A Content Analysis of Compatible Fit among Message Elements in Philanthropy Ads

References

• Aaker, J. L., & Lee, A. Y. (2001). “I” Seek Pleasures and “We” Avoid Pains: The Role of Self-Regulatory Goals in Information Processing and Persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(1), 33–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnett, D. B., German, S. D., & Hunt, S. D. (2003). The identity salience model of relationship marketing success: The case of nonprofit marketing. Journal of Marketing, 67(2), 89–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnocky, S., Stroink, M., & DeCicco, T. (2007). Self-Construal Predicts Environmental Concern, Cooperation, and Conservation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(4), 255–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avnet, T., & Higgins, E. T. (2003). Locomotion, Assessment, and Regulatory Fit: Value Transfer from “How” to “What”. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(5), 525–530. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00027-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baek, T. H., & Reid, L. N. (2013). The Interplay of Mood and Regulatory Focus in Influencing Altruistic Behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 30(8), 635–646. doi:10.1002/mar.20634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American psychologist, 37(2), 122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basil, D. Z., Ridgway, N. M., & Basil, M. D. (2008). Guilt and giving: A process model of empathy and efficacy. Psychology & Marketing, 25(1), 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batson, C. D. (1987). Prosocial motivation: Is it ever truly altruistic? Advances in experimental social psychology, 20, 65–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bebko, C. P. (2000). Service Intangibility and Its Impact on Consumer Expectations of Service Quality. Journal of Services Marketing, 14(1), 9–26.
   Google Scholar
• Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Bortree, D., Ahern, L., Dou, X., & Smith, A. N. (2012). Framing Environmental Advocacy: A Study of 30 Years of Advertising in National Geographic Magazine. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 17(2), 77–91.
   Google Scholar
• Brunel, F. F., & Nelson, M. R. (2000). Explaining Gendered Responses to Help-Self and Help-Others Charity Ad Appeals: The Mediating Role of World-Views. Journal of Advertising, 29(3), 15–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, M., & Miller, N. (1987). Explanation of the relation between negative mood and helping. Psychological Bulletin, 102(1), 91–108.
   Google Scholar
• Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral Inhibition, Behavioral Activation, and Affective Responses to Impending Reward and Punishment_ the BIS/BAS Scales. J Pers Soc Psychol, 67(2), 319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cesario, J., Grant, H., & Higgins, E. T. (2004). Regulatory Fit and Persuasion: Transfer From “Feeling Right”. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 86(3), 388–404. doi:10.1037/022-3514.86.3.388
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, C.-T., & Lee, Y.-K. (2009). Framing Charity Advertising: Influences of Message Framing, Image Valence, and Temporal Framing on a Charitable Appeal1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39(12), 2910–2935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, C.-T., & Lee, Y.-K. (2010). Effects of Message Framing, Vividness Congruency and Statistical Framing on Responses to Charity Advertising. International Journal of Advertising, 29(2), 195–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandran, S., & Menon, G. (2004). When a day means more than a year: Effects of temporal framing on judgments of health risk. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(2), 375–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B., Brown, S. L., Lewis, B. P., Luce, C., & Neuberg, S. L. (1997). Reinterpreting the empathy–altruism relationship: When one into one equals oneness. J Pers Soc Psychol, 73(3), 481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, S. E., Bacon, P. L., & Morris, M. L. (2000). The relational-interdependent self-construal and relationships. J Pers Soc Psychol, 78(4), 791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowe, E., & Higgins, E. T. (1997). Regulatory Focus and Strategic Inclinations: Promotion and Prevention in Decision-Making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69(2), 117–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, E., Kerkhof, P., & Kuiper, J. (2008). Improving the Effectiveness of Fundraising Messages: The Impact of Charity Goal Attainment, Message Framing, and Evidence on Persuasion. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 36(2), 161–175. doi:10.1080/00909880801922854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, J. J. (1995). The Effects of Message Framing on Response to Environmental Communications. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 72(2), 285–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeCicco, T. L., & Stroink, M. L. (2007). A Third Model of Self-Construal: The Metapersonal Self. International Journal of Transpersonal Studies, 26, 82–104.
   Google Scholar
• Dovidio, J. F., Allen, J. L., & Schroeder, D. A. (1990). Specificity of empathy-induced helping: Evidence for altruistic motivation. J Pers Soc Psychol, 59(2), 249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Förster, J., Higgins, E. T., & Idson, L. C. (1998). Approach and Avoidance Strength during Goal Attainment: Regulatory Focus and the” Goal Looms Larger” Effect. J Pers Soc Psychol, 75(5), 1115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. J., Vandenbosch, M., & Antia, K. D. (2008). An empathy-helping perspective on consumers' responses to fund-raising appeals. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(3), 519–531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galetzka, M., Verhoeven, J. W., & Pruyn, A. T. H. (2006). Service Validity and Service Reliability of Search, Experience and Credence Services: A Scenario Study. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 17(3), 271–283.
   Google Scholar
• Giles, M., Mcclenahan, C., Cairns, E., & Mallet, J. (2004). An application of the theory of planned behaviour to blood donation: The importance of self-efficacy. Health Education Research, 19(4), 380–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond Pleasure and Pain. American psychologist, 52(12), 1280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. T. (2000). Making a Good Decision: Value from Fit. Am Psychol, 55(11), 1217–1230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. T. (2008). Culture and personality: Variability across universal motives as the missing link. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(2), 608–634.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. T., Friedman, R. S., Harlow, R. E., Idson, L. C., Ayduk, O. N., & Taylor, A. (2001). Achievement Orientations from Subjective Histories of Success: Promotion Pride versus Prevention Pride. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31(1), 3–23. doi:10.1002/Ejsp.27
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. T., Idson, L. C., Freitas, A. L., Spiegel, S., & Molden, D. C. (2003). Transfer of Value from Fit. J Pers Soc Psychol, 84(6), 1140–1153. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.6.1140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. T., Roney, C. J., Crowe, E., & Hymes, C. (1994). Ideal versus Ought Predilections for Approach and Avoidance Distinct Self-Regulatory Systems. J Pers Soc Psychol, 66(2), 276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, J. G., Miller, D. T., & Lerner, M. J. (2002). Committing altruism under the cloak of self-interest: The exchange fiction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(2), 144–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Idson, L. C., Liberman, N., & Higgins, E. T. (2000). Distinguishing Gains from Nonlosses and Losses from Nongains: A Regulatory Focus Perspective on Hedonic Intensity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36(3), 252–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Idson, L. C., Liberman, N., & Higgins, E. T. (2004). Imagining How You'd Feel: The Role of Motivational Experiences from Regulatory Fit. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(7), 926–937.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joireman, J., Anderson, J., & Strathman, A. (2003). The aggression paradox: Understanding links among aggression, sensation seeking, and the consideration of future consequences. J Pers Soc Psychol, 84(6), 1287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joireman, J., Sprott, D. E., & Spangenberg, E. R. (2005). Fiscal responsibility and the consideration of future consequences. Personality and individual differences, 39(6), 1159–1168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kareklas, I., Carlson, J. R., & Muehling, D. D. (2012). The Role of Regulatory Focus and Self-View in “Green” Advertising Message Framing. Journal of Advertising, 41(4), 25–39. doi:10.2753/JOA0091-3367410402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kees, J., Burton, S., & Tangari, A. H. (2010). The Impact of Regulatory Focus, Temporal Orientation, and Fit on Consumer Responses to Health-Related Advertising. Journal of Advertising, 39(1), 19–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, P. A. (2006). Regulatory focus and efficacy of health messages. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(1), 109–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulkarni, A. A., & Yuan, H. (2015). Effect of Ad-Irrelevant Distance Cues on Persuasiveness of Message Framing. Journal of Advertising, 44(3), 254–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labroo, A. A., & Lee, A. Y. (2006). Between Two Brands: A Goal Fluency Account of Brand Evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(3), 374–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lalwani, A. K., Shrum, L., & Chiu, C.-Y. (2009). Motivated response styles: The role of cultural values, regulatory focus, and self-consciousness in socially desirable responding. J Pers Soc Psychol, 96(4), 870.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landsberg, B. E. (2004). The nonprofit paradox: For-profit business models in the third sector. The International Journal of Not-for-Profit Law, 6(2), 147–160.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, A. Y., Aaker, J. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2000). The Pleasures and Pains of Distinct Self-Construals: The Role of Interdependence in Regulatory Focus. Jounal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(6), 1122–1134. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.78.6.1i22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (1998). The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. J Pers Soc Psychol, 75(1), 5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, H. F., & Shen, F. Y. (2012). Regulatory Focus and Attribute Framing Evidence of Compatibility Effects in Advertising. International Journal of Advertising, 31(1), 169–188. doi:10.2501/Ija-31-1-169-188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsey, L. L. M. (2005). Anticipated Guilt as Behavioral Motivation An Examination of Appeals to Help Unknown Others Through Bone Marrow Donation. Human Communication Research, 31(4), 453–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, K. (2008). Regulatory Focus and Reliance on Response Efficacy and Self-efficacy in Health Attitude Change. Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University.
   Google Scholar
• Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the Self: Implications for Cognition, Emotion, and Motivation. Psychological review, 98(2), 224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masnovi, J. (2013). Persuasive Strategies and Hats Off for Cancer Donations. Pepperdine Journal of Communication Research, 1(1), 3.
   Google Scholar
• Mathur, A. (1996). Older adults' motivations for gift giving to charitable organizations: An exchange theory perspective. Psychology & Marketing, 13(1), 107–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mogilner, C., Aaker, J. L., & Pennington, G. L. (2008). Time will tell: The distant appeal of promotion and imminent appeal of prevention. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(5), 670–681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molden, D. C., Lee, A. Y., & Higgins, E. T. (2008). Motivations for promotion and prevention. In J. Shah & W. Gardner (Eds.), Handbook of motivation science, New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bendapudi, Neeli, Singh, S. N., & Bendapudi, V. (1996). Enhancing Helping Behavior: An Integrative Framework for Promotion Planning. Journal of Marketing, 60(3), 33–49. doi:10.2307/1251840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, G., Schwartz, H. A., Sap, M., Kern, M. L., Weingarten, E., Eichstaedt, J. C., … & Seligman, M. E. (2017). Living in the Past, Present, and Future: Measuring Temporal Orientation With Language. Journal of personality, 85(2), 270–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennington, G. L., & Roese, N. J. (2003). Regulatory focus and temporal distance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(6), 563–576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pessemier, E. A., Bemmaor, A. C., & Hanssens, D. M. (1977). Willingness to supply human body parts: Some empirical results. Journal of Consumer Research, 4(3), 131–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pounders, K. R., Lee, S., & Mackert, M. (2015). Matching Temporal Frame, Self-View, and Message Frame Valence: Improving Persuasiveness in Health Communications. Journal of Advertising, 44(4), 388–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reilly, T. (2016). Are Social Enterprises Viable Models for Funding Nonprofits? Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance ( pp. 1–5). http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2016.1165047.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhart, A. M., Marshall, H. M., Feeley, T. H., & Tutzauer, F. (2007). The Persuasive Effects of Message Framing in Organ Donation: The Mediating Role of Psychological Reactance. Communication Monographs, 74(2), 229–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. W. (1983). Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: A revised theory of protection motivation. In J. Cacioppo, & R. E. Petty (Eds.), Social psychophysiology (pp. 153–176). New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, J., Higgins, E. T., & Friedman, R. S. (1998). Performance Incentives and Means: How Regulatory Focus Influences Goal Attainment. J Pers Soc Psychol, 74(2), 285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singelis, T. M. (1994). The Measurement of Independent and Interdependent Self-Construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(5), 580–591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, K. D., Keating, J. P., & Stotland, E. (1989). Altruism reconsidered: The effect of denying feedback on a victim's status to empathic witnesses. J Pers Soc Psychol, 57(4), 641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strathman, A., Gleicher, F., Boninger, D. S., & Edwards, C. S. (1994). The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol, 66(4), 742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waiters, B. L. (1995). Are costs beneficial for motivating individuals to volunteer? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25(9), 752–759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, K., & Peloza, J. (2009). Self-Benefit Versus Other-Benefit Marketing Appeals: Their Effectiveness in Generating Charitable Support. Jounal of Marketing, 73(4), 109–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witte, K. (1992). Putting the Fear Back into Fear Appeals: The Extended Parallel Process Model. Communications Monographs, 59(4), 329–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witte, K., & Allen, M. (2000). A Meta-Analysis of Fear Appeals: Implications for Effective Public Health Campaigns. Health Education & Behavior, 27(5), 591–615.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeithaml, V. A. (1981). How Consumer Evaluation Processes Differ Between Goods and Services. Marketing of services, 9(1), 25–32.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., & Mittal, V. (2007). The attractiveness of enriched and impoverished options: Culture, self-construal, and regulatory focus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(4), 588–598.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar