Genetic Factors Affecting Pork Quality: Halothane and Rendement Napole Genes

References

• FAOSTAT. Food Supply: Livestock and Fish Primary Equivalent. Rome, Italy Food and Agriculture Organization; 2012. http://faostat.fao.org/sit/345/default.aspx. Accessed February 16, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Buege D. Variations in Pork Lean Quality. Pork Facts. Des Moines, IA: National Pork Producers Council Publication; 1998. http://old.pork.org/filelibrary/factsheets/pigfactsheets/newfactsheets/12-04-03g.pdf. Accessed March 16, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Bowker BC, Grant AL, Forrest JC, Gerrard DE. Muscle metabolism and PSE pork. J Anim Sci 2000; 79:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Frisbya J, Rafterya D, Kerryb JP. Diamond D. Development of an autonomous, wireless pH and temperature sensing system for monitoring pig meat quality. Meat Sci 2005; 70(2):329–336.
   Google Scholar
• Kanis E, De Greef KH, Hiemstra A, Van Arendonk JAM. Breeding for societally important traits in pigs. J Anim Sci 2005; 83(4):948–957.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tribout T, Larzul C, Phocas F. Efficiency of genomic selection in a purebred pig male line. J Anim Sci 2012; 90(12):4164–4176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huff-Lonergan E, Page J. The Role of Carcass Chilling in the Development of Pork Quality. Pork Facts. Des Moines, IA: National Pork Producers Council Publication; 2010. http://articles.extension.org/pages/27298/the-role-of-carcass-chilling-in-the-development-of-pork-quality. Accessed March 15, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• England EM, Scheffler TL, Kasten SC, Matarneh SK, Gerrard DE. Exploring the unknowns involved in the transformation of muscle to meat. Meat Sci 2013; 95:837–843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hambrecht E, Eissen JJ, Newman DJ, Smits CHM, Verstegen MWA, Den Hartog LA. Preslaughter handling effects on pork quality and glycolytic potential in two muscles differing in fiber type composition. J Anim Sci 2005; 83(4):900–907.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonergan SM, Stalder KJ, Huff-Lonergan E, et al. Influence of lipid content on pork sensory quality within pH classification. J Anim Sci 2007; 85:1074–1079.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vögeli P, Fries R, Bolt R et al. Genetics of Porcine Stress Syndrome and association with oedema disease. In: Puolanne E, Demeyer DI, Ruusunen M, Ellis S, eds. Pork Quality: Genetic and Metabolic Factors. Wallingford, UK: CAB International; 1993:22–36.
   Google Scholar
• Mickelson JR, Gallant EM, Rempel WE, et al. Effects of the halothane-sensitivity gene on sarcoplasmic reticulum function. Am J Physiol 1989; 25(C7):81–94.
   Google Scholar
• Fujii J, Otsu K, Orato F et al. Identification of a mutation in porcine ryanodine receptor associated with malignant hyperthermia. Science 1991; 253:448–451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carolino I, Vicente A, Sousa CO, Gama LT. SNaPshot based genotyping of the RYR1 mutation in Portuguese breeds of pigs. Livest Sci 2007; 111(3):264–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Küchenmeister U, Kuhn G, Wegner J, Nürnberg G, Ender K. Postmortem changes in Ca2+ transporting proteins of sarcoplasmic reticulum in dependence on malignant hyperthermia status in pigs. Mol Cell Biochem 1999; 195:37–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutalik VK, Venkatesh KV. Quantification of the glycogen cascade system: the ultrasensitive responses of liver glycogen synthase and muscle phosphorylase are due to distinctive regulatory designs. Theor Biol Med Model 2005; 2(1):19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryu YC, Kim BC. Comparison of histochemical characteristics in various pork groups categorized by postmortem metabolic rate and pork quality. J Anim Sci 2006; 84(4):894–901.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milan D, Jeon JT, Looft C, et al. A mutation in PRKAG3 associated with excess glycogen content in pig skeletal muscle. Science 2000; 288(5469):1248–1251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monin G, Sellier P. Pork of low technological quality with a normal rate of muscle pH fall in the immediate post-mortem period: the case of the Hampshire breed. Meat Sci 1985; 13:49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Laack RLJM, Kauffman RG. Glycolytic potential of red, soft, exudative pork longissimus muscle. J Anim Sci 1999; 77:2971–2973.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton DN, Ellis M, Miller KD, McKeith K, Parrett DF. The effect of the Halothane and Rendement Napole genes on carcass and meat quality characteristics of pigs. J Anim Sci 2000; 78(11):2862–2867.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reik TR, Rempel WE, McGrath CJ, Addis PB. Further evidence on the inheritance of halothane reaction in pigs. J Anim Sci 1983; 57:826–831.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rempel WE, Lu M, Kandelgy S, et al. Relative accuracy of the halothane challenge test and a molecular genetic test in detecting the gene for porcine stress syndrome. J Anim Sci 1993; 71(6):1395–1399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vögeli P, Stranzinger G, Schneebeli H, Hagger C, Künzi N, Gerwig C. Relationships between the H and A-O blood types, phosphohexoseisomerase and 6- phosphogluconate dehydrogenase red cell enzyme systems and halothane sensitivity, and economic traits in a superior and an inferior selection line of Swiss Landrace pigs. J Anim Sci 1984; 59:1440–1450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach LM, Ellis M, Sutton DS, McKeith FK, Wilson ER. The growth performance, carcass characteristics, and meat quality of halothane carrier and negative pigs. J Anim Sci 1996; 74(5):934–943.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moeller SJ, Baas TJ, Leeds TD, Emnett RS, Irvin KM. Rendement Napole gene effects and a comparison of glycolytic potential and DNA genotyping for classification of Rendement Napole status in Hampshire-sired pigs. J Anim Sci 2003; 81(2):402–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien PJ. The causative mutation for porcine stress syndrome. Comp Cont Educ 1995; 17:257–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez X, Tornberg E, Naveau J, Talmant A, Monin G. Bimodal distribution of the muscle glycolytic potential in French and Swedish populations of Hampshire crossbred pigs. J Sci Food Agric 1992; 59:307–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundstrom K, Anderson A, Hansson A. Effect of the RN gene on technological and sensory meat quality in crossbred pigs with Hampshire as terminal sire. Meat Sci 1996; 42(2):145–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enfält A, Lundström K, Hanssona I, Johansenb S, Nyström P. Comparison of non-carriers and heterozygous carriers of the RN− allele for carcass composition, muscle distribution and technological meat quality in Hampshire-sired pigs. Livest Prod Sci 1997; 47(3):221–229.
   Google Scholar
• Houde A, Pommier SA, Roy R. Detection of the ryanodine receptor mutation associated with malignant hyperthermia in purebred swine populations. J Anim Sci 1993; 71(6):1414–1418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goddard ME, Hayes BJ. Genomic selection. J Anim Breed Genet 2007; 124(6):323–330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos VS, Martins Filho S, Resende MD, et al. Genomic selection for slaughter age in pigs using the Cox frailty model. Genet Mol Res 2015; 14(4):12616–12627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biermann AD, Yin T, König von Borstel UU, Rübesam K, Kuhn B, König S. From phenotyping towards breeding strategies: using in vivo indicator traits and genetic markers to improve meat quality in an endangered pig breed. Animal 2015; 9(6):919–927.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher P, Mellett FD, Hoffman LC. Halothane genotype and pork quality. 1 Carcass and meat quality characteristics of three halothane genotypes Meat Sci 2000; 54(2):97–105.
   Google Scholar
• Silveira ACP, Freitas PFA, Cesar ASM, et al. Influence of the halothane gene (HAL) on pork quality in two commercial crossbreeds. Genet Mol Res 2011; 10(3):1479–1489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr CC, Morgan JB, Berg EP, Carter SD, Ray FK. Growth performance, carcass composition, quality, and enhancement treatment of fresh pork identified through deoxyribonucleic acid marker-assisted selection for the Rendement Napole gene. J Anim Sci 2006; 84(4):910–917.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Closter AM, Guldbrandtsen B, Henryon M, Nielsen B, Berg P. Consequences of elimination of the Rendement Napole allele from Danish Hampshire. J Anim Breed Genet 2011; 128(3):192–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan YY, Ma JW, Yuan F, et al. Genome-wide identification of quantitative trait loci for pork temperature, pH decline, and glycolytic potential in a large-scale White Duroc × Chinese Erhualian resource population. J Anim Sci 2009; 87(1):9–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wijk HJ, Dibbits B, Baron EE, et al. Identification of quantitative trait loci for carcass composition and pork quality traits in a commercial finishing cross. J Anim Sci 2006; 84(4):789–799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malek M, Dekkers JCM, Lee HK, Baas TJ, Rothschild MF. A molecular genome scan analysis to identify chromosomal regions influencing economic traits in the pig. I. Growth and body composition Mamm Genome 2001; 12:630–636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nezer C, Moreau L, Wagenaar D, Georges M. Results of a whole genome scan targeting QTL for growth and carcass traits in a Piétrain × Large White intercross. Genet Sel Evol 2002; 34:371–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yue G, Russo V, Davoli R, et al. Linkage and QTL mapping for Susscrofa chromosome 13. J. Anim Breed Genet 2003; 120(S1):103–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar