Case sampling for psychotherapy practice, theory, and policy guidance: Qualities and quantities

References

• Allwood, C. M. (2012). The distinction between qualitative and quantitative research methods is problematic. Quality & Quantity, 46, 1417–1429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amsteus, M. N. (2014). The validity of divergent grounded theory method. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 13, 71–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, M., van Dijk, A., & Wicherts, J. M. (2012). The rules of the game called psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 543–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow, D. H., Nock, M. K., & Hersen, M. (2008). Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Bellhouse, D. R. (2000). Survey sampling theory over the twentieth century and its relation to computing technology. Survey Methodology, 36, 11–20.
   Google Scholar
• Bőhnke, J. R., & Croudace, T. J. (2015). Factors of psychological distress: Clinical value, measurement substance, and methodological artefacts. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 50, 515–524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breckenridge, J., & Jones, D. (2009). Demystifying theoretical sampling in grounded theory research. Grounded Theory Review, 8, 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S. D., Furrow, D., Hill, D. F., Gable, J. C., Porter, L. P., & Jacobs, W. J. (2014). A duty to describe: Better the devil you know than the devil you don't. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 626–640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunswik, E. (1956). Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, R. B. (2013). Two war-torn soldiers: Combat related trauma through an intersubjective lens. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 67, 109–133.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chatterjee, S., & Hadi, A. S. (1986). Influential observations, high leverage points, and outliers in linear regression. Statistical Science, 1, 379–393.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, K. M. T., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Jiao, Q. G. (2007). A mixed methods investigation of mixed methods sampling designs in social and health science research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 267–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, D. R. (1958). Planning of experiments. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Dourdouma, A., & Mőrtl, K. (2012). The creative journey of grounded theory analysis: A guide to its principles and applications. Ricerca in Psicoterapia/Research in Psychotherapy, Psychopathology, Process and Outcome, 15, 96–106.
   Google Scholar
• Draucker, C. B., Martsolf, D. S., Ross, R., & Rusk, T. B. (2007). Theoretical sampling and category development in grounded theory. Qualitative Health Research, 17, 1137–1148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelhard, I. M., Lommen, M. J. J., & Sijbrandij, M. (2014). Changing for better or worse? Posttraumatic growth reported by soldiers deployed to Iraq. Clinical Psychological Science, 1, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Feller, W. (1968). An introduction to probability theory and its applications (Vol. 1, 3rd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Finney, D. J. (1960). An introduction to the theory of experimental design. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, D. A. (2010). Statistical models and causal inference: A dialogue with the social sciences. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, H. S., & Martin, L. R. (2012). The longevity project. New York, NY: Plume (Penguin Group, USA).
   Google Scholar
• Gellert, W., Küstner, H., Hellwich, M., & Kästner, H. (Eds.). (1977). The Van Nostrand Reinhold concise encyclopedia of mathematics. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
   Google Scholar
• Gerring, J. (2008). Techniques for case selection: A response to David Freedman. Qualitative and Multi-method Research, 6, 7–10.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G. (2002). Conceptualization: On theory and theorizing using grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1, 23–38.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G. (2012). Constructivist grounded theory? Grounded Theory Review, 11(1), 2–11.
   Google Scholar
• Gobo, G. (2004). Sampling, representativeness, and generalizability. In C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. F. Gubrium, & D. Silverman (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 435–456). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Goertz, G. (2008). Choosing cases for case studies: A qualitative logic. Qualitative and Multi-method Research, 6, 11–14.
   Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. (1965). Logic of statistical inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, M. H., Hurwitz, W. N., & Madow, W. G. (1953). Sample survey methods and theory. Volume II: Theory. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, C. E., & Williams, E. N. (2012). The sample. In C. E. Hill (Ed.), Consensual qualitative research: A practical resource for investigating social science phenomena (pp. 71–81). Washington, DC: APA.
   Google Scholar
• Hultsch, D. F., MacDonald, S. W. S., Hunter, M. A., Maitland, S. B., & Dixon, R. A. (2002). Sampling and generalizability in developmental research: Comparison of random and convenience samples of older adults. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26, 345–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of meta analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Iglewicz, B., & Hoaglin, D. (1993). How to detect and handle outliers. In E. F. Mytkytka (Ed.), The ASQC basic references in quality control: Statistical techniques (Vol. 16). Milwaukee, WI: American Society for Quality. Retrieved from http://asq.org
   Google Scholar
• Josselson, R. (2006). Narrative research and the challenge of accumulating knowledge. Narrative Inquiry, 16, 3–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalton, G. (2000). Developments in survey research in the past 25 years. Survey Methodology, 26, 3–10.
   Google Scholar
• Keane, T. M., Marshall, A. D., & Taft, C. T. (2006). Posttraumatic stress disorder: Etiology, epidemiology, and treatment outcome. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 2, 161–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, G. (1997/2013 e-book). A solution to the ecological inference problem: Reconstructing individual behavior from aggregate data. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• King, G. (1999). The future of ecological inference research: A comment on Freedman et al. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94, 352–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kish, L. (1965). Survey sampling. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kish, L. (2002). New paradigms (models) for probability sampling. Survey Methodology, 1, 31–34.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2013). Beyond significance testing: Statistics reform in the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: APA.
   Google Scholar
• Krause, M. S. (2005). How the psychotherapy research community must work toward measurement validity and why. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61, 269–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, M. S. (2010). Trying to discover sufficient condition causes. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 6, 59–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, M. S. (2012). Measurement validity is fundamentally a matter of definition, not correlation. Review of General Psychology, 16, 391–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, M. S. (2013a). The incompatibility of achieving fully specified linear models and assuming that residual dependent-variable variance is random. Quality & Quantity, 47, 3201–3204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, M. S. (2013b). The data analytic implications of human psychology's dimensions being ordinally scaled. Review of General Psychology, 17, 318–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, M. S., & Howard, K. I. (2002). The linear model is a very special case: Exploring data for their full clinical implications. Psychotherapy Research, 12, 475–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, M. S., Lutz, W., & Bőhnke, J. R. (2011). The role of sampling in clinical trial design. Psychotherapy Research, 21, 243–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, M. S., Lutz, W., & Saunders, S. M. (2007). Empirically certified treatments or therapists: The issue of separability. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 44, 347–353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luborsky, M. R., & Rubinstein, R. L. (1995). Sampling in qualitative research: Rationale, issues, and methods. Research on Aging, 17, 89–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markou, M., & Singh, S. (2003). Novelty detection: A review-part 1: Statistical approaches. Signal Processing, 83, 2481–2497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, A., Thoemmes, F., Rose, N., Steyer, R., & West, S. G. (2014). Theory and analysis of total, direct, and indirect causal effects. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 49, 425–442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse, J. M., Stern, P. N., Corbin, J., Bowers, B., Charmaz, K., & Clarke, A. E. (2008). Developing grounded theory: The second generation. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neuenschwander, E. (2013). Qualitas and quantitas: Two ways of thinking in science. Quality & Quantity, 47, 2597–2615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickerson, R. S. (2000). Null hypothesis significance testing: A review of an old and continuing controversy. Psychological Methods, 5, 241–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noy, C. (2008). Sampling knowledge: The hermeneutics of snowball sampling in qualitative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11, 327–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2007). Sampling designs in qualitative research: Making the sampling process more public. The Qualitative Report, 12, 238–254.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, G. L. (1967). Strategy of outcome research in psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 31, 109–118.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Quenouille, M. H. (1953). The design and analysis of experiment. London: Griffin.
   Google Scholar
• Rao, J. N. K. (2005). Interplay between sample survey theory and practice: An appraisal. Survey Methodology, 31, 117–138.
   Google Scholar
• Rizvi, S. L., & Ferraioli, S. J. (2012). Single-case experimental designs. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 589–611). Washington, DC: APA.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, O. C. (2014). Sampling in interview-based qualitative research: A theoretical and practical guide. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 11, 25–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sale, J. E. M., Lohfeld, L. H., & Brazil, K. (2002). Revisiting the quantitative-qualitative debate: Implications for mixed-methods research. Quality & Quantity, 36, 43–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidenfeld, T. (1979). Philosophical problems of statistical inference: Learning from R. A. Fisher. Dordrecht: Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, S., & Markou, M. (2004). An approach to novelty detection applied to the classification of image regions. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 16, 396–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stuart, A., Ord, J. K., & Arnold, S. (1999). Kendall's advanced theory of statistics, volume 2a: Classical inference and the linear model (6th ed.). London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Swift, J. K., & Greenberg, R. P. (2014). A treatment by disorder meta-analysis of dropout from psychotherapy. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 24, 193–207.
   Google Scholar
• Teddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 77–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topp, L., Barker, B., & Degenhardt, L. (2004). The external validity of results derived from ecstasy users recruited by using purposive sampling strategies. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 73, 33–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Veer, R., van IJzendoorn, M., & Valsiner, J. (1994). Epilogue. In R. van der Veer, M. van IJzendoorn, & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Reconstructing the mind: Replicability in research on human development (pp. 271–283). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Wertz, F. J., Charmaz, K., McMullen, L., Josselson, R., Anderson, R., & McSpadden, E. (2011). Five ways of doing qualitative analysis: Phenomenological psychology, grounded theory, discourse analysis, narrative research, and intuitive inquiry. New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, M., & Christy, R. (1999). Sampling for possibilities. Quality & Quantity, 33, 185–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar