Characterization of the promoter region of bovine ATP5B: roles of MyoD and GATA1 in the regulation of basal transcription

References

• Hausman GJ, Dodson MV, Ajuwon K, et al. Board-invited review: the biology and regulation of preadipocytes and adipocytes in meat animals. J Anim Sci. 2009;87(4):1218–1246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picard B, Gagaoua M, Al-Jammas M, De Koning L, Valais A, Bonnet M. Beef tenderness and intramuscular fat proteomic biomarkers: muscle type effect. PeerJ. 2018;6:e4891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho SH, Kim J, Park BY, et al. Assessment of meat quality properties and development of a palatability prediction model for Korean Hanwoo steer beef. Meat Sci. 2010;86(1):236–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt MR, Garmyn AJ, O’Quinn TG. Consumer assessment of beef palatability from four beef muscles from USDA Choice and Select graded carcasses. Meat Sci. 2014;98(1):1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang YH, Kim GD, Jeong JY, Hur SJ, Joo ST. The relationship between muscle fiber characteristics and meat quality traits of highly marbled Hanwoo (Korean native cattle) steers. Meat Sci. 2010;86(2):456–461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonnet M, Cassar-Malek I, Chilliard Y, Picard B. Ontogenesis of muscle and adipose tissues and their interactions in ruminants and other species. Animal. 2010;4(7):1093–1109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hocquette JF, Gondret F, Baéza E, Médale F, Jurie C, Pethick DW. Intramuscular fat content in meat-producing animals: development, genetic and nutritional control, and identification of putative markers. Animal. 2010;4(2):303–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee B, Yoon S, Lee Y, et al. Comparison of marbling fleck characteristics and objective tenderness parameters with different marbling coarseness within longissimus thoracis muscle of high-marbled Hanwoo steer. Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour. 2018;38(3):606.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhao ZD, Zan LS, Li AN, et al. Characterization of the promoter region of the bovine long-chain acyl-CoA synthetase 1 gene: roles of E2F1, Sp1, KLF15, and E2F4. Sci Rep. 2016;6:19661.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campos CF, Duarte MS, Guimarães SEF, Verardo LL. Animal model and the current understanding of molecule dynamics of adipogenesis. Animal. 2016;10(6):927.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roudbari Z, Coort SL, Kutmon M, et al. Identification of biological pathways contributing to marbling in skeletal muscle to improve beef cattle breeding. Front Genet. 2019;10: 1370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith SB, Crouse JD. Relative contributions of acetate, lactate and glucose to lipogenesis in bovine intramuscular and subcutaneous adipose tissue. J Nutr. 1984;114(4):792–800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nye CK, Hanson RW, Kalhan SC. Glyceroneogenesis is the dominant pathway for triglyceride glycerol synthesis in vivo in the rat. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(41):27565–27574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piccone CM, Brazeau GA, McCormick KM. Effect of oestrogen on myofibre size and myosin expression in growing rats. Experimental Physiology. 2005;90(1):87–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu H, Xu Y, Liang X, et al. Porcine skeletal muscle differentially expressed gene ATP5B: molecular characterization, expression patterns, and association analysis with meat quality traits. Mamm Genome. 2013;24(3–4):142–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva LHP, Rodrigues RTS, Assis DEF, Benedeti PDB, Duarte MS, Chizzotti ML. Explaining meat quality of bulls and steers by differential proteome and phosphoproteome analysis of skeletal muscle. J Proteomics. 2019;199:51–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2− ΔΔCT method. Methods. 2001;25(4):402–408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakrabarti SK, James JC, Mirmira RG. Quantitative assessment of gene targeting in vitro and in vivo by the pancreatic transcription factor, Pdx1. Importance of chromatin structure in directing promoter binding. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(15):13286–13293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carninci P, Sandelin A, Lenhard B, et al. Genome-wide analysis of mammalian promoter architecture and evolution. Nat Genet. 2006;38(6):626–635.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sudre K, Cassar-Malek I, Listrat A, et al. Biochemical and transcriptomic analyses of two bovine skeletal muscles in Charolais bulls divergently selected for muscle growth. Meat Sci. 2005;70(2):267–277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Q, Xiao X, Li M, et al. Telmisartan improves kidney function through inhibition of the oxidative phosphorylation pathway in diabetic rats. J Mol Endocrinol. 2012;49(1):35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juven-Gershon T, Hsu JY, Theisen JWM, Kadonaga JT. The RNA polymerase II core promoter—the gateway to transcription. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2008;20(3):253–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shintaku J, Peterson JM, Talbert EE, et al. MyoD regulates skeletal muscle oxidative metabolism cooperatively with alternative NF-κB. Cell Rep. 2016;17(2):514–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legerlotz K, Smith HK. Role of MyoD in denervated, disused, and exercised muscle. Muscle & Nerve. 2008;38(3):1087–1100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes SM, Koishi K, Rudnicki M, Maggs AM. MyoD protein is differentially accumulated in fast and slow skeletal muscle fibres and required for normal fibre type balance in rodents. Mech Dev. 1997;61(1–2):151–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macharia R, Otto A, Valasek P, Patel K. Neuromuscular junction morphology, fiber‐type proportions, and satellite cell proliferation rates are altered in MyoD−/− mice. Muscle & Nerve. 2010;42(1):38–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandstetter AM, Picard B, Geay Y. Muscle fibre characteristics in four muscles of growing male cattle: II. Effect of castration and feeding level. Livest Prod Sci. 1998;53(1):25–36.
   Google Scholar
• Evans T, Reitman M, Felsenfeld G. An erythrocyte-specific DNA-binding factor recognizes a regulatory sequence common to all chicken globin genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1988;85(16):5976–5980.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasegawa A, Shimizu R. GATA1 activity governed by configurations of cis-acting elements. Front Oncol. 2017;6:269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaneko H, Kobayashi E, Yamamoto M, Shimizu R. N-and C-terminal transactivation domains of GATA1 protein coordinate hematopoietic program. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(25):21439–21449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwahori A, Fraidenraich D, Basilico C. A conserved enhancer element that drives FGF4 gene expression in the embryonic myotomes is synergistically activated by GATA and bHLH proteins. Dev Biol. 2004;270(2):525–537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merika M, Orkin SH. Functional synergy and physical interactions of the erythroid transcription factor GATA-1 with the Krüppel family proteins Sp1 and EKLF. Mol Cell Biol. 1995;15(5):2437–2447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar