Copy number variations within fibroblast growth factor 13 gene influence growth traits and alternative splicing in cattle

References

• Giuffra E, Törnsten A, Marklund S, et al. A large duplication associated with dominant white color in pigs originated by homologous recombination between LINE elements flanking KIT. Mamm Genome. 2002;13(10):1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henrichsen CN, Chaignat E, Reymond A. Copy number variants, diseases and gene expression. Hum Mol Genet. 2009;18(R1):R1–R8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright D, Boije H, Meadows JR, et al. Copy number variation in intron 1 of SOX5 causes the Pea-comb phenotype in chickens. PLoS Genet. 2009;5(6):e1000512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang F, Gu W, Hurles ME, Lupski JR. Copy number variation in human health, disease, and evolution. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2009;10(1):451–481.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wright CJ, Smith CW, Jiggins CD. Alternative splicing as a source of phenotypic diversity. Nat Rev Genet. 2022;23(11):697–710.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu GE, Hou Y, Zhu B, et al. Analysis of copy number variations among diverse cattle breeds. Genome Res. 2010;20(5):693–703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang L, Niu Q, Zhang T, et al. Genomic sequencing analysis reveals copy number variations and their associations with economically important traits in beef cattle. Genomics. 2021;113(1 Pt 2):812–820.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang X, Xia L, Yu H, et al. Comparative genome-wide alternative splicing analysis of longissimus dorsi muscles between Japanese Black (Wagyu) and Chinese Red Steppes Cattle. Front Vet Sci. 2021;8:634577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamaguchi TP, Rossant J. Fibroblast growth factors in mammalian development. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1995;5(4):485–491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillemot F, Zimmer C. From cradle to grave: the multiple roles of fibroblast growth factors in neural development. Neuron. 2011;71(4):574–588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Bao L, Yang L, Wu Q, Li S. Roles of intracellular fibroblast growth factors in neural development and functions. Sci China Life Sci. 2012;55(12):1038–1044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu QF, Yang L, Li S, et al. Fibroblast growth factor 13 is a microtubule-stabilizing protein regulating neuronal polarization and migration. Cell. 2012;149(7):1549–1564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tríbulo P, Siqueira LGB, Oliveira LJ, Scheffler T, Hansen PJ. Identification of potential embryokines in the bovine reproductive tract. J Dairy Sci. 2018;101(1):690–704.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du Y, Ma J, Wang Y, et al. MiR-421 regulates goat intramuscular preadipocytes differentiation via targeting FGF13. Anim Biotechnol. 2022;33(6):1333–1343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang J, Wang Z, Sinden DS, et al. FGF13 modulates the gating properties of the cardiac sodium channel Nav1.5 in an isoform-specific manner. Channels. 2016;10(5):410–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnstone CN, Pattison AD, Harrison PF, et al. FGF13 promotes metastasis of triple-negative breast cancer. Int J Cancer. 2020;147(1):230–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu Y, Jiang Y, Shi T, et al. Whole-genome sequencing reveals mutational landscape underlying phenotypic differences between two widespread Chinese cattle breeds. PLoS One. 2017;12(8):e0183921.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ge W, Davis ME, Hines HC, Irvin KM, Simmen RCM. Association of single nucleotide polymorphisms in the growth hormone and growth hormone receptor genes with blood serum insulin-like growth factor I concentration and growth traits in Angus cattle. J Anim Sci. 2003;81(3):641–648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou HT, Chen CH, Tsai CH, Tsai FJ. Association between transforming growth factor-β1 gene C-509T and T869C polymorphisms and rheumatic heart disease. Am Heart J. 2004;148(1):181–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu H. Chinese Yellow Cattle. Beijing, China: Agriculture Press; 1992; 65.
   Google Scholar
• Sonstegard TS, Garrett WM, Ashwell MS, Bennett GL, Kappes SM, Van Tassell CP. Comparative map alignment of BTA27 and HSA4 and 8 to identify conserved segments of genome containing fat deposition QTL. Mamm Genome. 2000;11(8):682–688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmittgen TD, Livak KJ. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative CT method. Nat Protoc. 2008;3(6):1101–1108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Jia S, Yang M, et al. Detection of copy number variations and their effects in Chinese bulls. BMC Genomics. 2014;15(1):480.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sun X, Li M, Li A, et al. Two novel intronic polymorphisms of bovine FGF21 gene are associated with body weight at 18 months in Chinese cattle. Livest Sci. 2013;155(1):23–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Yang M, Li C, et al. Identification and genetic effect of a variable duplication in the promoter region of the cattle ADIPOQ gene. Anim Genet. 2014;45(2):171–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun J, Xue J, Zhang C, Lan X, Lei C, Chen H. Haplotype combination of the caprine PC1 gene sequence variants and association with growth traits in Chinese Haimen breed. J Genet. 2012;93(S1):54–59.
   Google Scholar
• Pan X, Zhao J, Zhou Z, et al. 5′-UTR SNP of FGF13 causes translational defect and intellectual disability. Elife. 2021;10:e63021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conrad B, Antonarakis SE. Gene duplication: a drive for phenotypic diversity and cause of human disease. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2007;8(1):17–35.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spielmann M, Klopocki E. CNVs of noncoding cis-regulatory elements in human disease. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2013;23(3):249–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boone PM, Campbell IM, Baggett BC, et al. Deletions of recessive disease genes: CNV contribution to carrier states and disease-causing alleles. Genome Res. 2013;23(9):1383–1394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stankiewicz P, Lupski JR. Structural variation in the human genome and its role in disease. Annu Rev Med. 2010;61(1):437–455.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen C, Qiao R, Wei R, et al. A comprehensive survey of copy number variation in 18 diverse pig populations and identification of candidate copy number variable genes associated with complex traits. BMC Genomics. 2012;13(1):733.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seroussi E, Glick G, Shirak A, et al. Analysis of copy loss and gain variations in Holstein cattle autosomes using BeadChip SNPs. BMC Genomics. 2010;11(1):673.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Papp B, Pál C, Hurst LD. Dosage sensitivity and the evolution of gene families in yeast. Nature. 2003;424(6945):194–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang ET, Sandberg R, Luo S, et al. Alternative isoform regulation in human tissue transcriptomes. Nature. 2008;456(7221):470–476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbazuk WB, Fu Y, McGinnis KM. Genome-wide analyses of alternative splicing in plants: opportunities and challenges. Genome Res. 2008;18(9):1381–1392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee H, Bae S, Choi BW, Choi JC, Yoon Y. Copy number variation of CCL3L1 influences asthma risk by modulating IL-10 expression. Clin Chim Acta. 2011;412(23-24):2100–2104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Nahashon S, Feaster TK, Bohannon-Stewart A, Adefope N. An initial map of chromosomal segmental copy number variations in the chicken. BMC Genomics. 2010;11(1):351.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xu Y, Zhang L, Shi T, et al. Copy number variations of MICAL-L2 shaping gene expression contribute to different phenotypes of cattle. Mamm Genome. 2013;24(11–12):508–516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar