OMICs approaches and technologies for understanding low-high feed efficiency traits in chicken: implication to breeding

References

• Hume DA, Whitelaw CBA, Archibald AL. The future of animal production: improving productivity and sustainability. J Agric Sci. 2011;149(S1):9–16.
   Google Scholar
• Saxena VK, Kolluri G. Selection methods in poultry breeding: from genetics to genomics. In: Liu X. Rijeka, ed. Application of Genetics and Genomics in Poultry Science, edited volume. Crotia: IntechOpen, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Calus MPL. Genomic breeding value prediction: methods and procedures. Animal. 2010;4(2):157–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulton JE. Genomic selection for poultry breeding. Anim Front. 2012;2(1):30–36.
   Google Scholar
• Hess CW, Byerly TC, Jull MA. The efficiency of feed utilization by barred plymouth rock and crossbred broilers. Poult Sci. 1941;20(3):210–216.
   Google Scholar
• Li H, Deeb N, Zhou H, Ashwell CM, Lamont SJ. Chicken quantitative trait loci for growth and body composition associated with the very low density apolipoprotein-II gene. Poult Sci. 2005;84(5):697–703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meuwissen THE, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics. 2001;157(4):1819–1829.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanRaden PM. Symposium review: how to implement genomic selection. J Dairy Sci. 2020;103(6):5291–5301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verdal HD, Narcy A, Bastianelli D, et al. Improving the efficiency of feed utilization in poultry by selection. 2. Genetic parameters of excretion traits and correlations with anatomy of the gastro-intestinal tract and digestive efficiency. BMC Genet. 2011;12:71–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottje W, Kong B-W. Cell biology symposium: feed efficiency: mitochondrial function to global gene expression 1, 2. J Anim Sci. 2013;91:1582–1593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottje WG, Carstens GE. Association of mitochondrial function and feed efficiency in poultry and livestock species 1. J Anim Sci. 2014;87:48–63.
   Google Scholar
• Donohue M, Cunningham DL. Effects of grain and oilseed prices on the costs of US poultry production. J Appl Poult Res. 2009;18(2):325–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zampiga M, Flees J, Meluzzi A, Dridi S, Sirri F. Application of omics technologies for a deeper insight into quali-quantitative production traits in broiler chickens : a review. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2018;9(61):1–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bottje WG, Lassiter K, Piekarski-Welsher A, et al. Proteogenomics reveals enriched ribosome assembly and protein translation in pectoralis major of high feed efficiency pedigree broiler males. Front Physiol. 2017;8(May):1–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mignon‑Grasteau S, Rideau N, Gabriel I, et al. Detection of QTL controlling feed efficiency and excretion in chickens fed a wheat ‑ based diet. Genet Sel Evol. 2015;47(74):74–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mignon-Grasteau S, Muley N, Bastianelli D, et al. Heritability of digestibilities and divergent selection for digestion ability in growing chicks fed a wheat diet. Poult Sci. 2004;83(6):860–867.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sell-Kubiak E, Wimmers K, Reyer H, Szwaczkowski T. Genetic aspects of feed efficiency and reduction of environmental footprint in broilers : a review. J Appl Genet. 2017;58:487–498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah TM, Patel NV, Patel AB, Upadhyay MR. A genome ‑ wide approach to screen for genetic variants in broilers (Gallus gallus) with divergent feed conversion ratio. Mol Genet Genom. 2016;291(4):1715–1725.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthur PF, Archer JA, Herd RM. Feed intake and efficiency in beef cattle: overview of recent Australian research and challenges for the future. Aust J Exp Agric. 2004;44(4–5):361–369.
   Google Scholar
• Willems OW, Miller SP, Wood BJ. Aspects of selection for feed efficiency in meat producing poultry. World Poult Sci J. 2013;69(1):77–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaur S, Trobe L, Park D. Genomics. In: Stanley M, Kelly H, eds. Brenner's Encyclopedia of Genetics. 2nd ed., Vol. 3. San Diego, California, USA: Elsevier Inc; 2013:310–312.
   Google Scholar
• Marchesi Augusto J, Petroli, Ono RK, Cantão ME, et al. Exploring the genetic architecture of feed efficiency traits in chickens. Sci Rep. 2021;11(0123456789):1–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mebratie W, Reyer H, Wimmers K, Bovenhuis H, Jensen J. Genome wide association study of body weight and feed efficiency traits in a commercial broiler chicken population, a re-visitation. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):1–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mignon-Grasteau S, Narcy A, Rideau N, et al. Impact of selection for digestive efficiency on microbiota composition in the chicken. PLoS One. 2015;10(8):1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyer H, Hawken R, Murani E, Ponsuksili S, Wimmers K. The genetics of feed conversion efficiency traits in a commercial broiler line. Sci Rep. 2015;5:16387–16311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romé H, Varenne A, Hérault F, et al. GWAS analyses reveal QTL in egg layers that differ in response to diet differences. Genet Sel Evol. 2015;47(1):1–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wolc A, Arango J, Jankowski T, et al. Genome-wide association study for egg production and quality in layer chickens. J Anim Breed Genet. 2014;131(3):173–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolc A, Drobik-Czwarno W, Jankowski T, et al. Accuracy of genomic prediction of shell quality in a White Leghorn line. Poult Sci. 2020;99(6):2833–2840.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun Y, Zhao G, Liu R, et al. The identification of 14 new genes for meat quality traits in chicken using a genome-wide association study. BMC Genomics. 2013;14(1):458–468.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lowe R, Shirley N, Bleackley M, Dolan S, Shafee T. Transcriptomics technologies. PLoS Comput Biol. 2017;13(5):1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottje WG, Kong B, Song JJ, et al. Molecular, cellular, and developmental biology gene expression in breast muscle associated with feed efficiency in a single male broiler line using a chicken 44K microarray. II. Differentially expressed focus genes. Poult Sci. 2012;91:2576–2587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SH, Gupta MK, Ho YT, Kim T, Lee HT. Transgenic chickens expressing human urokinase-type plasminogen activator. Poult Sci. 2013;92(9):2396–2403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao C, Deng J, Zeng L, et al. Transcriptome analysis identifies candidate genes and signaling pathways associated with feed efficiency in Xiayan chicken. Front Genet. 2021;12(March):1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Yi G, Yuan J, Bi H, Yan W, Yang N, Qu L. In-depth duodenal transcriptome survey in chickens with divergent feed efficiency using RNA-seq. PLoS One. 2015;10(9):10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou N, Lee WR, Abasht B. Messenger RNA sequencing and pathway analysis provide novel insights into the biological basis of chickens’ feed efficiency. BMC Genom. 2015;16(195).
   Google Scholar
• Liebler DC. Introduction to Proteomics: Tools for the New Biology. Totowa, New Jersey: Humana Press Inc.; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Soares R, Franco C, Pires E, et al. Mass spectrometry and animal science: protein identification strategies and particularities of farm animal species. J Proteomics. 2012;75(14):4190–4206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottje W, Tang ZX, Iqbal M, et al. Association of mitochondrial function with feed efficiency within a single genetic line of male broilers. Poult Sci. 2002;81(4):546–555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iqbal M, Pumford NR, Tang ZX, et al. Low feed efficient broilers within a single genetic line exhibit higher oxidative stress and protein expression in breast muscle with lower mitochondrial complex activity. Poult Sci. 2004;83(3):474–484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong B, Lassiter K, Piekarski-Welsher A, Dridi S. Proteomics of breast muscle tissue associated with the phenotypic expression of feed efficiency within a pedigree male broiler line : I. Highlight on mitochondria. PLoS One. 2016:11(5):1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanetti E, Molette C, Chambon C, Pinguet J, Cassandro M. Using 2-DE for the differentiation of local chicken breeds. Proteomics. 2011;11:2613–2619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng A, Luo J, Meng K, et al. Proteome changes underpin improved meat quality and yield of chickens (Gallus gallus) fed the probiotic Enterococcus faecium. BMC Genom. 2015;15:1167–1182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottje W, Brand MD, Ojano-Dirain C, Lassiter K, Toyomizu M, Wing T. Mitochondrial proton leak kinetics and relationship with feed efficiency within a single genetic line of male broilers. Poult Sci. 2009;88(8):1683–1693.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu Z, He X, Ma B, et al. Serum metabolomics study of nutrient metabolic variations in chronic heat-stressed broilers. Br J Nutr. 2018;119(7):771–781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzler-Zebeli BU, Magowan E, Hollmann M, et al. Assessing serum metabolite profiles as predictors for feed efficiency in broiler chickens reared at geographically distant locations. Br Poult Sci. 2017;50(6):729–738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzler-Zebeli BU, Siegerstetter S-C, Magowan E, Lawlor PG, O’Connell NE, Zebeli Q. Feed restriction reveals distinct serum metabolome profiles in chickens divergent in feed efficiency traits. Metabolites. 2019;9(2):38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altelaar AFM, Munoz J, Heck AJR. Next-generation proteomics: towards an integrative view of proteome dynamics. Nat Rev Genet. 2012.14:35–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boja ES, Kinsinger CR, Rodriguez H, Srinivas P. Integration of omics sciences to advance biology and medicine. Clin Proteomics. 2014;11(1):1–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Misra BB, Langefeld C, Olivier M, Cox LA. Integrated omics: tools, advances and future approaches. J Mol Endocrinol. 2019;62(1):R21–R45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raja K, Patrick M, Gao Y, Madu D, Yang Y, Tsoi LC. A review of recent advancement in integrating omics data with literature mining towards biomedical discoveries. Int J Genom. 2017;2017:6213474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontanesi L. Metabolomics and livestock genomics: insights into a phenotyping frontier and its applications in animal breeding. Anim Front. 2016;6(1):73–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadarmideen HN, Von Rohr P, Janss LLG. From genetical genomics to systems genetics: potential applications in quantitative genomics and animal breeding. Mamm Genome. 2006;17(6):548–564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzoni C, Kia DA, Vandrovcova J, et al. Genome, transcriptome and proteome: the rise of omics data and their integration in biomedical sciences. Brief Bioinform. 2018;19(2):286–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji B, Ernest B, Gooding JR, et al. Transcriptomic and metabolomic profiling of chicken adipose tissue in response to insulin neutralization and fasting. BMC Genom. 2012;13:441–458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conesa A, Madrigal P, Tarazona S, et al. A survey of best practices for RNA-seq data analysis. Genome Biol. 2016;17(1):1–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohen R, Barlev J, Hornung G, et al. UTAP: user-friendly transcriptome analysis pipeline. BMC Bioinf. 2019;20(1):1–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peng LY, Cui ZQ, Wu ZM, Fu BD, Yi PF, Shen HQ. RNA-seq profiles of chicken type II pneumocyte in response to Escherichia coli infection. PLoS One. 2019;14(6):1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero JP, Ortiz-Estévez M, Muniategui A, et al. Comparison of RNA-seq and microarray platforms for splice event detection using a cross-platform algorithm. BMC Genom. 2018;19(1):1–14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shendure J, Ji H. Next-generation DNA sequencing. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26(10):1135–1145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shendure J, Balasubramanian S, Church GM, et al. DNA sequencing at 40: past, present and future. Nature. 2017;550(7676):345–353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolani P, Gupta S, Yadav K, Aggarwal S, Yadav AK. Big data, integrative omics and network biology. In: Rossen D, Tatyana K, eds. Advances in Protein Chemistry and Structural Biology. 1st ed., Vol. 127. Elsevier Inc.; 2021:127–160.
   Google Scholar
• Yalamanchili HK, Wan Y-W, Liu Z. Data analysis pipeline for RNA-seq experiments: From differential expression to cryptic splicing. Curr Protoc Bioinf. 2017;59(1):11.15.1–11.15.21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aebersold R, Mann M. Mass-spectrometric exploration of proteome structure and function. Nature. 2016;537(7620):347–355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junot C, Fenaille F, Colsch B, Bécher F. High resolution mass spectrometry based techniques at the crossroads of metabolic pathways. Mass Spectrom Rev. 2014;33(6):471–500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner-Noble DO, Teeter RG. Components of feed efficiency in broiler breeding stock: energetics, performance, carcass composition, metabolism, and body temperature. Poult Sci. 2003;82(7):1080–1090.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers JR, Lin CY. Age-constant versus weight-constant feed consumption and efficiency in broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 1988;67(4):565–576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagger C. Phenotypic and genetic effects on feed intake of laying hens in different years. Poult Sci. 1991;70(3):434–439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izadnia HR, Tahmoorespur M, Reza M, Nassiri M, Esmaeilkhanien S. Gene expression profile analysis of residual feed intake for Isfahan native chickens using RNA-SEQ data. Ital J Anim Sci. 2019;18(1):246–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katle J, Kolstad N. Selection for efficiency of food utilisation in laying hens: direct response in residual food consumption and correlated responses in weight gain, egg production and body weight. Br Poult Sci. 1991;32(5):939–953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy BW, van der Werf JH, Meuwissen TH, Properties S, Intake RF. Genetic and statistical properties. J Anim Sci. 1993;71(12):3239–3250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolynetz MS, Sibbald IR. Relationships between apparent and true metabolizable energy and the effects of a nitrogen correction. Poult Sci. 1984;63(7):1386–1399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee G, Choi H, Sureshkumar S, et al. The 3D8 single chain variable fragment protein suppress infectious bronchitis virus transmission in the transgenic chickens. Res Vet Sci. 2019;123(September 2018):293–297.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tran T, Narcy A, Carré B, et al. Detection of QTL controlling digestive efficiency and anatomy of the digestive tract in chicken fed a wheat-based diet. Genet Sel Evol. 2014;46(1):460–465.
   Google Scholar
• Lee J, Karnuah AB, Rekaya R, Anthony NB, Aggrey SE. Transcriptomic analysis to elucidate the molecular mechanisms that underlie feed efficiency in meat ‑ type chickens. Mol Genet Genom. 2015;290(5):1673–1682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoury GA, Baliban RC, Floudas CA. Proteome-wide post-translational modification statistics: frequency analysis and curation of the swiss-prot database. Sci Rep. 2011;1:1–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam B, Basit M, Nisar MA, Khurshid M, Rasool MH. Proteomics: technologies and their applications. J Chromatogr Sci. 2017;55(2):182–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakalarski CE, Donal SK.. A Biologist’s Field Guide to Multiplexed Quantitative Proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2016;15(5):1489–1497.
   Google Scholar
• Hasin Y, Seldin M, Lusis A. Multi-omics approaches to disease. Genome Biol. 2017;18(1):1–15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Black MB, Parks BB, Pluta L, et al. Comparison of microarrays and RNA-Seq for gene expression analyses of dose-response experiments. Toxicol Sci. 2014;137(2):385–403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fumagalli D, Blanchet-Cohen A, Brown D, et al. Transfer of clinically relevant gene expression signatures in breast cancer: from Affymetrix microarray to Illumina RNA-Sequencing technology. BMC Genom. 2014;15(1):1008–1012.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang C, Gong B, Bushel PR, et al. The concordance between RNA-seq and microarray data depends on chemical treatment and transcript abundance. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32(9):926–932.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui X, Marshall B, Shi N, Chen SY, Rekaya R, Liu HX. RNA-Seq analysis on chicken taste sensory organs: an ideal system to study organogenesis. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nie Q, Lei M, Ouyang J, Zeng H, Yang G, Zhang X. Identification and characterization of single nucleotide polymorphisms in 6 growth-correlated genes in porcine by denaturing high performance liquid chromatography. Genet Sel Evol. 2005;37:339–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu W, Li D, Liu J, et al. A genome-wide SNP scan reveals novel loci for egg production and quality traits in white leghorn and brown-egg dwarf layers. PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e28600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aggrey SE, Karnuah AB, Sebastian B, Anthony NB. Genetic properties of feed efficiency parameters in meat-type chickens. Genet Sel Evol. 2010;42(1):25–25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xu Z, Ji C, Zhang Y, et al. Combination analysis of genome-wide association and transcriptome sequencing of residual feed intake in quality chickens. BMC Genom. 2016;17(1):1–14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schulman N, Tuiskula-Haavisto M, Siitonen L, Mäntysaari EA. Genetic variation of residual feed consumption in a selected Finnish egg-layer population. Poult Sci. 1994;73(10):1479–1484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar