Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation Outcome Measure (CORE-OM) in Chile

References

• Barkham, M., Mellor-Clark, J., & Stiles, W. B. (2015, December). A CORE approach to progress monitoring and feedback: Enhancing evidence and improving practice. Psychotherapy, 52(4), 402–411. https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1997). Statistics notes: Cronbach's alpha. BMJ, 314(7080), 572. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7080.572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, M. M., & Young, C. (2011). Introducing the CORE-OM in a South African Context: Validation of the CORE-OM using a South African student population sample. South African Journal of Psychology, 41(4), 488–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/008124631104100408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattell, R. B. (1966, April 1). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1(2), 245–276. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicchetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6(4), 284–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284
   Google Scholar
• Connell, J., Barkham, M., & Mellor-Clark, J. (2007, February 1). CORE-OM mental health norms of students attending university counselling services benchmarked against an age-matched primary care sample. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 35(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069880601106781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell, J., Barkham, M., Stiles, W. B., Twigg, E., Singleton, N., Evans, O., & Miles, J. N. V. (2007). Distribution of CORE–OM scores in a general population, clinicalcut-off points and comparison with the CIS–R. British Journal of Psychiatry, 190(1), 69–74. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.105.017657
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J. (1951, September 1). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Elfström, M. L., Evans, C., Lundgren, J., Johansson, B., Hakeberg, M., & Carlsson, S. G. (2013, September–October). Validation of the Swedish version of the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation Outcome Measure (CORE-OM). Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 20(5), 447–455. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.1788
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, C., Connell, J., Barkham, M., Margison, F., McGrath, G., Mellor-Clark, J., & Audin, K. (2002, January). Towards a standardised brief outcome measure: Psychometric properties and utility of the CORE-OM. British Journal of Psychiatry, 180(1), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.180.1.51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, C., Connell, J., Barkham, M., Marshall, C., & Mellor-Clark, J. (2003). Practice-based evidence: Benchmarking NHS primary care counselling services at national and local levels. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 10(6), 374–388. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, C., Margison, F., & Barkham, M. (1998). The contribution of reliable and clinically significant change methods to evidence-based mental health. Evidence-Based Mental Health, 1(3), 70–72. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmh.1.3.70
   Google Scholar
• Evans, C., Mellor-Clark, J., Margison, F., Barkham, M., Audin, K., Connell, J., & McGrath, G. (2000, January 1). CORE: Clinical outcomes in routine evaluation. Journal of Mental Health, 9(3), 247–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/713680250
   Google Scholar
• Evans, C., Paz, C., & Mascialino, G. (2021, August 9). “Infeliz” or “Triste”: A paradigm for mixed methods exploration of outcome measures adaptation across language variants. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.695893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gampe, K., Biescad, M., Labaničová, B., Timulak, L., & Evans, C. (2007, January 1). Slovenská adaptácie metódy CORE-OM [A Slovak adaptation of CORE-OM (Clinical Outcome in Routine Evaluation – Outcome Measure]. Ceská a slovenská psychiatrie, 103, 4–13.
   Google Scholar
• Hedges, L. V. (1981). Distribution theory for glass’s estimator of effect size and related estimators. Journal of Educational Statistics, 6(2), 107–128. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986006002107
   Google Scholar
• Honkalampi, K., Laitila, A., Juntunen, H., Lehmus, K., Piiparinen, A., Törmänen, I., Inkinen, M., & Evans, C. (2017, November). The Finnish clinical outcome in routine evaluation outcome measure: Psychometric exploration in clinical and non-clinical samples. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 71(8), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039488.2017.1365378
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59(1), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.59.1.12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristjánsdóttir, H., Sigurðsson, B. H., Salkovskis, P., Ólason, D., Sigurdsson, E., Evans, C., Gylfadóttir, E. D., & Sigurðsson, J. F. (2015, January–February). Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Icelandic version of the clinical outcomes in routine evaluation–outcome measure, its transdiagnostic utility and cross-cultural validation. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 22(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.1874
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, M. J., Burlingame, G. M., Umphress, V., Hansen, N. B., Vermeersch, D. A., Clouse, G. C., & Yanchar, S. C. (1996). The reliability and validity of the outcome questionnaire. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 3(4), 249–258. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0879(199612)3:4<249::AID-CPP106>3.0.CO;2-S
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyne, K. J., Barrett, P., Evans, C., & Barkham, M. (2006). Dimensions of variation on the CORE-OM. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 45(2), 185–203. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466505X39106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellor-Clark, J., Twigg, E., Farrell, E., & Kinder, A. (2013, March 1). Benchmarking key service quality indicators in UK Employee Assistance Programme Counselling: A CORE System data profile. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 13(1), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733145.2012.728235
   Google Scholar
• Ortiz, E., Báez, A., Trujillo, A., Núñez, C., Yaneth, M., Rodríguez, A., Pilar, Á., Rodríguez, Á, & Dominguez, S. (2021, December 30). Psychometric properties of Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure (CORE-OM) in Colombia and Peru. Mediterranean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 9. https://doi.org/10.13129/2282-1619/mjcp-3056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmieri, G., Evans, C., Hansen, V., Brancaleoni, G., Ferrari, S., Porcelli, P., Reitano, F., & Rigatelli, M. (2009, September–October). Validation of the Italian version of the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation Outcome Measure (CORE-OM). Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 16(5), 444–449. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.646
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paz, C., Mascialino, G., & Evans, C. (2020). Exploration of the psychometric properties of the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure in Ecuador. BMC Psychology, 8(1), 94–94. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-020-00443-z
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sales, C., Moleiro, C., Evans, C., & Alves, P. (2012). Versão Portuguesa do CORE-OM: Tradução, adaptação e estudo preliminar das suas propriedades psicométricas [The Portuguese version of CORE-OM: Translation, adaptation and preliminary data on its psychometric properties]. Archives of Clinical Psychiatry (São Paulo), 39(2), 54–59. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-60832012000200003
   Google Scholar
• Skre, I., Friborg, O., Elgarøy, S., Evans, C., Myklebust, L. H., Lillevoll, K., Sørgaard, K., & Hansen, V. (2013, March 22). The factor structure and psychometric properties of the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation – Outcome Measure (CORE-OM) in Norwegian clinical and non-clinical samples. BMC Psychiatry, 13(1), 99. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-13-99
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sosa-Torralba, J., Romero-Mendoza, M., Medina-Mora-Icaza, M., Méndez-Ríos, E., & Blum-Grynberg, B. (2020). Estructura dimensional de la Escala Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure (CORE-OM) en universitarios mexicanos. Revista Evaluar, 20(1), 49–66. https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/revaluar/article/view/28485.
   Google Scholar
• Trujillo, A., Feixas, G., Bados, A., García-Grau, E., Salla, M., Medina, J. C., Montesano, A., Soriano, J., Medeiros-Ferreira, L., Cañete, J., Corbella, S., Grau, A., Lana, F., & Evans, C. (2016). Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation—Outcome Measure. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 12, 109–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viliūnienė, R., Evans, C., Hilbig, J., Pakalniškienė, V., Danilevičiūtė, V., Laurinaitis, E., & Navickas, A. (2013, October). Translating the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation Outcome Measure (CORE-OM) into Lithuanian. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 67(5), 305–311. https://doi.org/10.3109/08039488.2012.745599
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Bergen, A., & de la Parra, G. (2002). OQ-45.2, Cuestionario para evaluación de resultados y evolución en psicoterapia: Adaptación, validación e indicaciones para su aplicación e interpretación [OQ-45.2, An outcome questionnaire for monitoring change in psychotherapy: Adaptation, validation and indications for its application and interpretation]. Terapia Psicológica, 20, 161–176.
   Google Scholar
• Zeldovich, M., & Alexandrowicz, R. W. (2019). Comparing outcomes: The clinical outcome in routine evaluation from an international point of view. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 28(3), e1774. https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1774
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., Hu, J., Evans, C., Jin, L. W., Wu, M. Y., Wang, C. Y., Zhang, X. J., Lu, W. H., & Chen, G. P. (2020, March 3). Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the clinical outcomes in routine evaluation-outcome measure (CORE-OM). British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 48(2), 289–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2019.1682120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar