The therapeutic relationship in action: How therapists and clients co-manage relational disaffiliation

References

• Angus, L. (2012). Toward an integrative understanding of narrative and emotion processes in Emotion-focused therapy of depression: Implications for theory, research and practice. Psychotherapy Research, 22, 367–380. doi:10.1080/10503307.2012.683988
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angus, L., Lewin, J., Bouffard, B., & Rotondi-Trevisan, D. (2004). “What's the story?” Working with narrative in experiential psychotherapy. In L. Angus & J. McLeod (Eds.), The handbook of narrative psychotherapy: Practice, theory, and research (pp. 87–102). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Antaki, C. (2008). Formulations in psychotherapy. In A. Peräkylä, C. Antaki, S. Vehviläinen & I. Leudar (Eds.), Conversation analysis and psychotherapy (pp. 26–42). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, J. M., & Drew, P. (1979). Order in court. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, J. M., & Heritage, J. (Eds.) (1984). Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bänninger-Huber, E. (1992). Prototypical affective microsequences in psychotherapeutic interactions. Psychotherapy Research, 2(4), 291–306. doi:10.1080/10503309212331333044
   Google Scholar
• Bercelli, F., Rossano, F., & Viaro, M. (2008). Clients' responses to therapists' reinterpretations. In A. Peräkylä, C. Antaki, S. Vehviläinen & I. Leudar (Eds.), Conversation analysis and psychotherapy (pp. 43–61). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bohart, A. C., Elliott, R., Greenberg, L. S., Watson, J. C., & Norcross, J. C. (2002). Empathy. In J. Norcross (Ed.), Psychotherapy relationships that work (pp. 89–108). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bordin, E. S. (1989, June). Building therapeutic alliances: The base for integration. Paper presented at the Society for Psychotherapy Research Conference. Berkley, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Bordin, E. S. (1994). Theory and research on the therapeutic working alliance: New directions. In A. O. Horvath & L. S. Greenberg (Eds.), The working alliance: Theory, research, and practice. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Boritz, T., Angus, L., Monette, G., Hollis-Walker, L., & Warwar, S. (2011). Narrative and emotion integration in psychotherapy: Investigating the relationship between autobiographical memory specificity and expressed emotional arousal in brief emotion-focused and client-centred treatments of depression. Psychotherapy Research, 21, 16–26. doi:10.1080/10503307.2010.504240
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Enfield, N. J. (2006). Social consequences of common ground. In N. J. Enfield & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition and interaction (pp. 399–430). Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Elvins, R., & Green, J. (2008). The conceptualization and measurement of therapeutic alliance: An empirical review. Clinical Psychology Review, 28(7), 1167–1187. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2008.04.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1994). The dynamics of transference Essential papers on transference analysis (pp. 5–17). Lanham, MD: Jason Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. Garden City: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Gonçalves, M. M., & Ribeiro, A. P. (2012). Narrative processes of innovation and stability within the dialogical self. In H. J. M. Hermans, & T. Gieser (Eds.), Handbook of dialogical self (pp. 301–318). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, L. (2002). Emotion-focused therapy: Coaching clients to work through feelings. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, L. S., Rice, L. N., & Elliot, R. (1993). Facilitating emotional change: The moment-by-moment process. New York, NY: Guildford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, L. S., & Watson, J. (1998). Experiential therapy of depression: differential effects of client-centered relationship conditions and process-experiential interventions. Psychotherapy Research, 8, 210–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., & Watson, D. (1979). Formulations as conversational objects. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 123–163). New York, NY: Irvington.
   Google Scholar
• Horvath, A. O. (2007). The alliance in context: Accomplishments, challenges, and future directions. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 43(3), 258–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Labov, W., & Fanshel, D. (1977). Therapeutic discourse: Psychotherapy as conversation. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lepper, G., & Mergenthaler, E. (2007). Therapeutic collaboration: How does it work? Psychotherapy Research, 15, 433–444. doi:10.1080/10503300500091587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mendes, I., Ribeiro, A., Angus, L., Greenberg, L., Sousa, I., & Goncalves, M. (2011). Narrative change in emotion-focused psychotherapy: A study on the evolution of reflection and protest innovative moments. Psychotherapy Research, 21, 304–315. doi:10.1080/10503307.2011.565489
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muntigl, P. (2004). Narrative counselling: Social and linguistic processes of change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Muntigl, P., & Turnbull, W. (1998). Conversational structure and facework in arguing. Journal of Pragmatics, 29(3), 225–256. doi:10.1016/S0378-2166(97)00048-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muntigl, P., Knight, N., Horvath, A. O., & Watkins, A. (2012). Client affectual stance and therapist-client affiliation: A view from grammar and social interaction. Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome, 15(2), 117–130
   Google Scholar
• Muntigl, P., Knight, N., & Watkins, A. (2012). Working to keep aligned in psychotherapy: using nods as a dialogic resource to display affiliation. Language and Dialogue, 2(1), 9–27. doi:10.1075/ld.2.1.01mun
   Google Scholar
• Muntigl, P., Knight, N., Watkins, A., Horvath, A. O., & Angus, L. (2013). Active retreating: Person-centered practices to repair disaffiliation in therapy. Journal of Pragmatics, 53, 1–20. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2013.03.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norcross, J. C. (Ed.) (2002). Psychotherapy relationships that work: Therapist contributions and responsiveness to patients. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norcross, J. C. (Ed.) (2011). Psychotherapy relationships that work: Evidence-based responsiveness (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Orlinsky, D. E. (2010). The “Generic Model of Psychotherapy” after 25 years: Evolution of a research-based metatheory. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 19, 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Peräkylä, A. (2004). Reliability and validity in research based on naturally occurring social interaction. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice (pp. 283–304). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Peräkylä, A. (2005). Patients' responses to interpretations: A dialogue between conversation analysis and psychoanalytic theory. Communication & Medicine, 2, 164–176.
   Google Scholar
• Peräkylä, A., Antaki, C., Vehviläinen, S., & Leudar, I. (2008). Conversation analysis and psychotherapy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessment: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structure of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 79–112). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ribeiro, E., Gonçalves, M., & Horvath, A. O. (2009, Oct.). Therapeutic alliance as a balance of therapist and client's complementary actions. Paper presented at the European Society for Psychotherapy Research Conference. Bolzano, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Ribeiro, A. P., Ribeiro, E., Loura, J., Gonçalves, M. M., Stiles, W. B., Horvath, A. O., & Sousa, I. (2014). Therapeutic collaboration and Resistance: Describing the nature and quality of the therapeutic relationship within ambivalence events using the Therapeutic Collaboration Coding System. Psychotherapy Research, 24, 346–359. doi:10.1080/10503307.2013.856042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, C. R., Gendlin, G. T., Kiesler, D. V., & Truax, L. B. (1967). The therapeutic relationship and its impact: A study of psychotherapy with schizophrenics. Madison: University of Wisconson Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation, Volumes 1 & 2. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735. doi:10.2307/412243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safran, J. D., (June, 2012) Personal communication.
   Google Scholar
• Safran, J. D., & Muran, J. C. (1996). The resolution of ruptures in the therapeutic alliance. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 447–458. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.64.3.447
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safran, J. D., & Muran, J. C. (2006). Has the concept of the therapeutic alliance outlived its usefulness? Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 43(3), 286–291. doi:10.1037/0033-3204.43.3.286
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safran, J. D., Muran, J. C., & Samstag, W. L. (1994). Resolving therapeutic ruptures: A task analytic investigation. In A. O. Horvath & L. S. Greenberg (Ed.), The working alliance: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 225–255). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Safran, J. D., Muran, J. C., Samstag, L. W., & Stevens, C. (2001). Repairing alliance ruptures. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 38(4), 406–412. doi:10.1037/0033-3204.38.4.406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1982). Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of ‘uh huh’ and other things that come between sentences. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Analyzing discourse: Text and talk. Georgetown University Roundtable on Languages and Linguistics (pp. 71–93). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2006). Interaction: The infrastructure for social institutions, the natural ecological niche for language, and the arena in which culture is enacted. In N. J. Enfield & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition and interaction (pp. 70–96). Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53, 361–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8, 289–327. doi:10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289
   Google Scholar
• Stiles, W. B. (1992). Describing talk. A taxonomy of verbal response modes. London: Sage
   Google Scholar
• Stiles, W. B. (2011). Coming to terms. Psychotherapy Research, 21, 367–384. doi:10.1080/10503307.2011.582186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiles, W., Glick, M., Osatuke, K., Hardy, G., Shapiro, D., Agnew-Davies, R., Rees, A. & Barkham, M. (2004). Patterns of alliance development and the rupture-repair hypothesis: Are productive relationships U-shaped or V-shaped? Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51, 81–92. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.51.1.81
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, T. (2008). Stance, alignment and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41(1), 31–57. doi:10.1080/08351810701691123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., & Hayashi, M. (2010). Transformative answers: One way to resist a question's constraints. Language in Society, 39, 1–25. doi:10.1017/S0047404509990637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., Mondada, L., & Steensig, J. (2011). Knowledge, morality and affiliation in social interaction. In T. Stivers, L. Mondada, & J. Steensig (Eds.), The morality of knowledge in conversation (pp. 3–24). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland, O., & Strong, T. (2011). Therapeutic collaboration: a conversation analysis of constructionist therapy. Journal of Family Therapy, 33, 256–278. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6427.2010.00500.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voutilainen, L., Peräkylä, A., & Ruusuvuori, J. (2011). Therapeutic change in interaction: Conversation analysis of a transforming sequence. Psychotherapy Research, 21(3), 348–365. doi:10.1080/10503307.2011.573509
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viklund, E., Holmqvist, R., & Nelson, K. Z. (June, 2012). Two ways of analyzing clients' accounts of important events in therapy. Paper presented at the Society for Psychotherapy Research Conference. Virginia Beach, VA.
   Google Scholar