Towards Multilife Marketing: How Goods Multiple Lives Practices Create Value for Consumers

References

• ADEME (2012). Donner, acheter ou vendre d'occasion: 98% des Français l'ont testé. Retrieved from: http://cdurable.info/Donner-acheter-ou-vendre-d-occasion-Les-Francais-l-ont-teste-Filieres-et-Recyclage-Ademe.html
   Google Scholar
• Ailawadi, K. L., Neslin, S. A., & Gedenk, K. (2001). Pursuing the value-conscious consumer: Store brands versus national brand promotions. Journal of marketing, 65(1), 71–89.
   Google Scholar
• Albinsson, P. A., & Perera, B. Y. (2009). From trash and beyond: The meaning of voluntary disposition. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 8(6), 340–353.
   Google Scholar
• Andreoni, J. (1990). Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving. The Economic Journal, 100(401), 464–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appadurai, A. (Ed.) (1986). The social life of things: Commodities in cultural perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arnould, E. J., & Rose, A. S. (2016). Mutuality: Critique and substitute for Belk's “sharing. Marketing Theory, 16(1), 75–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arsel, Z., & Dobscha, S. (2011). Local acts, global impacts? Examining the pro-social, non-reciprocal nature of freecyclers. European Advances in Consumer Research, 9, 7–8.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Associated Press (2016). Second-hand economy ‘may be worth $40b’. 19 septembre 2016. Récupéré de: http://www.news.com.au/national/breaking-news/secondhand-economy-may-be-worth-40b/news-story/a884b0067b2b3f15d9a253dc3ef9d325
   Google Scholar
• Bajde, D. (2013). Consumer culture theory (re) visits actor–network theory: Flattening consumption studies. Marketing Theory, 13(2), 227–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardhi, F., & Arnould, E. J. (2005). Thrift shopping: Combining utilitarian thrift and hedonic treat benefits. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 4(4), 223–233.
   Google Scholar
• Bardhi, F., & Eckhardt, G. M. (2012). Access-based consumption: The case of car sharing. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(4), 881–898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belk, R. (2014). You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), 1595–1600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belk, R. (2010). Sharing. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(February), 715–734.
   Google Scholar
• Belk, R. W., & Coon, G. S. (1993). Gift giving as agapic love: An alternative to the exchange paradigm based on dating experiences. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(3), 393–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belk, R. W., Sherry, Jr, J. F., & Wallendorf, M. (1988). A naturalistic inquiry into buyer and seller behaviour at a swap meet. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(4), 449–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1972). Les stratégies matrimoniales dans le système de reproduction. Annales Économies Sociétés Civilisations, 27(4–5), 1105–1127.
   Google Scholar
• Brosius, N., Fernandez, K. V., & Cherrier, H. (2013). Reacquiring consumer waste: Treasure in our trash? Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 32(2), 286–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruning, S. D., & Hatfield, M. (2002). Linking organization-public relationship attitudes and satisfaction outcomes: Communication strategies to build relationships and enhance satisfaction. Journal of Promotion Management, 8(2), 3–19.
   Google Scholar
• Cervellon, M. C., Carey, L., & Harms, T. (2012). Something old, something used: Determinants of women's purchase of vintage fashion vs second-hand fashion. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 40(12), 956–974.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, A. (1980). Barter as a universal mode of exchange. L'Homme, 20(3), 33–83.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. New York: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Chu, H., & Liao, S. (2007). Exploring consumer resale behavior in C2C online auctions. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 11(3), 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Corciolani, M., & Dalli, D. (2014). Gift-giving, sharing and commodity exchange at Bookcrossing.com: New insights from a qualitative analysis. Management Decision, 52(4), 755–776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2004). Identity ambiguity and change in the wake of a corporate spin-off. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(2), 173–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darley, W. K., & Lim, J. S. (1999). Effects of store image and attitude toward secondhand stores on shopping frequency and distance traveled. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 27(8), 311–318.
   Google Scholar
• Dalli, D., & Corciolani, M. (2008). Collective forms of resistance: The transformative power of moderate communities. Evidence from the bookcrossing case. International Journal of Market Research, 50(6), 757–775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debary, O., & Gabel, P. (2010). Seconde main et deuxième vie. Objets, souvenirs et photographies. Mélanges de la Casa de Velázquez. Nouvelle série, (40-1), 123–142.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. (1989). Interpretive biography (Qualitative Research Methods series 17). London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, P. (2000). Value-based marketing. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 8(4), 299–311.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, P. (2009). Value-based marketing: Marketing strategies for corporate growth and shareholder value. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Ertz, M., & Graf, R. (2014). Spotting the elusive prospect customer: Exploratory study of a web-powered customer relationship management framework. Journal of Applied Business Research, 31(5), 1835–1850.
   Google Scholar
• Ertz, M., Durif, F., & Arcand, M. (2016a). Collaborative consumption or the rise of the two-sided consumer. International Journal of Business and Management, 4(6), 195–209.
   Google Scholar
• Ertz, M., Durif, F., & Arcand, M. (2016b). Collaborative consumption: Conceptual snapshot at a buzzword. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 19(2), 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Ertz, M., Durif, F., & Arcand, M. (2017). Life after death? Study of goods multiple lives practices. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 34(2), 108–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertz, M., Lecompte, A., & Durif, F. (2016, June). Neutralization in Collaborative Consumption: An Exploration of Justifications Relating to a Controversial Service. Communication presented at SASE's 28th Annual Conference, Berkeley, California.
   Google Scholar
• Fisk, G. (1973). Criteria for a theory of responsible consumption. The Journal of Marketing, 37(2), 24–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.
   Google Scholar
• Godbout, J. T., & Caillé, A. C. (1998). World of the gift. Montreal: McGill-Queen's-Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graeber, D. (2001). Toward an anthropological theory of value: The false coin of our own dreams. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gregson, N., Metcalfe, A., & Crewe, L. (2007). Moving things along: The conduits and practices of divestment in consumption. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 32(2), 187–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grewal, D., Monroe, K. B., & Krishnan, R. (1998). The effects of price-comparison advertising on buyers' perceptions of acquisition value, transaction value and behavioral intentions. Journal of Marketing, 62(2), 46–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruen, T. W. (2005). Marketing relationnel: Réflexions et leçons sur une décennie. Revue Française du Marketing, mai, (202), 71–82.
   Google Scholar
• Guba, E. G. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educational Technology Research and Development, 29(2), 75–91.
   Google Scholar
• Guillard, V., & Roux, D. (2014). Macromarketing issues on the sidewalk: How « Gleaners » and « Disposers » (ce)create a sustainable economy. Journal of Macromarketing, 34(3), 291–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillard, V., & Pinson, C. (2012). Comprendre et identifier les consommateurs qui ont tendance à tout garder. Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 27(3), 57–79.
   Google Scholar
• Guiot, D., & Roux, D. (2010). A second-hand shoppers' motivation scale: antecedents, consequences, and implications for retailers. Journal of Retailing, 86(4), 383–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, J. W. (1980). A proposed paradigm for consumer disposition processes. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 14(Summer), 49–67.
   Google Scholar
• Harrell, G. D., & McConocha, D. M. (1992). Personal factors related to consumer product disposal. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 26, 397–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrmann, G. M., & Soiffer, S. M. (1984). For fun and profit. Urban Life, 12(4), 397–421.
   Google Scholar
• Holbrook, M. B. (1999). Introduction to consumer value. In M. B. Holbrook (ed.), Consumer value: A framework for analysis and research. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Humphrey, C., & Hugh-Jones, S. (Eds.) (1992). Barter, exchange and value: An anthropological approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacoby, J., Berning, C. K., & Dietvorst, T. F. (1977). What about disposition? The Journal of Marketing, 41(2), 22–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Jalil, E. E., Grant, D. B., Nicholson, J. D., & Deutz, P. (2016). Reverse logistics in household recycling and waste systems: a symbiosis perspective. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 21(2), 245–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John, N. A. (2012). Sharing and Web 2.0: The emergence of a keyword. New Media & Society, 15(2), 167–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kijiji (2015). Indice Kijiji de l’Économie de Seconde Main: Rapport 2015. Retrieved March 21, 2016, from http://consommationresponsable.kijiji.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Indice-Kijiji.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kijiji (2016). Indice Kijiji de l’Économie de Seconde Main: Rapport 2016. Retrieved March 21, 2016, from http://consommationresponsable.kijiji.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Indice-Kijiji-rapport-2016.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kijiji (2017). Indice Kijiji de l’Économie de Seconde Main: Rapport 2017. Retrieved June 6, 2017 from https://www.kijiji.ca/kijijicentral/app/uploads/2016/08/2017-Index1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H.-W., Chan, H. C., & Gupta, S. (2007). Value-based adoption of mobile Internet: An empirical investigation. Decision Support Systems, 43, 111–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landman, R. (1987). Washington's yard sales: Women's work, but not for the money. City and Society, 1, 148–161.
   Google Scholar
• Lamberton, C. P., & Rose, R. L. (2012). When is ours better than mine? A framework for understanding and altering participation in commercial sharing systems. Journal of Marketing, 76(July), 109–125.
   Google Scholar
• Lastovicka, J. L., & Fernandez, K. V. (2005). Three paths to disposition: The movement of meaningful possessions to strangers. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(4), 813–823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemaitre, N., & De Barnier, V. (2015). Quand le consommateur devient commerçant : Motivations, production d'expérience et perspectives. Décisions Marketing, 78, avril-juin, 11–28.
   Google Scholar
• Lévi-Strauss, C. (1949). L'efficacité symbolique. Revue de l'Histoire des Religions, 135(1), 5–27.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1986). But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New directions for evaluation, 1986(30), 73–84.
   Google Scholar
• Mauss, M. (1923). Essai sur le don forme et raison de l'échange dans les sociétés archaïques. L'Année sociologique (1896/1897–1924/1925), 1, 30–186.
   Google Scholar
• McArthur, E. (2015). Many-to-many exchange without money: Why people share their resources. Consumption Markets & Culture, 18(3), 239–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGoldrick, P. J., & Collins, N. (2007). Multichannel retailing: Profiling the multichannel shopper. International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 17(2), 139–158.
   Google Scholar
• Mehra, A., Kumar, S., & Raju, J. S. (2013). “Showrooming” and the Competition between Store and Online Retailers. Available at SSRN, 2200420: http://www.haas.berkeley.edu/groups/marketing/sics/pdf_2013/mkr.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2003). Analyse des données qualitatives. Bruxelles: De Boeck Supérieur.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Moeller, S., & Wittkowski, K. (2010). The burdens of ownership: Reasons for preferring renting. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 20(2), 176–191.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, S. L., & Liao, S. (2013). Consumers as resellers: exploring the entrepreneurial mind of North American consumers reselling online. International Journal of Business & Information, 8(2), 183–228.
   Google Scholar
• Novel, A.-S. (2013). La vie share : Mode d'emploi. Paris: Alternatives.
   Google Scholar
• Overman, S. S. (2016). Conscience economy: How a mass movement for good is great for business. New York: Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Ozanne, L. K., & Ballantine, P. W. (2010). Sharing as a form of anti-consumption? An examination of toy library users. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 9(6), 485–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paden, N., & Stell, R. (2005). Consumer product redistribution: disposition decisions and channel options. Journal of Marketing Channels, 12(3), 105–123.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods, (3rd). Edition. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Philip, H. E., Ozanne, L. K., & Ballantine, P. W. (2015). Examining temporary disposition and acquisition in peer-to-peer renting. Journal of Marketing Management, 31(11–12), 1310–1332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, L. L., Arnould, E. J., & Curasi, C. F. (2000). Older consumers' disposition of special possessions. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(2), 179–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razzouk, N. Y., & Gourley, D. (1982). Swap meets: A profile of shoppers. Arizona Business, 29, 8–12.
   Google Scholar
• Razzouk, N. Y., & Voight, C. W. (1985). Swap meet retailing: A profile of the heavy, medium, and light shoppers. Présenté lors de la conférence de l'Academy of Marketing Sciences, Miami Beach, Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Roux, D., & Korchia, M. (2006). Am I what I wear? An exploratory study of symbolic meanings associated with secondhand clothing. Advances in Consumer Research, 33, 29–35.
   Google Scholar
• Scaraboto, D. (2015). Selling, sharing, and everything in between: The hybrid economies of collaborative networks. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(1), 152–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schibsted (2015). Leboncoin: Secondhandeffect. Récupéré de: https://secondhandeffect.leboncoin.fr/resultat-leboncoin-france/le-rapport-complet/
   Google Scholar
• Sheth, J. N., Newman, B. I., & Gros, B. L. (1991). Consumption values and market choices: Theory and applications. Cincinnati: Southwestern Publishing inc.
   Google Scholar
• Sobo, E. J. (1994). The sweetness of fat: Health, procreation and sociability in rural Jamaica. In Nicole Soult (Ed.), Many Mirrors: Body Image and Social Relations New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 132–154.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, J., Horne, S., & Hibbert, S. (1996). Car boot sales: a study of shopping motives in an alternative retail format. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 24, 4–15.
   Google Scholar
• Thaler, R. (1985). Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Science 4(3), 199–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Damme, I., & Vermoesen, R. (2009). Second-hand consumption as a way of life: Public auctions in the surroundings of Alost in the late eighteenth century. Continuity and Change, 24, 275–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Walle, I., Hébel, P., & Siounandan, N. (2012). Les Secondes Vies des Objets : Les Pratiques d'Acquisition et de Délaissement des Produits de Consommation. CRÉDOC, Cahier de Recherche n°290, C290, 1–87.
   Google Scholar
• Weinberger, M. F., & Wallendorf, M. (2012). Intracommunity gifting at the intersection of contemporary moral and market economies. Journal of Consumer Research, 39 (June), 74–92.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, C. C., & Paddock, C. (2003). The meanings of informal and second-hand retail channels: some evidence from Leicester. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 13(3), 317–336.
   Google Scholar
• Woodruff, R. B. (1997). Customer value: The next source for competitive edge. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(2), 139–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yavas, U., & Riecken, G. (1981). Heavy, medium, light shoppers and nonshoppers of a used merchandise outlet. Journal of Business Research, 9(3), 243–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Zeithaml, V. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality and value: A means-end and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar