263
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

An Investigation of Consumers' Responses to Comparative “Attack” Ads

, &

REFERENCES

  • Ahluwalia, R. (2000). Examination of psychological processes underlying resistance to persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(2), 217–232.
  • Ahluwalia, R., Burnkrant, R.E., & Unnava, H.R. (2000). Consumer response to negative publicity: The moderating role of commitment. Journal of Marketing Research, 37(2), 203–214.
  • Barone, M.J., & Miniard, P.W. (1999). How and when factual ad claims mislead consumers: Examining the deceptive consequences of copy x copy interactions for partial comparative advertisements. Journal of Marketing Research, 36(1), 58–74.
  • Bennett, P.D., & Harrell, G.D. (1975). The role of confidence in understanding and predicting buyers' attitudes and purchase intentions. Journal of Consumer Research, 2(2), 110–117.
  • Chang, C.C., & Chou, Y.J. (2008). Goal orientation and comparative valence in persuasion. Journal of Advertising, 37(1), 73–87.
  • Chattopadhyay, A. (1998). When does comparative advertising influence brand attitude? The role of delay and market position. Psychology & Marketing, 15(5), 461–475.
  • Grewal, D., Kavanoor, S., Fern, E.F., Costley, C., & Barnes, J. (1997). Comparative versus non-comparative advertising: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marketing, 61(4), 1–15.
  • Gross, S.R., Holtz, R., & Miller, N. (1995). ‘Attitude Certainty’ in attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences. In R.E. Petty, & J.A. Krosnick (Eds.), Ohio State university series on attitudes and persuasion volume 21 (pp. 215–245). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Harrison, L. (2013). Update: Microsoft renews its “Scroogled” ads, claims they're working. http://blogs.kqed.org/newsfix/2013/04/09/microsoft-refocuses-scroogled-attack-ads-on-android/.
  • Ito, T.A., Larsen, J.T., Smith, N.K., & Cacioppo, J.T. (1998). Negative information weighs more heavily on the brain: The negativity bias in evaluative categorizations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(4), 887–900.
  • Jain, S.P., & Posavac, S.S. (2004). Valenced comparisons. Journal of Marketing Research, 41(1), 46–58.
  • Jeon, J.O., & Beatty, S.E. (2002). Comparative advertising effectiveness in different national cultures. Journal of Business Research, 55(11), 907–913.
  • Jewell, R.D., & Unnava, H.R. (2004). Exploring differences in attitudes between light and heavy brand users. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(1 & 2), 75–80.
  • Laczniak, R.N., Kempf, D.S., & Muehling, D.D. (1999). Advertising message involvement: The role of enduring and situational factors. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 21(1), 51–61.
  • McGuire, W.J. (1964). Inducing Resistance to Persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 1, 191–229.
  • Muehling, D.D., Laczniak, R.N., & Ehrich, K.R. (2013). Consumers' responses to positive and negative comparative advertisements: The moderating effect of current brand usage. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 34(2), 229–246.
  • Petty, R.E., Ostrom, T.M., & Brock, T.C. (1981). Cognitive responses in persuasion. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Raju, S., Unnava, H.R., & Montgomery, N.V. (2009). The effect of brand commitment on the evaluation of nonpreferred brands: A disconfirmation process. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(5), 851–863.
  • Rucker, D.D., Petty, R.E., & Briñol, P. (2008). What's in a frame anyway?: A meta-cognitive analysis of the impact of one versus two sided message framing on attitude certainty. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 18(2), 137–149.
  • Rust, R.T., & Cooil, B. (1994). Reliability measures for qualitative data: Theory and implications. Journal of Marketing Research, 31(1), 1–14.
  • Rydell R.J., Hugenberg, K., & McConnell, A.R. (2006). Resistance can be good or bad: How theories of resistance and dissonance affect attitude certainty. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(6), 740–750.
  • Shiv, B., Britton, J.A. E., & Payne, J.W. (2004). Does elaboration increase or decrease the effectiveness of negatively versus positively framed messages?. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(1), 199–208.
  • Sorescu, A.B., & Gelb, B.D. (2000). Negative comparative advertising: Evidence favoring fine-tuning. Journal of Advertising, 29(4), 25–40.
  • Soscia, I., Girolamo, S., & Busacca, B. (2010). The effect of comparative advertising on consumer perceptions: Similarity or differentiation?. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(1), 109–118.
  • Stutts, M.A. (1982). Comparative advertising and counterargument. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 10(3), 302–313.
  • Tormala, Z.L., & Petty, R.E. (2002). What doesn't kill me makes me stronger: The effects of resisting persuasion on attitude certainty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1298–1313.
  • Tormala, Z.L., & Petty, R.E. (2004). Resistance to persuasion and attitude certainty: The moderating role of elaboration. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(11), 1446–1457.
  • Venkatraman, M.P., & Gerald, S. (1997). The impact of occupation on responses to positive and negative framing. Journal of Promotion Management, 4(1), 63–74.
  • Wright, P. (1980). Message-evoked thoughts: Persuasion research using thought verbalizations. Journal of Consumer Research, 7(2), 151–175.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.