Moderating Role of Brand Familiarity in Cross-Media Effects: An Information Processing Perspective

References

• Alba, J. W., & Hutchinson, J. W. (1987). Dimensions of consumer expertise. Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 411–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assael, H. (2011). From silos to synergy: A fifty-year review of cross-media research shows synergy has yet to achieve its full potential. Journal of Advertising Research, 51, 42–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biswas, A. (1992). The moderating role of brand familiarity in reference price perceptions. Journal of Business Research, 25, 252–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchholz, L. M., & Smith, R. E. (1991). The role of consumer involvement in determining cognitive response to broadcast advertising. Journal of Advertising, 20(1), 4–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., Von Hippel, W., & Ernst, J. M. (1997). Mapping cognitive structures and processes through verbal content: The thought-listing technique. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 928–928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, M., & Keller, K. L. (2003). Brand familiarity and advertising repetition effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 292–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752–766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, Y., & Thorson, E. (2004). Television and web advertising synergies. Journal of Advertising, 33(2), 75–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Confer, M. G., & McGlathery, D. (1991). The research study: The advertising impact of magazines in conjunction with television. Journal of Advertising Research, 31(1), 64–64.
   Google Scholar
• Edell, J. A., & Keller, K. L. (1989). The information processing of coordinated media campaigns. Journal of Marketing Research, 26, 149–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harkins, S. G., & Petty, R. E. (1981a). Effects of source magnification of cognitive effort on attitudes: An information-processing view. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 401–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harkins, S. G., & Petty, R. E. (1981b). The multiple source effect in persuasion: The effects of distraction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 627–635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hilton, J. L., & Darley, J. M. (1991). The effects of interaction goals on person perception. In M. P. Zanna (ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 24, pp. 236–267). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB). (2012). Global mobile advertising market valued at $5.3 billion in 2011. Retrieved from http://www.iab.net/about_the_iab/recent_press_releases/press_release_archive/press_release/pr-060612_global
   Google Scholar
• Jagpal, H. (1981). Measuring joint advertising effects in multiproduct firms. Journal of Advertising Research, 21(1), 65–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolsarici, C., & Vakratsas, D. (2011). The complexity of multi-media effects. Working Paper N0. 11-100, Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Kumkale, G. T., Albarracín, D., & Seignourel, P. J. (2010). The effects of source credibility in the presence or absence of prior attitudes: Implications for the design of persuasive communication campaigns. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40, 1325–1356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, D. J., Mowen, J. C., & Reardon, R. (1994). Multiple sources in advertising appeals: When product endorsers are paid by the advertising sponsor. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 22, 234–243.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, D. J., & Reardon, R. (1987). Source magnification: The role of multiple sources in the processing of advertising appeals. Journal of Marketing Research, 24, 412–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naik, P. A., & Peters, K. (2009). A hierarchical marketing communications model of online and offline media synergies. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 23, 288–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naik, P. A., & Raman, K. (2003). Understanding the impact of synergy in multimedia communications. Journal of Marketing Research, 40, 375–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, P. (1974). Advertising as information. Journal of Political Economy, 82, 729–754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Issue involvement as a moderator of the effects on attitude of advertising content and context. In K. B. Monroe (ed.), Advances in Consumer Research (Vol. 8, pp. 20–24). Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research.
   Google Scholar
• Portio Research. (2012). Mobile messaging futures 2012–2016. Retrieved from http://www.portioresearch.com/en/major-reports/current-portfolio/mobile-messaging-futures-2012f-2016.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, M., & Stukas, A. A. (1999). Interpersonal processes: The interplay of cognitive, motivational, and behavioral activities in social interaction. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 273–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stammerjohan, C., Wood, C. M., Chang, Y., & Thorson, E. (2005). An empirical investigation of the interaction between publicity advertising, and previous brand attitudes and knowledge. Journal of Advertising, 34(4), 55–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, T., Newton, G. D., & Wang, X. (2007). Does synergy work? An examination of cross-promotion effects. The International Journal on Media Management, 9(4), 127–134.
   Google Scholar
• Voorveld, H. A. M., Neijens, P. C., & Smit, E. G. (2011). Opening the black box: Understanding the black box effects. Journal of Marketing Communications, 17(2), 69–85.
   Google Scholar
• Wakolbinger, L. M., Denk, M., & Oberecker, K. (2009). The effectiveness of combining online and print advertisements: Is the whole better than the individual parts? Journal of Advertising Research, 49, 360–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, A. (2007). Branding over mobile and internet advertising: The cross-media effect. International Journal of Mobile Marketing, 2(1), 34–42.
   Google Scholar
• Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1994). The personal involvement inventory: Reduction, revision, and application to advertising. Journal of Advertising, 23(4), 59–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar