A Few More Words for a Few More Cents: The Roles of Beneficiary and Message Frames during a Door-to-Door Donation Collection

References

• Abdellaoui, M., Bleichrodt, H., & L’Haridon, O. (2008). A tractable method to measure utility and loss aversion under prospect theory. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 36(3), 245–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-008-9039-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bae, T. Y., Yoon, S., Kim, S., & Kim, Y. (2019). Social exclusion influences on the effectiveness of altruistic versus egoistic appeals in charitable advertising. Marketing Letters, 30(1), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-019-09481-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banjarnahor, W., Napitupulu, L., & Situmeang, F. (2017). The effect of green advertisements: Broadening the differences between self-benefit versus environmental benefit appeal. Advanced Science Letters, 23(1), 121–125. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2017.7265
   Google Scholar
• Bekkers, R., & Wiepking, P. (2011). A literature review of empirical studies of philanthropy: Eight mechanisms that drive charitable giving. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(5), 924–973. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764010380927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beldad, A., Snip, B., & Van Hoof, J. (2014). Generosity the second time around: Determinants of individuals’ repeat donation intention. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(1), 144–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764012457466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilgin, B. (2012). Losses loom more likely than gains: Propensity to imagine losses increases their subjective probability. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 118(2), 203–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, L., Rottenstreich, Y., Sood, S., & Bilgin, B. (2007). On the psychology of loss aversion: Possession, valence, and reversals of the endowment effect. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(3), 369–376. https://doi.org/10.1086/518545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunel, F. F., & Nelson, M. R. (2000). Explaining gendered responses to “help-self” and “help-others” charity ad appeals: The mediating role of worldviews. Journal of Advertising, 29(3), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2000.10673614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullard, O., & Penner, S. (2017). A regulatory-focused perspective on philanthropy: Promotion focus motivates giving to prevention-framed causes. Journal of Business Research, 79, 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.06.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bull, R., & Gibson-Robinson, E. (1981). The influences of eye-gaze, style of dress, and locality on the amounts of money donated to a charity. Human Relations, 34(10), 895–905. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872678103401005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, X. (2016). Framing charitable appeals: The effect of message framing and perceived susceptibility to the negative consequences of inaction on donation intention. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 21(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.1536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CBF. (2017a, April 24). Geven in Nederland 2017: 20 jaar cijfers en trends over gevend Nederland. Retrieved 5 september 2017, from https://www.cbf.nl/nieuwsbericht/geven-in-nederland-2017-20-jaar-cijfers-en-trends-over-gevend-nederland
   Google Scholar
• CBF. (2017b). Roosters. Retrieved August 29, 2017, from https://www.cbf.nl/collecterooster/roosters/
   Google Scholar
• CBF. (2020). Het collecterooster. Retrieved November 1, 2021, from https://www.cbf.nl/collecterooster
   Google Scholar
• Chang, C. T. (2012). Missing ingredients in cause-related advertising: The right formula of execution style and cause framing. International Journal of Advertising, 31(2), 231–256. https://doi.org/10.2501/IJA-31-2-231-256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, C. T. (2014). Guilt regulation: The relative effects of altruistic versus egoistic appeals for charity advertising. Journal of Advertising, 43(3), 211–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2013.853632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, C. T., & Lee, Y. K. (2009). Framing charity advertising: Influences of message framing, image valence, and temporal framing on a charitable appeal. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39(12), 2910–2935. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00555.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, C. T., & Lee, Y. K. (2010). Effects of message framing, vividness congruency and statistical framing on responses to charity advertising. International Journal of Advertising, 29(2), 195–220. https://doi.org/10.2501/S0265048710201129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S., Duckworth, K., & Chaiken, S. (1999). Motivated heuristic and systematic processing. Psychological Inquiry, 10(1), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1001_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, E. L., & Hoffner, C. (2012). Gifts of giving: The role of empathy and perceived benefits to others and self in young adults’ decisions to become organ donors. Journal of Health Psychology, 18(1), 128–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105311433910
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooney, R. (2017, 23 November). The door-to-door dilemma. Third Sector. Retrieved March 5, 2019 from https://www.thirdsector.co.uk/door-to-door-dilemma/fundraising/article/1450094
   Google Scholar
• Cropanzano, R., Goldman, B., & Folger, R. (2005). Self-interest: Defining and understanding a human motive. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(8), 985–991. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, E., Kerkhof, P., & Kuiper, J. (2008). Improving the effectiveness of fundraising messages: The impact of charity goal attainment, message framing, and evidence on persuasion. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 36(2), 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909880801922854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickert, S., Sagara, N., & Slovic, P. (2011). Affective motivations to help others: A two-stage model of donation decisions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 24(4), 361–376. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donatiewijzer. (2012). Manieren om te doneren. Retrieved September 3, 2017, from http://donatiewijzer.nl/goede-doelen/manieren-om-te-doneren/
   Google Scholar
• Erlandsson, A., Nilsson, A., & Västfjäll, D. (2018). Attitudes and donation behavior when reading positive and negative charity appeals. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 30(4), 444–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495142.2018.1452828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk, A. (2007). Gift exchange in the field. Econometrica, 75(5), 1501–1511. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2007.00800.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, K., Ferguson, E., James, V., & Lowe, K. C. (2001). Confidence in the safety of blood for transfusion: The effect of message framing. Transfusion, 41(11), 1335–1340. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1537-2995.2001.41111335.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feiler, D. C., Tost, L. P., & Gran, A. M. (2012). Mixed reasons, missed givings: The costs of blending egoistic and altruistic reasons in donation requests. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(6), 1322–1328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.05.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. J., Vandenbosch, M., & Antia, K. D. (2008). An empathy-helping perspective on consumers’ responses to fund-raising appeals. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(3), 519–531. https://doi.org/10.1086/586909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grace, D., & Griffin, D. (2006). Exploring conspicuousness in the context of donation behaviour. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 11(2), 147–154. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.24
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, J. G., Miller, D. T., & Lerner, M. J. (2002). Committing altruism under the cloak of self-interest: The exchange fiction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(2), 144–151. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2001.1494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H., & Yucel-Aybat, O. (2018). Persuasive charity appeals for less and more controllable health causes: The roles of implicit mindsets and benefit frames. Journal of Advertising, 47(2), 112–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2017.1402720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, J. L., Liang, G. Y., & Tien, C. P. (2005). Social concerns and willingness to support charities. Social Behavior and Personality, 33(2), 189–200. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2005.33.2.189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong, E. S., Shi, Y., Baazova, A., Chiu, C., Nahai, A., Moons, W. G., & Taylor, S. E. (2011). The relation of approach/avoidance motivation and message framing to the effectiveness of charitable appeals. Social Influence, 6(1), 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2010.524369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorg, L. (2008). Promoting volunteerism: Effects of self-efficacy, advertisement-induced emotional arousal, perceived costs of volunteering, and message framing. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 19(1), 43–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-008-9054-z
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–292. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, P. A., Lipkus, I. M., & Rimer, B. K. (2003). Affect, framing, and persuasion. Journal of Marketing Research, 40(1), 54–64. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.40.1.54.19133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kermer, D. A., Driver-Linn, E., Wilson, T. D., & Gilbert, D. T. (2006). Loss aversion is an affective forecasting error. Psychological Science, 17(8), 649–653. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01760.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landry, C., Lange, A., List, J. A., Price, M. K., & Rupp, N. G. (2006). Toward an understanding of the economics of charity: Evidence from a field experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(2), 747–782. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2006.121.2.747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, I. P., Schneider, S. L., & Gaeth, G. J. (1998). All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76(2), 149–188. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1998.2804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyers-Levy, J., & Maheswaran, D. (2004). Exploring message framing outcomes when systematic, heuristic, or both types of processing occur. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14, 159–167. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1401&2_18
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D. T. (1999). The norm of self-interest. American Psychologist, 54(12), 1053–1060. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.12.1053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, S. E., & Miller, J. K. (2002). Communicating about gifts of life: The effect of knowledge, attitudes, and altruism on behavior and behavioral intentions regarding organ donation. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 30(2), 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909880216580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obermiller, C. (1985). Varieties of mere exposure: The effects of processing style and repetition on affective response. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1086/209032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, D. J., & Jensen, J. D. (2007). The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed loss-framed messages for encouraging disease prevention behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Health Communication, 12(7), 623–644. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730701615198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piff, P. K., Kraus, M. W., Côté, S., Cheng, B. H., & Keltner, D. (2010). Having less, giving more: The influence of social class on prosocial behaviour. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(5), 771–784. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratner, R. K., & Miller, D. T. (2001). The norm of self-interest and its effects on social action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhart, A. M., Marshall, H. M., Feeley, T. H., & Tutzauer, F. (2007). The persuasive effects of message framing in organ donation: The mediating role of psychological reactance. Communication Monographs, 74(2), 229–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750701397098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothman, A. J., Bartels, R. D., Wlaschin, J., & Salovey, P. (2006). The strategic use of gain- and loss-framed messages to promote healthy behavior: How theory can inform practice. Journal of Communication, 56(suppl_1), 5202–5220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00290.x
   Google Scholar
• Sargeant, A., & Hudson, J. (2007). Donor retention: An exploratory study of door‐to‐door recruits. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 13(1), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.301
   Google Scholar
• Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Wakslak, C. (2007). Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behaviour. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1057-7408(07)70013-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7455683
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. The Journal of Business, 59(4), S251–S278. https://doi.org/10.1086/296365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weyant, J. M., & Smith, S. L. (1987). Getting more by asking less: The effects of request size on donations to charity. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17(4), 392–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1987.tb00320.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, K., & Peloza, J. (2009). Self-benefit versus other-benefit marketing appeals: Their effectiveness in generating charitable support. Journal of Marketing, 73(4), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.73.4.109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, J. (2019). The impact of self-construal and message frame valence on reactance: A cross-cultural study in charity advertising. International Journal of Advertising: The Review of Marketing Communications, 38(3), 405–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2018.1536506
   Google Scholar
• Ye, N., Teng, L., Yu, Y., & Wang, Y. (2015). “What’s in it for me?”: The effect of donation outcomes on donation behavior. Journal of Business Research, 68(3), 480–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.09.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar