Student Perceptions of an Online Model for Library Orientation in Agriculture and Related Disciplines

References

• Anderson, L., & Krathwohl, D. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives (Abridged ed.) (Eds.). New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, A. (2014). Students' preferences regarding four characteristics of information literacy screencasts. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 8(1–2), 67–80. doi:10.1080/1533290X.2014.916247.
   Google Scholar
• California Polytechnic State University. (2016). Cal Poly fact book—Fall 2016. Retrieved from https://ir.calpoly.edu/content/publications_reports/factbook/index
   Google Scholar
• California State University. (n.d.). Overview. Retrieved from https://www2.calstate.edu/csu-system/about-the-csu/facts-about-the-csu/Pages/introduction.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Cannady, R. E. (2015). Under the microscope: Looking at libraries and online orientations. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 9(4), 289–303. doi:10.1080/1533290X.2015.1095266.
   Google Scholar
• Dewald, N. H. (1999). Transporting good library instruction practices into the web environment: An analysis of online tutorials. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 25(1), 26–31. doi:10.1016/S0099-1333(99)80172-4.
   Google Scholar
• Farkas, M. (2009). Your desktop: The movie. American Libraries, 40(11), 33.
   Google Scholar
• Gall, D. (2014). Facing off: Comparing an in-person library orientation lecture with an asynchronous online library orientation. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 8(3–4), 275–287. doi:10.1080/1533290X.2014.945873.
   Google Scholar
• Georgas, H. (2014). The implementation of an independent and self-paced online library orientation for freshman students and the use of Sakai as a quiz management system (QMS). College & Undergraduate Libraries, 21(1), 56–75. doi:10.1080/10691316.2014.877737.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzales, B. M. (2014). Online tutorials and effective information literacy instruction for distance learners. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 8(1–2), 45–55. doi:10.1080/1533290X.2014.898011.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, M., & Latham, D. (2009). Undergraduate perceptions of information literacy. College and Research Libraries, 70(4), 336–350. doi:10.5860/0700336.
   Google Scholar
• Gunn, C., Hearne, S., & Sibthorpe, J. (2011). Right from the start: A rationale for embedding academic literacy skills in university courses. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 8(1), 6.
   Google Scholar
• Hahn, E. (2012). Video lectures help enhance online information literacy course. Reference Services Review, 40(1), 49–60. doi:10.1108/00907321211203621.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, A. N. (2013). The MAGIC of web tutorials: How one library (re) focused its delivery of online learning objects on users. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 7(4), 331–348. doi:10.1080/1533290X.2013.839978.
   Google Scholar
• Ingalls, D. (2015). Virtual tours, videos, and zombies: The changing face of academic library orientation/visites virtuelles, vidéos et zombies: Le nouveau visage de l'initiation à la bibliothèque universitaire. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 39(1), 79–90. doi:10.1353/ils.2015.0003.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, N. (2010). Is an online learning module an effective way to develop information literacy skills? Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 41(3), 207–218. doi:10.1080/00048623.2010.10721464.
   Google Scholar
• Madhusudhan, M., & Singh, P. (2010). A multimedia-based library orientation programme at Dyal Singh College Library, New Delhi. Library Review, 59(6), 430–444. doi:10.1108/00242531011053940.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, N. A., & Martin, R. (2015). Would you watch it? Creating effective and engaging video tutorials. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 9(1–2), 40–56. doi:10.1080/1533290X.2014.946345.
   Google Scholar
• Oehrli, J. A., Piacentine, J., Peters, A., & Nanamaker, B. (2011, March). Do screencasts really work? Assessing student learning through instructional screencasts. Paper presented at the Association of College and Research Libraries Conference, Philadelphia, PA. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/acrl/conferences/confsandpreconfs/national/acrl2011papers
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, J. C., & Atwood, T. A. (2010). Transferring skills, transferring students: A call to academic libraries. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 17(4), 331–348. doi:10.1080/10691316.2010.525394.
   Google Scholar
• Rempel, H. G., & Slebodnik, M. (2015). Creating online tutorials: A practical guide for librarians. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Sachs, D. E., Langan, K. A., Leatherman, C. C., & Walters, J. L. (2013). Assessing the effectiveness of online information literacy tutorials for millennial undergraduates. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 20(3–4), 327–351. doi:10.1080/10691316.2013.829365.
   Google Scholar
• Silver, S. L., & Nickel, L. T. (2005). Are online tutorials effective? A comparison of online and classroom library instruction methods. Research Strategies, 20(4), 389–396. doi:10.1016/j.resstr.2006.12.012.
   Google Scholar
• Tong, M., & Moran, C. (2017). Are transfer students lagging behind in information literacy? Reference Services Review, 45(2), 286–297. doi:10.1108/RSR-10-2016-0064.
   Google Scholar
• Weiner, S. A., Pelaez, N., Chang, K., & Weiner, J. M. (2011). Biology and nursing students' perceptions of a web-based information literacy tutorial. Communications in Information Literacy, 5(2), 187–201.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Q., Goodman, M., & Xie, S. (2015). Integrating library instruction into the course management system for a first-source engineering class: An evidence-based study measuring the effectiveness of blended learning on students' information literacy levels. College & Research Libraries, 76(7), 934–958. doi:10.5860/crl.76.7.934.
   Google Scholar