Why Engaging in Mathematical Practices May Explain Stronger Outcomes in Affect and Engagement: Comparing Student-Driven With Highly Guided Inquiry

REFERENCES

• Ainley, M. (2012). Students’ interest and engagement in classroom activities. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 283–302). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ainley, M., & Ainley, J. (2011). Student engagement with science in early adolescence: The contribution of enjoyment to students’ continuing interest in learning about science. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 4–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ainley, M., Corrigan, M., & Richardson, N. (2005). Students, tasks and emotions: Identifying the contribution of emotions to students’ reading of popular culture and popular science texts. Learning and Instruction, 15, 433–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ainley, M., & Hidi, S. (2014). Interest and enjoyment. In R. Pekrun & L. Linnenbrink-Garcia (Eds.), International handbook of emotions in education (pp. 205–227). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ainley, M., Hidi, S., & Berndorff, D. (2002). Interest, learning, and the psychological processes that mediate their relationship. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 545–561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, D. L. (1993). With an eye on the mathematical horizon: Dilemmas of teaching elementary school mathematics. The Elementary School Journal, 93(4), 373–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 307–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaton, A. E., Mullis, I. V., Martin, M. O., Gonzales, E. J., Kelly, D. L., & Smith, T. A. (1996). Mathematics achievement in the middle school years: IEA’s Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College, TIMSS International Study Center.
   Google Scholar
• Boaler, J. (2002). Learning from teaching: Exploring the relationship between reform curriculum and equity. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33, 239–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boekaerts, M. (1999). Motivated learning: Studying student-situation transactional units. European Journal of Psychology in Education, 14, 41–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bright, G. W., & Friel, S. N. (1998). Graphical representations: Helping students interpret data. In S. Lajoie (Ed.), Reflections on statistics: Learning, teaching, and assessments in grades K-12 (pp. 63–88). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Burris, C. C., Heubert, J. P., & Levin, H. M. (2006). Accelerating mathematics achievement using heterogeneous grouping. American Educational Research Journal, 43(1), 137–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• California Department of Education. (1999). Mathematics framework for California public schools, kindergarten thru grade 12. Sacramento, CA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Case, R. W. (2005). The Dutch revolution in secondary school mathematics. Mathematics Teacher, 98(6), 374–384.
   Google Scholar
• Civil, M. (2006). Building on community knowledge: An avenue to equity in mathematics education. In N. Nasir & P. Cobb (Eds.), Improving access to mathematics: Diversity and equity in the classroom (pp. 105–117). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, P. (1999). Individual and collective mathematical development: The case of statistical data analysis. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1(1), 5–43.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, P., Gravemeijer, K., Yackel, E., McClain, K., & Whitenack, J. (1997). Mathematizing and symbolizing: The emergence of chains of signification in one first-grade classroom. In D. I. Kirschner & J. A. Whitson (Eds.), Situated cognition: Social, semiotic, and psychological perspectives (pp. 151–233). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, P., & McClain, K. (2001). Supporting students’ ability to reason about data. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 45, 103–129.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, P., & McClain, K. (2004). Principles of instructional design for supporting the development of students’ statistical reasoning. In D. Ben-Zvi & J. Garfield (Eds.), The challenge of developing statistical literacy, reasoning, and thinking (pp. 375–396). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, E. G., & Lotan, R. A. (1997). Working for equity in heterogeneous classrooms: Sociological theory in practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Common Core Standards Initiative. (2011). Standards for mathematical practice. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/read-the-standards/
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1913). Interest and effort in education. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• diSessa, A. A., Hammer, C., Sherin, B., & Kolpakowski, T. (1991). Inventing graphing: Meta-representational expertise in children. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 10, 117–160.
   Google Scholar
• Engle, R. A., & Conant, F. R. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20, 399–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enyedy, N. (2003). Knowledge construction and collective practice: At the intersection of learning, talk, and social configurations in a computer-mediated mathematics classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 361–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enyedy, N., Danish, J. A., & Fields, D. (2011). Negotiating the “relevant” in culturally relevant mathematics. Canadian Journal for Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 11(3), 273–291.
   Google Scholar
• Enyedy, N., & Mukhopadhyay, S. (2007). They don’t show nothing I didn’t know: Emergent tensions between culturally relevant pedagogy and mathematics pedagogy. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16, 139–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eppstein, S. (1990). Cognitive-experiential self-theory: Implications for developmental psychology. In M. Gunnary & L. A. Sroufe (Eds.), Minnesota symposia on child psychology: Self processes and development (pp. 79–123). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Esmonde, I. (2009). Ideas and identities: Supporting equity in cooperative mathematics learning. Review of Educational Research, 79, 1008–1043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eysink, T. H. S., de Jong, T., Bertold, K., Kolloffel, B., Operfmann, M., & Wouters, P. (2009). Learner performance in multimedia learning arrangements: An analysis across instructional approaches. American Educational Research Journal, 46, 1107–1149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredricks, J. A., & Eccles, J. S. (2002). Children’s competence and value beliefs from childhood through adolescence: Growth trajectories in two “male-typed” domains. Developmental Psychology, 38, 519–534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, T., Pekrun, R., & Watt, H. M. (2010). Development of mathematics interest in adolescence: Influences of gender, family, and school context. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20, 507–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freudenthal, H. (1979). New math or new education? Prospects: Quarterly Review of Education, 9(3), 321–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ge, X., & Land, S. M. (2003). Scaffolding students’ problem-solving processes in an ill-structured task using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(1), 21–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gravemeijer, K., & Doorman, M. (1999). Context problems in Realistic Mathematics Education: A calculus course as an example. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 39, 111–129.
   Google Scholar
• Greeno, J. C. (2006). Authoritative, accountable positioning and connected, general knowing: Progressive themes in understanding transfer. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15, 537–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gresalfi, M. S. (2009). Taking up opportunities to learn: Constructing dispositions in mathematics classrooms. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18, 327–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gresalfi, M. S., & Cobb, P. (2006). Cultivating students’ discipline-specific dispositions as a critical goal for pedagogy and equity. Pedagogies, 1(1), 49–57.
   Google Scholar
• Gutstein, E. (2003). Teaching and learning mathematics for social justice in an urban, Latino school. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34, 37–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutstein, E. (2012). Connecting community, critical, and classical knowledge in teaching mathematics for social justice. In S. Mukhopadhya & W. M. Roth (Eds.), Alternative forms of knowing (in) mathematics (pp. 300–311). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Hadi, S. (2012). Mathematics education reform movement in Indonesia. Retrieved from http://www.icme12.org/upload/submission/1897_F.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, C., Kaput, J. J., & Goldsmith, L. T. (1992). Authentic inquiry with data: Critical barriers to classroom implementation. Educational Psychologist, 27(3), 337–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hand, V. (2003). Reframing participation: Meaningful mathematical activity in diverse classrooms (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Hand, V. (2012). Seeing power and culture in mathematics learning: Teacher noticing for equitable mathematics instruction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80, 233–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidi, S. (2006). Interest: A unique motivational variable. Educational Research Review, 1(2), 69–82.
   Google Scholar
• Hidi, S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2000). Motivating the academically unmotivated: A critical issue for the 21st century. Review of Educational Research, 70(2), 151–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidi, S., Renninger, K. A., & Krapp, A. (2004). Interest, a motivational variable that combines affective and cognitive functioning. In D. Dai & R. Sternberg (Eds.), Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development (pp. 89–115). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hiebert, J. (1997). Making sense: Teaching and learning mathematics with understanding. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Hiebert, J., Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Fuson, K., Human, P., Murray, H., … Wearne, D. (1996). Problem solving as a basis for reform curriculum and instruction. The case of mathematics. Educational Researcher, 25(4), 12–21.
   Google Scholar
• Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn, I. S. (2006). Lessons learned from detracked mathematics departments. Theory Into Practice, 45, 72–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. E., Lanza, S., Osgood, D. W., Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Changes in children’s self-competence and values: Gender and domain differences across grades one through twelve. Child Development, 73, 509–527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapur, M. (2008). Productive failure. Cognition and Instruction, 26, 379–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapur, M. (2010). Productive failure in mathematical problem solving. Instructional Science, 38, 523–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (Eds.). (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41, 75–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klahr, D. (2009). “To every thing there is a season, and a time to every purpose under the heavens”: What about direct instruction? In S. Tobias & T. M. Duffy (Eds.), Constructivist theory applied to instruction: Success or failure? (pp. 291–310). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Klahr, D., & Nigam, M. (2004). The equivalence of learning paths in early science instruction effects of direct instruction and discovery learning. Psychological Science, 15, 661–667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köller, O., Baumert, J., & Schnabel, K. (2001). Does interest matter? The relationship between academic interest and achievement in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32, 448–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konold, C. (1995). Issues in assessing conceptual understanding in probability and statistics. Journal of Statistics Education, 3(1). Retrieved from http://www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v3n1/konold.html
   Google Scholar
• Konold, C., & Higgins, T. L. (2003). Reasoning about data. In J. Kilpatrick, G. Martin, & D. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 193–215). Reston, VA: NCTM.
   Google Scholar
• Konold, C., Robinson, A., Khalil, K., Pollatsek, A., Well, A. D., Wing, R., & Mayr, S. (2002). Students’ use of modal clumps to summarize data. Retrieved from http://iase-web.org/documents/papers/icots6/8b2_kono.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Krapp, A. (1999). Interest, motivation and learning: An educational-psychological perspective. European Journal of Psychology in Education, 14, 23–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. (2007). Is direct instruction an answer to the right question? Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 109–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampert, M. (1990). When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 27(1), 29–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer-Osuna, J. M. (2011). How Brianna became bossy and Kofi came out smart: Understanding the trajectories of identity and engagement for two group leaders in a project-based mathematics classroom. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 11(3), 207–225.
   Google Scholar
• Larkin, J. H., & Simon, H. A. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science, 11(1), 65–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehrer, R., & Pritchard, C. (2002). Symbolizing space into being. In K. Gravemeijer, R. Lehrer, B. van Oers, & L. Verschaffel (Eds.), Symbolization, modeling and tool use in mathematics education (pp. 58–86). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Lehrer, R., Strom, D., & Confrey, J. (2002). Grounding metaphors and inscriptional resonance: Children’s emerging understanding of mathematical similarity. Cognition and Instruction, 20, 359–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, X., Hmelo, C., Kinzer, C. K., & Secules, T. J. (1999). Designing technology to support reflection. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(3), 43–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linchevski, L., & Kutscher, B. (1998). Tell me with whom you’re learning, and I’ll tell you how much you’ve learned: Mixed-ability versus same-ability grouping in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29, 533–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, D. K., & Turner, J. C. (2002). Discovering emotion in classroom motivation research. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 107–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullis, I. V., Martin, M. O., Gonzalez, E. J., Gregory, K. D., Garden, R. A., O’Connor, K. M., … Smith, T. A. (2000). TIMSS 1999 international mathematics report. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS International Study Center.
   Google Scholar
• Nasir, N. S., & Hand, V. (2008). From the court to the classroom: Opportunities for engagement, learning and identity in basketball and classroom mathematics. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17, 143–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Panksepp, J. (2003). At the interface of the affective, behavioral, and cognitive neurosciences: Decoding the emotional feelings of the brain. Brain and Cognition, 52(1), 4–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Reiser, B. J. (2004). Scaffolding complex learning: The mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 273–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renninger, K. A., & Hidi, S. (2011). Revisiting the conceptualization, measurement, and generation of interest. Educational Psychologist, 46(3), 168–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samarapungavan, A., Patrick, H., & Mantzicopolous, P. (2011). What kindergarten students learn in inquiry-based science classrooms. Cognition and Instruction, 29, 416–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem-solving, metacognition, and sense-making in mathematics. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook for research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334–370). New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, D. L., & Bransford, J. D. (1998). A time for telling. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 475–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, D. L., & Martin, T. (2004). Inventing to prepare for future learning: The hidden efficiency of encouraging original student production in statistics instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 22, 129–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sengupta-Irving, T., Redman, E., & Enyedy, N. (2013). Re-storying practice: Using stories about students to advance mathematics education reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 31, 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13.
   Google Scholar
• Sherin, M. G., & Drake, C. (2009). Curriculum strategy framework: Investigating patterns in teachers’ use of a reform-based elementary mathematics curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 41, 467–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. P., III. (1996). Efficacy and teaching mathematics by telling: A challenge for reform. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 387–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenning, K., & Oberlander, J. (1995). A cognitive theory of graphical and linguistic reasoning: Logic and implementation. Cognitive Science, 19(1), 97–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suthers, D., & Hundhausen, C. (2003). An empirical study of the effects of representational guidance on collaborative learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 183–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trautwein, U., Ludtke, O., Marsh, H. W., Köller, O., & Baumert, J. (2006). Tracking, grading, and student motivation: Using group composition and status to predict self-concept and interest in ninth-grade mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 788–806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, S. A., Jr., & Silvia, P. J. (2006). Must interesting things be pleasant? A test of competing appraisal structures. Emotion, 6, 670–674.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 458–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Reeve, R., & Messina, R. (2009). Designs for collective cognitive responsibility in knowledge-building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18, 7–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar