953
Views
46
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Comparing Classroom Enactments of an Inquiry Curriculum: Lessons Learned From Two Teachers

, &
Pages 81-130 | Published online: 05 Dec 2007

REFERENCES

  • Abbas, J., Norris, C., and Soloway, E., 2002. Middle school children's use of the ARTEMIS digital library. Proceedings of the 2nd ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries. New York, 2002, .
  • Azevedo, R., and Cromley, J. G., 2004. Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students' learning with hypermedia?, Journal of Educational Psychology 96 (3) (2004), pp. 523–535.
  • Ball, D. L., and Cohen, D. K., 1996. Reform by the book: What is--or might be--the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform?, Educational Researcher 25 (1996), pp. 6–8, 14..
  • Baxter, G. P., Elder, A. D., and Glaser, R., 1995. Cognitive analysis of a science performance assessment. (CSE Tech. Rep. 398). Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards and Student Testing; 1995.
  • Bedersen, B. B., and Hollan, J., 1995. Pad++: A zooming graphical interface for exploring alternate interface physics. Proceedings of the 7th Annual ACM Symposium on User interface software and technology. New York, 1995.
  • Blumenfeld, P., Fishman, B., Krajcik, J., Marx, R. W., and Soloway, E., 2000. Creating useable innovations in systemic reform: Scaling-up technology-embedded project-based science in urban schools, Educational Psychologist 35 (3) (2000), pp. 149–164.
  • Borko, H., and Putnam, R., 1996. "Learning to teach.". In: Berliner, D., and Calfee, R., eds. Handbook of educational psychology. New York: Macmillan; 1996. pp. 673–708.
  • Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., and Cocking, R. R., 1999. How people learn. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999.
  • Bransford, J. D., Goldman, S. R., and Vye, N. J., 1991. "Making a difference in peoples' abilities to think: Reflections on a decade of work and some hopes for the future.". In: Okagaki, L., and Sternberg, R. J., eds. Directors of development: Influences on children. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc; 1991. pp. 147–180.
  • Brown, A. L., 1992. Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings, Journal of the Learning Sciences 2 (2) (1992), pp. 141–178.
  • Brown, A. L., and Campione, J. C., 1996. "Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles, and systems.". In: Glaser, R., ed. Innovations in learning: New environments for education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc; 1996. pp. 289–325.
  • Cary, S., 1986. Cognitive science and science education, American Psychologist 41 (10) (1986), pp. 1123–1130.
  • Cheng, P. C.-H., 1999. Unlocking conceptual learning in mathematics and science with effective representational systems, Computers and Education 33 (1999), pp. 109–130.
  • Chi, M. T. H., Hutchinson, J., and Robin, A. F., 1989. How inferences about novel domain-related concepts can be constrained by structured knowledge, Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 35 (1989), pp. 27–62.
  • Chi, M. T. H., and Koeske, R., 1983. Network representation of a child's dinosaur knowledge, Developmental Psychology 19 (1983), pp. 29–39.
  • Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., and Schauble, L., 2003. Design experiments in educational research, Educational Researcher 32 (1) (2003), pp. 9–13.
  • Cobb, P., McCain, K., and Gravemeijer, K., 2003. Learning about statistical covariation, Cognition and Instruction 21 (2003), pp. 1–78.
  • Cohen, D. K., and Ball, D. L., 2001. Making change: Instruction and its improvement, Phi Delta Kappan 83 (1) (2001), pp. 73–77.
  • Collins, A., 1992. "Toward a design science of education.". In: Scanlon, E., and O'Shea, T., eds. New directions in educational technology. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1992. pp. 15–22.
  • http://www.sde.ct.gov, Connecticut State Department of Education. (2003). Strategic school profile 2001-2002, middle and junior high school edition: Middle school, school district. Retrieved October 10, 2003 from.
  • Davis, E. A., and Krajcik, J., 2005. Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning, Educational Researcher 34 (3) (2005), pp. 3–14.
  • Davis, E. A., and Petish, D. A., 2001, April. Developing expertise in science teaching and in science teacher education. Presented at Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Conference.
  • Design-Based Research Collective, 2003. Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry, Educational Researcher 32 (1) (2003), pp. 5–8, .
  • Fasse, B. B., and Kolodner, J. L., 2002. Evaluating classroom practices using qualitative research methods: Defining and refining the process. Fourth International Conference of the Learning Sciences. Mahwah, NJ, 2002.
  • Furnas, G. W., 1986. Generalized fisheye views. Proceedings of the SIGHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (CHI '86;. New York, 1986.
  • Glynn, S. M., Yeany, R. H., and Britton, B. K., 1991. The psychology of learning science. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc; 1991.
  • Goldman, S. R., and Wiley, J., 2002, September. Science literacy: The centrality of critical reading. Presented at Paper presented at the conference on Ontological, Epistemological, Linguistic and Pedagogical Considerations of Language and Science Literacy: Empowering Research and Informing Instruction.
  • Graesser, A. C., Person, N. K., and Hu, X., 2002. Improving comprehension through discourse processing, New Directions for Teaching and Learning 89 (2002), pp. 33–44.
  • Hart, C., Mulhall, P., Berry, A., Loughran, J., and Gunstone, R., 2000. What is the purpose of this experiment? Or can students learn something from doing experiments?, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 37 (7) (2000), pp. 655–675.
  • Herman, J. L., 1997. Large scale assessment in support of school reform: Lessons in the search for alternative measures. (CSE Tech. Rep. 446). Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards and Student Testing; 1997.
  • Hiebert, J., and Carpenter, T. P., 1992. "Learning and teaching with understanding.". In: Grouws, D. A., ed. Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. New York: Macmillan; 1992. pp. 65–97.
  • Hmelo-Silver, C. E., 2003. Analyzing collaborative knowledge construction: Multiple methods for integrated understanding, Computers and Education 41 (2003), pp. 397–420.
  • Hoffman, J. L., Wu, H. -K., Krajcik, J. S., and Soloway, E., 2003. The nature of middle school learners' science content understandings with the use of on-line resources, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 40 (3) (2003), pp. 323–346.
  • Holbrook, J., and Kolodner, J. L., 2002. Scaffolding the development of an inquiry-based (science) classroom. Fourth International Conference of the Learning Sciences. Mahwah, NJ, 2002.
  • Kafai, Y. B., 1994. Minds in play: Computer game design as a context for children's learning. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc; 1994.
  • Kolodner, J. L., 1997. Educational implications of analogy: A view from case-based reasoning, American Psychologist 52 (1) (1997), pp. 57–66.
  • Kolodner, J. L., Camp, P. J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrooke, J., Puntambekar, S., and Ryan, M., 2003. Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle school science classroom: Putting Learning By Design” into Practice, Journal of the Learning Sciences 12 (4) (2003), pp. 495–547.
  • Kozma, R., 2001. Material and social affordances of multiple representations for science understanding. Presented at Paper presented at the Knowledge-in-the-Making: Epistemological Aspects of Using Inscriptions During Teaching and Learning Science Symposium at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), MONTHXX).
  • Krajcik, J. S., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Bass, K. M., and Fredricks, J., 1998. Inquiry in project-based science classrooms: Initial attempts by middle school students, Journal of the Learning Sciences 7 (3-4) (1998), pp. 313–350.
  • Krajcik, J. S., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., and Soloway, E., 1991. A collaborative model for helping middle grade science teachers learn project-based instruction, The Elementary School Journal 94 (5) (1991), pp. 483–497.
  • http://www.spencer.org/publications/usable_knowledge_report_ecl_a.htm, Lagemann, E. C. (2002). Usable knowledge in education: A memorandum for the Spencer Foundation Board of Directors (memorandum). Chicago: Spencer Foundation. Retrieved April 20, 2002, from.
  • Lampert, M., 2001. Teaching problems and the problems of teaching. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 2001.
  • Linn, M., Eyelon, B., and Davis, E., 2004. "The knowledge integration perspective on learning.". In: Linn, M., Davis, E., and Bell, P., eds. Internet Environments for Science education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2004.
  • Luckin, R., 2003. Between the lines: Documenting the multiple dimensions of computer-supported collaborations, Computers and Education 41 (4) (2003), pp. 379–396.
  • Markham, K. M., Mintzes, J. J., and Jones, M. G., 1994. The concept map as a research and evaluation tool: Further evidence of validity, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 31 (1994), pp. 91–101.
  • National Research Council, 1996. National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1996.
  • Newton, D. P., and Newton, L. D., 2000. Do teachers support causal understanding through their discourse when teaching primary science?, British Educational Research Journal 26 (5) (2000), pp. 599–613.
  • Novak, J. D., and Gowin, D. B., 1984. Learning how to learn. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 1984.
  • Otero, J., and Graesser, A. C., 2001. PREG: Elements of a model of question asking, Cognition and Instruction 19 (2001), pp. 143–175.
  • Palincsar, A. S., and Brown, A. L., 1984. Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities, Cognition and Instruction 1 (1984), pp. 117–175.
  • Palincsar, A. S., and Magnussen, S. J., 2001. "The interplay of first-hand and second-hand investigations to model and support the development of scientific knowledge and reasoning.". In: Klahr, D., and Carver, S., eds. Cognition and instruction: Twenty-five years of progress. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc; 2001. pp. 151–193.
  • Patton, M. Q., 1990. Qualitative evaluation and research methods, . Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1990.
  • Pearsall, R., Skipper, J., and Mintzes, J., 1997. Knowledge restructuring in the life sciences: A longitudinal study of conceptual change in biology, Science Education 81 (1997), pp. 193–215.
  • Puntambekar, S., and Stylianou, A., 2002. CoMPASS: Students' use of external representations in science learning. Keeping learning complex: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS;. Mahwah, NJ, 2002.
  • Puntambekar, S., Stylianou, A., and Hübscher, R., 2003. Improving navigation and learning in hypertext environments with navigable concept maps, Human Computer Interaction 18 (4) (2003), pp. 395–426.
  • Reiser, B. J., Tabak, I., Sandoval, W. A., Smith, B., Steinmuller, F., and Leone, A. J., 2001. "BGuILE: Strategic and conceptual scaffolds for scientific inquiry in biology classrooms.". In: Carver, S. M., and Klahr, D., eds. Cognition and instruction: Twenty-five years of progress. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc; 2001. pp. 263–305.
  • Roth, W. -M., 1995. Authentic school science: Knowing and learning in open-inquiry science laboratories. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic; 1995.
  • Roth, W. -M., and Roychoudhury, A., 1993. The development of science process skills in authentic contexts, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 30 (1993), pp. 127–152.
  • Ruiz-Primo, M. A., and Shavelson, R. J., 1995, April. Concept maps as potential alternative assessments in science. Presented at Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA).
  • Ruiz Primo, M. A., and Shavelson, R. J., 1996. Problems and issues in the use of concept maps in science assessment, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 33 (6) (1996), pp. 569–600.
  • Ryder, J., Hind, A., and Leech, J., 2003, August. Teaching about the epistemology of science in school science classrooms: Case studies of teachers' experiences. Presented at Paper presented at the European Science Education Research Association Conference.
  • Sandoval, W. A., and Daniszewski, K., 2004. Mapping the trade-offs in teachers'integration of technology-supported inquiry in high school science classes, Journal of Science Education and Technology 13 (2) (2004), pp. 161–178, .
  • Scardamalia, M., and Bereiter, C., 1992. Text-based and knowledge-based questioning by children, Cognition and Instruction 9 (1992), pp. 177–199.
  • Shapiro, A. M., 2000. The effect of interactive overviews on the development of conceptual structure in novices learning from hypermedia, Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 9 (2000), pp. 57–78.
  • Shavelson, R. J., Lang, H., and Lewin, B., 1994. On concept maps as potential “authentic” assessments in science. (CSE Tech. Rep. 388). Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards and Student Testing; 1994.
  • Schauble, L., Glaser, R., Duschl, R. A., Schulze, S., and John, J., 1995. Students' understanding of the objectives and procedures of experimentation in the science classroom, The Journal of the Learning Sciences 4 (1995), pp. 131–166.
  • Schneider, R. M., Krajcik, J., and Blumenfeld, P., 2005. Enacting reform-based science materials: The range of teacher enactments in reform classrooms, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 42 (2005), pp. 283–312.
  • Singer, J., Marx, R. W., Kracik, J., and Clay Chambers, J., 2000. Constructing extended inquiry projects: Curriculum materials for science education reform, Educational Psychologist 35 (3) (2000), pp. 165–178.
  • Soloway, E., and Wallace, R., 1997. Does the Internet support student inquiry? Don't ask, Communications of the ACM 40 (5) (1997), pp. 11–16.
  • Songer, N. B., Lee, H., and Kam, R., 2002. Technology-rich inquiry science in urban classrooms: What are the barriers to inquiry pedagogy?, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 39 (2) (2002), pp. 128–150.
  • Spiro, R. J., Feltovitch, P. J., Jacobson, M. J., and Coulson, R. J., 1991. Cognitive flexibility constructivism and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains, Educational Technology 31 (5) (1991), pp. 24–33.
  • Tabak, I., and Baumgartner, E., 2004. The teacher as partner: Exploring participant structures, symmetry, and identity work in scaffolding, Cognition and Instruction 22 (2004), pp. 393–429.
  • Tabak, I., and Reiser, B., 1997. Complementary roles of software-based scaffolding and teacher-student interactions in inquiry learning. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL '97. Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 1997.
  • Trowbridge, J., and Wandersee, J., 1994. Identifying critical junctures in learning in a college course on evolution, Journal on Research in Science Teaching 31 (1994), pp. 459–473.
  • Wallace, R., Soloway, E., Krajcik, J., Bos, N., Hoffman, J., Hunter, H. E., et al., 1998. ARTEMIS: Learner-centered design of an information seeking environment for K-12 education. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in computing systems 195–202). New York, N Y., 1998.
  • White, B., 1993. "Causal models and intermediate abstractions: A missing link for successful science education?". In: Glaser, R., ed. Advances in instructional psychology. Vol. Vol. 4. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc; 1993. pp. 177–252.
  • Wood, D., 1999. Representing, learning and understanding, Computers and Education 33 (1999), pp. 83–90.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.