Analysis of the population genetic structure using microsatellite markers in goat populations in Taiwan

References

• Lai YY, Lee SC, Huang YC, Wu MC. Breed Resources for Livestock Industry. Tainan, Taiwan: Livestock Research Institute, Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan; 2004:11–17.
   Google Scholar
• Huang JC, Hsieh RC, Chang HJ, et al. The research on productivity of Nubian and native goats. J Taiwan Livestock Res. 1993;26:175–187.
   Google Scholar
• Su AK, Yan SS, Hsieh RC, et al. The selection of Black Boer hybrid. J. Taiwan Livestock Res. 2010;43:195–206.
   Google Scholar
• Wen SH, Su AK, Hsieh RC, et al. Meat goat breeding: up-grading Taiwan native goat with Nubian goat. J. Taiwan Livestock Res. 1997;30:231–236.
   Google Scholar
• Casey NH, Van Niekerk WA. The Boer goat. I. Origin, adaptability, performance testing, reproduction and milk production. Small Ruminant Res. 1988;1(3):291–302.
   Google Scholar
• Peh HC. Sheep and Goat Production. Tainan, Taiwan: Hong-Da; 2007:60–72.
   Google Scholar
• Rout PK, Joshi MB, Mandal A, et al. Microsatellite-based phylogeny of Indian domestic goats. BMC Genet. 2008;9:11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saitbekova N, Gaillard C, Obexer-Ruff G, Dolf G. Genetic diversity in Swiss goat breeds based on microsatellite analysis. Anim Genet. 1999;30(1):36–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixit SP, Verma NK, Aggarwal RAK, et al. Genetic diversity and relationship among Indian goat breeds based on microsatellite markers. Small Ruminant Res. 2012;105(1–3):38–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guang‐Xin E, Hong QH, Zhao YJ, et al. Genetic diversity estimation of Yunnan indigenous goat breeds using microsatellite markers. Ecol Evol. 2019;9(10):5916–5924.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISAG Conference. Applied genetics in sheep and goats workshop; 2006. http://www.isag.us/Docs/ISAG2006_AppliedGeneticsSheepGoats.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Glowatzki-Mullis M, Muntwyler J, Gaillard C. Cost-effective parentage verification with 17-plex for goats and 19-plex for sheep. Anim Genet. 2007;38(1):86–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park SDE. Trypanotolerance in West African cattle and the population genetic effects of selection [Ph. D. Thesis]. Ireland Trinity College, University of Dublin; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall TC, Slate J, Kruuk LE, Pemberton JM. Statistical confidence for likelihood‐based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol Ecol. 1998;7(5):639–655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weir BS, Cockerham CC. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution. 1984;38(6):1358–1370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond M, Rousset F. GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered. 1995;86(3):248–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987;4(4):406–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dieringer D, Schlotterer C. Microsatellite analyser (MSA): a platform independent analysis tool for large microsatellite data sets. Mol Ecol. 2003;3(1):167–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felsenstein J. Phylogeny inference package (PHYLIP). Genomes sciences. Seattle, WA: Department of Genetics, Washington University; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution. 1985;39(4):783–791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. Inference of population structure using 19 multilocus genotype data. Genetics. 2000;155(2):945–959.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol. 2005;14(8):2611–2620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peakall R, Smouse PE. GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research – an update. Bioinformatics. 2012;28(19):2537–2539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dakin EE, Avise JC. Microsatellite null alleles in parentage analysis. Heredity. 2004;93(5):504–509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbará T, Palma-Silva C, Paggi GM, et al. Crossspecies transfer of nuclear microsatellite markers: potential and limitations. Mol Ecol. 2007;16(18):3759–3767.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agha SH, Pilla F, Galal S, et al. Genetic diversity in Egyptian and Italian goat breeds measured with microsatellite polymorphism. J Anim Breed Genet. 2008;125(3):194–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker JSF. A global protocol for determining genetic distances among domestic livestock breeds. Proceedings of 5th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production; 1994; vol. 21: 501–508.
   Google Scholar
• Fonteque GV, Battilana J, Paludo E, Lima-Rosa CADV. Genetic polymorphism of fifteen microsatellite loci in Brazilian (blue-egg Caipira) chickens. Pesq Vet Bras. 2014;34(1):98–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruno-de-Sousa C, Martinez AM, Ginja C, et al. Genetic diversity and population structure in Portuguese goat breeds. Livest Sci. 2011;135(2-3):131–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tefiel H, Ata N, Chahbar M, et al. Genetic characterization of four Algerian goat breeds assessed by microsatellite markers. Small Rumin. Res. 2018;160:65–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tefiel H, Ata N, Fantazi K, et al. Microsatellite based genetic diversity in indigenous goat breeds reared in Algeria and Turkey. J. Anim. Plant Sci. 2020;30:1115–1122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nei M. Genetic distance between populations. Am Nat. 1972;106(949):283–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efron B, Halloran E, Holmes S. Bootstrap confidence levels for phylogenetic trees. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93(23):13429–13434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang PH. Studies on Blood Types of Taiwan Native Goat [Master thesis]. Taipei, Taiwan: National Taiwan University; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Waits LP, Luikart G, Taberlet P. Estimating the probability of identity among genotypes in natural populations: cautions and guidelines. Mol Ecol. 2001;10(1):249–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistic Office of Council of Architecture. Yearly Report of Taiwan’s Agriculture. Taipei: Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan; 2020; vol. 109.
   Google Scholar
• Poole KG, Reynolds DM, Darryl M, et al. Estimating mountain goat abundance using DNA from fecal pellets. J Wildl Manag. 2011;75(6):1527–1534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar