Mapping of Marine Rest Raw Material in the Norwegian Seafood Industry: A Decade of Results

References

• Aas TS, Åsgård T, Ytrestøyl T. 2022. Utilization of feed resources in the production of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) in Norway: an update for 2020. Aquac Rep. 26:101316. doi:10.1016/j.aqrep.2022.101316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahern M, Thilsted SH, Oenema S. 2021. The role of aquatic foods in sustainable healthy diets [Internet]. Rome: UN Nutrition [accessed 2022 Sep 9]. https://www.unnutrition.org/wp-content/uploads/FINAL-UN-Nutrition-Aquatic-foods-Paper_EN_.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Al Khawli F, Pateiro M, Domínguez R, Lorenzo JM, Gullón P, Kousoulaki K, Ferrer E, Berrada H, Barba FJ. 2019. Innovative green technologies of intensification for valorization of seafood and their by-products. Mar Drugs. 17(12):689. doi:10.3390/md17120689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Åm H. 2021. A critical policy study on why introducing resource rent taxation in norwegian salmon aquaculture failed. Mar Policy. 131:104692. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arason S, Ásgeirsson E, Margeirsson B, Margeirsson S, Olsen P, Stefansson H. 2010. Decision support systems for the food industry. Intell Syst Ref Libr. 4:295–315. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-13639-9_12.
   Google Scholar
• Aspevik T, Thoresen L, Steinsholm S, Carlehög M, Kousoulaki K. 2021. Sensory and chemical properties of protein hydrolysates based on mackerel (scomber scombrus) and salmon (salmo salar) side stream materials. J Aquat Food Prod T. 30(2):176–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldursson J, Einarsson MI, Myhre MS, Viðarsson JR. 2021. Supply chain process mapping for the SUPREME project [Internet]. [place unknown]: Matís. https://zenodo.org/record/4498002.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett LT, Oldham T, Kristiansen TS, Oppedal F, Stien LH. 2022. Declining size-at-harvest in norwegian salmon aquaculture: lice, disease, and the role of stunboats. Aquaculture. 559:738440. doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2022.738440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costello C, Cao L, Gelcich S, Cisneros-Mata MÁ, Free CM, Froehlich HE, Golden CD, Ishimura G, Maier J, Macadam-Somer I, et al. 2020. The future of food from the sea. Nature. 588(7836):95–100. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2616-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cristiano S, Baarset H, Bruckner C, Johansen J, Pastres R. 2022. Innovative options for the reuse and valorisation of aquaculture sludge and fish mortalities: sustainability evaluation through life-cycle assessment. J Clean Prod. 352:131613. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis CL, Harwood JL, Dent CM, Caterson B. 2004. Biological basis for the benefit of nutraceutical supplementation in arthritis. Drug Discov Today. 9(4):165–72. doi:10.1016/S1359-6446(03)02980-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Digre H, Bar EMS, Mathiassen JR, Standal D, Grimsmo L, Henriksen K, Romsdal A, Asche F. 2014. Lønnsom foredling av sjømat i Norge [Internet]. [place unknown]. https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/00b7a7a3ebc141fdb9d62fbdf2ca9ea6/rapport_sintef_nou.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Elvevoll EO, James D. 2001. The emerging importance of dietary lipids, quantity and quality, in the global disease burden: the potential of aquatic resources. Nutr Health. 15(3–4):155–67. doi:10.1177/026010600101500403.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• EUMOFA. 2022. Monthly Iceland, Norway and United Kingdom. European market observatory for fisheries and aquaculture products [Internet]. [accessed 2022 Sep 13]. https://www.eumofa.eu/en/norway-and-iceland.
   Google Scholar
• EUMOFA. 2022a. Monthly European union. European market observatory for fisheries and aquaculture products [Internet]. [accessed 2022 Sep 15]. https://www.eumofa.eu/en/ad-hoc-queries1.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. 2009. Animal by-products regulation [Internet]. [accessed 2022 Aug 15]. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32009R1069&from=EN.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. 2010. EUROPE 2020 a European strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth [Internet]. [accessed 2022 Sep 15]. https://ec.europa.eu/eu2020/pdf/COMPLET%20EN%20BARROSO%20%20%20007%20-%20Europe%202020%20-%20EN%20version.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. 2011. A resource-efficient Europe - flagship initiative under the Europe 2020 strategy [Internet]. [accessed 2022 Sep 15]. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2011:0021:FIN:EN:PDF.
   Google Scholar
• FAO. 2022. The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2022 [Internet]. Rome: FAO [accessed 2022 Aug 21]. https://doi.org/10.4060/cc0461en.
   Google Scholar
• García-Vaquero M. 2018. Seaweed proteins and applications in animal feed. In: Hayes M, editor. Novel proteins for food, pharmaceuticals and agriculture Internet. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. p. 139–61. [accessed 2022 Sep 14]. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119385332.ch7.
   Google Scholar
• Garlock T, Asche F, Anderson J, Bjørndal T, Kumar G, Lorenzen K, Ropicki A, Smith MD, Tveterås R. 2020. A global blue revolution: Aquaculture growth across regions, species, and countries. Rev Fish Sci Aquac. 28(1):107–16. doi:10.1080/23308249.2019.1678111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimsmo L, Carvajal AK, Misimi E, Slizyte R, Thakur M, Toldnes B, Wolff R. 2015. Mulighetene for foredling og produkter fra restråstoff fra hvitfisk. [place unknown]: SINTEF Fiskeri og havbruk AS.
   Google Scholar
• Havfisk L. 2021. About us. About us [Internet]. [accessed 2022 Sep 13]. https://www.havfisk.no/en/about.
   Google Scholar
• Henriksen BIF, Møller SH, Malmkvist J. 2022. Animal welfare measured at mink farms in Europe. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 248:105587. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2022.105587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilborn R, Banobi J, Hall SJ, Pucylowski T, Walsworth TE. 2018. The environmental cost of animal source foods. Front Ecol Environ. 16(6):329–35. doi:10.1002/fee.1822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilmarsdottir GS, Ogmundarson Ó, Arason S, Gudjónsdóttir M. 2021. Efficiency of fishmeal and fish oil processing of different pelagic fish species: identification of processing steps for potential optimization toward protein production for human consumption. J Food Process Preserv [Internet]. 45(4). [accessed 2022 Jun 28]. doi:10.1111/jfpp.15294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilmarsen Ø, Hagemann A, Chauton MS, Evjemo JO, Hovland J, Brendeløkken HW, Høyli R, Goddek S, Lilleng G. 2020. Kunnskaps- og erfaringskartlegging om effekter av og muligheter for utnyttelse næringsstoffer fra oppdrett [Internet]. Tromsø: SINTEF Nord [accessed 2022 Aug 16]. https://www.fhf.no/prosjekter/prosjektbasen/901572/.
   Google Scholar
• Hjellnes V, Rustad T, Falch E. 2020. The value chain of the white fish industry in Norway: history, current status and possibilities for improvement – a review. Reg Stud Mar Sci. 36:101293. doi:10.1016/j.rsma.2020.101293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjellnes V, Rustad T, Jensen I-J, Eiken E, Pettersen SM, Falch E. 2021. Ultrafiltration of saithe (pollachius virens) protein hydrolysates and its effect on antioxidative activity. Catalysts. 11(9):1053. doi:10.3390/catal11091053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hox JJ, Boeije HR. 2005. Data collection, primary versus secondary. In: Kempf-Leonard K, editor. Encyclopedia of social measurement. Vol. 1. Oxford: Elsevier academic press. p. 593–99. doi:10.1016/B0-12-369398-5/00041-4.
   Google Scholar
• Hua K, Cobcroft JM, Cole A, Condon K, Jerry DR, Mangott A, Praeger C, Vucko MJ, Zeng C, Zenger K, et al. 2019. The future of aquatic protein: implications for protein sources in aquaculture diets. One Earth. 1(3):316–29. doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2019.10.018.
   Google Scholar
• ICES. 2020. WGIBAR 2020 annex 4 [Internet]. [accessed 2022 Sep 21]. https://doi.org/10.17895/ICES.PUB.8262.
   Google Scholar
• Idowu AT, Benjakul S. 2019. Bitterness of fish protein hydrolysate and its debittering prospects. J Food Biochem. 43(9):e12978.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IFFO. 2020. What are marine ingredients? [Internet]. [accessed 2022 Sep 14]. www.iffo.com/what-are-marine-ingredients.
   Google Scholar
• Jeyaprakashsabari S, Aanand S. 2022. Shrimp waste - a valuable protein source for aqua feed [Internet]. [accessed 2022 Sep 15]. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.27039.43684.
   Google Scholar
• Johansen U, Myhre MS, Young E, Richardsen R. 2021. Nasjonal betydning av sjømatnæringen - i et år der pandemien fikk betydning. [place unknown]: SINTEF Ocean AS.
   Google Scholar
• Jouvenot L. 2015. Utilisation of rest raw materials from the fish industry: business opportunities and logistics requirements [Internet]. [place unknown]: Norwegian University of Science and Technology. https://ntnuopen.ntnu.no/ntnu-xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/2351183/13467_FULLTEXT.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
   Google Scholar
• Knapp G, Rubino MC. 2016. The Political economics of marine aquaculture in the United States. Rev Fish Sci Aquac. 24(3):213–29. doi:10.1080/23308249.2015.1121202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knútsson Ö, Kristófersson DM, Gestsson H. 2016. The effects of fisheries management on the Icelandic demersal fish value chain. Mar Policy. 63:172–79. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2015.03.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landazuri-Tveteraas U, Oglend A, Steen M, Straume H-M. 2021. Salmon trout, the forgotten cousin? Aquac Econ Manag. 25(2):159–76. doi:10.1080/13657305.2020.1857469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen HD, Fonager J, Lomholt FK, Dalby T, Benedetti G, Kristensen B, Urth TR, Rasmussen M, Lassaunière R, Rasmussen TB, et al. 2021. Preliminary report of an outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 in mink and mink farmers associated with community spread, Denmark, June to November 2020. Eurosurveillance [Internet]. 26(5). [accessed 2022 Jun 28]. doi:10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.5.210009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Dave D. 2022. Beyond processing waste: extraction of oil from Atlantic salmon (salmo salar) by-products using immobilized alcalase on chitosan-coated magnetic nanoparticles. Aquaculture. 548:737546. doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.737546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liverpool‐Tasie LSO, Sanou A, Reardon T, Belton B. 2021. Demand for imported versus domestic fish in Nigeria. J Agric Econ. 72(3):782–804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovdata. 2016. Forskrift om animalske biprodukter som ikke er beregnet på konsum (animaliebiproduktforskriften). Lovdata.no [Internet]. [accessed 2022 Sep 9]. https://lovdata.no/dokument/SF/forskrift/2016-09-14-1064/*#*.
   Google Scholar
• Lyng K-A, Skovsgaard L, Jacobsen HK, Hanssen OJ. 2020. The implications of economic instruments on biogas value chains: A case study comparison between Norway and Denmark. Environ Dev Sustain. 22(8):7125–52. doi:10.1007/s10668-019-00463-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Industry and Fisheries. 2019. Blå muligheter - Regjeringens oppdaterte havstrategi [Internet]. [accessed 2022 Sep 15]. https://www.forskningsradet.no/siteassets/publikasjoner/2019/nfd_havstrategi_2019_norsk_uu.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Misund B, Oglend A, Pincinato RBM. 2017. The rise of fish oil: from feed to human nutritional supplement. Aquac Econ Manag. 21(2):185–210. doi:10.1080/13657305.2017.1284942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myhre MS, Richardsen R, Nystøyl R, Strandheim G. 2020. Analyse marint restråstoff 2019 - Analyse av tilgang og anvendelse for marint restråstoff i Norge [Analyis of marine rest raw material 2019 - Analysis of availability and application of marine rest raw material in Norway]. Norway: SINTEF Ocean AS.
   Google Scholar
• Myhre MS, Richardsen R, Nystøyl R, Strandheim G. 2021. Analyse marint restråstoff 2020 - Analyse av tilgang og anvendelse for marint restråstoff i Norge [Analysis of marine rest raw material 2020 - Analysis of availability and application of marine rest raw material in Norway]. Norway: SINTEF Ocean AS.
   Google Scholar
• Myhre MS, Richardsen R, Nystøyl R, Strandheim G. 2022. Analyse marint restråstoff 2021 - Analyse av tilgang og anvendelse for marint restråstoff i Norge [Analysis of marine rest raw material 2021 - Analysis of availability and application of marine rest raw material in Norway]. Norway: SINTEF Ocean AS.
   Google Scholar
• Nordtvedt TS, Austnes A, Wolff R, Hilmarsen Ø, Raspati G, Netzer R, Loncarevic S. 2015. Rensing av prosessvann i lakseslakterier. Leveranse 4.1: Faglig sluttrapport. Trondheim: SINTEF Ocean AS.
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Directorate of Fisheries. 2022. Rundvekt (tonn) fordelt på art. Fangst fordelt på art [Internet]. [accessed 2022 Sep 13]. https://www.fiskeridir.no/Yrkesfiske/Tall-og-analyse/Fangst-og-kvoter/Fangst/Fangst-fordelt-paa-art.
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Directorate of Fisheries. 2022a. A.06.002 Matfisk. Salg av laks, regnbueørret og ørret, etter art (Fylke) (1994-2021) [Internet]. [accessed 2022 Sep 13]. https://www.fiskeridir.no/Tall-og-analyse/Statistikkbanken.
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Directorate of Fisheries. 2022b. Datafiler 2021. Åpne data: fangstdata (seddel) koblet med fartøydata [Internet]. [accessed 2022 Sep 13]. https://www.fiskeridir.no/Tall-og-analyse/AApne-data/Fangstdata-seddel-koblet-med-fartoeydata.
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Seafood Council. 2022a. Pelagic: Monthly statistics. Market insight [Internet]. [accessed 2022 Sep 13]. https://en.seafood.no/market-insight/.
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Seafood Council. 2022c. White fish: Monthly statistics. Market insight [Internet]. [accessed 2022 Sep 13]. https://en.seafood.no/market-insight/.
   Google Scholar
• Olafsdottir G, Mehta S, Richardsen R, Cook, David D, Gudbrandsdottir I, Thakur M, Lane A, Bogason S. 2019. Governance of the farmed salmon value chain from Norway to EU [Internet]. [accessed 2022 Sep 15]. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.5494436.
   Google Scholar
• Olafsen T, Richardsen R, Nystøyl R, Strandheim G, Kosmo JP. 2013. Analyse marint restråstoff 2012 - Analyse av tilgang og anvendelse for marint restråstoff i Norge [Analysis of marine rest raw material 2012 - Analysis of availability and application of marine rest raw material in Norway]. Norway: SINTEF Fiskeri og havbruk AS.
   Google Scholar
• Olafsen T, Richardsen R, Nystøyl R, Strandheim G, Kosmo JP. 2014. Analyse marint restråstoff 2013 - Analyse av tilgang og anvendelse for marint restråstoff i Norge [Analysis of marine rest raw material 2013 - Analysis of availability and application of marine rest raw material in Norway]. Norway: SINTEF Fiskeri og havbruk AS.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen RL, Toppe J. 2017. Fish silage hydrolysates: not only a feed nutrient, but also a useful feed additive. Trends Food Sci Technol. 66:93–97. doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2017.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen RL, Toppe J, Karunasagar I. 2014. Challenges and realistic opportunities in the use of by-products from processing of fish and shellfish. Trends Food Sci Technol. 36(2):144–51. doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2014.01.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overton K, Dempster T, Oppedal F, Kristiansen TS, Gismervik K, Stien LH. 2019. Salmon lice treatments and salmon mortality in Norwegian aquaculture: A review. Rev Aquacult. 11(4):1398–417. doi:10.1111/raq.12299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozogul F, Cagalj M, Šimat V, Ozogul Y, Tkaczewska J, Hassoun A, Kaddour AA, Kuley E, Rathod NB, Phadke GG. 2021. Recent developments in valorisation of bioactive ingredients in discard/seafood processing by-products. Trends Food Sci Technol. 116:559–82. doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2021.08.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker R. 2018. Implications of high animal by-product feed inputs in life cycle assessments of farmed Atlantic salmon. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 23(5):982–94. doi:10.1007/s11367-017-1340-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pleym IE, Svorken M, Vang B. 2019. Verdifulle rester - muligheter for norsk marint restråstoff. Tromsø: Nofima AS.
   Google Scholar
• Puvanendran V, Mortensen A, Johansen L, Kettunen A, Hansen ØJ, Henriksen E, Heide M. 2022. Development of cod farming in Norway: past and current biological and market status and future prospects and directions. Rev Aquacult. 14(1):308–42. doi:10.1111/raq.12599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quang Tran H, Van Doan H, Stejskal V. 2022. Environmental consequences of using insect meal as an ingredient in aquafeeds: a systematic view. Rev Aquacult. 14(1):237–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remme JF, Tveit GM, Bondø M, Slizyte R, Ólafsdóttir A, Jónsdóttir R, Geirsdóttir M, Carvajal AK. 2022. Valorisation of frozen cod (Gadus morhua) heads, captured by trawl and longline by the oceanic fleet, by enzymatic hydrolysis. J Aquat Food Prod T. 31(5):483–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remme JF, Tveit GM, Toldnes B, Slizyte R, Carvajal AK. 2022. Production of protein hydrolysates from cod (Gadus morhua) heads: lab and pilot scale studies. J Aquat Food Prod T. 31(2):114–27. doi:10.1080/10498850.2021.2021341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Research Council of Norway. 2019. Sustainable production of ingredients from whitefish rest raw materials. Project bank [Internet]. [accessed 2022 Sep 15]. https://prosjektbanken.forskningsradet.no/en/project/FORISS/294539?Kilde=FORISS&distribution=Ar&chart=bar&calcType=funding&Sprak=no&sortBy=date&sortOrder=desc&resultCount=30&offset=0&TemaEmne.2=Annen+havbruksrelevant+forskning.
   Google Scholar
• Richardsen R, Myhre MS, Nystøyl R, Strandheim G, Marthinussen A. 2018. Analyse marint restråstoff 2017 - Analyse av tilgang og anvendelse for marint restråstoff i Norge [Analysis of marine rest raw material 2017 - Analysis of availability and application of marine rest raw material in Norway]. Norway: SINTEF Ocean AS.
   Google Scholar
• Richardsen R, Myhre MS, Nystøyl R, Strandheim G, Marthinussen A. 2019. Analyse marint restråstoff 2018 - Analyse av tilgang og anvendelse for marint restråstoff i Norge [Analysis of marine rest raw material 2018 - Analysis of availability and application of marine rest raw material in Norway]. Norway: SINTEF Ocean AS.
   Google Scholar
• Richardsen R, Nystøyl R, Strandheim G, Marthinussen A. 2016. Analyse marint restråstoff 2015 - Analyse av tilgang og anvendelse for marint restråstoff i Norge [Analysis of marine rest raw material 2015 - Analysis of availability and application of marine rest raw material in Norway]. Norway: SINTEF Fiskeri og havbruk AS.
   Google Scholar
• Richardsen R, Nystøyl R, Strandheim G, Marthinussen A. 2017. Analyse marint restråstoff 2016 - Analyse av tilgang og anvendelse for marint restråstoff i Norge [Analysis of marine rest raw material 2016 - Analysis of availability and application of marine rest raw material in Norway]. Norway: SINTEF Ocean AS.
   Google Scholar
• Richardsen R, Nystøyl R, Strandheim G, Viken A. 2015. Analyse marint restråstoff 2014 - Analyse av tilgang og anvendelse for marint restråstoff i Norge [Analysis of marine rest raw material 2014 - Analysis of availability and application of marine rest raw material in Norway]. Norway: SINTEF Fiskeri og havbruk AS.
   Google Scholar
• RUBIN. 2012. Historikk. RUBIN [Internet]. [accessed 2022 Sep 13]. https://www.rubin.no/index.php/no/om-rubin/historikk.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Salmón I, Margallo M, Laso J, Villanueva-Rey P, Mariño D, Quinteiro P, Dias AC, Nunes ML, Marques A, Feijoo G, et al. 2020. Addressing challenges and opportunities of the European seafood sector under a circular economy framework. Curr Opin Environ Sci Health. 13:101–06. doi:10.1016/j.coesh.2020.01.004.
   Google Scholar
• Rustad T. 2002. Utilization of marine by-product. Electron J Environ Agric Food Chem [Internet]. 2. [accessed 2022 Aug 12]. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228773956_Utilization_of_marine_by-product.
   Google Scholar
• Rustad T, Storrø I, Slizyte R. 2011. Possibilities for the utilisation of marine by-products. Int J Food Sci Tech. 46(10):2001–14. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2621.2011.02736.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarker S. 2020. By-products of fish-oil refinery as potential substrates for biogas production in Norway: A preliminary study. Results Eng. 6:100137. doi:10.1016/j.rineng.2020.100137.
   Google Scholar
• Shahidi F, Varatharajan V, Peng H, Senadheera R. 2019. Utilization of marine by-products for the recovery of value-added products. JFB [Internet]. 6. [accessed 2022 Jun 28]. doi:10.31665/JFB.2019.6184.
   Google Scholar
• Sikveland M, Tveterås R, Zhang D. 2021. Profitability differences between public and private firms: the case of Norwegian salmon aquaculture. Aquac Econ Manag. 1–25. doi:10.1080/13657305.2021.1970856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sogn-Grundvåg G, Zhang D, Henriksen E, Joensen S, Bendiksen B-I, Hermansen Ø. 2022. Fishing tactics and fish quality: the case of the coastal fishery for Atlantic cod in Norway. Fish Res. 246:106167. doi:10.1016/j.fishres.2021.106167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Standal D, Aarset B. 2008. The IVQ regime in Norway: a stable alternative to an ITQ regime? Mar Policy. 32(4):663–68. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2007.11.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens JR, Newton RW, Tlusty M, Little DC. 2018. The rise of aquaculture by-products: increasing food production, value, and sustainability through strategic utilisation. Mar Policy. 90:115–24. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2017.12.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strøm-Andersen N. 2020. Innovation and by-product valorization: a comparative analysis of the absorptive capacity of food processing firms. J Clean Prod. 253:119943. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119943.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subhan F, Hussain Z, Tauseef I, Shehzad A, Wahid F. 2021. A review on recent advances and applications of fish collagen. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 61(6):1027–37. doi:10.1080/10408398.2020.1751585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toppe J, Olsen RL, Peñarubia OR, James DG. 2018. Production and utilization of fish silage [Internet]. [accessed 2022 Jul 18]. https://www.fao.org/3/I9606EN/i9606en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Tveit GM, Carvajal AC, Slizyte R, Meldstad F, Nordtvedt TS, Remme J, Rustad T. 2020. Atlantic mackerel (Scomber scombrus) change skin colour in response to crowding stress [Internet]. J Fish Biol. 100(3):738–47. [accessed 2022 Sep 20]. doi:10.18462/IIR.ICCC.2020.284549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tveiterås K, Sperre I-M, Arhaug J, Pedersen M, Jensen N, Gregussen O, Rist S, Nergaard Ø. 2022. Grønn verdiskaping og økt bearbeiding i sjømatindustrien [Internet]. Oslo [accessed 2022 Aug 16]. https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/08e213d8875a40e6b16edde0b2b2b963/no/pdfs/w-0041-b-gronn-verdiskaping.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2022. Goal 12 - ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns. Department of Economic and Social Affairs [Internet]. [accessed 2022 Sep 15]. https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal12.
   Google Scholar
• Välimaa A-L, Mäkinen S, Mattila P, Marnila P, Pihlanto A, Mäki M, Hiidenhovi J. 2019. Fish and fish side streams are valuable sources of high-value components. Food Quality and Safety. 3(4):209–26. doi:10.1093/fqsafe/fyz024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vang B, Lian K. 2021. Utfordringer som hindrer økt utnyttelse av marint restråstoff og marine arter [Internet]. Tromsø: Nofima [accessed 2022 Aug 17]. https://nofima.brage.unit.no/nofima-xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/2775078/Rapport%2b29-2021%2bUtfordringer%2bsom%2bhindrer%2b%25C3%25B8kt%2butnyttelse%2bav%2bmarint%2brestr%25C3%25A5stoff%2bog%2bmarine%2barter.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
   Google Scholar
• Vang B, Reinholdtsen A, Whitaker RW. 2020. Prototype produksjon og markedstesting av proteinpulver fra torsk (Go BIG) [Internet]. Tromsø: Nofima [accessed 2022 Sep 13]. https://nofima.no/publikasjon/1802486/.
   Google Scholar
• Verhagen A, Ruben R. 2019. Towards sustainable global food systems: conceptual and policy analysis of agriculture. Food and Environment Linkages [Internet]. [place unknown]. [accessed 2022 Jun 28]. https://torl.biblioboard.com/content/68b4327f-d446-435a-b442-6910437b2328?organizationId=1f7368e7-f10b-49a1-8ced-2d9476279974.
   Google Scholar
• Vildmyren I, Cao H, Haug L, Valand I, Eng Ø, Oterhals Å, Austgulen M, Halstensen A, Mellgren G, Gudbrandsen O. 2018. Daily intake of protein from cod residual material lowers serum concentrations of nonesterified fatty acids in overweight healthy adults: a randomized double-blind pilot study. Marine Drugs. 16(6):197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windsor ML. 2001. Fish meal (49) [Internet]. [accessed 2022 Aug 7]. https://www.fao.org/3/x5926e/x5926e00.htm#Contents.
   Google Scholar