1698–1714. doi:10.1177/1461444814568784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorton, K. (2009). Media audiences: Television, meaning and emotion. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J., & MacAulay, M. (2009). NPO 2.0? Exploring the web presence of environmental nonprofit organizations in Canada. Global Media Journal – Canadian Edition, 2(1), 63–88.
   Google Scholar
• Guadagno, R. E., Rempala, D. M., Murphy, S., & Okdie, B. M. (2013). What makes a video go viral? An analysis of emotional contagion and Internet memes. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2312–2319. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.04.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna, Richard, Rohm, Andrew, & Crittenden, V L. (2011). we’re all connected: the power of the social media ecosystem. Business Horizons, 54(3), 265-273. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2011.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, T., Greenfield, J. M., & Johnston, M. (2005). Nonprofit internet strategies: Best practices for marketing, communications, and fundraising success. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Hastings, G., Stead, M., & Webb, J. (2004). Fear appeals in social marketing: Strategic and ethical reasons for concern. Psychology & Marketing, 21(11), 961–986. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazlett, R. L., & Hazlett, S. Y. (1999). Emotional response to television commercials: Facial EMG vs. self-report. Journal of Advertising Research, 39(2), 7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, R. (2009). Emotional engagement: How television builds big brands at low attention. Journal of Advertising Research, 49(1), 62–73. doi:10.2501/S0021849909090060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, D. L., & Fodor, M. (2010). Can you measure the ROI of your social media marketing? MIT Sloan Management Review, 52(1), 41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollebeek, L. D., Glynn, M. S., & Brodie, R. J. (2014). Consumer brand engagement in social media: Conceptualization, scale development and validation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 28(2), 149–165. doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2013.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanter, B., & Fine, A. (2010). The networked nonprofit: Connecting with social media to drive change. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keib, K., Espina, C., Lee, Y., Wojdynski, B., Choi, D., & Bang, H. (2016). Picture perfect: How photographs influence emotion, attention and selection in social media news posts. Paper presented at the 2016 Annual Conference of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, K. L. (2009). Building strong brands in a modern marketing communications environment. Journal of Marketing Communications, 15(2–3), 139–155. doi:10.1080/13527260902757530
   Google Scholar
• Kietzmann, J. H., Hermkens, K., McCarthy, I. P., & Silvestre, B. S. (2011). Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business Horizons, 54(3), 241–251. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2011.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laroche, M., Habibi, M. R., & Richard, M. O. (2013). To be or not to be in social media: How brand loyalty is affected by social media? International Journal of Information Management, 33(1), 76–82. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2012.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laroche, M., Habibi, M. R., Richard, M. O., & Sankaranarayanan, R. (2012). The effects of social media based brand communities on brand community markers, value creation practices, brand trust and brand loyalty. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1755–1767. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.04.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LoBue, V., & Thrasher, C. (2015). The child affective facial expression (CAFE) set: Validity and reliability from untrained adults. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–8. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovejoy, K., & Saxton, G. D. (2012). Information, community, and action: How nonprofit organizations use social media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(3), 337–353. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01576.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovejoy, K., Waters, R. D., & Saxton, G. D. (2012). Engaging stakeholders through Twitter: How nonprofit organizations are getting more out of 140 characters or less. Public Relations Review, 38(2), 313–318. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacInnis, D. J., & Price, L. L. (1987). The role of imagery in information processing: Review and extensions. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(4), 473–491. doi:10.1086/jcr.1987.13.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majchrzak, A., Faraj, S., Kane, G. C., & Azad, B. (2013). The contradictory influence of social media affordances on online communal knowledge sharing. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 19(1), 38–55. doi:10.1111/jcc4.2013.19.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangold, W. G., & Faulds, D. J. (2009). Social media: The new hybrid element of the promotion mix. Business Horizons, 52(4), 357–365. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2009.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaelidou, N., Siamagka, N. T., & Christodoulides, G. (2011). Usage, barriers and measurement of social media marketing: An exploratory investigation of small and medium B2B brands. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(7), 1153–1159. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2011.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills-Groninger, T. (2005). Staffing ePhilanthropy. In T. Hart, J. M. Greenfield, & M. Johnston (Eds.), Nonprofit Internet Strategies: Best Practices for Marketing, Communications and Fundraising success (pp. 39–47). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Neiger, B. L., Thackeray, R., Burton, S. H., Thackeray, C. R., & Reese, J. H. (2013). Use of twitter among local health departments: An analysis of information sharing, engagement, and action. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(8), e177. doi:10.2196/jmir.2775
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, C. W., & Young, S. M. (1986). Consumer response to television commercials: The impact of involvement and background music on brand attitude formation. Journal of Marketing Research, 23, 11–24. doi:10.2307/3151772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picture this: Top charities master visual and social media. (2014, May 10). Retrieved from http://www.umassd.edu/cmr/socialmediaresearch/charitiessocialmedia/
   Google Scholar
• Powell, A. J. (2005). It all begins with a strategy: Using the internet as a strategic tool. In T. Hart, J. M. Greenfield, & M. Johnston (Eds.), Nonprofit internet strategies: Best practices for marketing, communications and fundraising success (pp. 17–25). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Provalis WordStat [computer software]. (2016). Retrieved from: https://provalisresearch.com/products/content-analysis-software/
   Google Scholar
• Qualman, E. (2010). Socialnomics: How social media transforms the way we live and do business. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, L. M. (1994). Images in advertising: The need for a theory of visual rhetoric. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(2), 252–273. doi:10.1086/jcr.1994.21.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, Z., Rui, H., & Whinston, A. B. (2013). Content sharing in a social broadcasting environment: Evidence from twitter. SSRN Electronic Journal, 38(1):123-142.
   Google Scholar
• Small, D. A., & Verrochi, N. M. (2009). The face of need: Facial emotion expression on charity advertisements. Journal of Marketing Research, 46, 777–787. doi:10.1509/jmkr.46.6.777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stieglitz, S., & Dang-Xuan, L. (2013). Emotions and information diffusion in social media—Sentiment of microblogs and sharing behavior. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29(4), 217–247. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222290408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Top Nonprofits. (2016, Spring). Top nonprofits on Social Media. Retrieved from https://topnonprofits.com/lists/top-nonprofits-on-social-media/
   Google Scholar
• Tuten, T. L., & Solomon, M. R. (2017). Social media marketing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Unnava, H. R., & Burnkrant, R. E. (1991). An imagery-processing view of the role of pictures in print advertisements. Journal of Marketing Research, 28, 226–231. doi:10.2307/3172811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters, R. D., Burnett, E., Lamm, A., & Lucas, J. (2009). Engaging stakeholders through social networking: How nonprofit organizations are using Facebook. Public Relations Review, 35, 102–106. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiepking, P. (2010). Democrats support international relief and the upper class donates to art? How opportunity, incentives and confidence affect donations to different types of charitable organizations. Social Science Research, 39(6), 1073–1087. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar