Comparing Learning From Productive Failure and Vicarious Failure

REFERENCES

• Belenky, D. M., & Nokes-Malach, T. J. (2012). Motivation and transfer: The role of mastery-approach goals in preparation for future learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21, 399–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., & Farr, M. J. (1988). The nature of expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• diSessa, A. A., Hammer, D., Sherin, B., & Kolpakowski, T. (1991). Inventing graphing: Meta-representational expertise in children. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 10(2): 117–160.
   Google Scholar
• diSessa, A. A., & Sherin, B. L. (2000). Meta-representation: An introduction. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 19(4): 385–398.
   Google Scholar
• Kalyuga, S., Ayres, P., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2003). Expertise reversal effect. Educational Psychologist, 38, 23–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapur, M. (2008). Productive failure. Cognition and Instruction, 26, 379–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapur, M. (2010). Productive failure in mathematical problem solving. Instructional Science, 38, 523–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapur, M. (2011a). A further study of productive failure in mathematical problem solving: Unpacking the design components. Instructional Science, 39, 561–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapur, M. (2011b). Temporality matters: Advancing a method for analyzing problem-solving processes in a computer-supported collaborative environment. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(1), 39–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapur, M. (2012). Productive failure in learning the concept of variance. Instructional Science, 40, 651–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapur, M., & Bielaczyc, K. (2011). Classroom-based experiments in productive failure. In L. Carlson, C. Hölscher, & T. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2812–2817). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Kapur, M., & Bielaczyc, K. (2012). Designing for productive failure. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21, 45–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapur, M., & Kinzer, C. (2009). Productive failure in CSCL groups. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(1): 21–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapur, M., & Rummel, N. (2012). Productive failure in learning and problem solving. Instructional Science, 40, 645–650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirschner, F., Paas, F., & Kirschner, P. A. (2009). Individual and group-based learning from complex cognitive tasks: Effects on retention and transfer efficiency. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2): 306–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work. Educational Psychologist, 41(2): 75–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehtinen, E., & Hannula, M. M. (2006). Attentional processes, abstraction and transfer in early mathematical processes. In L. Verschaffel, F. Dochy, M. Boekaerts, & S. Vosniadou (Eds.), Instructional psychology: Past, present and future trends (pp. 39–55). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Levav-Waynberg, A., & Leikin, R. (2012). The role of multiple solution tasks in developing knowledge and creativity in geometry. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31, 73–90.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F. (2006). Sameness and difference in transfer. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15, 499–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paas, F. (1992). Training strategies for achieving transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: A cognitive load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 429–434.
   Google Scholar
• Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38, 1–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittle-Johnson, B., & Star, J. R. (2009). Compared to what? The effects of different comparisons on conceptual knowledge and procedural flexibility for equation solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 529–544.
   Google Scholar
• Roll, I., Aleven, V., & Koedinger, K. (2011). Outcomes and mechanisms of transfer in invention activities. In L. Carlson, C. Hölscher, & T. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2824–2829). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Roll, I., Aleven, V., & Koedinger, K. R. (2010). The invention lab: Using a hybrid of model tracing and constraint-based modeling to offer intelligent support in inquiry environments. In V. Aleven, J. Kay, & J. Mostow (Eds.), Proceedings of the international conference on intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 115–124). Berlin, Germany: Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. A., & Bjork, R. A. (1992). New conceptualizations of practice: Common principles in three paradigms suggest new concepts for training. Psychological Science, 3(4): 207–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, D. L., & Bransford, J. D. (1998). A time for telling. Cognition and Instruction, 16,475–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, D. L., & Martin, T. (2004). Inventing to prepare for future learning: The hidden efficiency of encouraging original student production in statistics instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 22(2), 129–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwel, J., van Oers, B., van Dijk, I. M. A. W., & van den Eeden, P. (2009). Are representations to be provided or generated in primary mathematics education? Effects on transfer. Educational Research and Evaluation, 15(1), 25–44.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher order psychological processes. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Westermann, K., & Rummel, N. (2012). New evidence on productive failure—Building on students’ prior knowledge is key! In J. van Aalst, K. Thompson, M. J. Jacobson, & P. Reimann (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 266–270). Sydney, Australia: ISLS.
   Google Scholar
• Wiedmann, M., Leach, R. C., Rummel, N., & Wiley, J. (2012). Does group composition affect learning by invention? Instructional Science, 40, 711–730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar