Progress and future perspectives of livestock genomics in India: a mini review

References

• [DAHD] Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairying. Annual report of department of animal husbandry, dairying & fisheries, ministry of agriculture, Government of India. 2021. Available from: https://dahd.nic.in/sites/default/filess/Annual%20Report%202020-21%20%28English%29_30.06.21%5D.pdf. [Accessed 20 December 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Gowane GR, Kumar A, Nimbkar C. Challenges and opportunities to livestock breeding programmes in India. J Anim Breed Genet. 2019;136(5):329–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith C, Simpson SP. The use of genetic polymorphisms in livestock improvement. J Anim Breed Genet. 1986;103(1–5):205–217.
   Google Scholar
• Venter JC, Adams MD, Myers EW, et al. The sequence of the human genome. Science. 2001;291(5507):1304–1351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Chicken Genome Sequencing Consortium. Sequence and comparative analysis of the chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution. Nature. 2004;432(7018):695–716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tellam RL, Lemay DG, Van Tassell CP, et al. Unlocking the bovine genome. BMC Genomics. 2009;10(1):193.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elsik CG, Unni DR, Diesh CM, et al. Bovine genome database: new tools for gleaning function from the Bos taurus genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(D1):D834–D839.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagen DE, Unni DR, Tayal A, et al. Bovine genome database: tools for mining the Bos taurus genome. Methods Mol Biol. 2018;1757:211–249.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosen BD, Bickhart DM, Schnabel RD, et al. De novo assembly of the cattle reference genome with single-molecule sequencing. Gigascience. 2020;9(3):giaa021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade CM, Giulotto E, Sigurdsson S, et al. Genome sequence, comparative analysis, and population genetics of the domestic Horse. Science. 2009;326(5954):865–867.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archibald AL, Bolund L, Churcher C, et al. Pig genome sequence-analysis and publication strategy. BMC Genomics. 2010;11(1):438.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Archibald AL, Cockett NE, Dalrymple BP, et al. The sheep genome reference sequence: a work in progress. Anim Genet. 2010;41(5):449–453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong Y, Xie M, Jiang Y, et al. Sequencing and automated whole-genome optical mapping of the genome of a domestic goat (Capra hircus). Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31(2):135–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Low WY, Tearle R, Bickhart DM, et al. Chromosome-level assembly of the water buffalo genome surpasses human and goat genomes in sequence contiguity. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):260.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Canavez FC, Luche DD, Stothard P, et al. Genome sequence and assembly of Bos indicus. J Hered. 2012;103(3):342–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ananthasayanam S, Kothandaraman H, Nayee N, et al. First near complete haplotype phased genome assembly of River buffalo (Bubalus bubalis). BioRxiv. 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Matukumalli LK, Lawley CT, Schnabel RD, et al. Development and characterization of a high density SNP genotyping assay for cattle. Toland AE, editor. PLOS One. 2009;4(4):e5350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [NBAGR] National Bureau of Animal Genetic Resources. Registered breeds of livestock. 2020. Available from: https://nbagr.icar.gov.in/. [Accessed 20 December 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Srivastava AK. Conservation of indigenous cattle breeds. J Animal Res. 2019;9(1):1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Saravanan KA, Panigrahi M, Kumar H, Bhushan B. Advanced software programs for the analysis of genetic diversity in livestock genomics: a mini review. Biol Rhythm Res. 2019;50:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Mukesh M, Sodhi M, Bhatia S, Mishra BP. Genetic diversity of Indian native cattle breeds as analysed with 20 microsatellite loci. J Anim Breed Genet. 2004;121(6):416–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sodhi M, Mukesh M, Ahlawat SPS, et al. Genetic diversity and structure of two prominent zebu cattle breeds adapted to the arid region of India inferred from microsatellite polymorphism. Biochem Genet. 2008;46(3–4):124–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma R, Pandey AK, Singh Y, et al. Evaluation of genetic variation and phylogenetic relationship among North Indian cattle breeds. Asian Australas J Anim Sci. 2009;22(1):13–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radhika G, Aravindakshan TV, Jinty S, Ramya K. Evaluation of genetic diversity, population structure, and relationship between legendary Vechur cattle and crossbred cattle of Kerala state, India. Anim Biotechnol. 2018;29(1):50–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora R, Lakhchaura BD, Prasad RB, Tantia MS, Vijh RK. Genetic diversity analysis of two buffalo populations of northern India using microsatellite markers. J Anim Breed Genet. 2004;121(2):111–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kataria RS, Sunder S, Malik G, et al. Genetic diversity and bottleneck analysis of Nagpuri buffalo breed of India based on microsatellite data. Russ J Genet. 2009;45(7):826–832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora R, Bhatia S. Genetic diversity of magra sheep from India using microsatellite analysis. Asian Australas J Anim Sci. 2006;19(7):938–942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar D, Sharma R, Pandey AK, et al. Genetic diversity and bottleneck analysis of Indian Bellary Sheep by microsatellite markers. Russ J Genet. 2007;43(9):996–1005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Dixit SP, Verma NK, et al. Genetic diversity analysis of the gohilwari breed of Indian goat (Capra hircus) using microsatellite markers. Am J Anim Vet Sciences. 2009;4(3):49–57.
   Google Scholar
• Dixit SP, Verma NK, Aggarwal RAK, et al. Genetic diversity and relationship among southern Indian goat breeds based on microsatellite markers. Small Rumin Res. 2010;91(2–3):153–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radhika G, Raghavan KC, Aravindakshan TV, Thirupathy V. Genetic diversity and population structure analysis of native and crossbred goat genetic groups of Kerala, India. Small Rumin Res. 2015;131:50–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behl R, Sheoran N, Behl J, Vijh RK. Genetic analysis of Ankamali pigs of India using microsatellite markers and their comparison with other domesticated Indian pig types. J Anim Breed Genet. 2006;123(2):131–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaman G, Chandra SM, Aziz A. Molecular characterization of Meghalaya local pigs (Niang Megha) using microsatellite markers. IJST. 2013;6(10):1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma R, Kishore A, Mukesh M, et al. Genetic diversity and relationship of Indian cattle inferred from microsatellite and mitochondrial DNA markers. BMC Genet. 2015;16(1):73.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pramod RK, Velayutham D, Sajesh PK, et al. Complete mitogenome reveals genetic divergence and phylogenetic relationships among Indian cattle (Bos indicus) breeds. Anim Biotechnol. 2019;30(3):219–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma R, Ahlawat S, Sharma H, et al. Microsatellite and mitochondrial DNA analyses unveil the genetic structure of native sheep breeds from three major agro-ecological regions of India. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):20422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diwedi J, Singh AW, Ahlawat S, et al. Comprehensive analysis of mitochondrial DNA based genetic diversity in Indian goats. Gene. 2020;756:144910.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dash S, Singh A, Bhatia AK, et al. Evaluation of bovine high-density SNP genotyping array in indigenous dairy cattle breeds. Anim Biotechnol. 2018;29(2):129–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malik AA, Sharma R, Ahlawat S, et al. Analysis of genetic relatedness among Indian cattle (Bos indicus) using genotyping-by-sequencing markers. Anim Genet. 2018;49(3):242–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saravanan KA, Panigrahi M, Kumar H, et al. Genome-wide assessment of genetic diversity, linkage disequilibrium and haplotype block structure in Tharparkar cattle breed of India. Anim Biotechnol. 2020;1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495398.2020.1796696
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nayee N, Sahana G, Gajjar S, et al. Suitability of existing commercial single nucleotide polymorphism chips for genomic studies in Bos indicus cattle breeds and their Bos taurus crosses. J Anim Breed Genet. 2018;135(6):432–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chhotaray S, Panigrahi M, Pal D, et al. Genome-wide estimation of inbreeding coefficient, effective population size and haplotype blocks in Vrindavani crossbred cattle strain of India. Biol Rhythm Res. 2021;52(5):666–679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad SF, Panigrahi M, Chhotaray S, et al. Population structure and admixture analysis in Frieswal crossbred cattle of India – a pilot study. Anim Biotechnol. 2020;31(1):86–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad SF, Panigrahi M, Chhotaray S, et al. Revelation of genomic breed composition in a crossbred cattle of India with the help of Bovine50K BeadChip. Genomics. 2020;112(2):1531–1535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chhotaray S, Panigrahi M, Pal D, et al. Ancestry informative markers derived from discriminant analysis of principal components provide important insights into the composition of crossbred cattle. Genomics. 2020;112(2):1726–1733.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar H, Panigrahi M, Chhotaray S, et al. Identification of breed-specific SNP panel in nine different cattle genomes. Biomed Res. 2019;30(1):0970–938X.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar H, Panigrahi M, Chhotaray S, et al. Comparative analysis of five different methods to design a breed-specific SNP panel for cattle. Anim Biotechnol. 2021;32(1):130–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar H, Panigrahi M, Saravanan KA, et al. SNPs with intermediate minor allele frequencies facilitate accurate breed assignment of Indian Tharparkar cattle. Gene. 2021;777:145473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar H, Panigrahi M, Rajawat D, et al. Selection of breed-specific SNPs in three Indian sheep breeds using ovine 50 K array. Small Rumin Res. 2021;205:106545.
   Google Scholar
• Mukherjee A, Mukherjee S, Longkumer I, et al. Genomic characterization of Mithun (Bos frontalis) populations using high density SNP array. Indian J Genet Plant Breed. 2019;79(01S):1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Sivalingam J, Vineeth MR, Surya T, et al. Genomic divergence reveals unique populations among Indian Yaks. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):3636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar H, Panigrahi M, Saravanan KA, et al. Genome-wide detection of copy number variations in Tharparkar cattle. Anim Biotechnol. 2021;1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495398.2021.1942027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhanuprakash V, Chhotaray S, Pruthviraj DR, et al. Copy number variation in livestock: a mini review. Vet World. 2018;11(4):535–541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vineeth MR, Surya T, Sivalingam J, et al. Genome-wide discovery of SNPs in candidate genes related to production and fertility traits in Sahiwal cattle. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2020;52(4):1707–1715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surya T, Vineeth MR, Sivalingam J, et al. Genomewide identification and annotation of SNPs in Bubalus bubalis. Genomics. 2019;111(6):1695–1698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wara AB, Kumar A, Singh A, et al. Genome wide association study of test day’s and 305 days milk yield in crossbred cattle. Indian J Anim Sci. 2019;89:861–865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh A, Kumar A, Gondro C, et al. Identification of genes affecting milk fat and fatty acid composition in Vrindavani crossbred cattle using 50 K SNP-Chip. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2021;53(3):347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kour A, Deb SM, Nayee N, et al. Novel insights into genome-wide associations in Bos indicus reveal genetic linkages between fertility and growth. Anim Biotechnol. 2021;1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495398.2021.1932520
   Google Scholar
• Karthikeyan A, Kumar A, Chaudhary R, et al. Genome-wide association study of birth weight and pre-weaning body weight of crossbred pigs. Indian J Anim Sci. 2020;90(2):195–200.
   Google Scholar
• Mehrotra A, Bhushan B, Kumar A, et al. A 1.6 Mb region on SSC2 is associated with antibody response to classical swine fever vaccination in a mixed pig population. Anim Biotechnol. 2021;1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495398.2021.1873145
   Google Scholar
• Chhotaray S, Panigrahi M, Bhushan B, et al. Genome-wide association study reveals genes crucial for coat color production in Vrindavani cattle. Livest Sci. 2021;247:104476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kour A, Deb SM, Nayee N, et al. Understanding the genomic architecture of clinical mastitis in Bos indicus. 3 Biotech. 2021;11(11):466.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vohra V, Chhotaray S, Gowane G, et al. Genome-wide association studies in Indian Buffalo revealed genomic regions for lactation and fertility. Front Genet. 2021;12:696109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaiswal S, Jagannadham J, Kumari J, et al. Genome wide prediction, mapping and development of genomic resources of mastitis associated genes in water buffalo. Front Vet Sci. 2021;8:593871.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixit SP, Singh S, Ganguly I, et al. Genome-wide runs of homozygosity revealed selection signatures in Bos indicus. Front Genet. 2020;11:92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh A, Mehrotra A, Gondro C, et al. Signatures of selection in composite Vrindavani cattle of India. Front Genet. 2020;11:589496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhardwaj S, Singh S, Ganguly I, et al. Genome-wide diversity analysis for signatures of selection of Bos indicus adaptability under extreme agro-climatic conditions of temperate and tropical ecosystems. Animal Gene. 2021;20:200115.
   Google Scholar
• Dixit SP, Bhatia AK, Ganguly I, et al. Genome analyses revealed genetic admixture and selection signatures in Bos indicus. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):21924.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Illa SK, Mukherjee S, Nath S, Mukherjee A. Genome-wide scanning for signatures of selection revealed the putative genomic regions and candidate genes controlling milk composition and coat color traits in Sahiwal cattle. Front Genet. 2021;12:699422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saravanan KA, Panigrahi M, Kumar H, et al. Genomic scans for selection signatures revealed candidate genes for adaptation and production traits in a variety of cattle breeds. Genomics. 2021;113(3):955–963.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajawat D, Panigrahi M, Kumar H, et al. Identification of important genomic footprints using eight different selection signature statistics in domestic cattle breeds. Gene. 2022;816:146165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutta P, Talenti A, Young R, et al. Whole genome analysis of water buffalo and global cattle breeds highlights convergent signatures of domestication. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):4739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravi Kumar D, Joel Devadasan M, Surya T, et al. Genomic diversity and selection sweeps identified in Indian swamp buffaloes reveals it's uniqueness with riverine buffaloes. Genomics. 2020;112(3):2385–2392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyagi SK, Mehrotra A, Singh A, et al. Comparative signatures of selection analyses identify loci under positive selection in the Murrah buffalo of India. Front Genet. 2021;12:673697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad SF, Mehrotra A, Charles S, Ganai NA. Analysis of selection signatures reveals important insights into the adaptability of high-altitude Indian sheep breed Changthangi. Gene. 2021;799:145809.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eydivandi S, Roudbar MA, Karimi MO, Sahana G. Genomic scans for selective sweeps through haplotype homozygosity and allelic fixation in 14 indigenous sheep breeds from Middle East and South Asia. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):2834.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saravanan KA, Panigrahi M, Kumar H, et al. Genome-wide analysis of genetic diversity and selection signatures in three Indian sheep breeds. Livest Sci. 2021;243:104367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrotra A, Bhushan B, Karthikeyan A, et al. Genome-wide SNP data unravel the ancestry and signatures of divergent selection in Ghurrah pigs of India. Livest Sci. 2021;250:104587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saravanan KA, Panigrahi M, Kumar H, et al. Selection signatures in livestock genome: a review of concepts, approaches and applications. Livest Sci. 2020;241:104257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaisa K, Kumar H, Saravanan K, et al. Concepts of genomic selection in poultry and its applications. Int J Livest Res. 2020;10(10):32–42.
   Google Scholar
• Wiggans GR, Cole JB, Hubbard SM, Sonstegard TS. Genomic selection in dairy cattle: the USDA experience. Annu Rev Anim Biosci. 2017;5(1):309–327.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Georges M, Charlier C, Hayes B. Harnessing genomic information for livestock improvement. Nat Rev Genet. 2019;20(3):135–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Kalaldeh M, Swaminathan M, Gaundare Y, et al. Genomic evaluation of milk yield in a smallholder crossbred dairy production system in India. Genet Sel Evol. 2021;53(1):73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mrode R, Ojango JMK, Okeyo AM, Mwacharo JM. Genomic selection and use of molecular tools in breeding programs for indigenous and crossbred cattle in developing countries: current status and future prospects. Front Genet. 2018;9:694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gajjar SG, Guldbrandtsen B, Su G, et al. Breed-of-origin specific genomic relationship matrix improves genomic prediction accuracy in crossbred Holstein Friesian cattle in India. In Proceedings of the 11th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production. 2018. p. 11–16. http://www.wcgalp.org/proceedings/2018/breed-origin-specific-genomic-relationship-matrix-improves-genomic-prediction
   Google Scholar
• Nayee NG, Su G, Gajjar SG, et al. Genomic prediction by single-step genomic BLUP using cow reference population in Holstein crossbred cattle in India. In Proceedings of the World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production. 2018. http://www.wcgalp.org/proceedings/2018/genomic-prediction-single-step-genomic-blup-using-cow-reference-population-holstein
   Google Scholar
• Ducrocq V, Laloe D, Swaminathan M, et al. Genomics for ruminants in developing countries: from principles to practice. Front Genet. 2018;9:251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidalgo DC, Swaminathan M, Deshpande PD, et al. Interest and limits of a bovine MD chip to study Bos taurus× Bos indicus crossbred animals in India. In Annual meeting of the European Federation of Animal Science EAAP. 2016. https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02739618/document
   Google Scholar
• Saha S, Nayee N, Shah H, et al. Effect of composition and size of the reference population in genotype imputation efficiency of INDUSCHIP in HF Crossbred cattle. IJDS. 2020;73(3):250–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saha S, Nayee N, Shah HA, et al. Efficiency of imputing missing genotypes by INDUSCHIP v2 in HF Crossbred cattle. IJDS. 2021;74(2):138–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall K, Gibson JP, Mwai O, et al. Livestock genomics for developing countries – African examples in practice. Front Genet. 2019;10:297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koltes JE, Cole JB, Clemmens R, et al. A vision for development and utilization of high-throughput phenotyping and big data analytics in livestock. Front Genet. 2019;10:1197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar