Celling The Concept: A Study of Managerial Brand Mindsharing of A Distributed Biobanking Research Infrastructure

References

• Aaker, D. A. (1996). Building strong brands. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aaker, D. A., & Joachimsthaler, E. (2000). Brand leadership. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aaker, D. A., & Moorman, C. (2017). Strategic market management: Global Perspectives. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Acuña, N. (2012). Mindshare: Igniting creativity and innovation through design intelligence. Henderson, NV: OneArchetype.
   Google Scholar
• Albert, N. M., & Siedlecki, S. L. (2016). Evaluating your nursing research program in nurturing it for long-term success. In N. M. Albert (Ed.), Building and Sustaining a Hospital-Based Nursing Research Program (pp. 217–226). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Almquist, E., & Roberts, K. J. (2000). A “mindshare” manifesto: Common misconceptions squander the power. Mercer Management Journal, 12, 9–20.
   Google Scholar
• Anisimova, T., & Mavondo, F. T. (2015). Corporate brand: Structural equation modelling. In T. C. Melewar & S. F. Syed Alwi (Eds.), Corporate branding: Areas, arenas and approaches (pp. 169–191). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Axelsson, A.-S., & Schroeder, R. (2009). Making it open and keeping it safe: E-Enabled Data-Sharing in Sweden. Acta Sociologica, 52(3), 213–226. doi:10.1177/0001699309339799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azevedo, A. (2005). Cities as brands: The role of communication strategy in place marketing context. In SOPCOM 2005: 4° Congresso da Associação Portuguesa de Ciências da Comunicação conference. Aveiro, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Balmer, J. M. T. (2010). Explicating corporate brands and their management: Reflections and directions from 1995. Journal of Brand Management, 18(3), 180–196. doi:10.1057/bm.2010.46
   Google Scholar
• BBMRI.se. (2015). BioBanking and molecular resources infractructure of Sweden: Strategic plan for BBMRI.se. Retrieved September 30, 2018, from http://web.archive.org/web/20160427042807/http://www.bbmri.se/Global/Omoss/Rapporter/BBMRIse_strategicplan_20150219_final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Beier, K., & Schnorrer, S. (2011). The future of biobanking in Europe: Searching for answers to the ethical and legal challenges of human tissue research (Final International Conference, Göttingen). In K. Beier, S. Schnorrer, C. Lenk, & N. Hoppe (Eds.), The ethical and legal regulation of human tissue and biobank research in Europe: Proceedings of the Tiss.EU Project (pp. 139–160). Göttingen, Germany: Universitätsverlag Göttingen.
   Google Scholar
• Benardou, A., Champion, E., Dallas, C., & Hughes, L. M. (2017). Introduction: A critique of digital practices and research infrastructures. In A. Benardou, E. Champion, C. Dallas, & L. M. Hughes (Eds.), Cultural heritage infrastructures in digital humanities (pp. 1–14). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Betsou, F. (2017). Quality assurance and quality control in biobanking. In P. Hainaut, J. Vaught, K. Zatloukal, & M. Pasterk (Eds.), Biobanking of Human Biospecimens: Principles and Practice (pp. 23–49). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Biobank Sverige. (2017). Nationella Biobanksrådet blir Biobank Sverige [Swedish National Biobank Council becomes Biobank Sweden]. Retrieved September 30, 2018, from http://biobanksverige.se/nationella-biobanksradet-blir-biobank-sverige
   Google Scholar
• Bravo, R., Montaner, T., & Pina, J. M. (2012). Corporate brand image of financial institutions: A consumer approach. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 21(4), 232–245. doi:10.1108/10610421211246649
   Google Scholar
• Brosset, E., & Mahalatchimy, A. (2017). EU law and policy on new health technologies. In T. K. Hervey, C. A. Young, & L. E. Bishop (Eds.), Research handbook on EU health law and policy (pp. 197–221). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2015). Business research methods (4th ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Calzolari, A., Napolitano, M., & Bravo, E. (2013). Review of the Italian current legislation on research biobanking activities on the eve of the participation of national biobanks’ network in the legal consortium BBMRI-ERIC. Biopreservation and Biobanking, 11(2), 124–128. doi:10.1089/bio.2012.0058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chad, P. (2016). Corporate rebranding: An employee-focused nonprofit case study. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 28(4), 327–350. doi:10.1080/10495142.2016.1237923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapleo, C. (2015). Brand ‘infrastructure’ in nonprofit organizations: Challenges to successful brand building? Journal of Marketing Communications, 21(3), 199–209. doi:10.1080/13527266.2012.741609
   Google Scholar
• Chen, H. (2013). Governing international biobank collaboration: A case study of China Kadoorie Biobank. Science, Technology and Society, 18(3), 321–338. doi:10.1177/0971721813498497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2017). Research methods in education (8th ed.). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, R., Junginger, S., & Lockwood, T. (2009). Design thinking and design management: A research and practice perspective. Design Management Review, 20(2), 46–55. doi:10.1111/j.1948-7169.2009.00007.x
   Google Scholar
• Craig, C. S. (2013). Partnering for growth in emerging markets: Why advertising agencies need to lead, not follow. Journal of Advertising Research, 53(4), 361–362. doi:10.2501/JAR-53-4-361-362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cravens, D. W., & Piercy, N. F. (2013). Strategic marketing (10th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Darling, E. J., & Whitty, S. J. (2016). The project management office: It’s just not what it used to be. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 9(2), 282–308. doi:10.1108/IJMPB-08-2015-0083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, S. M., & Dunn, M. (2002). Building the brand-driven business: Operationalize your brand to drive profitable growth. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• De Chernatony, L., & Cottam, S. (2008). Interactions between organisational cultures and corporate brands. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 17(1), 13–24. doi:10.1108/10610420810856477
   Google Scholar
• De Chernatony, L., & Dall’Olmo Riley, F. (1998). Defining a” brand”: Beyond the literature with experts’ interpretations. Journal of Marketing Management, 14(5), 417–443. doi:10.1362/026725798784867798
   Google Scholar
• Dillner, J. (2015). New items in the BBMRI-ERIC work programme. Biobank SWEDEN, 5(19), 11-11.
   Google Scholar
• Dricu, A. (2018). Recent challenges with stem cell banking. Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy, 18(4), 355–358. doi:10.1080/14712598.2018.1445715
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, D. C. (2004). Branding: The 6 easy steps. Oakland, CA: Cameron Street Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eaker, S. (2017). Stärkt samarbete för en nationell biobanksinfrastruktur [strengthened collaboration for a national biobank infrastructure]. Retrieved September 30, 2018, from http://www.rbcsyd.se/Dokument/svenska/nyhetsbrev/Nyhetsbrev nr 19.pdf
   Google Scholar
• ESFRI. (2006). European roadmap for research infrastructures, roadmap 2006. Luxembourg, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Ess, C., & AoIR Ethics Working Committee. (2002). Ethical decision-making and Internet research: Recommendations from the aoir ethics working committee. Retrieved September 30, 2018, from https://aoir.org/reports/ethics.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2009). Council regulation (EC) No 723/2009 of 25 June 2009 on the Community legal framework for a European Research Infrastructure Consortium (ERIC). Retrieved September 30, 2018, from https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/0ee0c61b-f877-4279-acf4-c8b57b350d92/language-en
   Google Scholar
• Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80–92. doi:10.1177/160940690600500107
   Google Scholar
• Franzen, G., & Moriarty, S. E. (2008). The science and art of branding. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• FWO. (2015). Large-scale research infrastructure. Retrieved September 30, 2018, from http://www.fwo.be/en/fellowships-funding/research-infrastructure/large-scale-research-infrastructure
   Google Scholar
• Ghodeswar, B. M. (2008). Building brand identity in competitive markets: A conceptual model. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 17(1), 4–12. doi:10.1108/10610420810856468
   Google Scholar
• Gill, L. (2013). Capture the Mindshare and the market share will follow: The art and science of building brands. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Glennerster, R., & Kremer, M. (2000). A better way to spur medical research and development. Regulation, 23(2), 34–39.
   Google Scholar
• Government Offices of Sweden. (2017). Regleringsbrev för budgetåret 2018 avseende Vetenskapsrådet [Appropriation directions for the fiscal year 2018 Concerning the Swedish Research Council]. Retrieved September 30, 2018, from https://www.esv.se/statsliggaren/regleringsbrev/?RBID=18539
   Google Scholar
• Granieri, M., & Renda, A. (2012). Innovation law and policy in the European Union: Towards Horizon 2020. Milan, Italy: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Grbich, C. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: An introduction (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2012). Applied thematic analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hallmans, G., Beskow, A., Larson, G., & Grankvist, K. (2015). Angående missförhållanden inom BBMRI.se. [Regarding Maladministration of BBMRI.se]. Sweden: Unpublished letter to Björn Halleröd and Tove Andersson, The Swedish Research Council, Dec. 7. Stockholm, Sweden: Vetenskapsrådet.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, J. H. (2002). “Dead Man Walking”: Case statements as organizational change narratives. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 10(2), 83–114. doi:10.1300/J054v10n02_05
   Google Scholar
• Hassan, E. (2006). Recall bias can be a threat to retrospective and prospective research designs. The Internet Journal of Epidemiology, 3(2), 339–412.
   Google Scholar
• Heaton, J. (2011). The difference between marketing and branding. Retrieved September 30, 2018, from http://www.tronviggroup.com/the-difference-between-marketing-and-branding
   Google Scholar
• Heding, T., Knudtzen, C. F., & Bjerre, M. (2016). Brand management: Research, theory and practice (2nd ed.). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, D. B. (2004). How brands become icons: The principles of cultural branding. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hytti, U., Kuoppakangas, P., Suomi, K., Chapleo, C., & Giovanardi, M. (2015). Challenges in delivering brand promise - focusing on municipal healthcare organisations. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 28(3), 254–272. doi:10.1108/IJPSM-10-2014-0127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indounas, K., & Arvaniti, A. (2015). Success factors of new health-care services. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 24(7), 693–705. doi:10.1108/JPBM-04-2014-0541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Järventie-Thesleff, R., Moisander, J., & Laine, P.-M. (2011). Organizational dynamics and complexities of corporate brand building: A practice perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 27(2), 196–204. doi:10.1016/J.SCAMAN.2010.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, M. (2015). Biobank research. Retrieved September 30, 2018, from https://www.researchethics.lu.se/research-ethics-information/biobank-research
   Google Scholar
• Kao, D., & Decou, J. (2003). A strategy-based model for e-commerce planning. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 103(4), 238–252. doi:10.1108/02635570310470638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapferer, J.-N. (2012). The new strategic brand management creating and sustaining brand equity long term (5th ed.). London, UK: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Karolinska Institutet (2016). Comments regarding the article on BBMRI.se in Expressen. Retrieved September 30, 2018, from https://ki.se/en/news/comments-regarding-the-article-on-bbmrise-in-expressen
   Google Scholar
• King, N., & Horrocks, C. (2010). Interviews in qualitative research. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kopec, J. A., & Esdaile, J. M. (1990). Bias in case-control studies: A review. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 44(3), 179–186. doi:10.1136/JECH.44.3.179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotler, P. (1997). Marketing management (7th ed.). Eaglewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Krishnan, V., Sullivan, U. Y., Groza, M. D., & Aurand, T. W. (2013). The brand recall index: A metric for assessing value. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 30(5), 415–426. doi:10.1108/JCM-02-2013-0464
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Langhof, H., Kahrass, H., Sievers, S., & Strech, D. (2017). Access policies in biobank research: What criteria do they include and how publicly available are they? A cross-sectional study. European Journal of Human Genetics, 25(3), 293–300. doi:10.1038/ejhg.2016.172
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson, A. (2017). The need for research infrastructures: A narrative review of large-scale research infrastructures in biobanking. Biopreservation and Biobanking, 15(4), 375–383. doi:10.1089/bio.2016.0103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson, A., Savage, C., Brommels, M., & Mattsson, P. (2018). Structuring a research infrastructure: A study of the rise and fall of a large-scale distributed biobank facility. Social Science Information, 57(2), 196–222. doi:10.1177/0539018418761848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawlor, R. T. (2017). Biobanks in low resource contexts. In P. Hainaut, J. Vaught, K. Zatloukal, & M. Pasterk (Eds.), Biobanking of human biospecimens: Principles and practice (pp. 169–198). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lenk, C., Sándor, J., & Gordijn, B. (2011). Introduction. In C. Lenk, J. Sándor, & B. Gordijn (Eds.), Biobanks and tissue research: The public, the patient and the regulation (pp. 3–16). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lind, A.-S., & Reichel, J. (2013). Regulating cross border biobanking through an “ERIC”? Biobank SWEDEN, 3(1), 3–4.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, B. D., Bieschke, K. J., Castonguay, L. G., & Hayes, J. A. (2012). The center for collegiate mental health: Studying college student mental health through an innovative research infrastructure that brings science and practice together. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 20(4), 233–245. doi:10.3109/10673229.2012.712837
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madge, C. (2012). Developing a geographers’ agenda for online research ethics. In J. Hughes (Ed.), SAGE internet research methods (pp. 251–277). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Matiatou, M. (2015). From internal branding to cultural transformation: A virtuous circle. International Journal of Knowledge Society Research, 6(2), 1–19. doi:10.4018/IJKSR.2015040101
   Google Scholar
• McBurney, D. H., & White, T. L. (2013). Research Mmethods (9th ed.). Belmont, CaliforniaCA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• McCloy, R., & Stone, R. (2001). Virtual reality in surgery. BMJ, 323(7318), 912–915. doi:10.1136/BMJ.323.7318.912
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Melvin, A. J., Edwards, K., Malone, J., Hassell, L., & Wilfond, B. S. (2013). Role for CTSAs in leveraging a distributed research infrastructure to engage diverse stakeholders in emergent research policy development. Clinical and Translational Science, 6(1), 57–59. doi:10.1111/j.1752-8062.2012.00444.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Mokyr, J. (2002). The gifts of Athena: Historical origins of the knowledge economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., & Sekia, F. (2003). Territorial innovation models: A critical survey. Regional Studies, 37(3), 289–302. doi:10.1080/0034340032000065442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muldur, U., Corvers, F., Delanghe, H., Dratwa, J., Heimberger, D., Sloan, B., & Vanslembrouck, S. (2006). A new deal for an effective European research policy: The design and impacts of the 7th Framework Programme. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mumuni, E., Kaliannan, M., & O’Reilly, P. (2016). Approaches for scientific collaboration and interactions in complex research projects under disciplinary influence. Journal of Developing Areas, 50(5), 383–391. doi:10.1353/jda.2016.0064
   Google Scholar
• Nobel, S. (2008). Biobanks–integration of human information to improve health: Report of the Committee for Research Infrastructures and the Scientific Council for Medicine at the Swedish Research Council. Stockholm, Sweden: Vetenskapsrådet.
   Google Scholar
• Nordin, E. (2017). Förslag på ny struktur för biobanker [Proposition of a new structure for biobanks]. Retrieved September 30, 2018, from https://www.life-time.se/forskning/forslag-pa-ny-struktur-for-biobanker
   Google Scholar
• Norlin, L., Fransson, M., Eaker, S., Elinder, G., & Litton, J.-E. (2012). Adapting research to the 21st century – The Swedish Biobank Register. Norsk Epidemiologi, 21(2), 149-153. doi:10.5324/nje.v21i2.1486
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O’Cass, A., & Frost, H. (2002). Status brands: Examining the effects of non‐product‐related brand associations on status and conspicuous consumption. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 11(2), 67–88. doi:10.1108/10610420210423455
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2010). Global Science Forum: Large Research Infrastructures: Report on roadmapping of large Research Infrastructures (2008) & Report on establishing large international Research Infrastructures: Issue and options. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2014a). Emerging policy issues in synthetic biology. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2014b). International distributed research infrastructures: Issues and option. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, P. (2006). Purposive sampling. In V. Jupp (Ed.), The SAGE dictionary of social research methods (pp. 244–245). London, UK: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Llantada, C. (2012). Scientific discourse and the rhetoric of globalization: The impact of culture and language. London, UK: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Pollak, M. (2016). BBMRI-ERIC: A true biobank collaboration. Retrieved September 30, 2018, from https://www.thermofisher.com/blog/biobanking/bbmri-eric-a-true-biobank-collaboration
   Google Scholar
• Regional Ethical Review Board in Stockholm. (2012). Protokoll 2012/1863-31/5 [Protocol 2012/1863-31/5]. Stockholm, Sweden: Regional Ethical Review Board in Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, A. (2010). Ethics and qualitative research. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Doing qualitative research (3rd ed.,) pp. 416–438. New York, NY: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Schofield, P. N., Eppig, J., Huala, E., de Angelis, M. H., Harvey, M., Davidson, D., … Hancock, J. M. (2010). Sustaining the data and bioresource commons. Science , 330(6004), 592–593. doi:10.1126/science.1191506
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. London, UK: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, C. N. (2010). Ex Post Facto Study. In N. J. Salkind (Ed.), Encyclopedia of research design (pp. 465–466). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. (2001). Brand metrics: Your key to measuring return on brand investment. Retrieved September 30, 2018, from http://www.marketingprofs.com/tutorials/brandmetrics.asp
   Google Scholar
• Stahlecker, T., & Kroll, H. (2013). Policies to build research infrastructures in Europe - Following traditions or building new momentum? In Working Papers Firms and Region Nr. R4/2013. Karlsruhe, Germany: Fraunhofer ISI.
   Google Scholar
• Stokols, D., Hall, K. L., Taylor, B. K., & Moser, R. P. (2008). The science of team science: Overview of the field and introduction to the supplement. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35(2), S77–S89. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumathipala, A. (2014). Research infrastructure. In S. O. Okpaku (Ed.), The essentials of global mental health (pp. 407–415). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sweden.se. (2018). Innovation in Sweden. Retrieved September 30, 2018, from https://sweden.se/business/innovation-in-sweden
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Research Council. (2009). Operation Grant application No. 2009-18438-71700-89 (Unpublished, filing date April 29, 2009, Joakim Dillner, applicant). Stockholm, Sweden: Vetenskapsrådet.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Research Council. (2016). Vetenskapsrådets finansiering av infrastrukturen BBMRI.se [The Swedish Research Council’s funding of the infrastructure BBMRI.se]. Retrieved September 30, 2018, from http://web.archive.org/web/20160630062730/http://www.vr.se/nyheterpress/nyheter2016/vetenskapsradetsfinansieringavinfrastrukturenbbmrise.5.11c1cb331544d75b0eb660b.html
   Google Scholar
• Upshaw, L. B., & Taylor, E. L. (2000). The masterbrand mandate: The management strategy that unifies companies and multiplies value. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Urde, M., & Greyser, S. A. (2015). The nobel prize: The identity of a corporate heritage brand. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 24(4), 318–332. doi:10.1108/JPBM-11-2014-0749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallaster, C., & de Chernatony, L. (2005). Internationalisation of services brands: The role of leadership during the internal brand building process. Journal of Marketing Management, 21(1–2), 181–203. doi:10.1362/0267257053166839
   Google Scholar
• Vaught, J., & Lockhart, N. C. (2012). The evolution of biobanking best practices. Clinica Chimica Acta, 413(19–20), 1569–1575. doi:10.1016/J.CCA.2012.04.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinther, L. D., Jensen, C. M., Hjelmager, D. M., Lyhne, N., & Nøhr, C. (2017). Technology-induced errors and adverse event reporting in an organizational learning perspective. In F. Lau, B.-C. John, G. Bliss, E. Borycki, K. Courtney, & A. Kuo (Eds.), Building capacity for health informatics in the future (pp. 358–363). Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vuorio, E. (2017). Networking biobanks throughout Europe: The development of BBMRI-ERIC. In P. Hainaut, J. Vaught, K. Zatloukal, & M. Pasterk (Eds.), Biobanking of human biospecimens: Principles and practice (pp. 137–153). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Waara, A. (2012). Högaktuell konferens om biobanker i forskningsprocessen [Highly topical conference concerning biobanks in the research process]. Retrieved September 30, 2018, from http://www.uu.se/nyheter-press/nyheter/artikel/?id=1940&typ=artikel
   Google Scholar
• Watts, J. H. (2008). Integrity in qualitative research. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 440–441). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar