Feedback and therapist effects in the context of treatment outcome and treatment length

References

• Alexander, L. B., & Luborsky, L. (1986). The Penn Helping Alliance Scales. In L. S. Greenberg & W. M. Pinsof (Eds.), The psychotherapeutic process: A research handbook (pp. 325–366). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, S. A., & Imel, Z. E. (2013). Therapist effects: Findings and methods. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Bergin and Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (6th ed., pp. 85–133). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, S. A., Murray, D. M., Shadish, W. R., Pals, S. L., Holland, J. M., Abramowitz, J. S., … Watson, J. (2011). Intraclass correlation associated with therapists: Estimates and applications in planning psychotherapy research. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 40(1), 15–33. doi:10.1080/16506073.2010.520731
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bassler, M., Potratz, B., & Krauthauser, H. (1995). Der “Helping Alliance Questionnaire” (HAQ) von Luborsky. Möglichkeiten zur Evaluation des therapeutischen Prozesses von stationärer Psychotherapie [The ‘Helping Alliance Questionnaire’ (HAQ) by Luborsky]. Psychotherapeut, 40, 23–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4 (R package version 1.1–7). Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4
   Google Scholar
• Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Carbin, M. G. (1988). Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation. Clinical Psychology Review, 8(1), 77–100. doi:10.1016/0272-7358(88)90050-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boswell, J. F., Kraus, D. R., Miller, S. D., & Lambert, M. J. (2013). Implementing routine outcome monitoring in clinical practice: Benefits, challenges, and solutions. Psychotherapy Research, 25, 6–19. doi:10.1080/10503307.2013.817696
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, S. L., Hooke, G. R., Newnham, E. A., & Page, A. C. (2012). The effects of progress monitoring on subsequent readmission to psychiatric care: A six-month follow-up. Journal of Affective Disorders, 137(1–3), 113–116. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2011.12.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlier, I. V. E., Meuldijk, D., Van Vliet, I. M., Van Fenema, E., Van der Wee, N. J. A., & Zitman, F. G. (2012). Routine outcome monitoring and feedback on physical or mental health status: Evidence and theory. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 18(1), 104–110. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01543.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castonguay, L. C., Barkham, M., Lutz, W., & McAleavy, A. (2013). Practice-oriented research: Approaches and applications. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Bergin and Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (6th ed., pp. 85–133). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Castonguay, L. G., Eubanks, C. F., Goldfried, M. R., Muran, J. C., & Lutz, W. (2015). Research on psychotherapy integration: Building on the past, looking to the future. Psychotherapy Research, 25, 365–382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crits-Christoph, P., Baranackie, K., Kurcias, J., Beck, A., Carroll, K., Perry, K., … Zitrin, C. (1991). Meta-analysis of therapist effects in psychotherapy outcome studies. Psychotherapy Research, 1(2), 81–91. doi:10.1080/10503309112331335511
   Google Scholar
• De Jong, K., Timman, R., Hakkaart-Van Roijen, L., Vermeulen, P., Kooiman, K., Passchier, J., & Busschbach, J. V. (2014). The effect of outcome monitoring feedback to clinicians and patients in short and long-term psychotherapy: A randomized controlled trial. Psychotherapy Research, 24, 1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong, K., van Sluis, P., Nugter, M. A., Heiser, W. J., & Spinhoven, P. (2012). Understanding the differential impact of outcome monitoring: Therapist variables that moderate feedback effects in a randomized clinical trial. Psychotherapy Research, 22, 464–474. doi:10.1080/10503307.2012.673023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derogatis, L. R. (1975). Brief symptom inventory. Baltimore, MD: Clinical Psychometric Research.
   Google Scholar
• Ehlers, A., & Margraf, J. (2001). Fragebogen zu körperbezogenen Ängsten, Kognitionen und Vermeidung (AKV) [Questionnaire on body-directed anxieties, cognitions, and avoidance] (2., ü berarbeitete und neunormierte Auflage). Weinheim: Beltz.
   Google Scholar
• Flückiger, C., Holforth, M. G., Znoj, H. J., Caspar, F., & Wampold, B. E. (2013). Is the relation between early post-session reports and treatment outcome an epiphenomenon of intake distress and early response? A multi-predictor analysis in outpatient psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Research, 23(1), 1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franke, G. (2000). BSI. Brief Symptom Inventory: Deutsche Version (BSI. Brief Symptom Inventory: German Version). Manual. Göttingen: Beltz.
   Google Scholar
• Gallop, R., & Tasca, G. A. (2014). Multilevel modeling of longitudinal data for psychotherapy researchers: 2. The complexities. In W. Lutz & S. Knox (Eds.), Quantitative and qualitative methods in psychotherapy research (pp. 117–141). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Garner, D. M. (1991). Eating disorders inventory-2: Professional manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Hannan, C., Lambert, M. J., Harmon, C., Nielsen, S. L., Smart, D. W., Shimokawa, K., & Sutton, S. W. (2005). A lab test and algorithms for identifying clients at risk for treatment failure. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61, 155–163. doi:10.1002/jclp.20108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiller, W., Zaudig, M., & Mombour, W. (2004). IDCL – International Diagnostic Checklists for ICD-10 and DSM-IV. Bern: Huber.
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, L. M., Strauß, B., & Kordy, H. (2000). Inventar Interpersonaler Probleme (IIP-D): Deutsche Version [Inventory of interpersonal problems (IIP-D): German Version]. Weinheim: Beltz Test GmbH.
   Google Scholar
• Hox, J. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, K. I., Moras, K., Brill, P. L., Martinovich, Z., & Lutz, W. (1996). Evaluation of psychotherapy. Efficacy, effectiveness, and patient progress. The American psychologist, 51, 1059–1064. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.51.10.1059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59(1), 12–19. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.59.1.12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klepsch, R., Zaworka, W., Hand, I., Lünenschloss, K., & Jauering, G. (1993). Hamburger Zwangsinventar—Kurzform (HZI-K). Manual [Hamburg Inventory for obsessive-compulsive disorders—short form]. Göttingen: Beltz.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, M. J. (2007). Presidential address: What we have learned from a decade of research aimed at improving psychotherapy outcome in routine care. Psychotherapy Research, 17(1), 1–14. doi:10.1080/10503300601032506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, M. J., & Shimokawa, K. (2011). Collecting client feedback. Psychotherapy, 48(1), 72–79. doi:10.1037/a0022238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, M. J., Whipple, J. L., Hawkins, E. J., Vermeersch, D. A., Nielsen, S. L., & Smart, D. W. (2003). Is it time for clinicians to routinely track patient outcome? A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10, 288–301. doi:10.1093/clipsy.bpg025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutz, W., Böhnke, J. R., & Köck, K. (2011). Lending an ear to feedback systems: Evaluation of recovery and non-response in psychotherapy in a German outpatient setting. Community Mental Health Journal, 47, 311–317. doi:10.1007/s10597-010-9307-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutz, W., Ehrlich, T., Rubel, J., Hallwachs, N., Röttger, M.-A., Jorasz, C., … Tschitsaz-Stucki, A. (2013). The ups and downs of psychotherapy: Sudden gains and sudden losses identified with session reports. Psychotherapy Research, 23(1), 14–24. doi:10.1080/10503307.2012.693837
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutz, W., Hofmann, S. G., Rubel, J., Boswell, J. F., Shear, M. K., Gorman, J. M., … Barlow, D. H. (2014). Patterns of early change and their relationship to outcome and early treatment termination in patients with panic disorder. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 82, 287–297. doi:10.1037/a0035535
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutz, W., Leon, S. C., Martinovich, Z., Lyons, J. S., & Stiles, W. B. (2007). Therapist effects in outpatient psychotherapy: A three-level growth curve approach. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 54(1), 32–39. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.54.1.32
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutz, W., Wittmann, W., Böhnke, J., Rubel, J., & Steffanowski, A. (2013). Zu den Ergebnissen des Modellprojektes der Techniker-Krankenkasse – Ein Plädoyer für mehr Psychotherapieforschung in Deutschland [The TK-project quality monitoring in outpatient psychotherapy from the perspective of the evaluation team – A plea for more psychotherapy research in Germany]. PPmP-Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie, 63, 225–228.
   Google Scholar
• Meehl, P. E. (1954). Clinical versus statistical prediction: A theoretical analysis and a review of the evidence. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newnham, E. A., & Page, A. C. (2010). Bridging the gap between best evidence and best practice in mental health. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(1), 127–142. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2009.10.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okiishi, J., Lambert, M. J., Nielsen, S. L., & Ogles, B. M. (2003). Waiting for supershrink: An empirical analysis of therapist effects. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 10, 361–373. doi:10.1002/cpp.383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poston, J. M., & Hanson, W. E. (2010). Meta-analysis of psychological assessment as a therapeutic intervention. Psychological Assessment, 22(2), 203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Probst, T., Lambert, M. J., Loew, T. H., Dahlbender, R. W., Göllner, R., & Tritt, K. (2013). Feedback on patient progress and clinical support tools for therapists: Improved outcome for patients at risk of treatment failure in psychosomatic in-patient therapy under the conditions of routine practice. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 75, 255–261. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2013.07.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linears models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rief, W., Hiller, W., & Heuser, J. (1997). SOMS—Das Screening für somatoforme Störungen (Manual zum Fragebogen) [Screening for somatoform disorders]. Bern: Huber.
   Google Scholar
• Riemer, M., & Bickman, L. (2011). Using program theory to link social psychology and program evaluation. In M. M. Mark, S. I. Donaldson, & B. Campbell (Eds.), Social psychology and evaluation (pp. 104–139). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Saxon, D., & Barkham, M. (2012). Patterns of therapist variability: Therapist effects and the contribution of patient severity and risk. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 80, 535–546. doi:10.1037/a0028898
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimokawa, K., Lambert, M. J., & Smart, D. W. (2010). Enhancing treatment outcome of patients at risk of treatment failure: Meta-analytic and mega-analytic review of a psychotherapy quality assurance system. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78, 298–311. doi:10.1037/a0019247
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, W., Lambert, M. J., Busath, G., Vazquez, A., Berkeljon, A., Hyer, K., … Berrett, M. (2013). Effects of providing patient progress feedback and clinical support tools to psychotherapists in an inpatient eating disorders treatment program: A randomized controlled study. Psychotherapy Research, 23, 287–300. doi:10.1080/10503307.2013.787497
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, W., Lambert, M. J., Harris, M. W., Busath, G., & Vazquez, A. (2012). Providing patient progress information and clinical support tools to therapists: Effects on patients at risk of treatment failure. Psychotherapy Research, 22, 638–647. doi:10.1080/10503307.2012.698918
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, B. M., Lutz, W., Steffanowski, A., Wittmann, W. W., Boehnke, J. R., Rubel, J., … Kirchmann, H. (2015). Benefits and challenges in practice-oriented psychotherapy research in Germany: The TK and the QS-PSY-BAY projects of quality assurance in outpatient psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Research, 25(1), 32–51. doi:10.1080/10503307.2013.856046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stulz, N., Lutz, W., Leach, C., Lucock, M., & Barkham, M. (2007). Shapes of early change in psychotherapy under routine outpatient conditions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75, 864–874. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.75.6.864
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittmann, W. W., Lutz, W., Steffanowski, A., Kriz, D., Glahn, E. M., Völkle, M.C., … Ruprecht, T. (2011). Qualitätsmonitoring in der ambulanten Psychotherapie: Modellprojekt der Techniker Krankenkasse – Abschlussbericht. Hamburg: Techniker Krankenkasse.
   Google Scholar
• Wittmann, W. W., & Lutz, W. (2014, June). The experience of a computer-based feedback system from the clients` perspective. Paper presented at the 45th International Meeting of the Society for Psychotherapy Research (SPR), Copenhagen, DK.
   Google Scholar