Empirical Analysis of Consumer Purchase Behavior: Interaction Between State Dependence and Sensitivity to Marketing-Mix VariablesFootnote¹

¹The article was prepared within the framework of the Academic Fund Program at the National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE) in 2016 (grant №15-05-0063) and by the Russian Academic Excellence Project “5-100”

References

• Abramson, C., Andrews, R. L., Currim, I. S., & Jones, M. (2000). Parameter bias from unobserved effects in the multinomial logit model of consumer choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 37(4), 410–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamowicz, W. L., & Swait, J. D. (2013). Are food choices really habitual? Integrating habits, variety-seeking, and compensatory choice in a utility-maximizing framework. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 95(1), 17–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allender, W. J., & Richards, T. J. (2012). Brand loyalty and price promotion strategies: An empirical analysis. Journal of Retailing, 88(3), 323–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, R. L., & Currim, I. S. (2005). An experimental investigation of scanner data preparation strategies for consumer choice models. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 2(3), 319–331.
   Google Scholar
• Baltas, G., & Doyle, P. (2001). Random utility models in marketing research: A survey. Journal of Business Research, 51(2), 115–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, S., Levinsohn, J., & Pakes, A. (1995). Automobile prices in market equilibrium. Econometrica, 63(4), 841–890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubé, J.-P., Hitsch, G. J., & Rossi, P. E. (2010). State dependence and alternative explanations for consumer inertia. The RAND Journal of Economics, 41(3), 417–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Empen, J., Loy, J.-P., & Weiss, C. (2015). Price promotions and brand loyalty. European Journal of Marketing, 49(5), 736–759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonül, F., & Srinivasan, K. (1993). Modeling multiple sources of heterogeneity in multinomial logit models: Methodological and managerial issues. Marketing Science, 12(3), 213–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guadagni, P., & Little, J. D. C. (1983). A logit model of brand choice calibrated on scanner data. Marketing Science, 2(3), 203–238.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, T-H., & Chong, J-K. (2003). A parsimonious model of stockkeeping-unit choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 40(3), 351–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inman, J. J., Park, J., & Sinha, A. (2008). A dynamic choice map approach to modeling attribute-level varied behavior among stockkeeping units. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(1), 94–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keane, M. P. (1997). Modeling heterogeneity and state dependence in consumer choice behavior. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 15(3), 310–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu-Thompkins, Y., & Tarn, L. (2013). Not all repeat customers are the same: Designing effective cross-selling promotion on the basis of attitudinal loyalty and habit. Journal of Marketing, 77(5), 21–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFadden, D. (1973). Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior, in P. Zarembka (ed.), Frontiers in Econometrics, 105–142, Academic Press: New York.
   Google Scholar
• Miravete, E., & Palacios-Huerta, I. (2014). Consumer inertia, choice dependence, and learning from experience in a repeated decision problem. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 96(3), 524–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nevo, A. (2001). Measuring market power in the ready-to-eat cereal industry. Econometrica, 69(2), 307–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, M. (2011). Consumer learning, switching costs, and heterogeneity: A structural examination. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 9(1), 25–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, J., Ehrenberg, A., & Goodhardt, G. (2008). Measuring customer loyalty to product variants. International Journal of Market Research, 50(4), 513–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seetharaman, P. B., Ainslie, A., & Chintagunta, P. K. (1999). Investigating household state dependence effects across categories. Journal of Marketing Research, 36(4), 488–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seetharaman, P. B. (2004). Modeling multiple sources of state dependence in random utility models: A distributed lag approach. Marketing Science, 23(2), 263–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shum, M. (2004). Does advertising overcome brand loyalty? Evidence from the breakfast-cereals market. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 13(2), 241–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirohi, N., McLaughlin, E. W., & Wittink, D. R. (1998). A model of consumer perceptions and store loyalty intentions for a supermarket retailer. Journal of Retailing, 74(2), 223–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Train, K. (2003). Discrete choice methods with simulation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zanutto, E. L., & Bradlow, E. T. (2006). Data pruning in consumer choice models. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 4(3), 267–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar