Differential effectiveness of group, individual, and conjoint treatments: An archival analysis of OQ-45 change trajectories

References

• Anderson, E., & Lambert, M. (2001). A survival analysis of clinically significant change in outpatient psychotherapy. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 57, 875–888. doi: 10.1002/jclp.1056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin, S., Berkeljon, A., Atkins, D., Olsen, J., & Nielsen, S. (2009). Rates of change in naturalistic psychotherapy: Contrasting dose-effect and good-enough levels models of change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77(2), 203–211. doi: 10.1037/a0015235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin, S., & Imel, Z. (2013). Therapist effects: Findings and methods. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Bergin & Garfield's handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (6th ed., pp. 258–297). New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, S., Murray, D., & Shaddish, W. (2005). Empirically supported treatments or type I errors? Problems with the analysis of data from group-administered treatments. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(5), 924–935. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.73.5.924
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barkham, M., Connell, J., Stiles, W., Miles, J., Margison, F., Evans, C., & Mellor-Clark, J. (2006). Dose-effect relations and responsive regulation of treatment duration: The good enough level. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74, 160–167. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.74.1.160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barkham, M., Margison, F., Leach, C., Lucock, M., Mellor-Clark, J., Evans, C.,  … McGrath, G. (2001). Service profiling and outcomes benchmarking using the CORE-OM: Towards practice-based evidence in the psychological therapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 184–196. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.69.2.184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barkham, M., & Mellor-Clark, J. (2000). Rigour and relevance practice-based evidence in the psychological therapies. In N. Rowland & S. Goss (Eds.), Evidence-based counselling and psychological therapies: Research and applications (pp. 127–144). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bostwick, G. (1987). Where's Mary? A review of group treatment dropout literature. Social Work with Groups, 10(3), 117–132. doi: 10.1300/J009v10n03_09
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burlingame, G., & Beecher, M. (2008). New directions and resources in group psychotherapy. Journal of Clinical Psychology: In Session, 64(11), 1–112. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20534
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burlingame, G., Kircher, J., & Honts, C. (1994). Analysis of variance versus bootstrap procedures for analyzing dependent observation in small group research. Small Group Research, 25(4), 486–501. doi: 10.1177/1046496494254004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burlingame, G., Lambert, M., Reisinger, C., Neff, W., & Mosier, J. (1995). Pragmatics of tracking mental health outcome in managed care settings. Journal of Mental Health Administration, 22(3), 226–236. doi: 10.1007/BF02521118
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burlingame, G., Strauss, B., & Joyce, A. (2013). Change mechanisms and effectiveness of small group treatments. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Bergin & Garfield's handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (6th ed., pp. 640–689). New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Burlingame, G., Wells, M. G., Hoag, M., Hope, C., Nebeker, S., Konkel, K.,  … Reisinger, C. (1996). Administration and scoring manual for the Youth Outcome Questionnaire (Y-OQ 2.01). Stevenson, MD: American Professional Credentialing Services.
   Google Scholar
• Burlingame, G. M., Fuhriman, A. F., & Mosier, J. (2003). The differentiated effectiveness of group psychotherapy: A meta-analytic review. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 7(1), 3–12. doi: 10.1037/1089-2699.7.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burlingame, G. M., MacKenzie, K. R., & Strauss, B. (2004). Small group treatment: Evidence for effectiveness and mechanisms of change. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Bergin & Garfield's handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (5th ed., pp. 647–696). New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, C., Burlingame, G., Rees, F., Gleave, R., Beecher, M., & Porter, G. (2012). Clinical prediction in group psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Research, 22(6), 673–681. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2012.702512
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (Sections 7.2, 7.8, and 9.2). Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Crits-Christoph, P., Siqueland, L., Blaine, J., Frank, A., Luborsky, L., Onken, L. S., … Beck, A. T. (1999). Psychosocial treatments for cocaine dependence: National institute on drug abuse collaborative cocaine treatment study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 56(6), 493–502. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.56.6.493
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, D. R., Burlingame, G. M., Johnson, J. E., Barlow, S. H., & Gleave, R. L. (2008). The effects of a feedback intervention on group process and outcome. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 12(2), 141–154. doi: 10.1037/1089-2699.12.2.141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, C., & Munro, J. (1988). Drug and group treatments for bulimia/bulimia nervosa. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 32(6), 647–660. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(88)90013-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, R. P. (2009). National survey of counseling center directors. Alexandria, VA: International Association of Counseling Services.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, R. P. (2010). National survey of counseling center directors. Alexandria, VA: International Association of Counseling Services.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, R. P. (2011). National survey of counseling center directors. Alexandria, VA: International Association of Counseling Services.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, R. P. (2012). National survey of counseling center directors. Alexandria, VA: International Association of Counseling Services.
   Google Scholar
• Hatfield, D. R., & Ogles, B. M. (2004). The use of outcome measures by psychologists in clinical practice. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 35(5), 485–491. doi: 10.1037/0735-7028.35.5.485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellider, K. (2009, March 24). No joke: Group therapy offers savings in numbers. Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123785686766020551.html
   Google Scholar
• Howard, K., Kopta, S., Krause, M., & Orlinsky, D. (1986). The dose-effect relationship in psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 41, 159–164. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.41.2.159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, K. I., Moras, K., Brill, P. L., Martinovich, Z., & Lutz, W. (1996). Evaluation of psychotherapy: Efficacy, effectiveness, and patient progress. American Psychologist, 51, 1059–1064. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.51.10.1059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadera, S., Lambert, M., & Andrews, A. (1996). How much therapy is really enough? A session-by-session analysis of the psychotherapy dose-effect relationship. Journal of Psychotherapy Practice and Research, 5, 132–151.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kazdin, A. E. (2008). Evidence-based treatment and practice: New opportunities to bridge clinical research and practice, enhance the knowledge base, and improve patient care. American Psychologist, 63, 146–159. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.63.3.146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, M. (2013). The efficacy and effectiveness of psychotherapy. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Bergin & Garfield's handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (6th ed., pp. 169–218). New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, M., Burlingame, G., Umphress, V., Hansen, N., Vermeersch, D. Clouse, G., & Yanchar, S. (1996). The reliability and validity of the outcome questionnaire. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 3, 249–258. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0879(199612)3:4<249::AID-CPP106>3.0.CO;2-S
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, M., Hansen, N., & Finch, A. (2001). Patient focused research: Using patient outcome to enhance treatment effects. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 159–172. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.69.2.159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, M., Kahler, M., Harmon, C., Shimokawa, K., & Burlingame, G. (2012). Administration and scoring manual for the OQ-45. Salt Lake City, UT: OQ Measures.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, M., Morton, H., Hatfield, D., Harmon, C., Hamilton, S. Reid, R., … Burlingame, G. (2004). OQ©-45 administration and scoring manual. Salt Lake City, UT: OQ Measures.
   Google Scholar
• McRoberts, C., Burlingame, G. M., & Hoag, M. (1998). Comparative efficacy of individual and group psychotherapy: A meta-analytic perspective. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 2(2), 101–117. doi: 10.1037/1089-2699.2.2.101
   Google Scholar
• Panas, L., Caspi, Y., Fournier, E., & McCarty, D. (2003). Performance measures for outpatient substance abuse services: Group versus individual counseling. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 25(4), 271–278. doi: 10.1016/S0740-5472(03)00142-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paturel, A. (2012). Power in numbers. Monitor on Psychology, 43(10), 48–49.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, T., & Smart, D. (2007, August). An empirical model of development for distressed college students. Poster presented at the annual convention of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York, NY: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Spybrook, J., Bloom, H., Congdon, R., Hill, C., Martinez, A., & Raudenbush, S. (2011, October 16). Optimal design plus empirical evidence: Documentation for the optimal design software. Retrieved May 1, 2013, from http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~brian/463/week14/od/od-manual-20111016-v300.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Steele, B., Mundfrom, D., & Perrett, J. (2011). Unbalanced sampling effect on the power at level-1 in the random coefficient model. Multiple Linear Regression Viewpoints, 37(1), 22–35.
   Google Scholar
• Stiles, W., Barkham, M., Connell, J., & Mellor-Clark, J. (2008). Responsive regulation of treatment duration in routine practice in the United Kingdom primary care settings: Replication in a larger sample. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76, 298–305. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.76.2.298
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstein, S., Gottheil, E., & Sterling, R. (1997). Randomized comparison of intensive outpatient versus individual therapy for cocaine abusers. Journal of Addictive Diseases, 16(2), 41–56. doi: 10.1300/J069v16n02_04
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, R. D., Jaffee, W. B., de Menil, V. P., & Cogley, C. B. (2004). Group therapy for substance use disorders: What do we know? Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 12(6), 339–350. doi: 10.1080/10673220490905723
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yalom, I. D., & Leszcz, M. (2005). The theory and practice of group psychotherapy (5th ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar