333
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Empirical Papers

Insight into conflictual relationship patterns: Development and validation of an observer rating scale

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 934-947 | Received 21 Jun 2019, Accepted 29 Oct 2019, Published online: 18 Nov 2019

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text rev.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.
  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
  • Baker, F. B. (2001). The basics of Item Response Theory. ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2010.02362.x
  • Beck, A., Steer, R., & Brown, G. (1996). Beck depression inventory-II. San Antonio. doi: 10.1037/t00742-000
  • Bundesausschuss, G. (2018). Psychotherapie-Richtlinie.
  • Callahan, J. L., & Hynan, M. T. (2005). Models of psychotherapy outcome: Are they applicable in training clinics? Psychological Services, 2, 65–69. doi:10.1037/1541-1559.2.1.65.
  • Cicchetti, D. V. (1994). Guidlines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evalauting normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6, 284–290. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284
  • Cogan, R., & Porcerelli, J. H. (2013). Validation of the Shedler-Westen assessment procedure insight scale. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 201, 706–708. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e31829db5bf
  • Connolly Gibbons, M. B., Crits-Christoph, P., Barber, J. P., & Schamberger, M. (2007). Insight in psychotherapy: A review of empirical literature. In L. G. Castonguay & C. E. Hill (Eds.), Insight in psychotherapy (pp. 143–165). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Connolly Gibbons, M. B., Crits-Christoph, P., Barber, J. P., Wiltsey Stirman, S., Gallop, R., Goldstein, L. A., … Ring-Kurtz, S. (2009). Unique and common mechanisms of change across cognitive and dynamic psychotherapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77, 801–813. doi:10.1037/a0016596.Unique doi: 10.1037/a0016596
  • Crits-Christoph, P., Connolly Gibbons, M. B., & Mukherjee, D. (2013). Psychotherapy process-outcome research. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (pp. 298–340). New York: Wiley.
  • Cuijpers, P., Reijnders, M., & Huibers, M. J. H. (2019). The role of common factors in psychotherapy outcomes. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 15, 207–231. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095424
  • Derogatis, L. R. (1994). Symptom checklist-90-R (SCL-90-R): Administration, scoring, and procedures manual (3rd ed.). Minneapolis, MN: NCS Pearson.
  • Erekson, D. M., Janis, R., Bailey, R. J., Cattani, K., & Pedersen, T. R. (2017). A longitudinal investigation of the impact of psychotherapist training: Does training improve client outcomes? Journal of Counseling Psychology, 64, 514–524. doi: 10.1037/cou0000252
  • Falkenström, F., Finkel, S., Sandell, R., Rubel, J. A., & Holmqvist, R. (2017). Dynamic models of individual change in psychotherapy process research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 85, 537–549. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000203
  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. doi: 10.3758/BF03193146
  • Flückiger, C., Del Re, A. C., Wampold, B. E., & Horvath, A. O. (2018). The alliance in adult psychotherapy: A meta-analytic synthesis. Psychotherapy, 55, 316–340. doi: 10.1037/pst0000172
  • Freud, S., & Breuer, J. (1895). Studien über Hysterie. Leipzig, Wien: Franz Deuticke.
  • Gabbard, G. O. (2000). A neurobiologically informed perspective on psychotherapy a neurobiologically informed perspective. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 177, 117–122. doi: 10.1192/bjp.177.2.117
  • Gabbard, G. O. (2014). Psychodynamic psychiatry in clinical practice. Arlington: American Psychiatric Publishing.
  • Goldberg, S. B., Rousmaniere, T., Miller, S. D., Whipple, J., Nielsen, S. L., Hoyt, W. T., & Wampold, B. E. (2016). Do psychotherapists improve with time and experience? A longitudinal analysis of outcomes in a clinical setting. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 63, 1–11. doi: 10.1037/cou0000131
  • Grande, T., Rudolf, G., Oberbracht, C., & Pauli-Magnus, C. (2003). Progressive changes in patients' lives after psychotherapy: Which treatment effects support them? Psychotherapy Research (13), 43–58. doi: 10.1093/ptr/kpg006
  • Grawe, K. (1997). Research-informed psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Research, 7, 1–19. doi: 10.1080/10503309712331331843
  • Grenyer, B. F. S., & Luborsky, L. (1996). Dynamic change in psychotherapy: Mastery of interpersonal conflicts. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 411–416. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.64.2.411
  • Hatcher, R. L., & Barends, A. W. (2006). How a return to theory could help alliance research. Psychotherapy, 43, 292–299. doi:10.1037/0033-3204.43.3.292.
  • Hatcher, R. L., & Gillaspy, J. A. (2006). Development and validation of a revised short version of the working alliance inventory. Psychotherapy Research, 16, 12–25. doi: 10.1080/10503300500352500
  • Hirsch, I. (1998). The concept of enactment and theoretical convergence. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 4, 171–192. doi: 10.1080/10481889409539012
  • Høglend, P., Engelstad, V., Sørbye, Ø, Heyerdahl, O., & Amlo, S. (1994). The role of insight in exploratory psychodynamic psychotherapy. British Journal of Medical Psychology, (67), 305–316. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8341.1994.tb01799.x
  • Høglend, P., & Hagtvet, K. (2019). Change mechanisms in psychotherapy: Both improved insight and improved affective awareness are necessary. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 87, 332–344. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000381
  • Huber, J., Born, A. K., Claaß, C., Ehrenthal, J. C., Nikendei, C., Schauenburg, H., & Dinger, U. (2019). Therapeutic agency, in-session behavior, and patient–therapist interaction. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 75, 66–78. doi:10.1002/jclp.22700.
  • Jennissen, S., Huber, J., Ehrenthal, J. C., Schauenburg, H., & Dinger, U. (2018). Association between insight and outcome of psychotherapy: Systematic review and meta-analysis. American Journal of Psychiatry, 175, 961–969. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.17080847
  • Johansson, P., Høglend, P., Ulberg, R., Amlo, S., Marble, A., Bøgwald, K.-P., … Heyerdahl, O. (2010). The mediating role of insight for long-term improvements in psychodynamic therapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78, 438–448. doi: 10.1037/a0019245
  • Kazdin, A. E. (2007). Mediators and mechanisms of change in psychotherapy research. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 3, 1–27. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091432
  • Lacewing, M. (2014). Psychodynamic psychotherapy, insight, and therapeutic action. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 21, 154–171. doi: 10.1111/cpsp.12065
  • Lemma, A., Target, M., & Fonagy, P. (2013). Dynamic interpersonal therapy (DIT): Developing a new psychodynamic intervention for the treatment of depression. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 33, 552–566. doi: 10.1080/07351690.2013.815092
  • Levy, M. S. (1998). A helpful way to conceptualize and understand reenactments. The Journal of Psychotherapy Practice and Research, 7, 227–235.
  • Lobbestael, J., Leurgans, M., & Arntz, A. (2011). Inter-rater reliability of the structured clinical interview for DSM-IV Axis I disorders (SCID I) and Axis II disorders (SCID II). Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 18, 75–79. doi: 10.1002/cpp.693
  • Luborsky, L. (1984). Principles of psychoanalytic psychotherapy: A manual for supportive-expressive treatment. New York: Basic Books.
  • Luborsky, L., Crits-Christoph, P., Mintz, J., & Auerbach, A. (1988). The central relationship pattern: Self-understanding of core relationship themes. In L. Luborsky, P. Crits-Christoph, J. Mintz, & A. Auerbach (Eds.), Who will benefit from psychotherapy?: Predicting therapeutic outcomes (pp. 243–249). New York: Basic Books.
  • Luborsky, L., Popp, C., Luborsky, E., & Mark, D. (1994). The core conflictual relationship theme. Psychotherapy Research, 4, 172–183. doi: 10.1080/10503309412331334012
  • Lutz, W., Tholen, S., Schürch, E., & Berking, M. (2006). Die Entwicklung, Validierung und Reliabilität von Kurzformen gängiger psychometrischer Instrumente zur Evaluation des therapeutischen Fortschritts in Psychotherapie und Psychiatrie. Diagnostica, 52, 11–25. doi: 10.1026/0012-1924.52.1.11
  • McCullough, L., Kuhn, N., Andrews, S., Valen, J., Hatch, D., & Osimo, F. (2003). Reliability of the achievement of thearpeutic objectives scale: A research and teaching tool for psychotherapy. Journalof Brief Therapy, 2, 75–90.
  • McCullough, L., Larsen, A. E., Schanche, E., Andrews, S., & Kuhn, N. (2003). Achievement of therapeutic objectives scale: ATOS scale.
  • Messer, S. B., & McWilliams, N. (2007). Insight in psychodynamic therapy: Theory and assessment. In L. G. Castonguay & C. E. Hill (Eds.), Insight in psychotherapy (pp. 9–29). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • O’Malley, S. S., Suh, C. S., & Strupp, H. H. (1983). The vanderbilt psychotherapy process scale: A report on the scale development and a process-outcome study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 581–586. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.51.4.581
  • Rosenblatt, A. (2004). Insight, working through, and practice: The role of procedural knowledge. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 52, 189–207. doi: 10.1177/00030651040520011901
  • Safran, J. (2002). Brief relational psychoanalytic treatment. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 12, 171–195. doi: 10.1080/10481881209348661
  • Safran, J. D., & Muran, C. J. (2000). Negotiating the therapeutic alliance: A relational treatment guide. New York: The Guilford Press.
  • Schauenburg, H., Dinger, U., Kriebel, A., Huber, J., Friederich, H.-C., Herzog, W., & Nikendei, C. (2018). Zur Entwicklung tiefenpsychologischer Ausbildungsinstitute. Psychotherapeut, 64, 46–54. doi: 10.1007/s00278-018-0320-2
  • Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420–428. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420
  • Stein, D. M., & Lambert, M. J. (1995). Graduate training in psychotherapy: Are therapy outcomes enhanced ? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 182–196. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.63.2.182
  • Stiles, W. B. (1980). Measurement of the impact of psychotherapy sessions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 48(2), 176–185. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.48.2.176
  • Stiles, W. B., Meshot, C., Anderson, T., & Sloan, W. (1992). Assimilation of problematic experiences: The case of John Jones. Psychotherapy Research, 2, 81–101. doi: 10.1080/10503309212331332874
  • Strachey, J. (1934). The nature of the therapeutic action of psycho-analysis. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 15, 127–159.
  • Strupp, H. H., & Binder, J. L. (1984). Psychotherapy in a new key: A guide to time-limited psychotherapy. New York: Basic Books.
  • Ulberg, R., Amlo, S., Dahl, H. S. J., & Høglend, P. (2017). Does insight mediate treatment and enhance outcome? Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 37, 140–152. doi: 10.1080/07351690.2017.1285184
  • Valen, J., Truls, R., Svartberg, M., Stiles, T. C., & McCullough, L. (2011). The achievement of therapeutic objectives scale: Interrater reliability and sensitivity to change in short-term dynamic psychotherapy and cognitive therapy. Psychological Assessment, 23, 848–855. doi: 10.1037/a0023649
  • Wittchen, H.-U., Zaudig, M., & Fydrich, T. (1997). Strukturiertes Klinisches Interview für DSM-IV (SKID I und SKID II). Göttingen, Hogrefe. doi: 10.1026//0084-5345.28.1.68
  • Zanarini, M. C., & Frankenburg, F. R. (2001). Attainment and maintenance of reliability of axis I and II disorders over the course of a longitudinal study. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 42, 369–374. doi: 10.1053/comp.2001.24556
  • Zilcha-Mano, S. (2017). Is the alliance really therapeutic? Revisiting this question in light of recent methodological advances. American Psychologist, 72, 311–325. doi: 10.1037/a0040435

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.