The Localization Choice of Multinational Firms’ R&D Centers: A Survey in the Piedmont Area

REFERENCES

• Alcácer, J., & Zhao, M. (2012). Local R&D strategies and multilocation firms: The role of internal linkages. Management Science, 58(4), 734–753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alfaro, L., & Chen, M. (2009). The global networks of multinational firms. NBER Working Paper, 15576(31).
   Google Scholar
• Ambos, B. (2005). Foreign direct investment in industrial research and development: A study of German MNCs. Research Policy, 34(4), 395–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appold, S.J. (2005). Location patterns of US industrial research: Mimetic isomorphism and the emergence of geographic charisma. Regional Studies, 39(1), 17–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora, A., Fosfuri, A., & Gambardella, A. (2001), Markets for technology and their implications for corporate strategy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(2), 417–449.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, C.A., & Ghoshal, S. (1986). Tap your subsidiaries for global reach. Harvard Business Review, 64(6), 87–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett, C.A., & Ghoshal, S. (1990). Managing innovation in the transnational corporation. In C.A. Bartlett, Y. Doz, & G. Hedlund (Eds.), Managing the global firm (pp. 215–255). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Basile, R., Castellani, D., & Zanfei, A. (2008). Location choices of multinational firms in Europe: The role of EU cohesion policy. Journal of International Economics, 74(2), 328–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belderbos, R. (2001). Overseas innovations by Japanese firms: An analysis of patent and subsidiary data. Research Policy, 30(2), 313–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belderbos, R., Lykogianni, E., & Veugelers, R. (2008). Strategic R&D location multinational firms: Spillovers, technology sourcing and competition. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 17(3), 759–779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belitz, H. (2006, September). Internationalization of R&D multinationals: The last decade from a German Perspective. Paper Presented at IFSAM VIII World Congress Berlin, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Branstetter, L.G., Fisman, R., & Foley, C.F. (2006). Do stronger intellectual property rights increase international technology transfer? Empirical evidence from U.S. firm-level panel data. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(1), 321–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bresciani, S., & Ferraris, A. (2012). Imprese multinazionali: Innovazione e scelte localizzative . Romagna, Italy: Maggioli.
   Google Scholar
• Bresciani, S., Vrontis, D., & Thrassou, A. (2012). Human resource management – Practices, performance and strategy in the Italian hotel industry. World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 8(4), 405–423.
   Google Scholar
• Cantwell, J., & Piscitello, L. (2005). Recent location of foreign-owned research and development activities large multinational corporations in the European regions: The role of spillovers and externalities. Regional Studies, 39(1), 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappellin, R. (2010, December). Le città e le regioni nell’economia della conoscenza, X Conferenza Nazionale di Statistica, Rome, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H.W. (2003). Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Cincera, M., Cozza, C., & Tuebke, A. (2012). Public policies and the location of EU business R&D: Insights from the EC IRMA survey. In H. Hveem & C. Henrik (Eds.), Technology, innovation and governance (pp. 188–198). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Colovic, A., & Mayrhofer, U. (2011). Optimizing the location of R&D and production activities: Trends in the automotive industry. European Planning Studies, 19(8), 1481–1498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devereux, M.P., & Griffith, R. (1998). Taxes and the location of production: evidence from a panel of US multinationals. Journal of Public Economics, 68(3), 335–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dougherty, S.M., Inklaar, R., McGuckin, R.H., & Van Ark, B. (2003). Internationalization and the changing structure of business R&D: recent trends and measurement implications, Growth and Development Center of the University of Groningen Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Dunning, J.H. (1998). Location and the multinational enterprise: A neglected factor? Journal of International Business Studies, 29(1), 45–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst, D. (2005, January). The complexity and internationalization of innovation: The root causes. In Globalization of R&D and developing countries: Proceedings of the Expert Meeting, Geneva, UNCTAD (Ed.), (pp. 61–87). New York, NY and Geneva, . Switzerland: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrero, V., Lanzetti, R., Marchi, A., Resegotti, R., & Vitelli, M. (2007). Gli investimenti diretti all’estero delle imprese piemontesi: tendenze, strategie e risultati [The Foreign Direct Investment of Piedmont firms: trends, strategies and results]. Contributi di ricerca, 208, IRES Piemonte.
   Google Scholar
• Florida, R. (1997). The globalization of R&D: Results of a survey of foreign-affiliated R&D laboratories in the USA. Research Policy, 26(1), 85–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerybadze, A., & Reger, G. (1999). Globalization of R&D: Recent trends in the management of innovation in transnational corporations. Research Policy, 28(2–3), 251–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guimón, J. (2011). Policies to benefit from the globalization of corporate R&D: An exploratory study for EU countries. Technovation, 31(2–3), 77–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head, K., & Mayer, T. (2004). Market potential and the location of Japanese investment in the European Union. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(4), 959–972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hines, J.R. (1995). Taxes, technology transfer, and R&D by multinational firms. In M. Feldstein, J.R. Hines, and G.R. Hubbard (Eds.), Taxing multinational corporations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ke, S., & Lai, M. (2011). Productivity of Chinese regions and the location of multinational research and development. International Regional Science Review, 34(1), 102–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenig, P., & MacGarvie, M. (2008). Regulatory policy and the location of bio-pharmaceutical FDI in Europe. New York, NY: Mimeo.
   Google Scholar
• Koschatzky, K., Zenker, A., & Baier, E. (2012). Regional embeddedness of multinational enterprises in European Regions. In D.A. Assimakopoulos, E.G. Carayannis, & R. Dossani (Eds.), Knowledge Perspectives of New Product Development. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kuemmerle, W. (1997). Building effective R&D capabilities abroad. Harvard Business Review, 75(2), 61–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuemmerle, W. (1999). Foreign direct investment in industrial research in the pharmaceutical and electronics industries–results from a survey of multinational firms. Research Policy, 28(2), 179–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, R., Thursby, J., & Thursby, M. (2011). University-industry spillovers, government funding, and industrial consulting. NBER Working paper, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Le Bas, C., & Sierra, C. (2002). Location versus home country advantage in R&D activities: Some further results on multinationals’ locational strategies. Research Policy, 31(4), 589–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malecki, E.J. (1980). Corporate organization of R&D and the location of technological activities. Regional Studies, 14(3), 219–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malecki, E.J. (1980). Dimensions of R&D location in the United States. Research Policy, 9(1), 2–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mariotti, S., & Mutinelli, M. (2010). Italia multinazionale 2010. Le partecipazioni italiane all’estero ed estere in Italia [Multinational Italy 2010. Italian foreign participations abroad and the foreign participations in Italy]. Catanzaro , Italy: Rubbettino.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, K.E., Mudambi, R., & Narula, R. (2011). Multinational enterprises and local contexts: The opportunities and challenges of multiple embeddedness. Journal of Management Studies, 48(2), 235–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mihai, S. (2012). A systemic risk management model for SMEs under financial crisis. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 20(4), 406–422.
   Google Scholar
• Moncada-Paternò-Castello, P., Vivarelli, M., & Voigt, P. (2011). Drivers and impacts in the globalization of corporate R&D: An introduction based on the European experience. Industrial and Corporate Change, 20(2), 585–603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narula, R., & Zanfei, A. (2005). Globalization of innovation: The role of multinational enterprises. In J. Fagerberg, D.C. Mowery, & R.R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 318–347). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Niosi, J. (1999). The internationalization of industrial R&D from technology transfer to the learning organization. Research Policy, 28(2–3), 107–117.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2008). The internationalization of business R&D. Evidence, impacts and implications, Paris, France: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Piscitello, L. (2011). Strategy, location, and the conceptual metamorphosis of the MNE. Global Strategy Journal, 1(1–2), 127–131.
   Google Scholar
• Quer, R.D., Claver Cortés, E., & Rienda García, L. (2012). Chinese multinationals: Host country factors and foreign direct investment location. In M. Marinov and S. Marinova (Eds.), Internationalization of emerging economies and firms (pp. 1–22). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ronstadt, R. (1977). Research and development abroad U.S. multinationals. New York, NY: Praeger Books.
   Google Scholar
• Rugman, A.M., & Oh, C.H. (2012). Why the home region matters: Location and regional multinationals. British Journal of Management, 24(4), 463–479. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2012.00817.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rugman, A., Verbeke, A., & Yuan, W. (2011). Re-conceptualizing Bartlett and Ghoshal's classification of national subsidiary roles in the multinational enterprise. Journal of Management Studies, 48(2), 253–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sala, A., Landoni, P., & Verganti, R. (2011). R&D networks: An evaluation framework. International Journal of Technology Management, 53(1), 19–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serapio, M., & Dalton, D. (1999). Globalization and industrial R&D: An examination of foreign direct investment in R&D in the United States. Research Policy, 28(2–3), 303–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siedschlag, I., Smitha, D., Turcub, C., & Zhanga, X. (2009). What determines the attractiveness of the European Union to the location of R&D multinational firms? ESRI Working Paper, 306.
   Google Scholar
• Song, J., Asakawa, K., & Chu, Y. (2011). What determines knowledge sourcing from host locations of overseas R&D operations?: A study of global R&D activities of Japanese multinationals. Research Policy, 40(3), 380–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squicciarini, M., & Loikkanen, T. (Eds.) (2008). Going global: The challenges for knowledge based economies. Publication of the Ministry of Industry and Employment, 20/2008. Helsinki, Finland: Ministry of Industry and Employment.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, J., & Chen, M. (2012). Studies on the new trends of multinational corporation strategic alliance and influence to China. Cross-Cultural Communication, 8(3), 32–36.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, Y. (2003). Strategic or tactical? Foreign research and development in developing countries, a case study of China. Asian Geographer, 22(1–2), 143–167.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, Y., Du, D., & Huang, L. (2006). Foreign R&D in developing countries: Empirical evidence from Shanghai, China. The China Review, 6(1), 67–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, Y., & Wen, K. (2007). Uncertainties, imitative behaviors and foreign R&D location: Explaining the over-concentration of foreign R&D in Beijing and Shanghai within China. Asia Pacific Business Review, 13(3), 405–424.
   Google Scholar
• Tardivo, G. (2008). L’evoluzione degli studi sul Knowledge Management. Sinergie, 76, 21–42.
   Google Scholar
• Tellis, J.G., Eisingerich, B.A., Chandy, K.R., & Prabhu, C.J. (2008). Competing for the future: Patterns in the global location of R&D centers by the world's largest firms (ISBM Report 06). University Park, PA: Institute for the Study of Business Markets, The Pennsylvania State University.
   Google Scholar
• Thursby, J.G., & Thursby, M.C. (2006a). Here or there? A survey on the factors in multinational R&D location. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thursby, J.G., & Thursby, M.C. (2006b). Where is the new science in corporate R&D? Science, 314(5805), 1547–1548.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Zedtwitz M., & Gassmann, O. (2002). Market versus technology drive in R&D internationalization: Four different patterns of managing research and development. Research Policy, 31(4), 569–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaheer, S., & Nachum, L. (2011). Sense of place: From location resources to MNE locational capital. Global Strategy Journal, 1(1–2), 96–108.
   Google Scholar