From Crisp to Fuzzy-Sets QCA in Exploring Causal Configurations: Examples from the New Zealand Context

References

• Amenta, E., & Poulsen, J. D. (1996). Social politics in context: The institutional politics theory and social spending at the end of the New Deal. Social Forces, 75(1), 33–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggert, R. (1997). Why labour wins, why labour loses: A test of two theories. The Sociological Quarterly, 38(1), 205–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, B., & Glaesser, J. (2011). Using case-based approach to analyze large datasets: a comparison of Ragin's fsQCA and fuzzy cluster analysis. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 14(1), 31–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coverdill, J. E., Finlay, W., & Martin, J. K. (1994). Labour management in the southern textile industry: Comparing qualitative, quantitative, and qualitative comparative analyses. Sociological Methods & Research, 23(1), 54–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denk, T. (2010). Comparative multilevel analysis: Proposal for a methodology. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 13(1), 29–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairweather, J., & Krivokapic-Skoko, B. (1998). Success factors of new land-based industries: Literature review and the QCA method. New Zealand: Agribusiness and Economics Research Unit, Lincoln University, Lincoln.
   Google Scholar
• Fiss, P. (2007). A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1180–1198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiss, P. (2008). Configurations of strategy, structure and environment: A fuzzy set analysis of high technology firms. Retrieved from http://www-rcf.usc.edu/∼fiss/research.html
   Google Scholar
• Greckhamer, T., Misangyi, V.F, Elms, H., & Lacey, T. (2008). Using Qualitative Comparative Analysis in strategic management research: An examination of combinations of industry, corporate, and business-unit effects. Organizational Research Methods, 11(4), 695–726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellström, E. (1998). Qualitative Comparative Analysis: A useful tool for research into forest policy and forestry conflicts. Forest Science, 44(2), 254–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrmann, A. M., & Cronqvist, L. (2009). When dichotomization becomes a problem for the analysis of middle-sized datasets. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 12(1), 33–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kithenerm, M, Beynon, M., & Harrington, C. (2002). Qualitative Comparative Analysis and public services research. Public Management Review, 4(2), 485–504.
   Google Scholar
• Kogut, B., & Ragin, C. C. (2006). Exploring complexity when diversity is limited: Institutional complementarity in theories of rule of law and national systems revisited. European Management Review, 3, 44–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krivokapic-Skoko, B. (2001). Understanding ethnic entrepreneurship in agricultural settings: Qualitative Comparative Analysis of ethnic groups in New Zealand agriculture (Ph.D. Thesis), Lincoln University, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Kvist, J (2003). Conceptualisation, configuration, and categorisation. Diversity, ideal types and fuzzy sets in comparative welfare state research. COMPASSS WP2003–15 Working Papers No. 15. Retrieved from http://www.ompass.org/WP.htm
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, S., & Fairweather, J. (2010). The socio-technical networks of technology users' innovation in New Zealand: A fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. Agribusiness and Economics Research Unit, Research Report 320, Lincoln University, Canterbury, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, A. (2010). Crips-set qualitative comparative analysis (csQCA) and model specification: Benchmarks for future csQCA applications. International Journal of Multiple Journal Approaches, 4, 138–158.
   Google Scholar
• Mayell, P. J., & Fairweather, J. (2000). Success factors in new land-based industries. Agribusiness and Economics Research Unit, Research Report 244, Lincoln University, Canterbury, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Research, Science and Technology (2010). Igniting potential: New Zealand's science and innovation pathway. Ministry of Research, Science and Technology. Wellington, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Özlem, Ö. (2004). Using Boolean and fuzzy-logic based methods to analysis multiple case study evidence in management research. Journal of Management Inquiry, 13(2), 166–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pajunen, K. (2008). Institutions and inflows of foreign direct investment: A fuzzy-set analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(4), 652–669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. (1987). The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. (2000). Fuzzy-set social science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C., & Sonnett, J. (2004). Between complexity and parsimony: Limited diversity, counterfactual cases, and comparative analysis. In S. Kropp & M. Minkenberg (Eds.), Vergleichen in der Politikwissenschaft. Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag fur Sozialwissenschaft.
   Google Scholar
• Rihoux, B., & Ragin, C. (Eds.). (2009). Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and related techniques. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Rizova, P. S. (2007). Applying Charles Ragin's method of Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) to the study of technological innovation. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1093090 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1093090
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. (2005). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Romme, A. G. (1995). Self-organising processes in top management teams: A Boolean comparative approach. Journal of Business Research, 34, 11–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, K. (2005). Measuring Innovation. In I. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K. (2006). Public policy framework for the New Zealand innovation system. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Economic Development.
   Google Scholar
• Steel, G., Rinne, T., & Fairweather, J. (2012). Personality, nations, and innovation: relationships between personality traits and Nation Innovation scores. Cross-cultural research, 46(1), 3–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokke, O. S. (2007). Qualitative comparative analysis, shaming and international regime effectiveness. Journal of Business Research, 60, 501–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Hippel, E. (2007). Horizontal innovation networks—by and for users. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(2), 293–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Hippel, E., de Jong, J. P. J., & Flowers, S. (2012). Comparing Business and Household Sector Innovation in Consumer Products: Findings from a Representative Study in the United Kingdom. Management Science, 58(9), 1669–1681.
   Google Scholar