Unraveling the genetic basis of methane emission in dairy cattle: a comprehensive exploration and breeding approach to lower methane emissions

References

• Giddings L, Robert R, David MH. Gene editing for the climate: biological solutions for curbing greenhouse emissions. Washington, DC: Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF); 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Pryce JE, Haile-Mariam M. Symposium review: genomic selection for reducing environmental impact and adapting to climate change. J Dairy Sci. 2020;103(6):1–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FAO. Pathways towards lower emissions – a global assessment of the greenhouse gas emissions and mitigation options from livestock agrifood systems. Rome: FAO; 2023.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. Climate change 2021–the physical science basis: working group I contribution to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace RJ, Sasson G, Garnsworthy PC, et al. A heritable subset of the core rumen microbiome dictates dairy cow productivity and emissions. Sci Adv. 2019;5(7). 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knapp JR, Laur GL, Vadas PA, Weiss WP, Tricarico JM. Invited review: enteric methane in dairy cattle production: quantifying the opportunities and impact of reducing emissions. J Dairy Sci. 2014;97(6):3231–3261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pszczola M, Strabel T, Mucha S, et al. Genome-wide association identifies methane production level relation to genetic control of digestive tract development in dairy cows. Sci Rep. 2018;8:15164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silpa MV, König S, Sejian V, et al. Climate-resilient dairy cattle production: applications of genomic tools and statistical models. Front Vet Sci. 2021;8:625189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Haas Y, Veerkamp RF, De Jong G, Aldridge MN. Selective breeding as a mitigation tool for methane emissions from dairy cattle. Animal. 2021;15 Suppl 1:100294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassen J, Difford GF. Review: genetic and genomic selection as a methane mitigation strategy in dairy cattle. Animal. 2020;14(S3):s473–s483.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sarghale AJ, Moradi Shahrebabak M, Moradi Shahrebabak H, et al. Genome-wide association studies for methane emission and ruminal volatile fatty acids using Holstein cattle sequence data. BMC Genet. 2020;21(1):1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Haas Y, J, Windig M, Calus, et al. Genetic parameters for predicted methane production and potential for reducing enteric emissions through genomic selection. J Dairy Sci. 2011;94(12):6122–6134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassen J, Løvendahl P. Heritability estimates for enteric methane emissions from Holstein cattle measured using non-invasive methods. J Dairy Sci. 2016;99(3):1959–1967.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negussie E, de Haas Y, Dehareng F, et al. Invited review: large-scale indirect measurements for enteric methane emissions in dairy cattle: a review of proxies and their potential for use in management and breeding decisions. J Dairy Sci. 2017;100(4):2433–2453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pszczola M, Rzewuska K, Mucha S, Strabel T. Heritability of methane emissions from dairy cows over a lactation measured on commercial farms. J Anim Sci. 2017;95(11):4813–4819.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin T, Pinent T, Brügemann K, Simianer H, König S. Simulation, prediction, and genetic analyses of daily methane emissions in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 2015;98(8):5748–5762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamalanathan S, Houlahan K, Miglior F, et al. Genetic analysis of methane emission traits in Holstein dairy cattle. Animals. 2023;13(8):1308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calderón-Chagoya R, Hernandez-Medrano JHH, Ruiz-López FJJ, et al. Genome-wide association studies for methane production in dairy cattle. Genes. 2019;10(12):995.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzanilla-Pech CIV, Difford GF, Sahana G, Romé H, Løvendahl P, Lassen J. Genome-wide association study for methane emission traits in Danish Holstein cattle. J Dairy Sci. 2022;105(2):1357–1368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ron M, Weller JI. From QTL to QTN identification in livestock-winning by points rather than knock-out: a review. Anim Genet. 2007;38(5):429–439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vistoso E, Salazar F, Gonzáles S. Estimación de la huella de carbono para la producción deleche en zona sur de Chile. XXXVIII Congreso Sociedad Chilena de Producción Animal (SOCHIPA). AgrovetMARKET; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. Glossary. In: Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Naranjo AM, Sieverding H, Clay D, Kebreab E. Carbon footprint of South Dakota dairy production system and assessment of mitigation options. PLOS One. 2023;18(3):e0269076.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorley M, Casey I, Styles D, et al. Factors influencing the carbon footprint of milk production on dairy farms with different feeding strategies in western Europe. J Cleaner Prod. 2023;435:140104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mech A, Devi GL, Sivaram M, et al. Assessment of carbon footprint of milk production and identification of its major determinants in smallholder dairy farms in Karnataka. J Dairy Sci. 2023;106(12):8847–8860.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Llontop D, Velarde-Guillén J, Fuentes E, Prudencio M, Gómez C. Milk carbon footprint of silvo-pastoral dairy systems in the Northern Peruvian Amazon. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2022;54(4):227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feyissa AA, Senbeta F, Diriba D, Tolera A. Understanding variability in carbon footprint of smallholder dairy farms in the central highlands of Ethiopia. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2022;54(6):411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hospers J, Kuling L, Modernel P, et al. The evolution of the carbon footprint of Dutch raw milk production between 1990 and 2019. J Cleaner Prod. 2022;380:134863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzetto AM, Falconer S, Ledgard S. Mapping the carbon footprint of milk production from cattle: a systematic review. J Dairy Sci. 2022;105(12):9713–9725.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledgard SF, Falconer SJ, Abercrombie R, Philip G, Hill JP. Temporal, spatial, and management variability in the carbon footprint of New Zealand milk. J Dairy Sci. 2020;103(1):1031–1046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayasundara S, Worden D, Weersink A, et al. Improving farm profitability also reduces the carbon footprint of milk production in intensive dairy production systems. J Cleaner Prod. 2019;229:1018–1028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkes A, Shimels W, Charles O, Simon F, Suzanne VD. Variation in the carbon footprint of milk production on smallholder dairy farms in central Kenya. J Cleaner Prod. 2020;265:121780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woldegebriel D, Udo H, Viets T, Van der Harst E, Potting J. Environmental impact of milk production across an intensification gradient in Ethiopia. Livest Sci. 2017;206:28–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galloway C, Conradie B, Prozesky H, Esler K. Opportunities to improve sustainability on commercial pasture-based dairy farms by assessing environmental impact. Agric Syst. 2018;166:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morais TG, Teixeira RFM, Rodrigues NR, Domingos T. Carbon footprint of milk from pasture-based dairy farms in Azores, Portugal. Sustainability. 2018;10(10):3658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sejian V, Prasadh RS, Lees AM, et al. Assessment of the carbon footprint of four commercial dairy production systems in Australia using an integrated farm system model. Carbon Manage. 2018;9(1):57–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Ledgard S, Lou J, et al. Environmental impacts and resource use of milk production on the North China Plain, based on life cycle assessment. Sci Total Environ. 2018;625:486–495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao R, Xu Y, Wen X, Zhang N, Cai J. Carbon footprint assessment for a local branded pure milk product: a life-cycle based approach. Food Sci Technol. 2018;38:98–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gollnow S, Lundie S, Moore AD, et al. Carbon footprint of milk production from dairy cows in Australia. Int Dairy J. 2014;37(1):31–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hristov AN. Perspective: could dairy cow nutrition meaningfully reduce the carbon footprint of milk production? J Dairy Sci. 2023;106(11):7336–7340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uddin ME, Tricarico JM, Kebreab E. Impact of nitrate and 3-nitrooxypropanol on the carbon footprints of milk from cattle produced in confined-feeding systems across regions in the United States: a life cycle analysis. J Dairy Sci. 2022;105(6):5074–5083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber P, Vellinga T, Opio C, Steinfeld H. Productivity gains and greenhouse gas emissions intensity in dairy systems. Livest Sci. 2011;139(1–2):100–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien D, Hennessy T, Moran B, Shalloo L. Relating the carbon footprint of milk from Irish dairy farms to economic performance. J Dairy Sci. 2015;98(10):7394–7407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossein-Zadeh NG. Estimates of the genetic contribution to methane emission in dairy cows: a meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):12352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopes LSF, Schenkel FS, Houlahan K, et al. Estimates of genetic parameters for rumination time, feed efficiency, and methane production traits in first lactation Holstein cows. J Dairy Sci. 2024; 107: S0022-0302.
   Google Scholar
• López-Paredes J, Goiri I, Atxaerandio R, et al. Mitigation of greenhouse gases in dairy cattle via genetic selection: 1. Genetic parameters of direct methane using non-invasive methods and proxies of methane. J Dairy Sci. 2020;103(8):7199–7209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Breukelen AE, Veerkamp RF, de Haas Y, Aldridge MN. Genetic parameter estimates for methane emission during lactation from breath and potential inaccuracies in reliabilities assuming a repeatability versus random regression model. J Dairy Sci. 2024; 107: S0022-0302.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saborío‐Montero A, Gutiérrez‐Rivas M, García‐Rodríguez A, et al. Structural equation models to disentangle the biological relationship between microbiota and complex traits: methane production in dairy cattle as a case of study. J Animal Breed Genet. 2019;137(1):36–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atashi H, Wilmot H, Vanderick S, Hubin X, Soyeurt H, Gengler N. Genome-wide association study for mid-infrared methane predictions in Walloon dairy cows. Proceedings of 12th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production (WCGALP); 2022:156–159.
   Google Scholar
• Uemoto Y, Tomaru T, Masuda M, et al. Exploring indicators of genetic selection using the sniffer method to reduce methane emissions from Holstein cows. Anim Biosci. 2024;37(2):173–183.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sitkowska B, Yüksel HM, Piwczyński D, Önder H. Heritability and genetic correlations of rumination time with milk-yield and milking traits in Holstein-Friesian cows using an automated milking system. Animal. 2024;18(3):101101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering NK, Oddy VH, Basarab J, et al. Animal board invited review: genetic possibilities to reduce enteric methane emissions from ruminants. Animal. 2015;9(9):1431–1440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson CM, Nguyen TTT, Abdelsayed M, et al. Genetic parameters for methane emission traits in Australian dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2021;104(1):539–549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Difford GF, Løvendahl P, Veerkamp RF, et al. Can greenhouse gases in breath be used to genetically improve feed efficiency of dairy cows? J Dairy Sci. 2020;103(3):2442–2459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Engelen S, Bovenhuis H, Dijkstra J, van Arendonk J, Visker M. Genetic study of methane production predicted from milk fat composition in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2015;98(11):8223–8226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez-Recio O, Zubiria I, García-Rodríguez A, Hurtado A, Atxaerandio R. Signs of host genetic regulation in the microbiome composition in 2 dairy breeds: Holstein and Brown Swiss. J Dairy Sci. 2018;101(3):2285–2292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Álvaro M, Auffret MD, Duthie CA, et al. Bovine host genome acts on rumen microbiome function linked to methane emissions. Commun Biol. 2022;5(1):350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breider IS, Wall E, Garnsworthy PC. Short communication: heritability of methane production and genetic correlations with milk yield and body weight in Holstein-Friesian dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2019;102(8):7277–7281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zetouni L, Difford GF, Lassen J, Byskov MV, Norberg E, Løvendahl P. Is rumination time an indicator of methane production in dairy cows? J Dairy Sci. 2018;101(12):11074–11085.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson CL, Schneider CJ, Erickson GE, MacDonald JC, Fernando SC. Rumen bacterial communities can be acclimated faster to high concentrate diets than currently implemented feedlot programs. J Appl Microbiol. 2016;120(3):588–599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson G, Cox F, Ganesh S, et al. Rumen microbial community composition varies with diet and host, but a core microbiome is found across a wide geographical range. Sci Rep. 2015;5:14567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huws SA, Creevey CJ, Oyama LB, et al. Addressing global ruminant agricultural challenges through understanding the rumen microbiome: past, present and future. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:2161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett K, Jensen K, Meyer AS, Frisvad JC, Lange L. Fungal secretome profile categorization of CAZymes by function and family corresponds to fungal phylogeny and taxonomy: example Aspergillus and Penicillium. Sci Rep. 2020;10:1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danielsson R, Dicksved J, Sun L, et al. Methane production in dairy cows correlates with rumen methanogenic and bacterial community structure. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgado B, Bach A, Guasch I, et al. Whole rumen metagenome sequencing allows classifying and predicting feed efficiency and intake levels in cattle. Sci Rep. 2019;9:11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Difford GF, Plichta DR, Løvendahl P, et al. Host genetics and the rumen microbiome jointly associate with methane emissions in dairy cows. PLOS Genet. 2018;14(10):e1007580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haque MN. Dietary manipulation: a sustainable way to mitigate methane emissions from ruminants. J Anim Sci Technol. 2018;60(1):15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tapio I, Snelling TJ, Strozzi F, Wallace RJ. The ruminal microbiome associated with methane emissions from ruminant livestock. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2017;8:7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizrahi I, Wallace RJ, Moraïs S. The rumen microbiome: balancing food security and environmental impacts. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2021;9(19):553–566.
   Google Scholar
• Arndt C, Powell JM, Aguerre MJ, Crump PM, Wattiaux MA. Feed conversion efficiency in dairy cows: repeatability, variation in digestion and metabolism of energy and nitrogen, and ruminal methanogens. J Dairy Sci. 2015;98(6):3938–3950.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beauchemin KA, Ungerfeld EM, Abdalla AL, et al. Invited review: current enteric methane mitigation options. J Dairy Sci. 2022;105(12):9297–9326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins J, Yesuf G, Zijlstra M, Schoneveld GC, Rufino MC. Feeding efficiency gains can increase the greenhouse gas mitigation potential of the Tanzanian dairy sector. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):4190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitta DW, Indugu N, Melgar A, et al. The effect of 3-nitrooxypropanol, a potent methane inhibitor, on ruminal microbial gene expression profiles in dairy cows. Microbiome. 2022;10(1):146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizrahi I, Jami E. Review: the compositional variation of the rumen microbiome and its effect on host performance and methane emission. Anim Int J Anim Biosci. 2018;12:s220–s232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borreani G, Tabacco E, Schmidt RJ, et al. Silage review: factors affecting dry matter and quality losses in silages. J Dairy Sci. 2018;101(5):3952–3979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bica R, Palarea-Albaladejo J, Lima J, et al. Methane emissions and rumen metabolite concentrations in cattle fed two different silages. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):5441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beauchemin KA, Kreuzer M, O’Mara F, McAllister TA. Nutritional management for enteric methane abatement: a review. Aust J Exp Agric. 2008;48(2):21–27.
   Google Scholar
• Bougouin A, Leytem A, Dijkstra J, Dungan RS, Kebreab E. Nutritional & environmental effects on ammonia emissions from dairy cattle housing: a meta-analysis. J Environ Qual. 2016;45:1123–1132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edouard N, Charpiot A, Robin P, Lorinquer E, Dollé JB, Faverdin P. Influence of diet and manure management on ammonia and greenhouse gas emissions from dairy barns. Animal. 2019;13(12):2903–2912.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edouard N, Hassouna M, Robin P, Faverdin P. Low degradable protein supply to increase nitrogen efficiency in lactating dairy cows and reduce environmental impacts at barn level. Animal. 2016;10(2):212–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrade S, Zeyer K, Mohn J, Zähner M. Effect of diets with different crude protein levels on ammonia and greenhouse gas emissions from a naturally ventilated dairy housing. Sci Total Environ. 2023;896:165027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federal Office for Agriculture. Research and advisory projects, evaluation projects and external studies.Bern, Switzerland: Federal Office for Agriculture, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Anthony TL, Szutu DJ, Verfaillie JG, et al. Carbon-sink potential of continuous alfalfa agriculture lowered by short-term nitrous oxide emission events. Nat Commun. 2023;14:1926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haisan J, Sun Y, Guan L, et al. The effects of feeding 3-nitro-oxypropanol at two doses on milk production, rumen fermentation, plasma metabolites, nutrient digestibility, and methane emissions in lactating Holstein cows. Anim Prod Sci. 2017;57(2):282–289.
   Google Scholar
• Van Wesemael D, Vandaele L, Ampe B, et al. Reducing enteric methane emissions from dairy cattle: two ways to supplement 3-nitrooxypropanol. J Dairy Sci. 2019;102(2):1780–1787.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melgar A, Harper MT, Oh J, et al. Effects of 3-nitrooxypropanol on rumen fermentation, lactational performance, and resumption of ovarian cyclicity in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2020;103(1):410–432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arndt C, Hristov AN, Price WJ, et al. Full adoption of the most effective strategies to mitigate methane emissions by ruminants can help meet the 1.5 °C target by 2030 but not 2050. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2022;119(20):e2111294119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FAO. Methane emissions in livestock and rice systems-sources, quantification, mitigation and metrics. Rome: FAO; 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Hristov AN, Melgar A, Wasson D, Arndt C. Symposium review: effective nutritional strategies to mitigate enteric methane in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 2022;105(10):8543–8557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kebreab E, Bannink A, Pressman EM, et al. A meta-analysis of effects of 3-nitrooxypropanol on methane production, yield, and intensity in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 2023;106(2):927–936.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meale SJ, Popova M, Saro C, et al. Early life dietary intervention in dairy calves results in a long-term reduction in methane emissions. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):3003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrancken H, Suenkel M, Hargreaves PR, et al. Reduction of enteric methane emission in a commercial dairy farm by a novel feed supplement. Open J Anim Sci. 2019;9(3):286–296.
   Google Scholar
• Fouts JQ, Honan MC, Roque BM, Tricarico JM, Kebreab E. Enteric methane mitigation interventions. Transl Anim Sci. 2022;6(2):txac041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramin M, Chagas JCC, Pal Y, Danielsson R, Fant P, Krizsan SJ. Reducing methane production from stored faces of dairy cows by Asparagopsis taxiformis. Front Sustain Food Syst. 2023;7:1187838.
   Google Scholar
• Muizelaar W, Groot M, Van Duinkerken G, Peters R, Dijkstra J. Safety and transfer study: transfer of bromoform present in Asparagopsis taxiformis to milk and urine of lactating dairy cows. Foods. 2021;10(3):584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khurana R, Tassilo B, Ilma T, Ali-Reza B. Effect of a garlic and citrus extract supplement on performance, rumen fermentation, methane production, and rumen microbiome of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2023;106(7):4608–4621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sypniewski M, Strabel T, Pszczola M. Genetic variability of methane production and concentration measured in the breath of polish Holstein-Friesian cattle. Animals. 2021;11(11):3175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Q, Difford G, Sahana G, et al. Bayesian modelling reveals host genetics associated with rumen microbiota jointly influence methane emission in dairy cows. ISME J. 2020;14(8):2019–2033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Lima AO, de Oliveira PSN, Tizioto PC, et al. Association analyses pointed the TIPARP as a potential candidate gene influencing residual feed intake variation in Nelore Cattle. Jaboticabal: International Meeting of Advances in Animal Science; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Salleh MS, Mazzoni G, Höglund JK, et al. RNA-Seq transcriptomics and pathway analyses reveal potential regulatory genes and molecular mechanisms in high-and low-residual feed intake in Nordic dairy cattle. BMC Genomics. 2017;18(1):258.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gebreyesus G, Buitenhuis AJ, Poulsen NA, et al. Combining multi-population datasets for joint genome-wide association and meta-analyses: the case of bovine milk fat composition traits. J Dairy Sci. 2019;102(12):11124–11141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasson G, Kruger BS, Seroussi E, Doron-Faigenboim A, Shterzer N, Yaacoby S, Mizrahi I . Heritable bovine rumen bacteria are phylogenetically related and correlated with the cow’s capacity to harvest energy from its feed. Mol Biol. 2017;8:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Abbas W, Howard JT, Paz HA, et al. Influence of host genetics in shaping the rumen bacterial community in beef cattle. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):15101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes BJ, Lewin HA, Goddard ME. The future of livestock breeding: genomic selection for efficiency, reduced emissions intensity, and adaptation. Trends Genet. 2013;29(4):206–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zira S, Bouquet A, Rydhmer L, Kargo M, Puillet L. Carbon footprint based on lifetime productivity for future cows selected for resilience to climate-related disturbances. J Dairy Sci. 2023;106(12):8953–8968.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandel PB, Vanderick S, Vanrobays ML, et al. Consequences of selection for environmental impact traits in dairy cows. Proceedings, 10th World Congress of Genetics Applied to Livestock Production; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Kandel P, Vanderick S, Vanrobays M, Soyeurt H, Gengler N. Consequences of genetic selection for environmental impact traits on economically important traits in dairy cows. Anim Prod Sci. 2018;58(10):1966–1966.
   Google Scholar
• González-Recio O, López-Paredes J, Ouatahar L, et al. Mitigation of greenhouse gases in dairy cattle via genetic selection: 2. Incorporating methane emissions into the breeding goal. J Dairy Sci. 2020;103(8):7210–7221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walmsley BJ. Consequences of using different economic selection index methods on greenhouse gas emissions in beef cattle. Proceedings of 12th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production (WCGALP); 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Roehe R, Dewhurst RJ, Duthie C-A, et al. Bovine host genetic variation influences rumen microbial methane production with best selection criterion for low methane emitting and efficiently feed converting hosts based on metagenomic gene abundance. PLOS Genet. 2016;12(2):e1005846.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun HZ, Chen Y, Guan LL. MicroRNA expression profiles across blood and different tissues in cattle. Sci Data. 2019;6(1):190013.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang Y, Li D, Wang Y, et al. The landscape of circular RNAs and mRNAs in bovine milk exosomes. J Food Compos Anal. 2019;76:33–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malmuthuge N, Liang G, Guan LL. Regulation of rumen development in neonatal ruminants through microbial metagenomes and host transcriptomes. Genome Biol. 2019;20(1):172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nayak DD, Metcalf WW. Cas9-mediated genome editing in the methanogenic archaeon Methanosarcina acetivorans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114(11):2976–2981.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leahy SC, Kelly WJ, Altermann E, et al. The genome sequence of the rumen methanogen Methanobrevibacter ruminantium reveals new possibilities for controlling ruminant methane emissions. PLOS One. 2010;5(1):e8926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bharathi M, Senthil Kumar N, Chellapandi P. Functional prediction and assignment of Methanobrevibacter ruminantium M1 operome using a combined bioinformatics approach. Front Genet. 2020;11:593990.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worku D, Hussen J, De Matteis G, Schusser B, Alhussien MN. Candidate genes associated with heat stress and breeding strategies to relieve its effects in dairy cattle: a deeper insight into the genetic architecture and immune response to heat stress. Front Vet Sci. 2023;10:1151241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar