Genetic diversity of autochthonous pig breeds analyzed by microsatellite markers and mitochondrial DNA D-loop sequence polymorphism

References

• Karolyi D, Lukovic Z, Salajpal K. Production traits of Crna slavonska pigs. Paper presented at: Proceedings of 6th International Symposium on the Mediterranean Pig; October 11-13, 2007; Capo d'Orlando, Messina, Italy; 11–13.
   Google Scholar
• Đikić M, Salajpal K, Karolyi D, Đikić D, Rupić V. Biological characteristics of turopolje pig breed as factors in renewing and preservation of population. J Anim Improv. 2009;64:2–4.
   Google Scholar
• Yang W, Kang X, Yang Q, Lin Y, Fang M. Review on the development of genotyping methods for assessing farm animal diversity. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2013;4(1):2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Archibald AL, Haley CS, Brown JF, et al. The PiGMaP consortium linkage map of the pig (Sus scrofa). Mamm Genome. 1995;6(3):157–175. Cited in PubMed; PMID: 7749223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li S-J, Yang SH, Zhao SH, et al. Genetic diversity analyses of 10 indigenous Chinese pig populations based on 20 microsatellites. J Anim Sci. 2004;82(2):368–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh JD, Song KD, Seo JH, et al. Genetic traceability of black pig meats using microsatellite markers. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2014;27(7):926–931.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michailidou S, Kalivas A, Ganopoulos I, et al. A multi-farm assessment of Greek black pig genetic diversity using microsatellite molecular markers. Genet Mol Res. 2014;13(2):2752–2765.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scali M, Vignani R, Quintetti M, Bigliazzi J, Paolucci E, Cresti M. Genetic traceability of cinta senese pig (Sus scrofa domesticus L.): a study of the meat and processed products by microsatellite markers. Food Nutr Sci. 2015;6(8):712–726.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta A, Bhardwaj A, Sharma P, Pal Y. Mitochondrial DNA-a Tool for Phylogenetic and Biodiversity Search in Equines. J Biodiversity Endangered Species. 2015;1:006.
   Google Scholar
• Molnár J, Tóth G, Stéger V, et al. Mitochondrial D‐loop analysis reveals low diversity in Mangalica pigs and their relationship to historical specimens. J Anim Breed Genet. 2013;130(4):312–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang JT, Jiao T, Zhao S. Genetic diversity in the mitochondrial DNA D-loop region of global swine (Sus scrofa) populations. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2016;473(4):814–820.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ausubel F, Brent R, Kingston R, et al., eds. Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. New York: Wiley; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Belkhir K, Borsa P, Chiki L, Bonhomme NR. Genetix 4.05, logiciel sous Windows TM pour la génétique des populations. CNRS UMR 5000. Université de Montpellier II, Montpellier (France): Laboratoire Génome, Populations, Interactions; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Guo SW, Thompson EA. Performing the exact test of Hardy–Weinberg proportion for multiple alleles. Biometrics. 1992;48:361–372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond M, Rousset F. Population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. GENEPOP (version 1.2). J Hered. 1995;86(3):248–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics. 2000;155:945–959.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evanno GS, Regnaut P, Gould J. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software structure: a simulation study. Mol Ecol. 2005;14:2611–2620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopelman N, Mayzel J, Jakobsson MN, Rosenberg M, Mayrose I. CLUMPAK: a program for identifying clustering modes and packaging population structure inferences across K. Mol Ecol Resour. 2015;15(5):1179–1191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson J, Gibson T, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins D. Flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25(24):4876–4882.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ursing BM, Arnason U. The complete mitochondrial DNA sequence of the pig (Sus scrofa). J Mol Evol. 1998;47(3):302–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghivizzani SC, Mackay SL, Madsen CS, Laipis PJ, Hauswirth WW. Transcribed heteroplasmic repeated sequences in the porcine mitochondrial DNA D-loop region. J Mol Evol. 1993;37(1):36–37. Cited in PubMed; PMID: 8360917
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gongora J, Fleming P, Spencer PB, et al. Phylogenetic relationships of Australian and New Zealand feral pigs assessed by mitochondrial control region sequence and nuclear GPIP genotype. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2004;33(2):339–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swofford D.L. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods), ver. 4.0 beta 10. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, et al. MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst Biol. 2012;61:539–542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nylander JAA. MrAIC. Program distributed by the author. Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University; 2004;1(3).
   Google Scholar
• Huson DH, Bryant D. Application of Phylogenetic Networks in Evolutionary Studies. Mol Biol Evol. 2006;23(2):254–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright S. Evolution and the genetics of populations: a treatise in four volumes. Vol. 4: variability within and among natural populations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Barker J. A global protocol for determining genetic distances among domestic livestock breeds. Paper presented At: 5th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production. Guelph and Ontario, Canada; 1994:501–508.
   Google Scholar
• Takezaki N, Nei M. Genetic distances and reconstruction of phylogenetic trees from microsatellite DNA. Genetics. 1996;144(1):389–399. Cited in PubMed; PMID: 8878702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druml T, Salajpal K, Dikic M, Urosevic M, Grilz-Seger G, Baumung R. Genetic diversity, population structure and subdivision of local Balkan pig breeds in Austria, Croatia, Serbia and Bosnia-Herzegovina and its practical value in conservation programs. Genet Sel Evol. 2012;44:5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredholm M, Winterø AK, Christensen K, et al. Characterization of 24 porcine (dA-dC) n-(dT-dG) n microsatellites: genotyping of unrelated animals from four breeds and linkage studies. Mamm Genome. 1993;4(4):187–92. Cited in PubMed; PMID: 8499651
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li K, Fan B, Zhao S, Peng Z, Chen Y, Moran C. Analysis of diversity and genetic relationships between four Chinese indigenous pig breeds and one Australian commercial pig breed. Anim Genet. 2000;31(5):322–325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margeta P, Margeta V, Budimir K. How black is really Black slavonian pig. Acta Agric Slov. 2014;4:25–28.
   Google Scholar
• Djurkin KI, Buha I, Margeta V, et al. Carcass Composition and Meat Quality of Crna Slavonska Pigs from Two Different Housing Conditions. Agric Conspec Sci. 2017;82(3):221–225.
   Google Scholar
• Harcet M, Đikić M, Gamulin V. Genetic Diversity of Turopolje Pig Breed. Food Technol Biotechnol. 2006;44(1):105–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robins JH, Matisoo‐Smith E, Ross HA. The origins of the feral pigs on the Auckland Islands. J R Soc NZ. 2003;33(2):561–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim KI, Lee JH, Li K, et al. Phylogenetic relationships of Asian and European pig breeds determined by mitochondrial DNA D‐loop sequence polymorphism. Anim Genet. 2002;33(1):19–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robić Z, Đikić M, Jurić I, Stipić N, Božac R, Liker B. The Turopolje pig one of the oldest European races: Its saving and Renewal. Paper presented at: 4th International symposium Animal Science Days; September 14–17, 1996; Kaposvar, Hungary.
   Google Scholar
• Giuffra E, Kijas JM, Amarger V, Carlborg O, Jeon JT, Andersson L. The origin of the domestic pig: independent domestication and subsequent introgression. Genetics. 2000;154(4):1785–1791. Cited in PubMed; PMID: 10747069
   Google Scholar
• Jones G, Rothschild M, Ruvinsky A. Genetic aspects of domestication, common breeds and their origin. In: Rothschild MF, Ruvinsky A, ed. The genetics of the pig. Oxfordshire: Cab International; 1998:17–50.
   Google Scholar
• Ritzoffy N. Prinos k poznavanju Turopoljskog svinjčeta [Contribution to knowledge on Turopolje pig]. Veterinarski arhiv 1931;1(1–4):83–134.
   Google Scholar