372
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Expression Profiling of Innate Immune Genes in Milk Somatic Cells During Subclinical Mastitis in Crossbred Dairy Cows

, , &

References

  • Gebreyohannes YT, Regassa GF, Kelay B. Milk yield and associated economic losses in quarters with subclinical mastitis due to Staphylococcus aureus in Ethiopian crossbred dairy cows. Trop Anim Hlth Prod 2010; 42(5):925–931.
  • Lavon Y, Leitner G, Moallem U, Immediate and carryover effects of Gram-negative and Gram-positive toxin-induced mastitis on follicular function in dairy cows. Theriogenol 2011; 76:942–953.
  • Hudson CD, Bradley AJ, Breen JE, Green MJ. Associations between udder health and reproductive performance in United Kingdom dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2012; 95:3683–3697.
  • Bangar CK, Singh B, Dohare AK, Verma RM. A systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence of sub-clinical mastitis in dairy cows in India. Trop Anim Hlth Prod 2015; 47:291–297.
  • Singh J, Kataria AK. Relationship between bacterial species and total somatic cell counts in sub-clinical and latent mastitis in cattle. Indian J Anim Sci 2009; 79(1):38–40.
  • Mir AQ, Bansal BK, Gupta DK. Sub-clinical mastitis in machine milked dairy farms in Punjab: prevalence, distribution of bacteria and current antibiogram. Vet Wld 2014; 7(5):291–294.
  • Chandrasekaran D, Venkatesan P, Tirumurugaan KG, Pattern of antibiotic resistant mastitis in dairy cows. Vet WId 2014; 7(6):389–394.
  • Mata F. Mastitis vaccination in dairy cattle: a meta-analysis of field case-control trials. RPCV 2013; 108:17–22.
  • Bradley AJ, Breen JE, Payne B, White V, Green MJ. An investigation of the efficacy of a polyvalent mastitis vaccine using different vaccination regimens under field conditions in the United Kingdom. J Dairy Sci 2015; 98:1–15.
  • Oltenacu PA, Broom DM. The impact of genetic selection for increased milk yield on the welfare of dairy cows. Anim Welfare 2010; 19:39–49.
  • Sordillo LM, Shafer-Weaver LK, Derosa D. Immunobiology of the mammary gland. J Dairy Sci 1997; 80:1851–1865.
  • Rainard P, Riollet C. Innate immunity of the bovine mammary gland. Vet Res 2006; 37:369–400.
  • Alnakip ME, Quintela-Baluja M, Bohme K, et al. The immunology of mammary gland of dairy ruminants between healthy and inflammatory conditions. J Vet Med 2014; 2014: 1–31.
  • Alluwaimi AM, Cullor JS. Cytokines gene expression patterns of bovine milk during middle and late stages of lactation. J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health 2002; 49:105–110.
  • Lee JW, Bannerman DD, Paape MJ, Huang MK, Zhao X. Characterization of cytokine expression in milk somatic cells during intramammary infections with Escherichia coli or Staphylococcus aureus by real-time PCR. Vet Res 2006; 37:219–229.
  • Fonseca I, Silva VP, Lange CC, et al. Expression profile of genes associated with mastitis in dairy cattle. Gen Mol Biol 2009; 32:776–781.
  • Bhatt DV, Khade PS, Tarate BS, et al. Cytokine expression pattern in milk somatic cells of subclinical mastitis-affected cattle analyzed by real time PCR. Korean J Vet Res 2012; 52(4):231–238.
  • Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔCT Method. Methods 2001; 25:402–408.
  • Yuan SJ, Wang D, Stewart NC. Statistical methods for efficiency adjusted real-time PCR quantification. Biotechnol J 2007; 3:112–123.
  • Bhutto AL, Murray RD, Woldehiwet Z. California mastitis test scores as indicators of subclinical intramammary infections at the end of lactation in dairy cows. Res Vet Sci 2012; 92:13–17.
  • Ilie LI, Tudor L, Galis AM. The electrical conductivity of cattle milk and the possibility of mastitis diagnosis in Romania. Vet Med Sci Works 2010; 43:220–227.
  • Baştan A, Kacar C, Acar DB, Şahin M, Cengiz M. Investigation of the incidence and diagnosis of subclinical mastitis in early lactation period cows. Turk J Vet Anim Sci 2008; 32:119–121.
  • Lafi SQ. Use of somatic cell counts and California Mastitis Test results from udder halves milk samples to detect subclinical intramammary infection in Awassi sheep. Small Rum Res 2006; 62:83–86.
  • Norberg E, Hogeveen H, Korsgaard IR, Friggens NC, Sloth KHMN, Lovendahl P. Electrical conductivity of milk: ability to predict mastitis status. J Dairy Sci 2004; 87:1099–1107.
  • Kasikci G, Cetin O, Bingol EB, Gunduz MC. Relations between electrical conductivity, somatic cell count, California mastitis test and some quality parameters in the diagnosis of subclinical mastitis in dairy cows. Turk J Vet Anim Sci 2012; 36:49–55.
  • Ley K. The role of selectins in inflammation and disease. TRENDS Mol Med 2003; 9:263–268.
  • Diez-Fraille A, Mehrzad J, Meyer E, Duchateau L, Burvenich C. Comparison of L-selectin and Mac-l expression on blood and milk neutrophils during experimental Escherichia coli-induced mastitis in cows. Am J Vet Res 2004; 65:1164–1171.
  • Totte P, Duperray C, Dedieu L. CD62 L defines a subset of pathogen-specific bovine CD4 with central memory cell characteristics. Dev Comp Immunol 2010; 34:177–182.
  • Ghaderi H, Kiany F, Razmkhah M, et al. mRNA expression of pattern recognition receptors and their signaling mediators in healthy and diseased gingival tissues. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2014; 18(2):150–154.
  • Oviedo-Boyso J, Valdez-Alarcón JJ, Cajero-Juárez M, et al. Innate immune response of bovine mammary gland to pathogenic bacteria responsible for mastitis. J Infect 2007; 54:399–409.
  • Seabury CM, Womack JE. Analysis of sequence variability and protein domain architectures for bovine peptidoglycan recognition protein 1 and toll-like receptors 2 and 6. Genomics 2008; 92:235–245.
  • Ma X, Liu Y, Gowen BB, Graviss EA, Clark AG, Musser JM. Full-exon resequencing reveals toll-like receptor variants contribute to human susceptibility to tuberculosis disease. PLoS ONE 2007; 2:p.e1318.
  • Goldammer T, Zerbe H, Molenaar A, et al. Mastitis increases mammary mRNA abundance of beta-defensin 5, toll-like-receptor 2 (TLR2), and TLR4 but not TLR9 in cattle. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 2004; 11:174–185.
  • Yang W, Zerbe H, Petzl W. Bovine TLR2 and TLR4 properly transduce signals from Staphylococcus aureus and E.coli, but S. aureus fails to both activate NF-κB in mammary epithelial cells and to quickly induce TNFα and interleukin-8 (CXCL8) expression in the udder Mol Immunol 2008; 45:1385–1397.
  • Whelehan CJ, Meade KG, Eckersall PD, Young FJ, O’Farrelly C. Experimental Staphylococcus aureus infection of the mammary gland induces region-specific changes in innate immune gene expression. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2011; 140:181–189.
  • Tydell CC, Yuan J, Tran P, Selsted ME. Bovine peptidoglycan recognition protein-S: antimicrobial activity, localization, secretion, and binding properties. J Immunol 2006; 176:1154–1162.
  • Wang HL, Li ZX, Wang LJ, et al. Polymorphism in PGLYRP-1 gene by PCR-RFLP and its association with somatic cell score in Chinese Holstein. Res Vet Sci 2013; 95:508–514.
  • Kappeler SR, Heuberger C, Farah Z, Puhan Z. Expression of the peptidoglycan recognition protein, PGRP, in the lactating mammary gland. J Dairy Sci 2004; 87:2660–2668.
  • Podolin PL, Bolognese BJ, Foley JJ, et al. A potent and selective non-peptide antagonist of CXCR2 inhibits acute and chronic models of arthritis in the rabbit. J Immunol 2002; 169:6435–6444.
  • Lahouassa H, Rainard P, Caraty A, Riollet C. Identification and characterization of a new interleukin-8 receptor in bovine species. Mol Immunol 2008; 45:1153–1164.
  • Rambeaud M, Clift R, Pighetti GM. Association of a bovine CXCR2 gene polymorphism with neutrophil survival and killing ability. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2006; 111:231–238.
  • Verbeke J, Poucke VM, Peelman L, Vliegher SD. Differential expression of CXCR1 and commonly used reference genes in bovine milk somatic cells following experimental intramammary challenge. BMC Genetics 2015; 16:40. doi:10.1186/s12863-015-0197-9.
  • Nannuru KC, Sharma B, Varney ML, Singh RK. Role of chemokine receptor CXCR2 expression in mammary tumor growth, angiogenesis and metastasis. J Carcinogen 2011; 10:1477–3163.
  • Atkins K, Berry EJ, Zhang W, et al. Coordinate expression of OPN and associated receptors during monocyte/macrophage differentiation of HL-60 cells. J Cell Physiol 1998; 175:229–237.
  • Denhardt TD, Guo X. Osteopontin: a protein with diverse functions. FASEB J 1993; 7:1475–1482.
  • Bayless KJ, Davis GE, Meininger GA. Isolation and biological properties of osteopontin from bovine milk. Protein Expr Purif 1997; 9:309–314.
  • Wang XK, Denhardt TD. Osteopontin: role in immune regulation and stress responses. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 2008; 19:333–345.
  • Alain K, Karrow KA, Thibault C, St Pierre J, Lessard M, Bissonnette N. Osteopontin: an early innate immune marker of Escherichia coli mastitis harbors genetic polymorphisms with possible links with resistance to mastitis. Bio Med Cent Genomics 2009; 10:444.
  • Salvi V, Scutera S, Rossi S, et al. Dual regulation of osteopontin production by TLR stimulation in dendritic cells. J Leukoc Biol 2013; 94:147–158.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.